Hi,
I think it's because the archive description is the same (the default is
"Archive Date: mm/dd/")
With the same archive description, the directory can not be copied again
because it can affect already archived data.
Can you try to use a unique description when you run second archive?
Efim
Hi guys,
I noticed something unexpected with creating archives. Let me explain what I
did:
1) Under root in the homedir I created a directory called test with two
subdirs (test1 and test2) and one file (testfile).
2) The directory test and everything in it is owned by a non-root
Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Skylar
Thompson
Sent: 20. januar 2017 15:43
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Advice for archiving 80 billion of small files.
Do you need to recover files individually? If so, then image backup (at least
on its own) won't
Bo,
What is the total space occupied by this data?
-Rick
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Bo
Nielsen
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 9:18 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Advice for archiving 80 billion of small
Whenever we have a situation like this we always tar.gz into one file first,
before archiving to TSM .. either the top level directory or multiple lower
level directories, if it makes sense to do so, based on what the retrieval
expectations might be.
Also very useful is to tar.gz verbosely
Do you need to recover files individually? If so, then image backup (at
least on its own) won't be a good option. One thing you could do is tar up
chunks (maybe a million files) and archive/backup those chunks. Keep a
catalog (hopefully a database with indexes) of which files are in which tar
On 20.1.2017. 15:31, Zoltan Forray wrote:
> TAR and/or GZip?
We do it here that way.
Regards,
--
Sasa Drnjevic
www.srce.unizg.hr
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Anderson Douglas
> wrote:
>
>> Try image backup
>>
>> Em 20/01/2017 12:23, "Bo Nielsen"
Good one. :-)
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Anderson Douglas
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 9:27 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Advice for archiving 80 billion of small files.
Try image backup
Em 20/01/2017 12:23
TAR and/or GZip?
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Anderson Douglas
wrote:
> Try image backup
>
> Em 20/01/2017 12:23, "Bo Nielsen" escreveu:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I need advice.
> > I must archive 80 billion small files, but that is not possible, as I
Try image backup
Em 20/01/2017 12:23, "Bo Nielsen" escreveu:
> Hi all,
>
> I need advice.
> I must archive 80 billion small files, but that is not possible, as I see
> it.
> since it will fill in the TSM's Database about 73 Tb.
> The filespace is mounted on a Linux server.
> Is
Hi all,
I need advice.
I must archive 80 billion small files, but that is not possible, as I see it.
since it will fill in the TSM's Database about 73 Tb.
The filespace is mounted on a Linux server.
Is there a way to pack/zip the files, so it's a smaller number of files.
anybody who has tried
) and the
filesystem is NFS. The user confirmed this. They also did all kinds of
verification that there aren't any problems with the symbolic links or the
filesystem. They can't use archsyml=no since these are end-of-semester
archiving and if needed, the users would have to have it back the way they
left
Dear TSM-ers,
We are currently backing up several Lotus Domino version 9 servers by using the
Data Protection for IBM Domino 7.1 client. I don't know much about this client,
but it's working as designed.
The Lotus Notes department now wants to implement Lotus Domino mail archiving
to manage
, but it's working as designed.
The Lotus Notes department now wants to implement Lotus Domino mail
archiving to manage the users mailbox sizes. If I understand this process
correctly the archiving is managed by a separate Domino archiving server.
However, I can't find much information about
Hi all,
We are looking at implementing the TSM for Mail software on a Exchange
archiving server and we are wondering what the functionality in this setup
will be.
When I backup the databases on this archiving server will I be able to
restore them and will I have item level recovery as an option
with seperate Exchange
archiving server
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
Hi all,
We are looking at implementing the TSM for Mail software on a Exchange
archiving server and we are wondering what the functionality in this
setup
will be.
When I backup the databases
archiving server
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
Hi all,
We are looking at implementing the TSM for Mail software on a Exchange
archiving server and we are wondering what the functionality in this
setup
will be.
When I backup the databases on this archiving server
: Question about Exchange environment with seperate
Exchange archiving server
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
Hi Del,
Thanks for the quick reply.
Can you tell me if it is possible to restore the mailstore?
Or can this release do nothing on a server like that at the moment
We are working on illuminating our netapp storage system.
There are six top level volders which the users of this storage wish archived
before it goes away.
We do not have any tsm connections to the netapp directly.
I would like to use an existing server to archive the folders via UNC path.
I would like to use an existing server to archive the folders via UNC path.
However, I am told by our windows admins that the system user may not have
access to these network resources.
The system user definitely will not.
1. First pick a system to run the archives off the netapp, presumably
: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 8:59 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Archiving problem
Query Filespace sadly doesn't reveal enough information to assist in cases
where you need to query further. The filespace you're interested in might have
been the subject of backups, but not archiving. You
: Archiving problem
How about:
q ar dochub\restore:* -subdir=yes
If that doesn't work, try configuring the web client on the NetWare
machine, then you can use the graphical browser to verify that there
objects at all under that file space.
Best regards,
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli
Of Andrew
Raibeck
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 9:16 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Archiving problem
I hit send too soon, what the heck is graphical browser? I meant
accessing the Web client graphical interface via a web browser.
Best regards,
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli
@vm.marist.edu wrote on 2011-07-21
07:58:20:
From: Hughes, Timothy timothy.hug...@oit.state.nj.us
To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
Date: 2011-07-21 08:09
Subject: Re: Archiving problem
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
Thanks Andy ...should that command be client side? Or can I try
Subject: Re: Archiving problem
Hi Timothy,
You are referring to the q ar command? That would be TSM client only. The
TSM server does not understand the TSM client commands.
As I mentioned, you can also try the Web Client GUI to navigate the
archives for that file system. Another alternative
:15:54:
From: Thomas Denier thomas.den...@jeffersonhospital.org
To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
Date: 2011-07-19 15:19
Subject: Archiving problem
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
I have a client system administrator attempting to archive files with a
command like:
dsmc archive
Responses at bottom:
===
I have a client system administrator attempting to archive files with a command
like:
dsmc archive '/CMS/oldpatients/039*' -subdir=y -archmc=ro_patient \
-description='Xio 4.51 07/19/2011 ND'
Files
\restore:
Same results, no files have previously been archived for dochub\restore:
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Prather, Wanda
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 1:49 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Archiving
Query Filespace sadly doesn't reveal enough information to assist in cases
where you need to query further. The filespace you're interested in might have
been the subject of backups, but not archiving. You would have to go to the
TSM server to perform Query OCCupancy for that node
@vm.marist.edu wrote on 2011-07-20
18:33:57:
From: Hughes, Timothy timothy.hug...@oit.state.nj.us
To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
Date: 2011-07-20 18:35
Subject: Re: Archiving problem
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
Since we are on the subject of Archive how do you check
To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
Date: 2011-07-20 21:13
Subject: Re: Archiving problem
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
How about:
q ar dochub\restore:* -subdir=yes
If that doesn't work, try configuring the web client on the NetWare
machine, then you can use the graphical browser
I have a client system administrator attempting to archive files with a
command like:
dsmc archive '/CMS/oldpatients/039*' -subdir=y -archmc=ro_patient \
-description='Xio 4.51 07/19/2011 ND'
Files that are in oldpatients and have names starting with '039' get
archived. In cases where a
We have a weekly archive requirement for our Netapp file servers and are
using TSM NDMP for this. My opinion is this is one of those misusing
backups as an archive situations and I want to change this.
We are looking at 100-150TB a week with LONG term retention and I'm not
sure what options are
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM Archiving 50tb data with millions of files
How many millions of files? A worst case would be 2000 bytes/file in the
DB when you upgrade to 6.2, which isn't so bad. For reference, we're
tracking around 280 million files in our TSM 6.1 server and it's only
~360GB.
On 11/03/10 19
Hi,
Also think about about what and why.
If you need to archive 50TB of data to create space, to archive just
once and move the data to TSM, just do it, it isn't such a problem.
But if you do the archive as an other way of doing for instance
monthly backups, don't use archives, use backupsets
@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM Archiving 50tb data with millions of files
Hi,
Also think about about what and why.
If you need to archive 50TB of data to create space, to archive just
once and move the data to TSM, just do it, it isn't such a problem.
But if you do the archive as an other
Need to archive 50tb of data with millions of files, here is the caveat, tsm db
at 220gb, planning on upgrading from 5.5 to 6.2 in the near future, but
currently waiting for newer hardware, how would one accomplish this without
causing too much db bloat? Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.
How many millions of files? A worst case would be 2000 bytes/file in the
DB when you upgrade to 6.2, which isn't so bad. For reference, we're
tracking around 280 million files in our TSM 6.1 server and it's only
~360GB.
On 11/03/10 19:13, sanman2010 wrote:
Need to archive 50tb of data with
03, 2010 10:14 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM Archiving 50tb data with millions of files
Need to archive 50tb of data with millions of files, here is the caveat,
tsm db at 220gb, planning on upgrading from 5.5 to 6.2 in the near
future, but currently waiting for newer hardware
Archiving 50tb data with millions of files
Need to archive 50tb of data with millions of files, here is the caveat, tsm db
at 220gb, planning on upgrading from 5.5 to 6.2 in the near future, but
currently waiting for newer hardware, how would one accomplish this without
causing too much db bloat
Thanks Rick, i was going to try an image backup, but was unsure of the impact
to the db, would you recommend straight to LT05 or diskpool first then migrate
to tape, since these are going to be kept for long term storage?
B.
situation would be a primary tape pool with
no copy pool.
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
sanman2010
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 2:25 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM Archiving 50tb data with millions
, 2010 9:22 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Tsm archiving or HSM
There is nothing built in to TSM that does archiving based on last reference
date.
You can certainly write your own scripts to select the files and archive
based on that.
There are larger difference between archiving and HSM
Does the archiving function allow archiving files based on last reference date
or is that what TSM HSM is for ?
Thanks
Tim Brown
Systems Specialist - Project Leader
Central Hudson Gas Electric
284 South Ave
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
Email: tbr...@cenhud.com mailto:tbr...@cenhud.com
Phone: 845-486
There is nothing built in to TSM that does archiving based on last reference
date.
You can certainly write your own scripts to select the files and archive based
on that.
There are larger difference between archiving and HSM.
Archives:
-the same file can be archived multiple times on different
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: LTO for long term archiving
I truly doubt that archiving drives, servers and tapes for 25 years
each
time the technology updates will let you read the tapes because the
drive and server will probably not even boot up and run.
You will have to update
it, and there is probably not gonna be anyone around that was
there when the app was written ;)
Best Regards
Daniel Sparrman
From:
Kauffman, Tom kauffm...@nibco.com
To:
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date:
2009-05-06 15:37
Subject:
Re: LTO for long term archiving
Sent by:
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Soapbox
www.storserver.com
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Kauffman, Tom
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 7:38 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] LTO for long term archiving
Soapbox time.
The media is not important - any sane
/article.pl?sid=09/04/27/179205art_pos=2
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/27/technology/business-computing/27disk.html?_r=1
-Original Message-
From: Len Boyle
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 4:49 PM
To: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
Subject: RE: LTO for long term archiving
Over ten years ago I
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] LTO for long term archiving
Here here. I'll reiterate: the data must be stored in the lowest common
denominator format. No databases, no strange and wondrous binary formats.
Simple text is the best. That's why microfiche is still used!
I would
I work for a large hospital. I have been asked to investigate
possible configurations for archiving something between a few
hundred terabytes and a petabyte of data for 25 years. This would
be clinical records that we need to keep in case of a malpractice
suit. The retention period is 25 years
On May 5, 2009, at 22:10 , Thomas Denier wrote:
snip
As far as I can tell, the most expensive part of such a
configuration is the media, and LTO media will cost about a third
as much as the most economical MagStar media (extended length 3592
volumes read and written with TS1130 drives).
Subject: [ADSM-L] LTO for long term archiving
I work for a large hospital. I have been asked to investigate possible
configurations for archiving something between a few hundred terabytes
and a petabyte of data for 25 years. This would be clinical records that
we need to keep in case of a malpractice
To me the problem is having the drives around and more importantly, the
interfaces to the drives. I think that probably the best bet is to plan on
archiving a TSM server with a drive along with the media periodically. Snap
off the last database backup, restore it on the to be archived server
, George J. [gjhuebsch...@lmus.leggmason.com]
Gesendet: 05.05.2009 16:25 AST
An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Betreff: Re: [ADSM-L] LTO for long term archiving
Does anyone have 25 year old tape media or tape drives around?
Will you stil be able to use LTOx media in 25 years?
-Original Message-
From
:
To me the problem is having the drives around and more importantly,
the interfaces to the drives. I think that probably the best bet is
to plan on archiving a TSM server with a drive along with the
media periodically. Snap off the last database backup, restore it
on the to be archived server
Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Remco
Post
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 2:39 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] LTO for long term archiving
I do agree, having the tapedrives around _could_ be important. I know
of at least one environment that was able
tape drive in the vault, would you expect it to work after being stored
for 30 years? No way. Do you think you will be able to get a FC
adapter or switch to attach it to your server in 30 years? No way.
We use TSM for archiving all the time, and we have 30 year retention
requirements, too
I truly doubt that archiving drives, servers and tapes for 25 years each
time the technology updates will let you read the tapes because the
drive and server will probably not even boot up and run.
You will have to update the data every two LTO cycles or so. LTO will
read two generations back
Stor cc
Manager
ads...@vm.marist Subject
.EDU Re: [ADSM-L] LTO for long term
archiving
06/05/2009 07:34
Hello,
I want to have an image of my servers each month .At the beginning I wanted to
do it with the function backupset but I have a network appliance and with it
it's not possible.I have contacted the support and they recommended me the
functionality archive with TSM :to create a storage pool
Francoise BERLIN wrote:
Hello,
I want to have an image of my servers each month .At the beginning I wanted
to do it with the function backupset but I have a network appliance and with
it it's not possible.I have contacted the support and they recommended me the
functionality archive with
Evening
I am about to import archive data into a server that does not have the
same management classes defined meaning the data will go to the default
archive management class. I'm happy with this as it will provide the 5
year retention that I need and the archive date seems to have been
Archive expiration is the sum of the ARCHIVE_DATE as seen in the
ARCHIVES table, plus the RETVer value of the management class to
which the files are bound. The pertinent date can change during
importation via the Dates parameter of IMport Node. If you are
importing Archive files and not also
Right, I think I have the archiving process clear in my own mind now. I may be
wrong but that's purely my own fault ;-)
The next query is expiration. Ideally, I'd like to immediately expire the files
which have been archived, to free up library space. I currently retain 3
versions up to 100
(s) that occupy the library. Those would be triggered immediately.
- Original Message -
From: Angus Macdonald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 4:27 AM
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Archiving basic queries
Right, I think I have the archiving process
.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Larry Clark
Sent: 22 October 2007 12:16
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Archiving basic queries
You can execute an expire inventory at anytime
It sounds like you
to wait for the normal expiration process timeout?
I think we're all puzzled as to why you would have bothered archiving
files which you could have simply deleted from the file system, to
achieve the same effect?
You need to dig into the B/A client manual, the chapter Archiving
and retrieving your
-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Richard Sims
Sent: 22 October 2007 12:34
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Archiving basic queries
On Oct 22, 2007, at 5:27 AM, Angus Macdonald wrote:
...
The next query is expiration. Ideally, I'd like to immediately
: Monday, October 22, 2007 7:41 AM
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Archiving basic queries
I may not be describing it very well ;-)
I have lots of old, unaccessed files that need to be retained indefinitely.
To free up library space I want to archive them to tape and delete from the
fileservers. It would
That's the plan. I have an archiving storage pool setup and ready, although not
a separate management class. The bit I'm working on is getting the existing
backups of the files I'm archiving, out of the existing main storage pool. I
can then reclaim the main storage pool tapes and regain a lot
May I suggest something ?
I had to deal with a problem like that, involving externalization of datas, for
legal archiving.
I made a specific node, specific mgmt class and archive datas like that, then
export node to deal with externalization of cartridges.
I keep node definition but I had
] Behalf Of
CAYE PIERRE
Sent: 22 October 2007 14:12
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Archiving basic queries
May I suggest something ?
I had to deal with a problem like that, involving externalization of datas, for
legal archiving.
I made a specific node, specific mgmt class
: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De
la part de Angus Macdonald
Envoyé : lundi 22 octobre 2007 15:16
À : ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Objet : Re: [ADSM-L] Archiving basic queries
In my case that would involve moving all the files to be
archived to a different server and backup
-
From: Angus Macdonald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 5:22 AM
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Archiving basic queries
Thanks for that. Makes it a lot clearer.
So, if I create a filelist of files I want to archive and archive them with
the -deletefiles option
Of
Larry Clark
Sent: 19 October 2007 10:56
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Archiving basic queries
Archiving and backups are two separate considerations unless you do an
archive with the deletefiles option.
If you archive a file it remains on the client unless you add the
deletefiles
Archiving and backups are two separate considerations unless you do an
archive with the deletefiles option.
If you archive a file it remains on the client unless you add the
deletefiles option. In that case, the backup versions are not affected.
If you archive with the deletefiles option
process!
If I archive a file, is the file removed from the source afterwards? Once
archived, are files removed from other primary and secondary storage pools they
might be living in? I'm archiving to free up Tivoli library space so I'd like
to expire archived files immediately; does the archive
Thanks Richard. I think I'll just hang onto Veritas for a bit.
Angus
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Richard Sims
Sent: 07 September 2007 12:15
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Archiving files older than a certain date
On Sep 7, 2007, at 6:05 AM, Angus Macdonald wrote:
I have a lot of very old files in various Windows filesystems,
which I would like to archive. Many of them have not changed in
years but are often opened for reference only, so the modified date
doesn't change. I would like to archive
I have a lot of very old files in various Windows filesystems, which I would
like to archive. Many of them have not changed in years but are often opened
for reference only, so the modified date doesn't change. I would like to
archive everything that has not been accessed (ie opened at all)
Hi,
There seems to be hell of a lot of log archiving going on , and am I
wondering
if it's because it has been set up incorrectly. I currently have two
methods
of log archiving
1) The databases were enabled for rollforward recovery using the user
exit
parameter, where by full logfiles
Why, do you want it done hourly if its gets automatically archived by
DB2 when the log file is full? Just let DB2 do the archiving directly to
TSM. We have 21 DB2 databases all archiving directly to one TSM server
with no problems. Some of them are pretty busy, writing a log file every
few seconds
Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
22/08/2007 10:28
Please respond to
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: [ADSM-L] DB2 Log Archiving via TSM
Why, do you want it done hourly if its gets automatically
(Apologies if I've asked this before; I can't find any trace of an
answer, let alone that I sent the question, although I've thought of
asking in the past.)
We may have new requirements from a user that are a better match for
TSM's archival functions than its backup functions. Can anyone point
Hello,
We are currently using using Backup Sets for Archiving Data
some GroupWise mailboxes for a Novell Client. I am looking to
switch from using Backup Sets to Archiving.
Has anyone went from using Backup Sets to using Archiving?
I have read the Documents on Archiving. Are there any
Hi *,
I'm encoutering some errors when trying to archive from the command line in
AIX. I have two directories I want to archive and all subdirectories :
/exp1
/exp2
I've created a file called filelistarchive and have put the following entries :
/exp1
/exp2
but it will only archive the
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Richard
Mochnaczewski
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 08. Februar 2007 17:00
An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Betreff: [ADSM-L] Syntax for archiving from the command line
Hi *,
I'm encoutering some errors
You don't find the info in help for -FILELIST since is for files only, not
directories.
Try:
dsmc archive /exp1/ /exp2/ -subdir=yes
tack on
-archmc=
if you want to specify a management class other than the default.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage
2006 18:12
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Archiving Exchange
KVS is said to be good for archiving Exchange, but KVS is part of
Veritas (Symantec).
Any recommendations on archiving Exchange for at a TSM shop?
TIA
Orin Rehorst
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rodney clark
Sent: 09 January 2006 14:09
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Archiving Exchange
The current version of KVS can use DR550 as an archive, and heard a
rumour that the next release will archive to TSM. It's certainly
something we are waiting
KVS is said to be good for archiving Exchange, but KVS is part of
Veritas (Symantec).
Any recommendations on archiving Exchange for at a TSM shop?
TIA
Orin Rehorst
Orin,
IBM has an Exchange archiving product that uses TSM.
It is called DB2 CommonStore for Exchange Server. Check it out:
http://www-306.ibm.com/software/data/commonstore/exchange/
Thanks,
Del
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L
On Wed, 04 Jan 2006, Orin Rehorst might have said:
KVS is said to be good for archiving Exchange, but KVS is part of
Veritas (Symantec).
Any recommendations on archiving Exchange for at a TSM shop?
My company is using KVS for Exchange. Seems to work ok (I'm not
one of the admins
:\
that would need archiving, while on most servers, D:\ would be the cdrom drive.
Like I said, the most thrilling answer would be to find out there is a way to
make archives use the Client Option Sets. Otherwise, is there an option #3 or
4 that I've missed here? The netware client
Kaufman
Troy Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
05/09/2005 04:56 PM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc:
Subject:Archiving conundrum
We are planning on implementing archives soon
by the
-servername parameter.
Matt.
Computer says 'No'..
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Troy Frank
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 10:56 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Archiving conundrum
We are planning on implementing
Consider simply using -ARCHMc= on the 'dsmc Archive' command
line to flexibly select the management class and retention period you
desire.
Richard Sims
We are planning on implementing archives soon, and some of it I'm not sure how
to accomplish.
- We currently have no archives, and our backup retention policy is 60 copies
for 60 days.
- Ideally, we want to get a 1-year archive every 60 days, and a 7-year archive
once a year.
- The archives
We don't have the requirement for email archiving, so I can't address
that question.
I would first ask, what do you mean by when there is a problem with the
tape??!?
I assume when you say restore of the tape, you mean recreating the
tape using RESTORE VOLUME from your offsite/DR tape?
I would
1 - 100 of 242 matches
Mail list logo