If I move a node to a new management class (e.g. include * 15day), is there a
message in either the server actlog or the client dsmched.log that indicates
that backup entries have been rebound to the new class? I looking for some
indication that the change to the new management class
:[ADSM-L] New management class
Gesendet von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
If I move a node to a new management class (e.g. include * 15day), is
there a message in either the server actlog or the client dsmched.log that
indicates that backup entries have been rebound to the new
you have examined the files you are interested in you
can exit without starting a restore.
Thomas Denier
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
-Original Message-
If I move a node to a new management class (e.g. include * 15day), is there a
message in either the server actlog
Op 3 jul. 2014, om 15:04 heeft Ehresman,David E. deehr...@louisville.edu het
volgende geschreven:
If I move a node to a new management class (e.g. include * 15day), is there
a message in either the server actlog or the client dsmched.log that
indicates that backup entries have been rebound
Hello,
You can also look at ANE4960I messages in the actlog.
On 3 juillet 2014 17:35:48 CEST, Remco Post r.p...@plcs.nl wrote:
Op 3 jul. 2014, om 15:04 heeft Ehresman,David E.
deehr...@louisville.edu het volgende geschreven:
If I move a node to a new management class (e.g. include * 15day
A user wishes to bind all files except .pst files to a new management class
with more ample retention settings. What's the best way to do this? Is it
sufficient to bind all .pst files to a second management class --to keep them
from being bound to the new management class?
Something like
@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] bind all files except .pst to new management class?
A user wishes to bind all files except .pst files to a new management class
with more ample retention settings. What's the best way to do this? Is it
sufficient to bind all .pst files to a second management class
management class?
A user wishes to bind all files except .pst files to a new management class
with more ample retention settings. What's the best way to do this? Is it
sufficient to bind all .pst files to a second management class --to keep them
from being bound to the new management class
Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Arbogast, Warren K
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:50 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] bind all files except .pst to new management class?
A user wishes to bind all files except .pst files
@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Arbogast, Warren K
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:50 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] bind all files except .pst to new management class?
A user wishes to bind all files except .pst files to a new management class
with more ample retention settings
management class tonight when it does it's incremental backup? I just
wanted to make sure that I was 100% sure about this. Thanks so much!
Rebinding associates a file or a logical volume image with a new
management class.
Backups of files are bound again to a different management class in the
following
www.berbee.com
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Joni Moyer
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 11:15 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Rebinding files to a new management class?
Hi Everyone!
If I have a particular file
: Re: [ADSM-L] Rebinding files to a new management class?
All files will be rebound, save those that are strictly inactive (such
as files that have been deleted from the client but have not yet
expired).
--
Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
CDW Berbee
System engineer
7145 Boone Avenue North, Suite
, Lisa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
08/21/2008 12:32 PM
Please respond to
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: Rebinding files to a new management class?
And see also the Technote for Retention
@VM.MARIST.EDU
08/21/2008 12:32 PM
Please respond to
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: Rebinding files to a new management class?
And see also the Technote for Retention modification for subset of
data
in a management class.
Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
08/21/2008 12:45 PM
Please respond to
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: Rebinding files to a new management class?
Athttp://www-306.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt
Andy,
I got a note that said that all is now as the users want. thanks for the help.
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of Andrew Raibeck
Sent: Mon 12/3/2007 3:15 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class
Hi
: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class
Hi Fred,
FORCE has no effect on INCLEXCL, so that's a nonstarter.
Try this: remove the INCLUDE statement from the dsm.opt file and instead
add it to the client option set on the server. But instead of using the
drive letter, use the UNC name, e.g
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class
Hi Fred,
FORCE has no effect on INCLEXCL, so that's a nonstarter.
Try this: remove the INCLUDE statement from the dsm.opt file and instead
add it to the client option set on the server. But instead of using the
drive
Administrator
University of Chicago
773-702-8464
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Andrew Raibeck
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 12:34 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class
A couple
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class
A couple of things:
1. Is the actual machine name tank1.ad.uchicago.edu? In other words,
if
from that machine you run SET COMPUTERNAME from an OS prompt, is that
what
it shows? Or does it just show tank1? Make
-8464
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Andrew Raibeck
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 12:45 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class
OK, so my comments re: your INCLUDE file spec stand
] On Behalf Of
Andrew Raibeck
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 12:45 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class
OK, so my comments re: your INCLUDE file spec stand. Once that is fixed
up
to match the actual file space name, it should work.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
Our desktop support unit has a user that wants a new retention policy on
their file share. The admin added this to the dsm.opt:
INCLUDE F:\NSIT\FieldSupport\University Administration\Budget Office\*
LONGADMIN
INCLUDE F:\NSIT\FieldSupport\University Administration\Budget
Office\*.* LONGADMIN
I
On Nov 29, 2007, at 3:23 PM, Fred Johanson wrote:
Our desktop support unit has a user that wants a new retention
policy on
their file share. The admin added this to the dsm.opt:
INCLUDE F:\NSIT\FieldSupport\University Administration\Budget
Office\*
LONGADMIN
INCLUDE
Does not work, his term, which means the files show up on the gui as
being in the default management class.
The new management class does not show up in Q inclexcl.
The new management class shows up on the active policy set.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto
Nothing wrong per se, although the second INCLUDE appears redundant.
The first place to start with these kinds of issues is to use dsmc query
inclexcl to makes sure those files aren't being picked up by an earlier
filter.
Also make sure the updated policy was activated.
Regards,
Andy
Andy
Of
Andrew Raibeck
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 2:29 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class
Nothing wrong per se, although the second INCLUDE appears redundant.
The first place to start with these kinds of issues is to use dsmc
query
inclexcl to makes
Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Andrew Raibeck
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 4:48 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class
Yes, but it's not position in the dsm.opt file that matters when client
option
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class
Yes, but it's not position in the dsm.opt file that matters when client
option sets are at issue. Use dsmc query inclexcl to see the final
list
that TSM actually uses.
I suspect it is that client option set that is overriding the dsm.opt
file
: Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class
Nothing wrong per se, although the second INCLUDE appears redundant.
The first place to start with these kinds of issues is to use dsmc
query
inclexcl to makes sure those files aren't being picked up by an earlier
filter.
Also make sure
down, I see this above the INCLUDE for the new
management class:
Include All *\...\*Server
So that's why the new INCLUDE is ineffective. There are a lot of other
excluded files below that are probably getting backed up.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
of excellence.
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 11/29/2007
05:38:30 PM:
So how does he get what he wants. The option set is to set a
management class for a number of clients. The new management class
applies to 1 of the 10. Will setting the OVERRIDE=yes have the
desired effect
So how does he get what he wants. The option set is to set a management class
for a number of clients. The new management class applies to 1 of the 10.
Will setting the OVERRIDE=yes have the desired effect?
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of Andrew
line will be bound to the initial include.
I hope that's as clear as it is brief.
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of Andrew Raibeck
Sent: Thu 11/29/2007 6:53 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class
Fred, I
dir all,
how I can create new policy domain and define new management class
other than standard.and is it possible to create it from GUI
regards
shaban
respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:new management class
Hello everyone!
Quick question: I have created a new disk storage pool, sequential and
offsite storage pool for oracle logs, which were previously going to
another disk
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Ochs, Duane
Is there a way to bind files to a new management class from the
TSM server ?
I have 6 Exchange systems that no longer exist and we need to
rebind the DB
backups to a different MC.
Afraid not. About the only
Is there a way to bind files to a new management class from the TSM server ?
I have 6 Exchange systems that no longer exist and we need to rebind the DB
backups to a different MC.
Duane Ochs
Systems Administration
Quad/Graphics Inc.
414.566.2375
39 matches
Mail list logo
