Very good point.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 24, 2020, at 7:33 PM, TJ Trout wrote:
>
>
> Or back feeding interference to the cmts
>
>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020, 6:18 PM Chuck McCown wrote:
>> Every receiver has a local oscillator. They use UHF there. Maybe a front
>> end amp was unstable. A
I want one but with lights
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020, 9:59 PM Ken Hohhof wrote:
> Chuck, I know you like the cone of silence from Get Smart. I keep getting
> ads for this thing:
>
> https://microclimate.com/
>
>
>
> I can’t decide if it’s goofy or creepy or what. Maybe it’s a joke but
> looks like
Chuck, I know you like the cone of silence from Get Smart. I keep getting
ads for this thing:
https://microclimate.com/
I can't decide if it's goofy or creepy or what. Maybe it's a joke but looks
like it's a real thing. Hi there, I'm in my own personal bubble, literally.
--
AF mailing lis
It was cable according to the article I read. They said they replaced all
the cable infrastructure and it was still present so they took the
"extreme" measure of bringing in a spectrum analyzer. Which seems odd and
backward to me.
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020, 9:14 PM Bill Prince wrote:
> Got the impres
Got the impression that it was cable internet.
bp
On 9/24/2020 6:18 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
Every receiver has a local oscillator. They use UHF there. Maybe a front end
amp was unstable. And the house was next to a major cluster of APs.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 24, 2020, at 6:38 PM, K
Or back feeding interference to the cmts
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020, 6:18 PM Chuck McCown wrote:
> Every receiver has a local oscillator. They use UHF there. Maybe a front
> end amp was unstable. And the house was next to a major cluster of APs.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Sep 24, 2020, at 6:38
Every receiver has a local oscillator. They use UHF there. Maybe a front end
amp was unstable. And the house was next to a major cluster of APs.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 24, 2020, at 6:38 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
>
> Smells like BS, and they don't give enough details to convince me otherwi
Smells like BS, and they don't give enough details to convince me otherwise.
What type of Internet infrastructure do they have, and how was an old TV
disrupting it?
Didn't Chuck have a story about every time the phone rang the dog would howl
or something like that?
-Original Message-
From
Did you read the story about the village in Wales:
https://www.cnet.com/news/an-old-tv-crashed-entire-towns-broadband-every-day-for-more-than-a-year/
--
bp
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
So I changed all the settings I could think of, but it was still
blocking the customer from 3-16 hours after rebooting the AP. Strange
thing is that the customer Router would continue to ARP just fine, but
would not pass any traffic. I changed the 2.4ghz 1k radios out to 5ghz
F300-16 radios, a
Good call out, thanks!
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 3:30 PM Adam Moffett wrote:
> Ok yeah it's worse than I remembered
>
> 3.5ghz 450m is 140W typical, 150W max.
>
> Max input per power port on rack injector is 10 amp.
>
> You should definitely not put more than 3 on one power input. To use the
> ra
Ok yeah it's worse than I remembered
3.5ghz 450m is 140W typical, 150W max.
Max input per power port on rack injector is 10 amp.
You should definitely not put more than 3 on one power input. To use
the rack injector for that you might have to pull two outputs from the
ICT into two different
That's exactly what I was wondering about regarding max amperage.
On 9/24/2020 3:18 PM, Eric Muehleisen wrote:
You might check with Forest on the max output power of the PIDU. We
tried (4) CBRS 450M's on one card which caused weird power reboots on
random AP's. We were using a 600W power supply
You might check with Forest on the max output power of the PIDU. We tried
(4) CBRS 450M's on one card which caused weird power reboots on random
AP's. We were using a 600W power supply, which might have been the issue as
well. 3 AP's have been working just fine however.
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:
On this original question, the only thing I'd watch out for is the total
load on the Rack Injector. There's a max current on each input (10A?
12A? I don't remember, but it's on the web page). Each 450m is I think
100W typical and 125W max. If you're on battery then your voltage could
drop do
I guess you could also do power shedding during a power failure. Like you’ve
got 3 power sucking sectors and the site is running on batteries and the time
to get there with a generator exceeds the battery runtime, so you decide to
power down the APs to at least keep the backhauls running so the
Sure, if you're having to power cycle APs then you have a problem you
should fix, but I'd still prefer to know that I could if I had to. It's
also useful during a migration to be able to power up the new AP and
power down the old one. And if your vendor introduces a bug requiring a
power cycl
I think he said 3 GHz 450m which requires direct DC power because it uses like
1.21 gigawatts.
From: AF On Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2020 1:28 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Power for 450M via PacketFlux or Rectifier?
If you need s
If you need sync...power it over that too.
In my case, we don't need sync on our deployment so we went fiber + DC. No
sync - we've got a bomb shelter building for a good bit of shielding.
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On
I can’t remember last time I power cycled an AP, it’s been years.
Only time would be if I did something stupid and needed to do the quick power
cycle to get into the Recovery Console. Usually that wouldn’t be an AP that’s
in service, but one from the used pile that I’m planning to redeploy b
Yep - standardization is a good thing!
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 1:30 PM Sean Heskett wrote:
> Either way is fine, we’ve chosen to do it in the PacketFlux RI so that
> everything is standardized across our towers. Support staff and field
> techs know that ALL APs get power from a rack injector...
Either way is fine, we’ve chosen to do it in the PacketFlux RI so that
everything is standardized across our towers. Support staff and field
techs know that ALL APs get power from a rack injector...so when problems
happen look there and try a reboot.
-Sean
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 9:18 AM Josh B
We're deploying our first 450M gear soon. This site will have a +48VDC ICT
rectifier solution and DC distribution (managed).
We're going to be using a PacketFlux RackInkjector w/ Cambium Sync modules
to provide sync to the 450M 3ghz radios. We could load a PDU module in the
RackInjector as well
The 2k AP was regularly going to 100% frame utilization. The 3K AP is
running about 50% and spiking to 80%. (via 5 minute reads with MRTG)
On 9/24/2020 9:29 AM, Darin Steffl wrote:
Cambium has been saying for a while that you should see at least a 10%
improvement in throughput and lower laten
Cambium has been saying for a while that you should see at least a 10%
improvement in throughput and lower latency going from 1/2k to 3k gear even
with Force 200 and elevate clients.
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 9:27 AM Josh Luthman
wrote:
> Based on my swap, that's simply wrong.
>
> I think we can a
Based on my swap, that's simply wrong.
I think we can all agree to expect much more improvement with 300 SM,
though.
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:22 AM David Sovereen via AF
wrote:
> Was I mis
Yes, it's wrong. We have seen slight improvements on both sector
capacity/throughput and frame utilization. Cambium has always said you
would see a slight improvement.
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:22 AM David Sovereen via AF
wrote:
> Was I misinformed? I was told that replacing ePMP 2000 APs wi
Was I misinformed? I was told that replacing ePMP 2000 APs with ePMP 3000 APs
would have zero effect on capacity without changing out SMs to ePMP 3000 series
SMs. Is that wrong?
Dave
> On Sep 24, 2020, at 9:51 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>
> We did a 1000 to 3000L swap on Tuesday morning. Not
We did a 1000 to 3000L swap on Tuesday morning. Noticing the same thing -
more capacity and much less frame utilization. I think there were 36 SM -
mostly force 200 but some elevate/300-25.
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
O
29 matches
Mail list logo
