Re: Good Bye

. Del — Del Hoobler Principal Storage SWAT Specialist, IBM Technology, Americas > On May 24, 2023, at 7:02 PM, Zoltan Forray wrote: > > Marcel, > > I too thought it was very interesting that IBM would collaborate with > Cohesity ( > https://www.cohesity.com/p

Re: Spectrum Protect Plus for office 365

: [EXTERNAL] Re: Spectrum Protect Plus for office 365 He Del, Thank you for clarification, could you please point me in where I can check how SPPOS can be integrated with Spectrum Protect. Thank you Chavdar On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 5:18 PM Del Hoobler wrote: > Native SPP for M365 is proba

Re: Spectrum Protect Plus for office 365

Protect (use SPP as tape solution for SPP+) Thank you Chavdar On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 4:54 PM Del Hoobler wrote: > Check the right side of this page: > > https://www.ibm.com/products/spectrum-protect-plus-online-services > > Del > > > From:

Re: Spectrum Protect Plus for office 365

Check the right side of this page: https://www.ibm.com/products/spectrum-protect-plus-online-services Del From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of Chavdar Cholev Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2022 9:41 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [EXTERNAL]

Re: 8.1.15 Linux client update causing failures

Hi Zoltan, IBM knows about this ... and it's being actively worked. I am sure it will be mitigated soon. Feel free to open a fresh IBM Support case so you can be quickly notified once it is fixed. Del From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of Zoltan Forray

Re: Azure blob soft delete

Hi Matt, It has not been tested; it would probably work .. but, if something happens to the primary copy ... of some of the items ... I am not sure how you would coordinate getting everything synchronized, i.e. the dedup chunks stored in object storage and the objects in the SP/SPP server

Re: Questions on CVE-2022-22394

The product team advises that you upgrade to 8.1.14.100. https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6562367 For specific questions regarding the CVE that was published, please open a case with support. Del From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of Bjørn

Re: ANR3692W A client backup anomaly was detected

Take a look at Cobalt Iron Compass with Cyber Shield (https://www.cobaltiron.com/products/cyber-shield-data-security-feature/) and Predatar (https://www.predatar.com/?prdLang=en-gb) which both have integration with IBM Spectrum Protect and (BM Spectrum Protect Plus and can help with your cyber

Re: Sun SPARC support for non-API clients

Hi Martin, It is true the native Spectrum Protect Solaris SPARC B/A client went EOS on December 31, 2021. In talking with other clients, they have chosen a few different options: 1.) Purchase an extended support contract from IBM until December 31, 2022 (this is Usage and Known Defect only)

Re: Any impact on SP client with security vulnerability: CVE-2021-44228

Please watch this page: https://www.ibm.com/blogs/psirt/an-update-on-the-apache-log4j-cve-2021-44228-vulnerability/ IBM is actively working on a this. Del "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 12/12/2021 01:31:46 AM: > From: "Bommasani,

Re: Lustre filesystem backup support

Hi Zoltan, As you saw, deep integration is not supported today. You can back up the data. Here is the statement with regards to file systems that are not directly tested: ... NFS backups are supported, but the backups include only standard POSIX metadata (access permissions, creation date,

Re: Lustre filesystem

Hi Zoltan, Here is the statement with regards to file systems that are not directly tested: ... NFS backups are supported, but the backups include only standard POSIX metadata (access permissions, creation date, and so on). For more information about backing up NFS file systems, see Backup

Re: [E] Re: [ADSM-L] TSM alternatives

ound. > > > Regards > Sarav > +65 9857 8665 > > > > On 26 Apr 2021, at 7:03 PM, Del Hoobler wrote: > > > > Hi Michael, > > > > You are correct. At the end of this year, the Backup/Archive client for > > Solaris SPARC will

Re: [E] Re: [ADSM-L] TSM alternatives

SHvJObTbx- > siA1ZOg=0hq2JX5c3TEZNriHEs7Zf7HrkY2fNtONOrEOM8Txvk8=xbwRG2jwrVEOfJbwF7XUE6ogWFzsumbFCZ0SPJpEH- > Y=FuEfe5SeT2yOWzFApUbjJivuOqOY9QCLmW-e8ZqJV2g= > > > *Michael Stahlberg* > Engineer IV Consultant - Network Eng & Ops > Server & Services Management International -* Global Oper

Re: TSM API for Cassandra database

Protect server (instead of the TSM API). > Appreciate if you could able to share any reference technote for the > same. Thanks. > > > Best Regards, > _ > > Venu Bommasani > Storage & Data Protection > Capgemini Indi

Re: TSM API for Cassandra database

There is no "TDP for Cassandra". Some ideas to consider: 1. Leverage the new "S3" interface to the Spectrum Protect server (instead of the TSM API). 2. Use the "dump and sweep" method, i.e. dump the backup to a file and then back up the file with the Backup/Archive client. Del

Re: TSM alternatives

Thanks Michael. Just to be sure it's clear to all. IBM Spectrum Protect still supports Solaris for x86_64. It's the Solaris SPARC platform that is API only support: https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/84861#Solaris%20x86_64 Some other notes: - You can still use the Spectrum Protect V7

Re: WORM Azure blob for cloud container pool

> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" > > Hi Del, > > Do we agree that you refer to retention sets "hold"? > > Thanks > > -- > Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي > Erwann SIMON > > - Mail original - > De: "Del Hoob

Re: Data Protection for Lotus Domino

Hi Eric, IBM still intends to support Data Protection for Domino after 7.1 goes EOS. Details on that will be available before 7.1 goes EOS. Del "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 03/16/2021 11:40:40 AM: > From: "Loon, Eric van (ITOP NS)

Re: WORM Azure blob for cloud container pool

Hi Matt, Spectrum Protect does not support object storage object lock yet. It's on the roadmap. You can look at Retention Sets "lock" to help with this requirement. Del "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 03/01/2021 11:28:53 AM: >

Re: SP patch versions??

sa a regular fix for 8.1.11? > > e.g. the bug which prohibited the restore of the dsmkey is fixed with > 8.1.19-200, but still exits in 8.1.11-0 :-( > > thanks & best > Bjørn > > Del Hoobler wrote: > > Hi Eric, > > > > The answer is always "it dep

Re: SP patch versions??

SP patch versions?? > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" > > Hi Del, > > Ah OK, thanks! Does that mean that the vulnerabilities fixed in OC > 8.1.10.200 do not exist in 8.1.11.0? > > Kind regards, > Eric van Loon > Air France/KLM Storage & Backup >

Re: SP patch versions??

Hi Eric, In some cases, customers prefer to stay at the N-1 level of code and IBM will release fixes on top of the N-1 level to help them with an issue. Del "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 02/15/2021 03:02:21 AM: > From: "Loon, Eric

Re: Issues with Spectrum Protect+ reports after upgrade to 10.1.7

Hi Zoltan, OK, this matches. Thank you! An APAR is opened and this will be fixed. Del "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 12/15/2020 04:15:55 PM: > From: Zoltan Forray > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Date: 12/15/2020 04:16 PM > Subject:

Re: Issues with Spectrum Protect+ reports after upgrade to 10.1.7

Hi Zoltan, 1. What report are you trying to open? 2. Are you seeing this message? "The file format and extension of ‘file.xls’ don’t match. The file could be corrupted or unsafe. Unless you trust its source, don’t open it. Do you want to open it anyway?" 3. Does clicking "yes" to open the

Re: Issues with Spectrum Protect+ reports after upgrade to 10.1.7

Hi Zoltan, This looks like a issue that was reported already. I don't have a specific APAR number yet. Feel free to open a PMR if needed. Del "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 12/14/2020 11:35:59 AM: > From: Zoltan Forray > To:

Re: TDP for SQL Server password file

Hi Eric, If you cannot find anything in the Windows registry, please open a ticket with IBM. I spoke to the developers and they are not entirely sure of the use/case scenario that would lead to this. Thank you, Del "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 12/10/2020 05:15:14 AM: > From:

Re: Openshift support in SP Plus

Hi Steven, Get in touch with your IBM rep or BP that helps with Spectrum Protect. It can be discussed under NDA. Del "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 09/10/2020 10:05:58 PM: > From: Steven Harris1 > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Date:

IBM Spectrum Protect Portfolio Beta Program - Get early access and insights early!

Data Management. If interested, contact Katherine Keaney at kkea...@us.ibm.com Thank you, Del Hoobler

Re: AW: [ADSM-L] Move Container (Automatic) filling up the directories

APAR IT33478 was created for adding this capability. This is targeted for the next release. This APAR will introduce a built-in quota for the defrag engine to limit the # of containers processed in one day Del "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"

Re: Spectrum Protect Plus IA restore

on after recovery), but that is not what I want, > I want the VM powered on during the restore. > I will open a case for this. Thanks for your help! > > Kind regards, > Eric van Loon > Air France/KLM Storage & Backup > > -Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist

Re: Spectrum Protect Plus IA restore

l disks in one go, the order of the disks get mixed up and the VM > can't boot. > Thanks again for your help! > > Kind regards, > Eric van Loon > Air France/KLM Storage & Backup > > -Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager On Behalf Of Del Hooble

Re: Spectrum Protect Plus IA restore

ead in the manual this creates a new VM with unique > names and identifiers in a fenced network. What if I want the > original VM restored in production? > Thanks again for your help! > > Kind regards, > Eric van Loon > Air France/KLM Storage & Backup > > -Orig

Re: Spectrum Protect Plus IA restore

Hi Eric, Full VM mount/instant Access can be done by selecting 'Test' radio button in the Restore mode. Test mounts the entire VM directly from the vSnap. Del "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 05/20/2020 05:09:12 AM: > From: "Loon,

Re: SPP Message board & Developerworks

Hi Steven, I recommend using this same forum for Spectrum Protect Plus questions/comments. Spectrum Protect Plus is a fairly new component in the Spectrum Protect portfolio and will become more and more integrated as time goes on. Check here for the old developerWorks content:

Re: ANR1942W

Hi Eric, This is great feedback. Your input is very important to us. Can you click on the link in the User's Guide and submit it here? https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSEQVQ_8.1.9/srv.admin/t_adm_repl_mng.html This will ensure it gets back to our documentation team and we can make

Re: MS SQL for Linux

Hi Sarav, We have not seen a lot of demand for this yet. If you are interested, please vote for this RFE: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe_ID=108504 Del "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 04/23/2020 03:28:25 PM: > From: Saravanan Palanisamy > To:

Re: Moving data in cloud storage pool

The "AllowTierTargetDir" is not supported for cloud container pools. It is only supported for directory container pools. If you can't do something within Cloudian directly (transparently to Spectrum Protect) one option is to create a pool with the correct user and point all new backups here

Re: Moving all containers from one storage to a new one

We only see this request coming up on occasion ... mostly for the use case outlined in this post. We do have this in our backlog, but it hasn't hit peak demand yet to target it for delivery. For now, the scripting/macro method outlined below is what IBM recommends. Del

Re: tdpoconf showenv no longer working after upgrade to 8.1.9.0

Check here: https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSER7G_8.1.9/db.common/r_techchg_db_orc.html Del "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 01/23/2020 03:37:39 AM: > From: "Loon, Eric van (ITOP NS) - KLM" > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Date: 01/23/2020 03:38 AM > Subject:

Re: MS-SQL 2019 TDP support

11/14/2019 09:05 AM > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: MS-SQL 2019 TDP support > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" > > Thanks for the reply Del. > > Any way we can help "testing with the official GA"? We are already > approved beta testers for SPP and 8.1.9. >

Re: RHEL8 Support for Server 8.1.8

Hi Stephan, Spectrum Protect relies on Db2. Db2 does not support RHEL 8 yet. Once that happens, Spectrum Protect will be able to test and fully validate it. The current target is not defined not, but I suspect it will not happen until early next year. Del

Re: MS-SQL 2019 TDP support

Hi, Yes, SQL Server 2019 support is scheduled for release soon. SQL Server 2019 itself just official GA'd on November 4th. IBM has been testing this with "pre-release" versions of SQL Server 2019, but needs to complete the full regression testing with the official GA version. So, this is

Re: deletion performance of large deduplicated files

Hi Eric and all, We are aware of this situation and putting additional focus and attention on it. Del "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 07/19/2019 09:35:37 AM: > From: "Loon, Eric van (ITOP NS) - KLM" > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU >

Re: Spectrum Protect PVU licensing

Hi Bent, Please have the auditors contact me directly ASAP. Thank you. Del "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 07/08/2019 11:08:58 AM: > From: "Bent Christensen (BVC)" > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Date: 07/08/2019 11:15 AM > Subject:

Re: Query regarding IBM Spectrum Suite support renewal

Hi Paul, Check here: https://www.ibm.com/software/passportadvantage/about_software_licensing.html Del Del Hoobler Principal Offering Manager - IBM Spectrum Protect IBM Corporation "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 05/14/2

Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: 8.1.6.0 woes

Stefan, If you are not getting the response you need, raise the severity/priority of the support case. Del "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 11/03/2018 04:05:33 AM: > From: Tsm Tsm > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Date: 11/03/2018 05:45

Re: Backing up Oracle 18c with - TDP

Hi Vikas, It is not officially supported yet, but it is something we know about and working on to validate. Del "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 10/15/2018 06:49:01 AM: > From: Vikas Arora > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Date:

Re: Netapp snapdiff issues having TSM client on a Linux machine, making use of NFS mounts

eagues > (which were previously doing the restores on their own) specific > logging rights on that machine. Was not the case before ... > > Cheers. > > Arnaud > > -Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On > Be

Re: Netapp snapdiff issues having TSM client on a Linux machine, making use of NFS mounts

Hi Arnaud, Not related to SnapDiff ... but just some info on NDMP and B/A Client... In Spectrum Protect BA client 8.1.6 that GAs this coming Friday (21 September) you will be able to use the native Java GUI to handle NDMP backups/restores. Del

Re: Download SP VE 8.1.6

HI Hans Chr. As shown in the announcement letter, Spectrum Protect 8.1.6 will be available on September 21. https://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/ShowDoc.wss?docURL=/common/ssi/rep_ca/6/897/ENUS218-316/index.html_locale=ja Del "ADSM: Dist

Re: CentOS vs RHEL

This is something we are evaluating. @Everyone ... if you are also looking at moving to CentOS in your company and would like this support, please go vote for this RFE: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe_ID=100020 Thank you, Del

Re: dedup on stgpool or global

Spectrum Protect container pool deduplication is at the storage pool level. "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 07/23/2018 09:07:18 AM: > From: "Loon, Eric van (ITOPT3) - KLM" > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Date: 07/23/2018 09:08 AM > Subject: dedup on stgpool or global > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist

Re: [EXT] [ADSM-L] VMFolder in VMware backups

VMware tagging was introduced as a better solution for managing backups (vs. VMFOLDER/subfolder). As for pagefile.sys ... one solution is to place the pagefile on its own volume and exclude that volume.You can also set this disk as Independent (VMware Edit Settings) and it will not participate

Re: Looking for suggestions to deal with large backups not completing in 24-hours

nt configuration we are using to back > up ISILON. I have passed the info on. > > BTW, FWIW, when I copied/pasted the info, Chrome spell-checker red-flagged > on "The easy way to incrementally backup billons of objects" (billions). > So if you know anybody at the company,

Re: Looking for suggestions to deal with large backups not completing in 24-hours

Another possible idea is to look at General Storage dsmISI MAGS: http://www.general-storage.com/PRODUCTS/products.html Del "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 07/05/2018 02:52:27 PM: > From: Zoltan Forray > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Date: 07/05/2018 02:53 PM > Subject: Looking for

Re: Backup up multiple vcenters with one TSM4VE ?

You do not need multiple SPP servers for multiple vCenters. Del "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 05/03/2018 03:54:29 PM: > From: Remco Post > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Date: 05/03/2018 03:56 PM >

Re: Quoting an IBM SP Suite FE capacity based

Hi Tommaso, This is why the Operations Center FE capacity reporting was introduced. If you are using the "front-end" model and the Operations Center FE capacity reporting isn't sufficient for you, please engage with your IBM representative. Del

Re: SPP licensing/included with SP Extended Edition/Suite?

isit https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url? > u=https-3A__phishing.vcu.edu=DwIBaQ=jf_iaSHvJObTbx- > siA1ZOg=0hq2JX5c3TEZNriHEs7Zf7HrkY2fNtONOrEOM8Txvk8=JGKiSkCR3nJHeQHMAj-4Zwy5ZrAfXW8f_0NYT8p_0vE=roR54umzcWB_VBPTbLFPzjhVGBvFZOI4ZcNIhmXxvCA= > > On Thu, Mar 22, 2018, 4:45 PM Del Hoobler <hoob...@us.ibm.com

Re: NTNamedStreamRead() openNamedStream errors

I recommend opening a PMR. Before opening the PMR, you should collect a SERVICE trace of a command line selective backup of that specific file and have it ready for support. Del "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on

Re: SPP licensing/included with SP Extended Edition/Suite?

Hi Matt, That's not correct. It sounds like the person who gave you the briefing was not clear. There are three general models: 1. If you purchase SPP "stand alone" (i.e. not via Suite), you pay per VM. If you offload to Spectrum Protect, you pay for those offloaded TBs managed by Spectrum

Re: SPP licensing/included with SP Extended Edition/Suite?

Hi Zoltan, Spectrum Protect Plus was added to the Spectrum Protect Suites and Spectrum Storage Suite in 4Q17. That means, if you are a Suite customer, you are entitled to use Spectrum Protect Plus. https://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/cgi-bin/ssialias?infotype=AN=CA=897/ENUS217-552=USN

Re: spectrum protect documentation

Hi Gary, Try these: https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSEQVQ_8.1.4/tsm/r_pdfs_tsm.html ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/software/products/ISP/current/ Del "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 03/13/2018 09:55:16

Re: Certificate chaining error

Hi Tommaso, Are you using a supported S3 device or service? http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg22000915 If so, this is probably a certificate and/or configuration issue. Make sure you follow the instructions here:

Re: Spectre & Meltdown patching in relation to Spectrum Protect

Hi Stefan, IBM is still evaluating this. Once there is something to share, I will post it. Del "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 01/23/2018 02:29:17 AM: > From: Stefan Folkerts > To:

Re: Should I upgrade to 7.1.8.x ??? (on the client end only)

t if upgrading to >=7.1.8 is going to require manual updates to get the > certs right, I would rather hold off. Right now it is manageable. > > On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 2:54 PM, Del Hoobler <hoob...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > Hi Zoltan, > > > > It's fine to

Re: Should I upgrade to 7.1.8.x ??? (on the client end only)

stand this > correctly) is a major problem for us. Unless of course I am completely > misunderstanding and it is only the web Administrator interface (which we > don't use). > > On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 7:45 AM, Del Hoobler <hoob...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > Here are a few lin

Re: Should I upgrade to 7.1.8.x ??? (on the client end only)

on 24. > > > > > > So I updated my admin to sessionsecurity=transitional (strange, this > > > should be the default...) and now I could start a session successful. > > > I tried the same admin account on another TSM client and again On the > > >

Re: Should I upgrade to 7.1.8.x ??? (on the client end only)

ssion > successful. I tried the same admin account on another TSM client and > again On the client side: ANS1592E Failed to initialize SSL > protocol. A q admin f=d showed that sessionsecurity was again set to > strict! I'm lost... > Kind regards, > Eric van Loon > Air France/KLM St

Re: Should I upgrade to 7.1.8.x ??? (on the client end only)

Here are a few links that might help: https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSEQVQ_8.1.2/srv.install/r_srv_knowsec-aix.html http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg22004844 Del "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"

Re: SP 8.1.4 information / typo

Hi Zoltan, Thank you. I will forward it along to get it corrected. Del "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 12/18/2017 08:35:43 AM: > From: Zoltan Forray > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Date: 12/18/2017

Re: Hyper-V VM backup and restore sessions (single VM restore performance)

Hi Stefan, Data Protection for Hyper-V does not currently have the same parallelization that is there for VMware (except for an entire VM in parallel). It is under consideration for a future release. Del "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"

Re: *EXTERNAL* Re: Spectrum Protect for VE - how to get started

Spectrum Protect Plus is intended to be our new offering providing: * Next generation agentless data protection platform * Simple to deploy and use * Single pane of glass, role-based access * SLA-based policy * Ability to store backups on the Spectrum Protect Server It is not an

Re: Database restore and containerpools

Hi Eric, This should be fine. I will work with the owner of the documentation to get something added moving forward. Del "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 08/04/2017 02:38:10 AM: > From: "Loon, Eric van (ITOPT3)

Re: One to many replication in Spectrum Protect 8.1

> > Are there any technical reasons behind "IBM does not recommend the > switching technique" statement? > > Another thought came to my mind - circular replication - > TSM1->TSM2->TSM3->TSM1 - I know this will double replication traffic over > the WAN but wil

Re: One to many replication in Spectrum Protect 8.1

yes > > > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Mikhail Golbin <mikhail.gol...@roche.com> > wrote: > > > Hi Del, > > > > We are all disk, no tape, so that is not an option. > > Any possible workarounds? > > > > Thanks, > > M

Re: One to many replication in Spectrum Protect 8.1

Hi Mikhail, One-to-many node replication is not currently supported. It is a known requirement. One way to create two copies of your backup data stored in directory-container storage pools is to use PROTECT STGPOOL to a second Spectrum Protect server and a PROTECT STGPOOL to tape. Del

Re: FULL VM Instant Restore

; > Thanks for the link... > > So Instant restore is a regular restore but can be access after few > percent restored . The instant restore is permanent and no need > to do a "dismount" . > > Correct ? > > Best Regards Robert > > -Original Messa

Re: FULL VM Instant Restore

From the User's Guide: https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSERB6_8.1.0/ve.user/t_ve_dpext_restore_vm.html Instant restore The virtual machine is restored and is available during the restore operation. Instant access A temporary virtual machine is created for verification of

Re: SAP HANA backup expiration

n > Air France/KLM Storage Engineering > > -Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On > Behalf Of Del Hoobler > Sent: maandag 19 juni 2017 15:48 > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: Re: SAP HANA backup expiration > > Hi

Re: SAP HANA backup expiration

Hi Eric, Once the backups have been deleted in HANA Studio, then HANA will delay the actual deletion of the objects in Spectrum Protect. It is not known or documented by SAP how long this delay may be or on what it depends. We have seen a delay of several minutes. If you delete a large number

Re: Linux on Power Support - Available now

> Steven Harris > TSM Admin/Consultant > Canberra Australia. > > -Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On > Behalf Of Del Hoobler > Sent: Friday, 2 June 2017 3:31 AM > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: Re: [ADSM-L]

Re: TDP for SQL and UAC

Hi Steve, Assuming the user running the DP/SQL client has local administrator authority, the customer can disable UAC prompts only for administrators as described here: http://tweaks.com/windows/39115/disable-user-account-control-uac-only-for-administrators/ Alternatively, it is

Re: Linux on Power Support - Available now

Del - Forwarded by Del Hoobler/Endicott/IBM on 06/01/2017 01:27 PM - Del Hoobler/Endicott/IBM wrote on 04/24/2017 02:47:21 PM: > From: Del Hoobler/Endicott/IBM > To: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST

Re: Client-side dedup speed

SM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> > > Hello Del > > Did it's working too with Storage type DIRECTORY when on it > deduplicate data is YES ? > > TSM server Version 8.1.1.0 > > Best Regards Robert > > -Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:

Re: Client-side dedup speed

latency networks and is recommend to always be set to 'no' for applications which use the Spectrum Protect API. Del > - Forwarded by Del Hoobler/Endicott/IBM on 05/21/2017 01:33 PM - > > From: "Loon, Eric van (ITOPT3) - KLM" <eric-van.l...@klm.com> > To: ADS

Re: Questions related to Container pools

r Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> > > Del, > > Can you give us an rough idea of when or, more specifically, which > release of Spectrum Protect will no longer have virtual volume support? > > Thanks, > Rick Saylor > Austin Community College > > On 5/5/

Re: Questions related to Container pools

automate the retention of DBB and > RFP objects. Right now, they are using file device class volumes to store > the archive objects that back the VVs. > > Best regards, > Joerg Pohlmann > > -----Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@V

Re: Questions related to Container pools

Hi Arnaud, For question #1 ... The reason the information is in the document is because Spectrum Protect restricts it. Stay tuned though, this could be allowed soon. For question #2 ... The only reason we recommend using 1 pool is strictly for the best possible deduplication rates AND the

Re: Linux on Power Support

Hi Jonathan, Spectrum Protect 8.1 server dropped Linux on Power - Big Endian (you can still get it for Spectrum Protect 7.1 server). Spectrum Protect 8.1 is adding support for Linux on Power - Little Endian. It is targeted to be released for RHEL within the next few months. Del

Re: Deduplication

Hi Eric, A few things: - Client-side provides better overall throughput for Spectrum Protect because the deduplication is spread across more CPU's. So if you can afford to do the deduplication client-side, that is the best overall result. - Client-side helps reduce network traffic - The

Re: TDP for Exchange

>From the User's Guide: https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSERBW_8.1.0/mail.exc/dpe_con_info_performance.html Del "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 03/28/2017 03:43:01 PM: > From: David Ehresman > To:

Re: Best Practices/Best Performance SP/TSM B/A Client Settings ?

ups but I suspect it > will make no difference as 99% of the data is all in one DB and I don't > think SQL/TSM will split that into multiple streams (will it?). > > On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 6:57 AM, Del Hoobler <hoob...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > Hi Tom, > > > &g

Re: Best Practices/Best Performance SP/TSM B/A Client Settings ?

IZATION 2 (we increase this up to 10 for some WAN backups) > TXNBYTELIMIT 2097152 > TCPNODELAY YES > TCPBUFFSIZE 512 > TCPWINDOWSIZE 2048 > LARGECOMMBUFFERS YES > > Also we never use compression because our storage folks believe it will > foul up the de-duplication that h

Re: Best Practices/Best Performance SP/TSM B/A Client Settings ?

Hi Ben, Here are some items to get you started: Backup-Archive client with limited, high latency network (WAN backups): === TCPWINDOWSIZE 512 RESOURCEUTILIZATION 4 COMPRESSION Yes DEDUPLICATION Yes ENABLEDEDUPCACHEYes Tip:

Re: digging deeper with VE tagging support possible?

Hi Stefan, In that case, you should open a PMR since we don't want to get into a debugging session on ADSM-L. Del "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 03/15/2017 11:24:17 AM: > From: Stefan Folkerts

Re: digging deeper with VE tagging support possible?

Hi Stefan, There is nothing obvious here except that you mention 'dsm.opt'. Not sure if this is just a general name for the opt file but the datamover opt file generally includes the datamover name. Is it possible that the dsm.opt file that you changed is not the one being used by the

Re: TSM 8.1 Support for Solaris??

http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21243309#Solaris%20SPARC It means that the Backup/Archive client for Solaris SPARC is not shipped starting with Spectrum Protect 8.1. The API is still available for the TDPs that use it and you can still use the Backup/Archive 7.1 client for

Re: 8.1 Client Backup/Archive Backup/Archive discontinued in Virtual Environment??

ontinued in future versions of the product? > > Regards, > > Hans Chr. > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 9:30 PM, Del Hoobler <hoob...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > This is not referring to running the BA Client in guest. > > > >

Re: 8.1 Client Backup/Archive Backup/Archive discontinued in Virtual Environment??

This is not referring to running the BA Client in guest. This is referring to the legacy commands like: DSMC BACKUP VM DSMC RESTORE VM DSMC QUERY VM Del "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 03/14/2017

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >