Re: [AFMUG] Aviat vs Bridgewave multi-carrier battle

Daniel is correct, and the notion that one could coordinate and license an 80 MHz channel pair with a 40 MHz pair separated by 60 MHz to somehow block out a 120 MHz chunk to then operate a 112 MHz bandwidth ETSI configuration is patently false. Any vendor (integrator, radio OEM or coordinator)

Re: [AFMUG] Aviat vs Bridgewave multi-carrier battle

e? > > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > > Midwest Internet Exchange > > The Brothers WISP > > > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Tim Hardy" > To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users

Re: [AFMUG] RV Park Fiber

My read is the RV Park is on very shaky ground here. Most RVs and trucks now have fixed antennas underneath radomes on the roof. There’s just no basis for restricting one from receiving satellite signals through these antennas - as Chuck commented, are you going to knock on their door to

Re: [AFMUG] Aviat vs Bridgewave 11GHz

Just confirming that this is actually two (2) dual core radios - one CCDP at 80 MHz bandwidth and the other CCDP at 40 MHz bandwidth with the two transmit frequencies separated by 60 MHz - correct? This will require couplers and associated losses on both ends (approximately 7 dB). Any attempt

Re: [AFMUG] HFT

Its a lot more complicated than that. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flash_Boys > On Nov 28, 2020, at 7:17 AM, Matt Hoppes > wrote: > > Sure but their operations could be. > >> On Nov 28, 2020, at 1:30 AM, Colin Stanners wrote: >> >>  >> I'm

Re: [AFMUG] 11ghz etiquette

Ken nailed it - all of this is Frequency Coordination / Efficient Spectrum Utilization 101 - there’s at least one “Coordinator” out there that could desperately use your help! > On Nov 11, 2020, at 12:52 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: > > It also pays to plan out your HI and LOW side towers and which

Re: [AFMUG] MG License AGL height margin of error

Hardy guy weighing-in! Mark and Daniel are both correct, except: Bullet point 6 should read: Any change in transmit antenna polarization https://www.rfvenue.com/blog/2015/07/01/polarization-polarity-and-polar-pattern-whats-the-difference Daniel’s points below come from § 1.929(d)

Re: [AFMUG] MG part 101 - why does license need specific hardware?

It is primarily needed for adjacent channel or non-co-channel interference situations as there can be wide differences in filtering. But even for co-channel, its important to know the practical threshold as well as the required T/I value that allows no more than 1 dB of degradation due to

Re: [AFMUG] FCC coordinate verification

Heck, when we were laying out the MCI system in 1971, the best maps in most area were 1:250,000 - and some areas out west, even worse than that. Try getting accurate anything at those scales, particularly when the contour granularity was up to 250’! > On Dec 28, 2020, at 3:13 PM, Chuck McCown

Re: [AFMUG] FCC coordinate verification

For FAA Obstruction Evaluations only and this is where the 2C survey requirement applies. FCC has its own set of rules and requirements.. From FAA FAQs on filing FAA Form 7460-1: 12. How do I get the latitude and longitude? The geographic coordinates may be obtained by utilizing a U.S.

Re: [AFMUG] 2+0 Co-Polar

A note of caution: Some vendors have been pushing the notion that at 11 GHz, one can coordinate and license an 80 MHz bandwidth pair along with a 40 MHz bandwidth pair separated by 60 MHz to in effect get a contiguous 120 MHz of spectrum. This is okay as long as you are transmitting two

Re: [AFMUG] 2+0 Co-Polar

book.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > > > <https://www.youtube.com

Re: [AFMUG] 2+0 Co-Polar

thing you feel is equivalent. > > > From: AF On Behalf Of Ryan Ray > Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2021 12:09 PM > To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 2+0 Co-Polar > > Hey Tim, > > Does this rule have a reason? Or is it just a rule for rul

Re: [AFMUG] 2+0 Co-Polar

inkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>

Re: [AFMUG] 2+0 Co-Polar

2+0 Co-Polarization will add couplers and losses on each end, and I believe that LinkPlanner automatically puts those in when you specify this. With the Aviat WTM, you would be using the WTM-42C (coupler version) which has the coupler losses baked-in to the specs. > On Jan 4, 2021, at 2:51

Re: [AFMUG] 2+0 Co-Polar

The dual-core WTM-4200 radio only suffers a coupler loss hit. I think you’re referencing the single-core WTM-4100 using Adaptive Dual Carrier (A2C) which has a significant power hit at 1024 QAM and above. > On Jan 4, 2021, at 3:01 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: > > Yeah, you can do 2 x 80mhz

Re: [AFMUG] Favorite high capacity 11Ghz XPIC backhaul

Whatever you end up with, make sure to pay attention to system gain. It is absolutely critical for modulations above 512 QAM.. Sent from my iPad > On Mar 3, 2021, at 6:19 PM, Darin Steffl wrote: > >  > Aviat > > Our link is solid > >> On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 4:02 PM TJ Trout wrote: >> Ahh

Re: [AFMUG] Employee Handling - Did I handle this correctly?

Comsearch was built on Friday afternoon keg parties - at least the first 15 years, till we sold the company to someone with a lot more sense and brain cells.. > On Aug 4, 2021, at 11:20 AM, Chuck McCown via AF wrote: > > Damn, I have a mini lunch party planned for today. But I missed out on

Re: [AFMUG] OT: Breakfast is served

Mid 1990s, $2,700 “lunch” for 3 at Il Giardino (French Restaurant in DC) with Tom Leming, VP of Engineering at MCI. I don’t remember much as there was a bottle of Louis XIV Cognac involved. Sent from my iPad > On Nov 1, 2021, at 7:19 PM, Robert Andrews wrote: > > $1800 dinner with my boss

Re: [AFMUG] Licensed Dish RF Pattern

Nate, I think this is the radiation pattern envelope that you were looking for. Keep in-mind that the RPE is “smoothed” over the peaks and does not show the valleys. scx2-190c171013.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document > On Nov 4, 2021, at 10:55 AM, Nate Burke wrote: > > We were aligning

Re: [AFMUG] C band 5G vs Radar Altimeters

Deja Vu all over again. Very similar to the OBE / adjacent channel concerns voiced in the 6 GHz unlicensed proceeding. The FCC’s total lack of understanding of receiver filtering in even current devices is astounding and its fairly clear that money / politics beats physics everyday. > On Dec

Re: [AFMUG] OT: SpaceX PCN

I haven’t seen the PCN you reference, but I suspect it is a standard satellite ground station PCN since 18 GHz would be their downlink and 28 GHz the uplink. Part 25.203(c2) covers the coordination requirements for ground stations in shared bands and the PCN must include an antenna horizon gain

Re: [AFMUG] Off topic by a long way

Chuck - we loved the video! My parents were both British and I have many relatives in Devon, the next county East of Cornwall. Looking forward to seeing more until Pamela & I can get back over the pond. > On Jan 21, 2022, at 3:03 PM, Chuck McCown via AF wrote: > > My oldest daughter lives in

Re: [AFMUG] LENT

Glad that shit is over. You’ll be happy with your Tesla, our Model Y is is 2 years old today and its been a great experience. The wife’s car and I still have the gas guzzling 911! Peace out. > On May 25, 2022, at 6:35 PM, Chuck McCown via AF wrote: > > Model 3 They predict Sept to December

Re: [AFMUG] OT Political

So how come there’s 133% democrats in the racial column as an example. On this question in particular, did they ensure the sample included the same percentages of minorities in every category? Maybe they explain all this, but I have better things to do with my time.. > On Oct 7, 2022, at 4:45

[AFMUG] FCC Proposes $62 Million penalty against Q Link Wireless for violation of EBB program rules

docs.fcc.govSo many redactions, it’s like reading the Mueller report.Sent from my iPad-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Re: [AFMUG] Killer 900MHz?

So, more likely one of these https://extension.psu.edu/juniper-diseases - these idiots need to spray their plants but it's always easier to blame it on everything else. > On Apr 20, 2024, at 3:27 PM, Chuck McCown via AF wrote: > > I would go with the vent as the number one suspect. > >

<    1   2