at different prices as not having enough
bandwidth.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Stewart
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 7:25 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Limelight Networks and TCP congestion control
Yeah ... just think of whack a mole here.. you slow down CDN network X
prices as not having enough
bandwidth.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Stewart
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 7:25 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Limelight Networks and TCP congestion control
Yeah ... just think of whack a mole here.. you slow down CDN network X
this may
Is this only from LLNW? I swear I've seen it from other CDNs as well. I
don't see any way around this other than throwing bandwidth at it. And
as you mention, this means upstream bandwidth and backhaul links between
towers.
On 7/8/2015 5:50 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
This has been discussed in
Find a way to shape bandwidth at your edge/core routers instead of at the
tower? Powercode, Azotel, and possibly others will do this.
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 7:15 PM, George Skorup geo...@cbcast.com wrote:
Is this only from LLNW? I swear I've seen it from other CDNs as well. I
don't see any way
This has been discussed in previous threads, but I just got off a call with
a customer where I was able to identify what content was being distributed
via LLNW and causing problems. Customer had bought a new Xbox and it was
downloading game updates. He was complaining that the game update
You can push it all the way to the border(s) and have the same problem.
You'll still need more upstream bandwidth. Because some CDNs think
bandwidth is unlimited. We should start sending them a bill for 50% of
our upstream costs.
On 7/8/2015 7:21 PM, Darin Steffl wrote:
Find a way to shape
: Re: [AFMUG] Limelight Networks and TCP congestion control
Is this only from LLNW? I swear I've seen it from other CDNs as well. I
don't see any way around this other than throwing bandwidth at it. And as
you mention, this means upstream bandwidth and backhaul links between
towers.
On 7/8/2015 5:50
What about lowering the priority of stuff coming from LLNW?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 7/8/2015 5:15 PM, George Skorup wrote:
Is this only from LLNW? I swear I've seen it from other CDNs as well.
I don't see any way around this other than throwing bandwidth at it.
And as you mention,
...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Bill Prince
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 7:45 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Limelight Networks and TCP congestion control
What about lowering the priority of stuff coming from LLNW?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 7/8/2015 5:15 PM, George Skorup wrote:
Is this only
you interpret selling different speeds at different prices as
not having enough bandwidth.
-Original Message- From: Paul Stewart
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 7:25 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Limelight Networks and TCP congestion control
Yeah ... just think of whack a mole
10 matches
Mail list logo
