: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mobile in CBRS
So funny, we used to have a commissioner here that everyone called Boss Hogg.
He wasn’t quite as short.
From: Adam Moffett
Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2018 11:51 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG
So funny, we used to have a commissioner here that everyone called Boss Hogg.
He wasn’t quite as short.
From: Adam Moffett
Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2018 11:51 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mobile in CBRS
I can see the 1st amendment thing.
"Uh oh
o: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group"
Sent: 10/31/2018 6:45:47 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mobile in CBRS
I’d find it more “ominous” if there was an actual case of them
censoring someone, rather than just some language in an AUP. I’d also
worry more if the current AUP actually had such l
lFarm Microwave Users Group
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Mobile in CBRS
But not lamb.
*From:* ch...@wbmfg.com
*Sent:* Thursday, November 1, 2018 8:50 AM
*To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Mobile in CBRS
I like fruit cake and mincemeat pie too.
*From:* Bill Prince
*Sent:* Thursday, Novem
Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2018 8:54 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users
Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mobile in CBRS
But
.
From: Bill
Prince
Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2018 8:17 AM
To: af@af.afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mobile in CBRS
Lima beans bad
But not lamb.
From: ch...@wbmfg.com
Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2018 8:50 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mobile in CBRS
I like fruit cake and mincemeat pie too.
From: Bill Prince
Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2018 8:17 AM
To: af@af.afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG
Are we off topic yet?
From: ch...@wbmfg.com
Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2018 8:54 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mobile in CBRS
But not lamb.
From: ch...@wbmfg.com
Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2018 8:50 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG
I like fruit cake and mincemeat pie too.
From: Bill Prince
Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2018 8:17 AM
To: af@af.afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mobile in CBRS
Lima beans bad.
Vienna sausage good.
Spam good on camping trips, not so much otherwise.
Liver bad.
Rice pudding good.
Bacon good
To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users
Group'
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mobile in CBRS
Sounds good, just hold the brussels
sprouts and give me
To: af@af.afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mobile in CBRS
I LOVE barbecued Brussels sprouts. Especially when there are
bits of bacon sprinkled over them.
bp
On 10/31/2018 1:06 PM, ch
Lima beans, pickled beets, vienna sausages, spam. Love lots of things my kids
and grand kids think are non-foods.
From: Ken Hohhof
Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2018 7:51 AM
To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group'
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mobile in CBRS
Sounds good, just hold the brusse
unsuccessfully to persuade him to love broccoli.
https://www.cnn.com/2016/06/25/politics/george-h-w-bush-broccoli-twitter/index.html
From: AF On Behalf Of Bill Prince
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 10:50 PM
To: af@af.afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mobile in CBRS
I LOVE barbecued
Radabaugh
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 1:59 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users
Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mobile in CBRS
I’m not
a huge fan of muni
On Behalf Of ch...@wbmfg.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 4:53 PM
To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group'
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mobile in CBRS
Rise is a private company. They can write whatever rules they want.
A city is government, the people.
They should not be able
, you could not quote certain passages from Huck
Finn in an email if using the muni system.
From: Ken Hohhof
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 3:46 PM
To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group'
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mobile in CBRS
By the article, you mean the think tank guy? That paper
, and has ties to ALEC. Not saying
that’s wrong, just that they are carrying water for big telecom.
From: AF On Behalf Of ch...@wbmfg.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 4:03 PM
To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group'
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mobile in CBRS
This is breaking
This is breaking LENT a bit.
The TN one was the one quoted in the article. Specifically mentioned hate
speech.
From: Ken Hohhof
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 2:35 PM
To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group'
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mobile in CBRS
Chuck, where in this document do
mp;T.
>
>
> From: AF mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com>> On Behalf
> Of Mark Radabaugh
> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 3:00 PM
> To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <mailto:af@af.afmug.com>>
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mobile in CBRS
>
> I’m not a h
roviding police and fire services. I
guess those don’t bother some big corporation like AT&T.
From: AF On Behalf Of Mark Radabaugh
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 3:00 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mobile in CBRS
I’m not a huge fan of muni broadband for
alf Of*Mark Radabaugh
*Sent:*Wednesday, October 31, 2018 1:47 PM
*To:*AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
*Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] Mobile in CBRS
Michael O’Rielly absolutely positively thinks it’s a fantastic idea.
The really scary part is that he thinks it’s better for private
industry to own it, si
Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mobile in CBRS
I’m not a huge fan of muni broadband for some of the reasons you cite. I was
just amazed that he is all for free speech when it meets his goals and then
completely against it another circumstance.
Mark
On Oct 31, 2018, at 3:53 PM
only a socialist when it serves my purposes, at all other times I am a
> libertarian...
>
> From: Mark Radabaugh <>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 1:49 PM
> To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <>
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mobile in CBRS
>
> Oh, it’s even bett
a socialist when it serves my purposes, at all other times I am a
libertarian...
From: Mark Radabaugh
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 1:49 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mobile in CBRS
Oh, it’s even better.
In the same speech where he was railing against
>
> From: AF mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com>> On Behalf
> Of Mark Radabaugh
> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 1:47 PM
> To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <mailto:af@af.afmug.com>>
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mobile in CBRS
>
> Michael O’Rielly absolut
-broadband-an-ominous-threat-to-the-first-amendment
From: AF On Behalf Of Mark Radabaugh
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 1:47 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mobile in CBRS
Michael O’Rielly absolutely positively thinks it’s a fantastic idea.
The
not worth paying much money to “own”.
>
>
>
>
>
> From: AF mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com>> On Behalf
> Of Dave
> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 10:13 AM
> To: af@af.afmug.com <mailto:af@af.afmug.com>
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mobile in CBRS
>
>
gigabit speeds, serve densely populated areas, and compete with
cable.
But how much is it worth in flyover country?
From: AF On Behalf Of Adam Moffett
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 11:36 AM
To: af@af.afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mobile in CBRS
If you're the government, the au
spectrum, CBRS is like
icing on the cake, nice but not mission critical, and possibly not
worth paying much money to “own”.
*From:* AF mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com>> *On Behalf Of *Dave
*Sent:* Wednesday, October 31, 2018 10:13 AM
*To:* af@af.afmug.com <mailto:af@af.afmu
On 10/31/18 9:06 AM, Joe Novak wrote:
" On the other hand, they get rewarded for carrying spectrum as an asset
on their balance sheet."
This is the most disgusting thing about the American auctioning system
right now.
Who in their right minds thought it was a good idea to just auction a
fin
channel in
> other spectrum, CBRS is like icing on the cake, nice but not mission
> critical, and possibly not worth paying much money to “own”.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* AF *On Behalf Of *Dave
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 31, 2018 10:13 AM
> *To:* af@af.afmug.com
> *Su
anchor channel in other
spectrum, CBRS is like icing on the cake, nice but not mission critical, and
possibly not worth paying much money to “own”.
From: AF On Behalf Of Dave
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 10:13 AM
To: af@af.afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mobile in CBRS
That makes
Adam - your statement is correct. The UE’s will most likely be over 23dB EIRP
and will need a SAS grant.
Mark
> On Oct 31, 2018, at 11:06 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:
>
> Oh I see. I think all of our existing UE have greater than 23dbm EIRP.
> So all of our UE will have to be registered in the SA
That makes it easier for the carriers to stomp out the little GAA guys :)
On 10/31/18 9:50 AM, Joe Novak wrote:
I think it's more likely that they will have a licensed anchor channel
and only aggregate 3.65 in the downlink, using different frequencies
for uplink. Carrier aggregation is a whole
Oh I see. I think all of our existing UE have greater than 23dbm EIRP.
So all of our UE will have to be registered in the SAS?
Sorry, I gave up following these rules after like 5 years of them being
1 year away, so I have no idea what's going on anymore. I guess I have
to catch up.
-Adam
I think it's more likely that they will have a licensed anchor channel and
only aggregate 3.65 in the downlink, using different frequencies for
uplink. Carrier aggregation is a whole different game of spectrum usage.
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 9:38 AM Adam Moffett wrote:
> One thing that was unfort
23dB EIRP to operate in Category A as an EUD (End User Device - which can be
mobile).To operate over 23dB EIRP the device has to be a CBSD and register
with the SAS.
Mark
> On Oct 31, 2018, at 10:37 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:
>
> One thing that was unfortunate about the NN license was tha
One thing that was unfortunate about the NN license was that mobile
stations had a stupid low Tx power limit. Basically mobile wasn't viable.
Is CBRS going to have that type of restriction?
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
38 matches
Mail list logo
