How comes the Cambium Sync version of the rack injector? I am really
hoping it improves ethernet and sync stability now that we are needing
1000base on PTP450i's more and more.
applied at
the physical layer. It also sounds like there is an NDA in place...
*From:* Forrest Christian (List Account)
*Sent:* Saturday, June 17, 2017 11:25 AM
*To:* af
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Sync
Did't need to...
On Jun 17, 2017 12:22 PM, wrote:
Have you done any reverse e
f
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Sync
Did't need to...
On Jun 17, 2017 12:22 PM, wrote:
Have you done any reverse engineering on it yet?
*From:* Forrest Christian (List Account)
*Sent:* Saturday, June 17, 2017 10:57 AM
*To:* af
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Sync
AM
To: af
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Sync
Did't need to...
On Jun 17, 2017 12:22 PM, wrote:
Have you done any reverse engineering on it yet?
From: Forrest Christian (List Account)
Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2017 10:57 AM
To: af
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Sync
Cambi
Did't need to...
On Jun 17, 2017 12:22 PM, wrote:
> Have you done any reverse engineering on it yet?
>
> *From:* Forrest Christian (List Account)
> *Sent:* Saturday, June 17, 2017 10:57 AM
> *To:* af
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Sync
>
> Cambium sync uses a diff
rom:* Forrest Christian (List Account)
>> *Sent:* Saturday, June 17, 2017 11:02 AM
>> *To:* af
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Sync
>>
>> The l2 packet solution isnt what they're calling cambium sync.
>>
>> On Jun 17, 2017 11:57 AM, wrote:
>>
>
Have you done any reverse engineering on it yet?
From: Forrest Christian (List Account)
Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2017 10:57 AM
To: af
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Sync
Cambium sync uses a different method of injecting the sync pulse which is more
compatible with high power and gigabit data
1:02 AM
> *To:* af
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Sync
>
> The l2 packet solution isnt what they're calling cambium sync.
>
> On Jun 17, 2017 11:57 AM, wrote:
>
>> Canopy sync was originally a one second pulse on the sync wires on the
>> RJ11 jack.
>> The
So, where does it fit in the picture?
Is the L2 packet thing deployed or planned?
What is shipping with the current product?
From: Forrest Christian (List Account)
Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2017 11:02 AM
To: af
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Sync
The l2 packet solution isnt what they're ca
Nope.
On Jun 17, 2017 11:58 AM, wrote:
> Forrest, is it not ethernet based?
>
> -Original Message- From: ch...@wbmfg.com
> Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2017 10:57 AM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Sync
>
> Canopy sync was originally a one second pu
nds once a second.
>
> Cambium sync, at least the one Forrest has talked about, uses some kind of
> L2 ethernet timing packet to send the sync over ethernet.
>
> -Original Message- From: Matt
> Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2017 10:50 AM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: [AFMUG] Camb
Forrest, is it not ethernet based?
-Original Message-
From: ch...@wbmfg.com
Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2017 10:57 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Sync
Canopy sync was originally a one second pulse on the sync wires on the RJ11
jack.
Then they added sync over power which
send the sync over ethernet.
-Original Message-
From: Matt
Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2017 10:50 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] Cambium Sync
So how does Canopy sync over power differ from Cambium sync?
Cambium sync uses a different method of injecting the sync pulse which is
more compatible with high power and gigabit data.
They aren't close to the same. I can't be more specific than that.
On Jun 17, 2017 11:50 AM, "Matt" wrote:
So how does Canopy sync over power differ from Cambium sync?
So how does Canopy sync over power differ from Cambium sync?
15 matches
Mail list logo
