Re: [AFMUG] Cellular Unlimited Plans

I will know difference between Verizon and TMobile service in about month...MDVR is TMobile and Cradlepoint is Verizon... Jaime Solorza On Jun 17, 2017 8:36 PM, "Mitch Koep" wrote: A Good friend works as a Verizon Engineer He related that Verizon allows the first 20 G then

Re: [AFMUG] Cellular Unlimited Plans

Ouch From: Mitch Koep Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2017 8:36 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cellular Unlimited Plans A Good friend works as a Verizon Engineer He related that Verizon allows the first 20 G then throttles to 3G speed then after 32G it throttles to 1 Meg for the

Re: [AFMUG] Cellular Unlimited Plans

I would hit 32G in two to three days streaming. No streaming at 1Mbps. Looking at the last few days of usage, we used 31G Thursday, 7G yesterday, and so far today we are at 21G. I don't see this as a viable solution unless people force it into low resolution (which is only possible on Netflix).

Re: [AFMUG] Cellular Unlimited Plans

A Good friend works as a Verizon Engineer He related that Verizon allows the first 20 G then throttles to 3G speed then after 32G it throttles to 1 Meg for the balance of the month Mitch On 6/17/2017 12:07 PM, Jeremy wrote: Well, most of the 'unlimited plans' allow 25GB and then they

Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Sync

They send and receive the sync pulse one second forward in time so we don't ever need to see it. It's just a tiny lower-power version of the flux capacitor on the board. That's why the 450m needs only 70 watts and not 1.21 jigawatts. On 6/17/2017 12:27 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote: From what you

Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Sync

>From what you are saying it sounds like it is simplified version of 1588? >Something that is part of the ethernet rather than applied at the physical >layer. It also sounds like there is an NDA in place... From: Forrest Christian (List Account) Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2017 11:25 AM To: af

Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Sync

Did't need to... On Jun 17, 2017 12:22 PM, wrote: > Have you done any reverse engineering on it yet? > > *From:* Forrest Christian (List Account) > *Sent:* Saturday, June 17, 2017 10:57 AM > *To:* af > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Sync > > Cambium sync uses a different method

Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Sync

Let me try adding one more thing. IEEE 1588 is rather complex, cambium sync is a lot simpler.Some industries already use IEEE 1588 so for those it makes sense for cambium to support. Not sure if it does for this industry On Jun 17, 2017 12:20 PM, "Forrest Christian (List Account)" <

Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Sync

Have you done any reverse engineering on it yet? From: Forrest Christian (List Account) Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2017 10:57 AM To: af Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Sync Cambium sync uses a different method of injecting the sync pulse which is more compatible with high power and gigabit data.

Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Sync

IEEE 1588 ... and not sure. On Jun 17, 2017 12:05 PM, wrote: > So, where does it fit in the picture? > Is the L2 packet thing deployed or planned? > What is shipping with the current product? > > *From:* Forrest Christian (List Account) > *Sent:* Saturday, June 17, 2017 11:02

Re: [AFMUG] Netonix/Mimosa compatibility.

I would also suggest that you troll thru the netonix forum for discussion, and possible ask Chris S. there for some feedback. (before you go off spinning your wheels :) ) Regards. Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet & Telecom 7266 SW 48 Street Miami, FL 33155 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

Re: [AFMUG] Cellular Unlimited Plans

Well, most of the 'unlimited plans' allow 25GB and then they throttle to a level that would not likely support streaming, except at the lowest resolution. Most of our streaming customers average 250 GB per month. Hard to imagine that this will work as a replacement to a fixed home connection. On

Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Sync

So, where does it fit in the picture? Is the L2 packet thing deployed or planned? What is shipping with the current product? From: Forrest Christian (List Account) Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2017 11:02 AM To: af Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Sync The l2 packet solution isnt what they're calling

Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Sync

Nope. On Jun 17, 2017 11:58 AM, wrote: > Forrest, is it not ethernet based? > > -Original Message- From: ch...@wbmfg.com > Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2017 10:57 AM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Sync > > Canopy sync was originally a one second pulse on

Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Sync

The l2 packet solution isnt what they're calling cambium sync. On Jun 17, 2017 11:57 AM, wrote: > Canopy sync was originally a one second pulse on the sync wires on the > RJ11 jack. > Then they added sync over power which interrupted the POE current for a > few microseconds

Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Sync

Forrest, is it not ethernet based? -Original Message- From: ch...@wbmfg.com Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2017 10:57 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Sync Canopy sync was originally a one second pulse on the sync wires on the RJ11 jack. Then they added sync over power which

Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Sync

Canopy sync was originally a one second pulse on the sync wires on the RJ11 jack. Then they added sync over power which interrupted the POE current for a few microseconds once a second. Cambium sync, at least the one Forrest has talked about, uses some kind of L2 ethernet timing packet to

Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Sync

Cambium sync uses a different method of injecting the sync pulse which is more compatible with high power and gigabit data. They aren't close to the same. I can't be more specific than that. On Jun 17, 2017 11:50 AM, "Matt" wrote: So how does Canopy sync over power

[AFMUG] Cellular Unlimited Plans

Anyone trying them as a sole home connection? How does that work out? Streaming etc?

[AFMUG] Cambium Sync

So how does Canopy sync over power differ from Cambium sync?

Re: [AFMUG] Netonix/Mimosa compatibility.

at site "b" board revision is F at site "c" board revision is C Getting abnormal termination on one link at site "B" and on both links at site "C" Plan to do additional testing next week We do have additional netonix in stock - Original Message - From: CBB - Jay Fuller To:

Re: [AFMUG] Netonix/Mimosa compatibility.

Cable testing on a live / connected POE device such as Mimosa (GigeE + POE, and multi-polarity circuit) would yield different results. It is also possible that the results of the cable test have been tweaked in different version of the firmware. You have an interesting situation going one,