ub traffic?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> bp
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/20/2015 10:05 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Management. VLAN.
>>
;>>>> you split management/sub traffic?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> bp
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 1/20/2015 10:05 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>>>>>>&g
2015 8:51:22 AM AKST, Bill Prince
>>>>>>>> <mailto:part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Not the AP side, but the client side. We have traditionally NATted all
>>>>>>>> residential subs on Canopy, and w
client side. We have traditionally NATted all
>>>>>> residential subs on Canopy, and were trying to do the same with UBNT.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> With Canopy it's easy, because the NATted TCP stack just passes through,
>>>>>> and i
orts are open, it goes to the sub's router (no impact on the
>>>>> SM).
>>>>>
>>>>> Not so with UBNT, as the public IP for NAT is also the IP for the CPE.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just wondering if anyone else has tried the CPE firewall to pre
1:22 AM AKST, Bill Prince
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Not the AP side, but the client side. We have traditionally NATted
>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>&
SSH ports are open, it goes to the sub's
>router (no impact on the
>>>>>>> SM).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not so with UBNT, as the public IP for NAT is also
>the IP for the CPE.
&
Behalf
Of Bill Prince Sent: Monday, January 19, 2015
1:47 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG]
UBNT firewall Nobody actually using the UBNT
firewall? bp On
1/14/2015 11:25 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
We
;>> the
>>>>>>>> SM).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Not so with UBNT, as the public IP for NAT is also the IP for the CPE.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just wondering if anyone else has tried the CPE fire
, January 19, 2015 1:47 PM To:
af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] UBNT firewall
Nobody actually using the UBNT firewall? bp
On 1/14/2015 11:25 AM,
Bill Prince wrote:
We notice that any time we use NAT on UBNT we
enerally a bad idea to use that firewall (at least on the access point
>>> side) as it supposedly cuts into your PPS capacity on the
>>> radio.
>>>
>>> Peter Kranz
>>> Founder/CEO - Unwired Ltd
>>> www.UnwiredLtd.com <http://www.unwiredltd.
east on
>>> the access point side) as it supposedly cuts into your
>>> PPS capacity on the radio. Peter Kranz Founder/CEO -
>>> Unwired Ltd www.UnwiredLtd.com
>>> <http://www.UnwiredLtd.com> Desk: 510-868-16
Message- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On
Behalf Of Bill Prince Sent: Monday, January 19, 2015 1:47
PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] UBNT firewall
Nobody actually using the UBNT firewall? bp
On 1/14/2015 11:25 AM, Bil
ide) as it supposedly cuts into your PPS
>> capacity on the radio. Peter Kranz Founder/CEO - Unwired Ltd
>> www.UnwiredLtd.com <http://www.UnwiredLtd.com> Desk:
>> 510-868-1614 x100 Mobile: 510-207- pkr...@unwiredltd.com
>> -Original Message
ile: 510-207- pkr...@unwiredltd.com
-Original Message- From: Af
[mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Bill Prince Sent:
Monday, January 19, 2015 1:47 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re:
[AFMUG] UBNT firewall Nobody actually using the UBNT firewall?
bp
nto your PPS capacity on the radio.
>>
>> Peter Kranz
>> Founder/CEO - Unwired Ltd
>> www.UnwiredLtd.com
>> Desk: 510-868-1614 x100
>> Mobile: 510-207-
>> pkr...@unwiredltd.com
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.
al Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Bill Prince
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2015 1:47 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] UBNT firewall
Nobody actually using the UBNT firewall?
bp
On 1/14/2015 11:25 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
We notice that any time we use NAT on UBNT we
: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Bill Prince
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2015 1:47 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] UBNT firewall
Nobody actually using the UBNT firewall?
bp
On 1/14/2015 11:25 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
>
> We notice that any time we use NAT on UBNT we get a
Nobody actually using the UBNT firewall?
bp
On 1/14/2015 11:25 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
We notice that any time we use NAT on UBNT we get a lot of login
attempts via SSH. Are any of you using the firewall built in? It's
not clear from the GUI interface whether this affects input or
forwardi
We notice that any time we use NAT on UBNT we get a lot of login
attempts via SSH. Are any of you using the firewall built in? It's not
clear from the GUI interface whether this affects input or forwarding,
or both.
What I'd like to do is block any SSH logins that are not in one of our
su
20 matches
Mail list logo
