Re: improving performance on solaris 2.8

2003-02-17 Thread Christian Pallinder
How about setting diskmap to yes. I think this is lowers the IOwait alot. --- Christian Pallinder Exist i Stockholm AB Propellervägen 6B 183 62 Täby Mobil: +46 (0)70 - 399 27 58 Paul Ripke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: AIX TSM Client and AFS/butc

2003-02-17 Thread Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
Hi Chet! I finally received an answer from Tivoli. Tivoli will deliver an AIX 5.1 AFS client in the next PTF release (I guess the 5.2.1 client), scheduled somewhere in June. An AFS client for AIX 5.2 is under consideration. Hope this answers you question. Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal

Re: When comes the supportTDP for Oracle 9.2.x.x

2003-02-17 Thread Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
Yeah right Mark... but if you check out Tivoli Data Protection for Databases 5.1.5 you will see that it contains TDP for Oracle 2.2.1... Kind regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines -Original Message- From: Stapleton, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003

Re: When comes the supportTDP for Oracle 9.2.x.x

2003-02-17 Thread Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
Hi Zlatko! Versioning is a little unclear here. I know about ITSM for databases, but it's a new bundle, containing the old (March 21, 2002) 2.2.1 client. Ok, so the end-of-support page should read end of support only for version 2.2.0 then. Thanks for clearing that up! Kindest regards, Eric van

Re: When comes the supportTDP for Oracle 9.2.x.x

2003-02-17 Thread Zlatko Krastev/ACIT
Eric, new product ITSM for Databases is just a new licensing scheme for: - TDP for Informix - TDP for MS SQL - TDP for Oracle ITSM for DBs 5.1.5 is successor version of TDP for Oracle v2.2. Versions 3.x and 4.x are skipped to aligh numbers with ITSM ones. Actually in ITSM for DBs v5.1.5 TDPO

Re: AIX TSM performance improvement (was Re: OS390 TSM Performance questions.)

2003-02-17 Thread PAC Brion Arnaud
Zlatko, You said : P.S. I am charging my customers for such advices but hopefully I can get a beer (or Swiss chocolate) for this one :-) I promise to send you that chocolate (wich one do you prefer : black, white, milky, bitter quality ? Just ask, we have lots of varieties ) as soon as my

Re: AIX TSM performance improvement (was Re: OS390 TSM Performance questions.)

2003-02-17 Thread PAC Brion Arnaud
To all that responded my request : I'm really gratefull for the help you provided to me; hopefully I'll manage it to use your precious advices properly, therefore ceasing whining on my weak system ;-) What still amazes me, is that our TSM server has been running flawless using a faulty

Re: Stop Bagging TSM Developers.

2003-02-17 Thread Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
Hi Steve! I don't understand your message. I haven't read any offending message about development on this list. Sure, there are several complaints about the stability of TSM lately, but I think the people have the right to complain in this case. Lately there have been several patches to patch

Re: Complaint Instructions: Please watch this short movie.....

2003-02-17 Thread Shannon Bach
I took your advice and reported this person to the service provider. Thanks for the advice! Shannon Bach Madison Gas Electric Co. Operations Analyst - Data Center Services Office 608-252-7260 Fax 608-252-7098 e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Ndmp Backup to primary Diskpool

2003-02-17 Thread Stefan Holzwarth
I think about the following environment: TSM Server on Windows2000 with 5 * 2 TByte Primary diskpools on FC Raids (with IDE Disk internal - RAID 5) and 5 * 2 TByte Copy diskpools on FC Raids (with IDE Disk internal - RAID 5) TSM DB on lokal RAID 10 with total 8

OS390 SELFTUNEBUFPOOLSIZE yes/no?

2003-02-17 Thread MC Matt Cooper (2838)
Hello all, I have been reading the dialog on OS/390 performance tuning. I too have found that lowering the size of the address space to 512MB has helped. I have also seen improvements in my throughput by cycling TSM. (I just don't do it as often.) One thing that I was wondering is if

Re: OS390 SELFTUNEBUFPOOLSIZE yes/no?

2003-02-17 Thread Seay, Paul
I like to set it about 10% higher than the happy point and set it to yes on AIX. Then check it every once and a while to see if it needs adjusting. The problem is you can create a lot of GETMAINs on MVS if you do not set it high enough to begin with. On MVS, you are probably best to set it to NO

Re: When comes the supportTDP for Oracle 9.2.x.x

2003-02-17 Thread Stapleton, Mark
From: Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Yeah right Mark... but if you check out Tivoli Data Protection for Databases 5.1.5 you will see that it contains TDP for Oracle 2.2.1. That is correct, but your original question concerned a level of TDP for Oracle that would be supported

Re: OS390 SELFTUNEBUFPOOLSIZE yes/no?

2003-02-17 Thread MC Matt Cooper (2838)
Paul, How can I tell what size my BUFPOOLSIZE has grown to? I know I start at 32MB but I don't know how much it grows/shrinks. Matt -Original Message- From: Seay, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 10:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

Re: OS390 SELFTUNEBUFPOOLSIZE yes/no?

2003-02-17 Thread Miller, Ryan
You can check the size of your buffer pool by querying your server options. q opt Ryan Miller Principal Financial Group Tivoli Certified Consultant Tivoli Storage Manager v4.1 -Original Message- From: MC Matt Cooper (2838) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003

Re: improving performance on solaris 2.8

2003-02-17 Thread Dave Canan
Actually, this parameter is no longer used. It is accepted for parameter syntax, but the value now is always set to YES. The documentation still needs to be update to reflect this information. At 09:19 AM 2/17/2003 +0100, you wrote: How about setting diskmap to yes. I think this is lowers the

Re: Ndmp Backup to primary Diskpool

2003-02-17 Thread PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI)
Hi If u have filer .Then u should we using ndmpcopy utility on Filer.To copy between volumes on Filer or across filers. I did this recently. Thanks Balanand Pinni -Original Message- From: Stefan Holzwarth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 8:13 AM To: [EMAIL

Re: OS390 SELFTUNEBUFPOOLSIZE yes/no?

2003-02-17 Thread John Naylor
Matt, I have always had SELFTUNEBUFPOOLSIZE no By the way I run with buffpool 48mb against 28 gb database 70% full. Experiment with some different settings against same workloads to see which gives you best results. cheers, John MC Matt Cooper (2838) [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 02/17/2003 02:28:15

SHARE - TSM Support Certificate Track

2003-02-17 Thread Talafous, John G.
Hello ITSMers, While preparing my agenda for SHARE in Dallas next week, I notice that there is a TSM Support Certificate Track. I will be investigating this via http://www.share.org but my first thought is that I could get some quick feedback from this group. There seem to be 16 sessions in

Re: AIX TSM performance improvement (was Re: OS390 TSM Performance questions.)

2003-02-17 Thread Roger Deschner
Very good - thanks Zlatko! I have only one thing to add: Do not stripe the Database; it makes things slower. I tested it out, and it was MUCH slower. With the random I/O pattern of the Database, and the multiple threads inside the server program, it just made the arm contention issues worse. It

Re: Stop Bagging TSM Developers.

2003-02-17 Thread Rainer Tammer
Hello, I completely agree with Eric. Fix the bugs in the current level ant delay new functions. We are on 4.2.1.15 and we want to upgrade to a 5.x level... Bye Rainer Tammer On Mon, 17 Feb 2003 10:33:43 +0100, Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM wrote: Hi Steve! I don't understand your message. I haven't

Re: Stop Bagging TSM Developers.

2003-02-17 Thread Rob Berendt
I think the number of TSM clients is about to grow dramatically in the near future. IBM has bundled TSM into a package called Enterprise Edition. If you purchase an iSeries, (formerly known as an AS/400), with the Enterprise package IBM is bundling a LOT of software. One of these is TSM. We

Re: Stop Bagging TSM Developers.

2003-02-17 Thread Hart, Charles
I have had a discussion with a Tivoli - IBM CE/Sales Rep and he stated that IBM appears to be getting the message that many of us want more stability that features, which will then dictate how many new versions per year will be released. -Original Message- From: Mark Bertrand

Re: Stop Bagging TSM Developers.

2003-02-17 Thread Mark Bertrand
I also agree, Fix the bugs or extend the support on 4. Mark B. -Original Message- From: Rainer Tammer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 8:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Stop Bagging TSM Developers. Hello, I completely agree with Eric. Fix the bugs in

Re: OS390 SELFTUNEBUFPOOLSIZE yes/no?

2003-02-17 Thread Dave Canan
If you do a q status command, look at the line titled BufPoolSize. This is the actual bufferpoolsize that has being used when using SELFTUNEBUFPOOLSIZE set to YES.. At 10:44 AM 2/17/2003 -0500, you wrote: Paul, How can I tell what size my BUFPOOLSIZE has grown to? I know I start at

Long term retention of DB2 backups

2003-02-17 Thread Eric Winters
Dear All, Can anyone advise on a workable strategy for taking DB2 backups which would be treated effectively as 'archives' ie kept for the long term. The requirement is to take an occasional DB2 backup (online if possible) and to keep this backup offsite for the long term. The DB2 backup would

Re: When comes the supportTDP for Oracle 9.2.x.x

2003-02-17 Thread Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
Hi Mark! That's where it was unclear to me. You say TDP for Databases 5.1.5 (which is TDP for Oracle 2.2.1) but that's not completely true. TDP for Databases 5.1.5 is a bundle which contains TDP for Oracle 2.2.1 among other database TDP's. I now found out that support ends for TDP for Oracle 2.2.0

Re: OS390 SELFTUNEBUFPOOLSIZE yes/no?

2003-02-17 Thread Zlatko Krastev
Misleading! - q opt returns what is set in dsmserv.opt not the actual usage, i.e. 32 MB from the initial question; - q db f=d is the correct answer! Have in mind the result is in pages, not kB or MB. Zlatko Krastev IT Consultant Miller, Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor

Re: Estimating size of backup sets

2003-02-17 Thread Graham Trigge
Paul and co, The TSM server I am administering is not running any tape drives through the TSM component - all data which is backed up to this server is being sent straight to diskpools (to a whopping great SAN). On a monthly basis I generate backupsets for each node and send these to another

Re: Tivoli pubs email address evaporated

2003-02-17 Thread Andrew Raibeck
Richard, The folks who maintain the web site indicate that the [EMAIL PROTECTED] address is gone, and emails will not be redirected. Instead, customers can provide feedback via the following site: http://www.ibm.com/software/tivoli/contact.html Pick the [EMAIL PROTECTED] address and send

Re: Long term retention of DB2 backups

2003-02-17 Thread Steve Harris
Hi Eric How much disk space do you have? What is the size of the database? You don't specify the platform either, but I'll assume AIX. Possibility #1. Backup as normal. Use db2adutl extract to restore the data to a filesystem. Archive this data. Watch out for filesystem limits on the size

Backup via a script

2003-02-17 Thread Nicolas Savva
Hi to all, Any ideas for a script that will take a backup file(through TSM server) on AIX box? Thanks in advance Nick Privileged/Confidential information may be contained in this message and may be subject to