bwahahaha now this is a funny one. I've been posting these same
discussions over on the cambium forums. I've basically been talking to
myself over there because it seems no one hangs out there, not even the
cambium guys. but for all my hard work posting replies to myself they
awarded me a
And +1 to the newer radios appearing to being more stable. Not all, but
most.
On 1/27/2016 6:04 PM, Sean Heskett wrote:
also for what it's worth the APs that seem to have the most problems
with the 14.1.1 software are the original APs from a few years ago
with the FSK port on them.
The
also for what it's worth the APs that seem to have the most problems with
the 14.1.1 software are the original APs from a few years ago with the FSK
port on them.
The newer APs and particularly the ones with the GLONASS GPS chip had the
least if any problems.
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 4:35 PM,
Yup, I've seen the out of range thing quite a bit.
On 1/27/2016 5:35 PM, Sean Heskett wrote:
so I gave up, our network and clients can't put up with all the memory
stack dumps, false DFS hits and registration failures that state "out
of range".
I downgraded the APs to 13.2.1 and everything
Yuck. 3.6 does the same kind of stuff. If a sector reboots, it can cause
an LBT hit. It'll boot up and not quite be on the correct timing.
Usually fine after a few seconds. Known issue though. DFS is different
with the 30 minute timeout. THAT really sucks.
I have faith in the software guys
alright so after digging into this and making some adjustments I think i've
got the DFS events settled down now.
*1. Issue:* The 14.1.1 upgrade on PMP450 APs using the 5.4 band will
delete "Alternate Frequency Carrier 1" and "Alternate Frequency Carrier 2".
*Fix:* I had to log into each AP
That’s very impressive progress, kudos and thanks for the info.
From: Sean Heskett
Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2016 2:58 PM
To: af@afmug.com ; memb...@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1 DFS problems :-/
alright so after digging into this and making some adjustments I think i've got
I will be opening a ticket with cambium but I wanted to let everyone know
this issues we just came across.
I updated all our 450 APs to 14.1.1 yesterday. On our 5Ghz 450s we use the
5.4 band. On all these APs the "Alternate Frequency Carrier 1" and
"Alternate Frequency Carrier 2" were reset to
Aaron,
That's great news - thanks for the quick response!
-- Darren
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Schneider [mailto:aaron.schnei...@cambiumnetworks.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2015 9:38 AM
To: af@afmug.com; Darren Shea
Subject: RE: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1
Well, I must
;
> -- Darren
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Aaron Schneider [mailto:aaron.schnei...@cambiumnetworks.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2015 9:38 AM
> To: af@afmug.com; Darren Shea
> Subject: RE: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1
>
> Well, I must correct myself! While t
fixing this.
Regards,
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Aaron Schneider
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 5:19 PM
To: Darren Shea; af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1
Darren -
We'll take a look but the external gain for 450D is locked
Aaron,
I had a question about a change Cambium implemented on the 450D radios,
although it's not new to 14.1.1 (I think it started in 13.4): the Power
Control section on the Configuration -> Radio, External Gain setting is no
longer adjustable, and is locked in at 25dB. OK, but the radio
[AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1
Aaron,
I had a question about a change Cambium implemented on the 450D radios,
although it's not new to 14.1.1 (I think it started in 13.4): the Power
Control section on the Configuration -> Radio, External Gain setting is no
longer adjustable, and is locked in at
ng these in 5.4G band, but the tx power should be correct.
Regards,
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Darren Shea [mailto:darr...@ecpi.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 3:58 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Cc: Matt Mangriotis; Aaron Schneider
Subject: RE: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1
Aaron,
I had
For anyone that may be interested, Cambium put up 13.2.1.3 (for Lite
APs) in the PMP450 Archive section.
On 11/25/2015 10:06 PM, Aaron Schneider wrote:
I can help if that is necessary. I’ll forward this on internally.
On 11/25/15, 6:02 PM, "Af on behalf of George Skorup"
h is now 14.1.1 for 450i/450 sectors, including 450/430 SMs), as
> having it on will impact the performance capability of the 450i AP.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> -Aaron
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Sriram Chatu
Regards,
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Sriram Chaturvedi
Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 1:06 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1 Release and PTP
Yes you can, Mark.
From: A
15 1:06 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1 Release and PTP
Yes you can, Mark.
From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>> on behalf of Mark
Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net<mailto:m...@amplex.net>
] Canopy 14.1.1 Release and PTP
Just trolling... ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Sriram Chaturvedi
Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 9:35 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1 Release and PTP
Hi Chuck, I was directly responding to Mark�s question on 430
�upgradeï
: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1 Release and PTP
How about 450i AP to 430 SM? I would like to start deploying 450i instead
of 450 for 430 upgrade projects. Do I have to get all of the 430 SM’s swapped
first?
Mark
> On Nov 27, 2015, at 11:21 AM, Aaron Schneider
> <aaron.schnei...@cambi
"right away" sounds ominous
-Original Message-
From: Sriram Chaturvedi
Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 8:00 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1 Release and PTP
450i AP will interop with 430 SMs. You don't need to swap the SMs out right
away.
Than
Just trolling... ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Sriram Chaturvedi
Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 9:35 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1 Release and PTP
Hi Chuck, I was directly responding to Mark�s question on 430 �upgrade�
project where I assumed he
AM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>
> "right away" sounds ominous
>
>
> -Original Message- From: Sriram Chaturvedi
> Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 8:00 AM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1 Release and PTP
>
>
How about 450i AP to 430 SM? I would like to start deploying 450i instead
of 450 for 430 upgrade projects. Do I have to get all of the 430 SM’s swapped
first?
Mark
> On Nov 27, 2015, at 11:21 AM, Aaron Schneider
> wrote:
>
> It should work, but at
rvedi
>> Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 8:00 AM
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1 Release and PTP
>>
>> 450i AP will interop with 430 SMs. You don't need to swap the SMs out right
>> away.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sriram
>>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1 Release and PTP
Very much like that already.
We watch frame utilization and as it gets high we hunt down high usage 430's
and swap those out, and fix any 450's running with poor signals.
There isn't a lot of point to swapping out low usage 430's so it's nice
:05 PM, Sriram Chaturvedi wrote:
Yes you can, Mark.
From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Mark Radabaugh
<m...@amplex.net>
Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 12:35 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1 Release and PTP
Yes you can, Mark.
From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Mark Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net>
Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 12:35 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1 Release and PTP
We have a number of towers to co
8, 2015, at 10:28 AM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> "right away" sounds ominous
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message- From: Sriram Chaturvedi
> >> Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 8:00 AM
> >&g
oun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Mark Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net>
Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 12:35 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1 Release and PTP
We have a number of towers to convert from 4 450�s with 90 degree sectors to
6 AP�s with 60 degree sec
t here.
>> >
>> >
>> >> On Nov 28, 2015, at 10:28 AM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> "right away" sounds ominous
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> -Original Message- From: Sriram Chatu
It should work, but at the moment I can’t recall if/when we tried this with PTP
mode. I’ll let you know.
450i - 450 isn’t really an “interop” situation like 430 - 450 was. 430 - 450
was quite a bit different, needing SISO to talk to MIMO with the way we did
MIMO at first (MIMO-B using both
Is it possible for a PTP450i master to talk to a PTP450 slave now?
I thought interop was only for PMP?
On 11/26/2015 11:38 PM, Matt wrote:
Is it possible for a PTP450i master to talk to a PTP450 slave now?
I see it made it to the support site today. How about putting up
13.2.1.3 for us with Lite APs that may want to go back?
I can help if that is necessary. I’ll forward this on internally.
On 11/25/15, 6:02 PM, "Af on behalf of George Skorup" wrote:
>I see it made it to the support site today. How about putting up
>13.2.1.3 for us with Lite APs that may
36 matches
Mail list logo