Brandon,
Depending on what your looking to do, my company Atheral might be a good
fit for you. We specialize in white-label solutions for ISPs, one of
which being VoIP. Everything is hosted in data centers across the
country (private cloud).
We are not the right solution for just an
I'll be happy to quote you our solution
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019, 8:03 PM Brandon Yuchasz
wrote:
> We are looking for a cloud based phone system that is fairly simple. We
> have a legacy phone number that can’t be ported. The phone company is to
> small and won’t / cant / isn’t required to? Port
We are looking for a cloud based phone system that is fairly simple. We
have a legacy phone number that can't be ported. The phone company is to
small and won't / cant / isn't required to? Port numbers over to other
carriers. So what we would like to do is forward that number to a phone
system
I would guess no.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 13, 2019, at 5:36 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
>
> Is solar interference polarized, such that it would affect only one
> polarization in a dual pol link?
>
> From: AF On Behalf Of Forrest Christian (List
> Account)
> Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2019
Is solar interference polarized, such that it would affect only one
polarization in a dual pol link?
From: AF On Behalf Of Forrest Christian (List Account)
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2019 6:18 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 820 Support Help
One thing to look
One thing to look at that often gives you a hint as to the cause is the the
signal strength during the period of interest.
An interferer rarely causes the signal level to drop. Instead the noise
(and sometimes the signal) level rises to the point where the radio cannot
maintain a link.
I've
Is there anything he can do to confirm interference or rule it out, short of
coordinating a different set of frequencies (assuming that is even possible)?
What do the big carriers do in such a case? Can the radios monitor for signal
level if the other end is muted? Sending someone up the
If it is interference then I would be checking with comsearch or one of
the other coordinators to see if anything recent has been issued for
license.
If not then a re-check on alignment would be the other step taken.
On 8/13/19 12:43 PM, Nate Burke wrote:
Any cambium 820 support people
6 or 8 months ago.
Jim Bouse
Owner - Brazos WiFi
979-985-5912
http://www.brazoswifi.com
From: AF On Behalf Of Dan Spitler
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2019 11:21 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ubiquiti UFiber
SNMP! When did that (finally) happen?
On Mon, Aug 12,
They were offering me about 17% off on switches when I was talking about
buying some volume. Ended up getting Edgecore instead.
-Adam
On 8/7/2019 3:31 PM, Carl Peterson wrote:
Speaking of FS, do other people get a discount off their list? We
have for a long time but it isn't much. Thinking
Uses Chirp frequency hopping modulation...going to test them shortly for
some projects.
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019, 10:34 AM Daniel White wrote:
> Looks like just another 900MHz IOT radio to me using FHSS
>
> [image: photograph]
> Daniel White
> Co-Founder - Business Development & Operations
> phone:
I think the shipping comes down a bit when you actually go to check out. I
was seeing crazy shipping costs up front, it still wound up being quite a
bit, but not what I originally thought.
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 12:14 PM Nate Burke wrote:
> Are you guys paying the massive shipping costs too?
That was definitely the case
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019, 12:58 PM Josh Luthman
wrote:
> Maybe the private power generator was better quality than the public
> government run service?
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
>
> On
Sounds like GIGE and hopefully fiber in the future for me then :)
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 2:06 PM wrote:
> Cambium equipment Ethernet circuitry is very susceptible to crc and frame
> check errors.
Cambium equipment Ethernet circuitry is very susceptible to crc and frame check
errors. Even with nothing but a cat5 cable it will have errors. Surge
suppressors that use solid state components exacerbate this problem. Even the
surge products they manufacture will cause this problem. So, I
Would everything else work with gas tubes as well? I'd prefer to buy one
part that works with everything.
I've been using the GIGE-APC on ePMP just fine. When you say Cambium, do
you mean 450x hardware?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH
Maybe the private power generator was better quality than the public
government run service?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 11:15 AM Lewis Bergman
wrote:
> The typical standard is a generator should be
Are you guys paying the massive shipping costs too?
One duplex LC/LC cable is only $12, but it's coming up as $34 shipping.
Each additional cable raises the shipping cost by $10-20 Or is that what
you mean by paying the tariff?
Nate
On 8/7/2019 2:31 PM, Carl Peterson wrote:
Chris, we need
Any cambium 820 support people lurking on here? I've been having
trouble with an 18ghz 820C link since the beginning of July and My
support ticket only get's updated by Cambium every couple days. I was
hoping that there might be someone who would be able to help me out with
a little quicker
As an FYI, if you don't "donate" the stream stops about every 10 min or so
and you have to start it up again. I was trying to watch a preseason game
this weekend and it kept taking me to the donate message then would go back
to the Roku home screen.
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 11:25 AM wrote:
> I
I think that Locast should re cast themselves as a digital backbone delivery
system to translators. They do have the legal right to re-transmit the signal.
Then develop a part 15 “translator” that looks like a Roku stick. You might
even have to go so far as to transmit the signal on a TV
SNMP! When did that (finally) happen?
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 6:22 PM Jim Bouse [Brazos WiFi]
wrote:
> We have been using it in production since July 30, 2018. Much testing
> before then.
>
> Nearly 100 subs on them so far and no issues in current firmware. Early
> beta FW had some memory
I'd tell them to fuck off and declare retransmission fees and agreements of
freely broadcast information illegal.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: ch...@wbmfg.com
To: af@af.afmug.com
Non Cambium equipment will work with both. Cambium needs the gas tubes.
From: Josh Luthman
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2019 9:06 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] mccowntech SS's
What place is that for both?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
The typical standard is a generator should be able to produce twice the
amperage of the load you expect. Maybe thats because genset guys like
selling bigger generators but all the docs I have seen from UPS
manufacturers state the same thing. They all produce cleaner power at the
mid range of what
What place is that for both?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 10:27 AM Chuck McCown wrote:
> No, it is a gas tube version. They both have their place.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Aug 13, 2019, at 7:56
The Ubiquiti ER-X-SFP allows a 2018 byte MTU on all the physical
interfaces, but will not allow an MTU larger than 1500 bytes on the
PPPoE interface. I guess this thing is going in the garbage.
-Adam
On 8/13/2019 8:57 AM, Dennis Burgess via AF wrote:
If you can set the L2MTU on the UBNT
Adam,
General comment: The packets aren't actually being fragmented. Most TCP
packets have the Do-Not-Fragment bit set, all equipment will honor
(except VPNs). However, when using a Mikrotik as a PPPoE server, it
automatically sets up some IP Mangle rules that modify the TCP MSS
(maximum
No, it is a gas tube version. They both have their place.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 13, 2019, at 7:56 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>
> Is 800-CAT6-APC a replacement for 800-GIGE-APC-HV ?
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH
It will run cooler too.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 12, 2019, at 8:53 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:
>
> I might be a weirdo, but I figure a 50amp subpanel is 12kva, so I got a 16kva
> generator for the 50 amp sub-panel fed by a 50 amp breaker from the main
> panel.
>
> The reason for the
Looking at last week's distributor stocking positions (which may now be out of
date), I suggest you try either Winncom or DoubleRadius
John
From: AF On Behalf Of Mark Frost
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2019 5:08 PM
To: AF@af.afmug.com
Subject: [ External ] [AFMUG] Cambium 820S 6GHz
Hi All,
I
Is 800-CAT6-APC a replacement for 800-GIGE-APC-HV ?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 1:38 PM wrote:
> Yes
>
> *From:* Eric Muehleisen
> *Sent:* Monday, August 12, 2019 11:32 AM
> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave
If you can set the L2MTU on the UBNT radio to 1508 or better yet 1510, then you
should be able to specify the MTU of the PPPoE to 1508, then you should be
able to have a full 1500 byte packets without fragmentation. Of course, if
UBNT can't do this, I would recommend not using them, but I
I can't speak to the Ubiquiti equipment, but PPPoE adds 8 bytes of overhead.
So MTU will normally be 1492, and the PPPoE client will normally enforce this
by modifying MTU advertisements from the client side.
What you want to do seems comparable to carrying 8 passengers in an 8 seat van,
34 matches
Mail list logo
