Subject: [AFMUG] Aviat vs Bridgewave 11GHz
Does anyone have any experience with the two of these (Aviat WTM4200 vs
Navigator Dual)? I'm having a hard time deciding.
-Jason
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
ot;
Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 12:54:13 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Aviat vs Bridgewave 11GHz
But Part 101 is probably the least dumb set of rules that WISPs have to deal
with. It’s about the only time dealing with government regulations where I feel
like I have a seat at the adult table. We sho
Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 12:39 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Aviat vs Bridgewave 11GHz
That's dumb.
-
Mike Hammett
<http://www.ics-il.com/> Intelligent Computing Solutions
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
<https://
When operating that way, do both channels need to be the same size, or can
you mix a 40mhz and an 80mhz, for example? I got the impression with the
Bridgewaves that would both need to be the same size (i.e 80mhz+80mhz).
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 12:43 PM wrote:
> Matthew - yes we do.
>
> Thanks,
>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> --
> *From: *"Tim Hardy"
> *To: *"AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group"
> *Sent: *Thursday, June 4, 2020 12:19:32 PM
> *Subject: *
Matthew - yes we do.
Thanks,
Joe Schraml
VP Sales Operations & Marketing
SIAE Microelettronica, Inc.
+1 (408) 832-4884
joseph.schr...@siaemic.com
www.siaemic.com
>>> Mathew Howard 6/4/2020 8:20 AM >>>
Does Siae have the capability of running two channels per core, like
That's dumb.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Hardy"
To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group"
Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 12:19:32 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG]
And, this is exactly what I have been discussing in this thread. “In instances
where a customer can get the FCC to license wider than 80 MHz channels (11 GHz
& 18 GHz), we can unlock the modems to provide up to 112 MHz bandwidth.”
Let’s be clear on this. The only way to “get the FCC to
Our ALFOPlus2 radio is true dual-carrier radio capable of up to 2x 112 MHz
channels. In instances where a customer can get the FCC to license wider than
80 MHz channels (11 GHz & 18 GHz), we can unlock the modems to provide up to
112 MHz bandwidth. With 4096QAM, this yields just over 2 Gbps
I don't know what specific bonding features Aviat has, but you can
technically do that with any radios... it's just a question of where and
how you have to do the bonding. You are also able to do two radios on the
same dish with the appropriate couplers, etc. with most 11ghz radios.
On Thu, Jun
If you need more throughput in 11ghz can't you license two separate links
for 11ghz and install two separate AVIAT radios and then the radios can
bond both links together? I thought that was a feature that AVIAT had.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 11:21 AM Mathew Howard wrote:
> Does Siae have the
Does Siae have the capability of running two channels per core, like was
discussed earlier on the Bridgewave and Aviat radios?
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 8:49 AM Tim Hardy wrote:
> Should be easy enough to check to ensure that you have two (2) dual core
> radios each transmitting a discrete
Should be easy enough to check to ensure that you have two (2) dual core radios
each transmitting a discrete frequency 60 MHz apart from one another. Anything
else would lead one to believe that they actually are just using their ETSI
configuration (112 MHz) within the 120 MHz block. Seems
I’m not sure details other than I verified multiple times 120Mhz of actual
usage and the speed matched. Our frequency coordinator worked with them on the
rest...
Jon Langeler
Michwave Technologies, Inc.
> On Jun 4, 2020, at 7:59 AM, Tim Hardy wrote:
>
> Just confirming that this is
Just confirming that this is actually two (2) dual core radios - one CCDP at 80
MHz bandwidth and the other CCDP at 40 MHz bandwidth with the two transmit
frequencies separated by 60 MHz - correct? This will require couplers and
associated losses on both ends (approximately 7 dB). Any attempt
11Ghz is 80MHz per channel, plus another 40Mhz= 120Mhz (two channels per
polarity). But the channels have to be stacked and available.
Ignore the promos and prices. Tell him what price you need to be at and he will
try to make it happen.
Jon Langeler
Michwave Technologies, Inc.
> On Jun 3,
Have they come down in price recently? Last time I checked they were
considerably higher than both Bridgewave and Aviat.
On Wednesday, June 3, 2020, Jon Langeler wrote:
> SIAE just licensed me 2Gbps links in 120Mhz x2. Price was basically all
> the same
>
> Jon Langeler
> Michwave Technologies,
Jon,
I'm pretty dumb with this stuff, is this possibly two descrete 60mhz
channels per TX side?
TJ
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 5:40 PM Jon Langeler
wrote:
> 11Ghz...2 channels in FCC assignment -similar- to AF11FX.
>
> Jon Langeler
> Michwave Technologies, Inc.
>
>
> On Jun 3, 2020, at 8:08 PM, TJ
11Ghz...2 channels in FCC assignment -similar- to AF11FX.
Jon Langeler
Michwave Technologies, Inc.
> On Jun 3, 2020, at 8:08 PM, TJ Trout wrote:
>
>
> What band can you do 120mhz in?
>
>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 5:04 PM Jon Langeler
>> wrote:
>> SIAE just licensed me 2Gbps links in
What band can you do 120mhz in?
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 5:04 PM Jon Langeler
wrote:
> SIAE just licensed me 2Gbps links in 120Mhz x2. Price was basically all
> the same
>
> Jon Langeler
> Michwave Technologies, Inc.
>
>
> On Jun 3, 2020, at 6:16 PM, Jason McKemie <
>
SIAE just licensed me 2Gbps links in 120Mhz x2. Price was basically all the
same
Jon Langeler
Michwave Technologies, Inc.
> On Jun 3, 2020, at 6:16 PM, Jason McKemie
> wrote:
>
> Yeah, the throughput is pretty comparable between the two.
>
>> On Wednesday, June 3, 2020, TJ Trout wrote:
Yeah, the throughput is pretty comparable between the two.
On Wednesday, June 3, 2020, TJ Trout wrote:
> aviat can do the same with dual channels on a single radio, it's called
> a2c or active two channel, we use it on the wtm4100
>
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 12:38 PM Josh Baird wrote:
>
>> The
aviat can do the same with dual channels on a single radio, it's called a2c
or active two channel, we use it on the wtm4100
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 12:38 PM Josh Baird wrote:
> The WTM4200 is dual core which is why it can do 1.4Gbps. The Bridgewave
> has some other magic.
>
> On Wed, Jun 3,
The WTM4200 is dual core which is why it can do 1.4Gbps. The Bridgewave
has some other magic.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 12:41 PM Jason McKemie <
j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote:
> I may have gotten the Aviat model wrong, whatever their dual core version
> is - 4300? I think the power on
<http://www.unwiredltd.com/> www.UnwiredLtd.com
Desk: 510-868-1614 x100
Mobile: 510-207-
<mailto:pkr...@unwiredltd.com> pkr...@unwiredltd.com
From: AF On Behalf Of Jason McKemie
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 9:41 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFM
I may have gotten the Aviat model wrong, whatever their dual core version
is - 4300? I think the power on the Aviat is better, probably in part due
to the field replaceable diplexer in the Navigator.
On Wednesday, June 3, 2020, Josh Baird wrote:
> I think the Navigator DT will have a higher
I think the Navigator DT will have a higher overall throughput (~3Gbps if
you have the channels available).
The WTM4200 and the Navigator ST are a better comparison - each capable of
~1.4Gbps.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 11:27 AM Jason McKemie <
j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote:
> Does anyone
Does anyone have any experience with the two of these (Aviat WTM4200 vs
Navigator Dual)? I'm having a hard time deciding.
-Jason
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
28 matches
Mail list logo
