Julian,
I have been having a look at using your select statement below and with
slight modifications I am getting the number of tapes that are needed for
each filespace for the particular node. I believe that the results brought
back by this select command are effectively any tape which has a
Hello,
I'm quite new to ADSM so please forgive me if I'm asking something
stupid.
I am trying to connect to a TSM server (4.2.1) using both Linux and
Windows clients (home made clients built using the API).
Both clients need to connect to the same client node and the same
filespace.
The Windows
Hi,
How can you manage offsite backups without DRM?
I have just ideas in mind but I have lack of experience.
Is the following right way
first day
1) backup the nodes
2) backup copy pools to offsite copy pools
3) backup the database
4) take database backup and copy pools to offsite
5)
chris,
I think using the win client sets the nodes filespaces to unicode enabled
within the tsm internal database. This causes your error. you can reset the
client only
using the non documented SET RECORD method. ( This manipulates the
internal db and should only be used on IBM/Tivoli advice.)
Hello everyone,
I have some questions about backup verification and would like to seek some
advice.
When I backup using TSM, how can I verify that the backup is good ? What I
mean is when TSM write to tape, how do I verify that the write-to-tape
process is good. I come from VMS backup. In
Hi Chris!
Bare in mind that what you are trying to do (cross-platform backup and
restore) is not supported!
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Chris West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 10:35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Herfried,
Thanks for your response.
Looking on the server admin console indicates that the filespace is not
unicode:
Is Filespace Unicode? NO
Do you know of anything else that could cause this problem?
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Herfried Abel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Hi, sounds ok
first day
1)
2)backup primary storage pool to copy pool and mark volumes within copy
pool as offsite
3)
4)
next day
1)
2) + 3)depends on the number of volumes you have( you could send them
offsite daly and get them back weekly )
4)
5)
6)
after the dbbackups it would also be nice
Chris, i think it does not depend weather the filespace *is* unicode, it
depends on the unicode client.
see following APAR from Tivoli web.
herfried
APAR= PQ54549 SER=IN INCORROUT
ANS1357S WHEN CONNECTING WITH NON-UNICODE CLIENT
Status: CLOSED
Hi,
Hopefully someone can shed some light on this problem.
I am in the process of migrating data from a V3.1 ADSM server connected to
a 3494 library containing 4 * 3590 drives.
I have set up a new ADSM server 4.2.1 to act as a data recovery server.
This server has a 3590 with a stacker
Hi *SM-ers!
I checked my 3584 library through the IBM 3584 UltraScalable Tape Library
Specialist and I saw something strange.
If I select the Physical Library option it shows: Total storage slots: 253
and Empty storage slots: 2. All storage slots are actually filled!
When I click on Total storage
Hi,
I would be interested in hearing from any Users/Organisations that utilise
IBM 3466 NSM's
and struggle to navigate through the necessary IBM support Teams.
As a user of NSM's I would expect, when raising a pmr, to have a single
point of ownership
of the problem, be it OS, hardware or TSM
We have some Netware 4.11 clients and it looks like they are going to Netware 6.
The 4.11 clients are running ok with TSM 3..7.20, but this is no longer
supported
Is anyone running TSM with netware 6 clients?
What TSM version are you using.
Any problems/recommendations.
Thanks.
John
Hi Chris! Like I mentioned earlier: Cross platform backup/restore is not
supported.
It's not very likely that TSM will allow you to restore NTFS data to EXT2
filespaces, nor the other way around. Even if both clients are using a FAT
filesystem, it will probably not works, simply because TSM is
Yes please. =)
-JD.
If you want a copy of the presentation, please let me know.
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon, INC
757-688-8180
I had an NSM setup - we had performance issues that forced us to use raw logical
volumes for storage and db, and that breaks the supported configuration.
(try dealing with the NSM bunch in that situation!)
I simply dealt with the OS and TSM support teams separately - calling into the
NSM support
Hi Gurus !
Could anyone explain me how to use the archsyml option when building a client schedule
thru web interface ? I defined a schedule that looks like this :
Action -- command
Objects -- /home/tivoli/toto.sh
Options -- -archsyml=no
Toto.sh looks like : dsmc archive -subdir=yes
The TSM TDP for Oracle on UNIX says AIX, HP-UX and SOLARIS.
But how about LINUX ? After all, Oracle is available/supported on LINUX
?
Anyone try this combination ?
Someone is pushing VERITAS as the solution for this situation, that being
backing up Oracle files live without shutting down the
I'd like to get a copy also
Justin Derrick [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 03/07/2002
07:29:07 AM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: Thanks to All That Provided Input
The 'word' we got from Tivoli was that Netware 6 support would be availabe
in TSM 5.1 due out in April. Other client levels may work, but I would
expect the but it isn't supported line from Tivoli. I also found a similar
response in the ADSM-L archives.
Bill Boyer
-Original Message-
search for the dsm.opt and dsm.sys in your system incase you are
using different option files other than you believe to be right one
regards,
burak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
07.03.2002 16:14
Please respond to ADSM-L
Hi
Have you checked the nodename setting in the OPT-file?
Seems to me that this node has a name of 10.16.8.54?
If the TSM server wouldn't recognize the client, you wouldn't get the
statement such as in your actlog.
Best Regards
Daniel Sparrman
---
Daniel
Mark,
Looks like you changed the NODENAME to 10.16.8.54 instead of changing the
TCPSERVERADDRESS in you dsm.sys file.
Bill Smoldt
STORServer
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Burak Demircan
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 7:21 AM
To:
Dale,
Thanks for the info. Its good to know we are not alone!
We too have serious performance issues with the NSM'S and are also
frustrated by their lack of scalability.
We also have Sun TSM Servers using raw logical volumes that fly along
by comparison, we will go forward with TSM on Solaris
Unless Paul is willing to email this to a lot of people, or place it
somewhere for download, you can always go to http://www.share.org to
download session presentations after that SHARE conference is over. I've
downloaded several TSM SHARE presentations from past conferences.
Bill
-Original
Hi
If all slots are used, you have a problem, as the first two slots are used
by diagnostic cartridge and cleaning cartridge. Theese are not seen by TSM.
Best Regards
Daniel Sparrman
---
Daniel Sparrman
Exist i Stockholm AB
Bergkällavägen 31D
192 79 SOLLENTUNA
Hi all, we have changed our IP for the AIX/TSM server. We back up 38 Novell/Unix nodes
and all of them are fine. We also back up the AIX/TSM server as well. It is not
working. I have changed the IP in the dsm.sys file to the new IP address. Below is the
error message we receive from TSM.
Hi Daniel!
Aren't you confusing the 3584 with a 3494? As far as I can find in the
doc's, there is no fixed cleaner slot in a 3584 and I don't even have a CE
cartridge!
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Sparrman [mailto:[EMAIL
We recently setup a 3584, and had a IBM technician put his hand on the
machine, to enable warranty. According to him, the first two slots are
reserved, one for diagnostic cartridge, and one for cleaning cartridge.
According to him, theese slots can not be used for standard LTO cartridges,
and TSM
From the Planning and Operator Guide (Third Edition (February 2001).
Cleaning Cartridge
To maintain the operating efficiency of the drive, IBM supplies a specially
labeled
IBM LTO Ultrium Cleaning Cartridge with each 3584 UltraScalable Tape
Library.
Each drive in the library determines when it
My knowledge of select statements is fairly limited but you will probably have to use
the information in the BACKUPS table but I am unsure how to figure out which tape the
file is stored on. My guess is to use the OBJECT_ID field and there must be another
table that stores what tape that
I found that moving the DB volumes off JFS to raw logical improved our
performance tremendously - our full DB backups took less than half the previous
time to complete. It was a small system though, one L32 cabinet and a single
frame LTO SCSI attached.
Unfortuneately, I haven't had the
We have a user who is trying to back up a Win/2000 machine and is receiving
ANS1340E Exporting RSM Database Files Failed during the backup. The
backup stops after that. This is a manual backup, not a scheduled
backup. Looking at the list archives, I noticed that past responses were
to startup
Mark,
are you using the clients ip address as its nodename?
Now when you change your TSM servers ip address this does not affect the
clients, except your TSM servers client...
To fix this problem you could
- use more symbolic nodenames that do not change when ip addresses change
- rename your TSM
YES!!!
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Seay, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 1:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Thanks to All That Provided Input for the Share Session on SQL
Co mmands
If you want a copy of the presentation, please let me know.
Paul
Hi Daniel!
Strange. I compared the output from StorWatch's Storage Slot Details list
with a q libvol. The volumes in the first two slots are actually seen (and
used) by TSM. I am however missing the last 4 volumes in TSM. They are
positioned in Column 8, Row 41, 42, 43 and 44...
I' getting
OFF SUBJECT, Those who work in SP environments might be interested
Big problem we had when upgrading to ML9 last week, here is a resolution...
Flash sent 02/25/2002 - - Service Updates to RSCT
Problem Description:
When customers are doing service updates to PSSP 3.2
and
Yes please!
thanks in advance
Juraj Salak
-Original Message-
From: Prather, Wanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 3:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Thanks to All That Provided Input for the Share Session on
SQ L Co mmands
YES!!!
Thanks!
-Original
I would like a copy too...
Tom Melton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/07/02 08:20AM
I'd like to get a copy also
Justin Derrick [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 03/07/2002
07:29:07 AM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Taken from page 390 of TSM for AIX handbook.
2 sides to the coin...
The Advantages of Using Journal File System Files
TSM supports both journaled file system (JFS) files and raw logical volumes
as database,
recovery log, and disk storage pool volumes. JFS files have the
On the slight chance someone has figured out a trick to get TSM to reprocess
its dsmserv.opt file and I missed hearing about it...
I've bumped up the # in my dsmserv.opt but getting a quiet moment on this
TSM server is like asking the sun to not shine for a while.
Dwight
Dale,
Yes the NSM's are the only IBM Boxes that we have but we have now started to
move forward
on Sun TSM Servers connected to 3494 Libraries. At the moment we have 5
NSM's and 4 TSM Sun Servers.
Admittedly the Sun Servers are a higher spec but the performance is
exceptional compared to the
Anyone ever see this error:
ANS1149E No domain available for incremental backup
I have verified that the server has a domain for this node.
Any other thoughts?
Thanks,
Jamie Aldrich
What version of the client are you running?
We haven't seen this anymore since we upgraded the client code to 4.2.0
-Original Message-
From: Diana Noble [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 9:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ANS1340E Exporting RSM Database
We have upgraded our OS/390 TSM server to 4.2.1.9. This appears to have
resolved our performance problems. I would like to thank Bill Colwell, John
Naylor, and Brian Nick for their advice and assistance.
The first time we started the server it reported that it was upgrading its
database, even
I too would like a copy...
George Cardoza
- Original Message -
From: Tom Melton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 7:12 AM
Subject: Re: Thanks to All That Provided Input for the Share Session onSQL
Co mmands
I would like a copy too...
Tom Melton
I have tested NW6 with the latest 4.x.x client and it worked fine. I suppose
that Bill is correct in saying that Tivoli will give you the but it isn't
supported line but it does work.
Seth Forgosh
-Original Message-
From: Bill Boyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 07,
Thanks, Tim, that's what I SHOULD have said:
We still get the message, but the backups don't fail since 4.2.0.
-Original Message-
From: Rushforth, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 11:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ANS1340E Exporting RSM Database
I would help to know to which client you are referring (operating system
and version). For example, this message might come up on Linux if you have
only EXT3 file systems, because TSM does not (yet) support EXT3.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client
Folks,
Why do all the rest of us have to see your ME TOO replies?
PLEASE reply to the senders private email. There is enough traffic on
this list without all of you having to plug it up with those kinds of
replies.
Malbrough, Demetrius wrote:
COPY please...
-Demetrius Malbrough
I would like a copy too..
Thanks
Raminder Braich
-Original Message-
From: George Cardoza [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 11:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Thanks to All That Provided Input for the Share Session
onSQL Co mmands
I too would
I would like a copy too! Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Braich, Raminder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 10:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Thanks to All That Provided Input for the Share Session
onSQL Co mmands
Importance: High
I would like a copy
COPY please...
-Demetrius Malbrough
-Original Message-
From: George Cardoza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 10:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Thanks to All That Provided Input for the Share Session
onSQL Co mmands
I too would like a copy...
George
I just went through that.
On your Linux box you can:
* convert the ext3 filesystems back to ext2, or
* Upgrade to the 4.2.1 Linux client and convert the ext3 filesystems
to REiserfs, or
* Upgrade to the 4.2.1 Linux client and add to your dsm.sys file:
Earlier I posted a question regarding a migration problem I was having
while trying to restore to a 3590 with a tape stacker.
I was encountering a no drives availabel while trying to restore.
To overcome this problem, I had to mark the volume as READ ONLY. The
restore went throught without a
Hi,
We have been using Sysback/6000 for years as our backup recovery tool for
our AIX systems. We are now merging many of those servers, and the
collection of non-AIX systems is proliferating so we are migrating to a TSM
backup/recovery mechanism. The TSM server is an AIX based NSM box.
I am in
I have some questions about backup verification and would like to seek some
advice.
When I backup using TSM, how can I verify that the backup is good ? What I
mean is when TSM write to tape, how do I verify that the write-to-tape
process is good. I come from VMS backup. In VMS, it has a
If its the same or similiar problem I had in converting from
a 3466-C00 (tsm 3) to a 3466-C01(tsm 4) but using the same 3494/3590s
then its because your system thinks the tapes are ONLY capatible in
READ/ONLY mount modes.
Even though you are mounting a tape for RESTORE if you look closely
you
We are running the following:
Our MVS is OS/390 2.10.
TSM server is Version 4, Release 1, Level 2.0
I've been asked to look into MPTHREADING and determine if there are any
reasons NOT to implement it. I've searched the archives and found a
refrence from a long time ago concerning ADSM taking
Seth,
Have you checked in to how it handles Netware clustering?
Along with the 'failover' shortcoming, the gui restore interface with the cluster
presents some interesting challenges!
Forgosh, Seth wrote:
I have tested NW6 with the latest 4.x.x client and it worked fine. I suppose
that
I work for the New York State Dept. of Health. We just starting to look
at the OS/390 MVS SMF records for Tivoli/ADSM accounting. I am
not sure which fields, we will be asked about.
I am reading and learning about MXG to extract data from the records.
I was wondering if anybody had shareable
Hi at all !!!. I have a problem when i want to run a script to perform
a backup of a database on Oracle 7 with EBU Utility, I receive this error
message in the dsierror.log file and the client doesn't connect whit the
server. The backup with the TSM Cllient run fine.
Thank you very much for
We've done some testing with the TDP for Oracle (AIX) and made some
backups. However, when I query the filespace for the node in question it
comes back with Capacity 0.0 and Pct 0.0
Is this by design, or have we not really gotten a succesfull backup?
It's creating the filespace name I specify,
What does it take to get attention from a Tivoli Rep in the Central North
America region???
I have been trying for two days to get a return call from someone because we
want to spend money...
Anybody know a number for a rep in the Pittsburgh, PA area?
I think the Chicago office covers this area.
Pinheads! Case Closed.
|+--
|| Dale Jolliff|
|| dale.jolliff.b@|
|| BAYER.COM |
|| |
|| 03/07/02 02:04 |
|| PM |
|
One quick thought, just install the needed drivers on the H70.
Miles
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 07-Mar-02 11:19:12 AM
Hi,
We have been using Sysback/6000 for years as our backup recovery tool for
our AIX systems. We are now merging many of those servers, and the
collection of non-AIX systems is
Dale,
You'll probably be better off contacting a Tivoli business partner rather
than Tivoli directly. I work for a BP over near Reading, PA. If you go to
Tivoli's web site (http:\\www.tivoli.com) and click on 'Business Partners'
along the red strip across the top of the page, you'll be
You might be looking for different retention periods for these
point-in-time backups from the rest of your data. You can do this handily
with archives, or you can use multiple nodenames per system to manage
different incremental series. This has been discussed at length before,
check the
TSM server 4.1.5.0 on AIX 4.3.3 PL 8.
Two 3575s and one 3583; four drives each.
AIX clients run 4.3.3 PL 8.
About 120 active nodes. 3.5 TB online.
The AIX backup/archive client fails totally when pointed directly to a tape
pool instead of a disk pool. I've gotten the same failure on client
Joe,
Are you seeing the Agent make communications to the Server when recycled ?
Is the Server receiving the mount request from the Agent ?
Any changes to the device configurations on the server that effect the Agent
(other server) need to recycle agent.
If you want to send portion of activity
LANN-Free DSM.SYS Example for all
- Original Message -
From: Leijnse, Finn F SITI-ITDSES31 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 9:46 AM
Subject: lanfree not lan free
Hi guys,
In a totally AIX environment I have set up my storage agent for LAN
Another little goodie you can stick in there for troubleshooting
purposes is the undocumented enableallclients directive.
Very usefull for troubleshooting...turn that on, then you should be able
to fire up a dsmadmc -consolemode session on the client end, to see
what's happening.
-Lloyd
On
I'm new to TSM, so please be patient with me.
Let say I backup directly from clients to tape, so my primary pool is tape
and I do not use a disk pool.
Since I cannot find verify command in TSM, so I wonder how TSM do the
verification ? Is the data already been verified when it writes to tape ?
Haven't done this specifically, but I have one suggestion if it would fit.
If you know ahead of time when these PIT backups would be needed,
then create additional schedules to do your backups at these times.
Make sure they wouldn't conflict with the normal backup times.
When we are going to do
Hi Ann,
We run exactly the same environment - OS/390 and TSM versions.
We have been using the MPTHREADING YES parameter for the last
2-3 years - no problems directly related to the MPTHREADING.
What we have had for a while now is a call open for TSM going
into a flat spin when there is a tape
75 matches
Mail list logo