That's called malicious interference and can and should get you fined and
shut down. Further, it is not WISP spectrum and never was. I have never
understood the WISP sense of entitlement with unlicensed (free) spectrum,
especially given that it is a population that is largely politically
Then Patrick
Mobile carriers really have no rights to be start using unlicensed spectrum
they pay the big bucks for license spectrum so what gives them rights to enter
the unlicensed spectrum? So they can trash the whole or some of the 5ghz
spectrum so we wisp cant have anything? Just like I
Tim, none of us have to like it but the right they have to use unlicensed
spectrum is exactly the same as that which permits you to do so.
On Mar 3, 2015 7:52 AM, Tim Reichhart t...@nwohiobb.com wrote:
Then Patrick
Mobile carriers really have no rights to be start using unlicensed
spectrum
My message makes it official. :)
Travis
On 3/3/2015 8:03 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
We talked about it yesterday :)
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mar 3, 2015 9:58 AM, Travis Johnson t...@ida.net
mailto:t...@ida.net wrote:
Im trying to avoid expensive licensed links. My customer base is too small for
now. If I have to spend money on licensed links for such a small area it
wouldn't be much more to just run my own fiber.
Thank you,
Brett A Mansfield
On Mar 3, 2015, at 8:42 AM, Josh Luthman
LOL, so true.
Regards,
Chuck
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Chuck McCown ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
You never regret running fiber.
*From:* Brett A Mansfield br...@silverlakeinternet.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 03, 2015 8:45 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 60GHz
Im trying
I’ve got 100 senior citizens using Roku. It’s the easiest one but only after
you set the channel up on your computer. That’s what hangs up most of them.
Rory
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 8:29 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re:
The range severely drops when you're getting more beamwidth and sacrificing
forward gain.
Have you looked at 28 GHz from CTI? I think that sounds like an ideal
solution for you.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015
http://www.firstpost.com/business/biggest-deal-since-autonomy-hp-buy-wi-fi-gear-maker-aruba-networks-2-7-bn-2132659.html
Travis
Anyone know if there is any 60GHz PTMP solution out there yet? All of my towers
cover less than half a mile so short range 60GHz would be ideal for me. I am
competing with fiber and would like to offer similar speeds.
Thank you,
Brett A Mansfield
Silver Lake Internet
You never regret running fiber.
From: Brett A Mansfield
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 8:45 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 60GHz
Im trying to avoid expensive licensed links. My customer base is too small for
now. If I have to spend money on licensed links for such a small area it
We talked about it yesterday :)
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mar 3, 2015 9:58 AM, Travis Johnson t...@ida.net wrote:
http://www.firstpost.com/business/biggest-deal-since-
Exactly, We just have to be more creative on how we deploy and own our
sites. Property, Property and Property is going to allow wisps to
mitigate certain areas that cause pain from the bigger monsters.
Antenna tech has come along way in the last five years and that will
be our saving grace.
I
We love 5.15-5.25 though. So far our customer testing is showing
performance very close to our 3.65 due to the low noise floor, and I know
you've been reading about how the 3.65 is doing.
Patrick
Telrad
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 10:03 AM, David dmilho...@wletc.com wrote:
Agreed but now there
I haven't seen this, and have never had an issue with our Samsung SmartTV.
However, we mostly use the Roku, as the interface is much better.
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:20 PM, Caleb Knauer cknauer.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
I've seen literally hundreds of Roku's in use in my adventures lately and
Really? I thought Roku was the worst interface. My parents inability to
use it concurred with that.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Jeremy jeremysmi...@gmail.com wrote:
I haven't seen this, and
Interesting. It does say small cell deployments though.
https://www.qualcomm.com/invention/technologies/lte/unlicensed
https://www.qualcomm.com/news/releases/2015/02/26/qualcomm-extends-lte-unlicensed-spectrum-enhance-mobile-experiences-and
If systems like this end up rolling out on cell
I remember a few years ago Doug Clark was going on about a 24 GHz PTMP system.
Seems like he may have actually purchased on.
Then there was the ultraviolet light system that required reflection from
airborne dust particles.
From: Josh Luthman
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 8:42 AM
To:
It can be done on the cheap.
Rent a trencher.
Get the duct. Put the fiber in the duct before laying it in the trench if
possible.
Lots of slack on both ends. At least 100 feet.
Use something the unicam machine for ends rather than fusion splicing or hire
someone to do the splicing.
Total
Who’s gonna buy ubnt?
Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
www.aeronetpr.com
@aeronetpr
From: Travis Johnson t...@ida.netmailto:t...@ida.net
Reply-To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Date: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 at 11:17 AM
To:
We use ATT MetroE to get Cogent back to us from Louisville. The MetroE
product is priced through FISPA. Essentially, the net is a little less than
$4/mb.
I assume you are hitting a data center there. Are you getting hit
with any cross connect fees etc? Finding data centers are raising
Doesn't Elva or whatever they are called sell a 38 Ghz ptmp system
Jaime Solorza
On Mar 3, 2015 8:46 AM, Chuck McCown ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
I remember a few years ago Doug Clark was going on about a 24 GHz PTMP
system. Seems like he may have actually purchased on.
Then there was the
So we help the Cellular industry by offloading data to WiFi. We help the
Cellular Industry by supporting Cellular repeaters that allow customers to
use their cell phones in homes and businesses where tower coverage is
spotty. Then we get our nuts kicked once they complete their build out and
we
Its PTMP, so if I run fiber it would be to the home. In the neighborhood I'm in
it's about 400 homes right now. They are on phase 2 of 9. The next 2 phases are
high density housing and then the rest are homes to total about 2400 homes.
Laying fiber will be easy and cheap for the remaining
Even in a small cell deployment, it's going add a whole bunch of noise in an
increasingly overused band. At a minimum this will require WISPs to modify our
minimum signal level standards.
It will be interesting to see who has more difficulty. They are trying to talk
to handsets and are used
its meaning interference
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Patrick Leary patrickleary.af...@gmail.com
wrote:
LTE has interference mitigation techniques most WISPs are not familiar
with. Many are used to gear that performs poorly in its presence. One
customer at our training recently explained
Yes,
I love my 3.65 deployment thus far and not looking back. Steadily moving
with more tower growth and more deployments.
We have 4 sites scheduled this year to go on and 1 is completed working
2 this next quarter.
We are doing a full 3.65 on each site and adding 5Ghz 450 where it makes
LTE has interference mitigation techniques most WISPs are not familiar
with. Many are used to gear that performs poorly in its presence. One
customer at our training recently explained to others how even as the noise
got worse, the link chugged right along, staying consistent. It does much
better
Frankly, it's worse Caleb. The rural broadband allocation of 3.65 GHz is
most definitively NOT WISP spectrum, but rather is spectrum WISPs can use
for a specific use. That in itself is rare, as the FCC pretends it prefers
flexible use rules that allow the market to decide best use. In this
Agreed. They get very defensive when they have no right to be.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Leary patrickleary.af...@gmail.com
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 6:31:28 AM
Subject:
Huawei.
On Mar 3, 2015 9:52 AM, Gino Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com wrote:
Who’s gonna buy ubnt?
Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
www.aeronetpr.com
@aeronetpr
From: Travis Johnson t...@ida.net
Reply-To: af@afmug.com af@afmug.com
Date: Tuesday, March
LTE has magic awesome sauce, but then they have been playing in their own
ultra-quiet licensed bands listening down below -100 against a background of
-150+. Noise for them is -140…
We can cope with narrower/beam forming sectors, higher gain at the CPE, etc.
GPS sync will be a must for
I think the point some are missing is the lesson learned from 900Mhz and smart
meters.
While 900Mhz is unlicensed spectrum, a single operator has managed to take it
over in California to the point where no other user has any chance of using the
spectrum for commercial purposes.
By this
Yep, lived it.
The discussions PGE ended with “Our lawyers say we are in compliance, take it
up with them”.
OK then….
We managed to keep some links up, but ultimately it relegated 900 to very low
density neighborhoods and links that needed to be -65 or better at both ends.
Shit.
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 9:03 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ::: More LTE tradgedy of the commons on 5 GHz..
The handset isn't putting out any power in 5 GHz. 5 GHz is downlink only.
-
Mike
Here in the border we have to deal with interference on licensed and
unlicensed bands from another country! Even our Public Safety system was
interfered with and had to be dealt with. Like Gino says, Its part of
doing business in these bands!
Jaime Solorza
Wireless Systems Architect
HP
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/3/2015 8:52 AM, Gino Villarini wrote:
Who�s gonna buy ubnt?
Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
www.aeronetpr.com
@aeronetpr
From: Travis Johnson t...@ida.net mailto:t...@ida.net
Reply-To: af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com
If you bury anything, bury fiber. Do not bury anything else new. No.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Brett A Mansfield br...@silverlakeinternet.com
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 10:47:41 AM
Aeronet!!!
Jaime Solorza
Wireless Systems Architect
915-861-1390
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 9:59 AM, cjwstudios cjwstud...@gmail.com wrote:
Huawei.
On Mar 3, 2015 9:52 AM, Gino Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com wrote:
Who’s gonna buy ubnt?
Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless
The handset isn't putting out any power in 5 GHz. 5 GHz is downlink only.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Jerry Richardson je...@richardson.bz
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 10:45:27 AM
I sit on both sides of the fenceWISP and SCADA...many SCADA operators
are switching to unlicensed bands to use IP and pass higher data rates that
serial radios can't carry. With everything going IP it makes sense.
Surveillance cameras and other devices require Ethernet so many are using
the
We have been installing shields ala' silence of the lambs where necessary.
Image result for silence of the lambs
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/3/2015 9:05 AM, Jerry Richardson wrote:
Yep, lived it.
The discussions PGE ended with “Our lawyers say we are in compliance,
take it
I refuse to use any CMS system of any kind because they're easily exploited.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: David dmilho...@wletc.com
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 11:17:27 AM
Subject: Re:
It is. All we can do is plan the best we can and react when no-one else does.
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jaime Solorza
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 9:23 AM
To: Animal Farm
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] More LTE tradgedy of the commons on 5 GHz..
Here in the border we have
Use Chrome?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Patrick Leary patrick.le...@telrad.com
wrote:
I did a full scan today with my Kaspersky. Seems I'm okay, but I don't
know s**t about that stuff.
On 3/3/15 12:03, Josh Luthman wrote:
But has the interface changed?
Yeah, it's been like 7 years.
~Seth
I don't know what it looked like before, but if you google/image roku
interface you'll see what it looks like.
--
Josh Reynolds
CIO, SPITwSPOTS
www.spitwspots.com
On 03/03/2015 11:03 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
But has the interface changed?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct:
Nowhere close to that now.
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 3:29 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Samsung smart TVs
This is what I remember:
http://www5.pcmag.com/media/images/266683-roku-2-xs-interface-menu.jpg
Gino, I followed your investing lead... you proclaimed $ 100 UBNT stock by end
of 2014.
Can I file my claim for stock under performance directly with you ?
LOL
Paul :)
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 12:37 PM
To: af@afmug.com
There are two products that we recommend without any hesitation, Roku and Ooma.
Never have a problem with either.
Rory
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 1:29 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Samsung smart TVs
This is what I
we are trying to get these srv record working for office 365
Adding through the web interface doesnt seem to get the format correct
Editing the record file doesnt seem to do it either
is there something Im missing, like is there somewhere I need to enable srv
records, we have never put one in
I know that was some discussion on this and some people said that mixing
firmware was a problem, even with 5.5.10. I hadn't seen the problem until
about a week ago. Had PowerBridge talking to a Powerbeam talking to a
PowerBridge which then link to a another PTP using NS5's and an AP on that
encapsulation dot1q VLAN_ID native? Unless I'm confused what you're
asking for...
On 3/4/2015 1:28 AM, Jason McKemie wrote:
If I have an incoming VLAN tag that I want to strip on a Cisco router,
how would I do so? I've got a sub interface configured on the physical
interface where the VLAN
If I have an incoming VLAN tag that I want to strip on a Cisco router, how
would I do so? I've got a sub interface configured on the physical
interface where the VLAN enters the router, the correct VLAN number, and an
IP address on the same network as the device at the other end of the cable
.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://afmug.com/pipermail/af/attachments/20150303/f33e4d9b/attachment.html
--
Subject: Digest Footer
I raised this with the CPUC. Same approach that although the part15 rules
allow them to do this, should they because of their position. Monopoly etc..
especially when licensed is available to them for this purpose. The CPUC were
not interested. Just quoted part15.
From: Af
Yeah, stop being cry babies and man up!
Gino A. Villarini
@gvillarini
On Mar 3, 2015, at 1:24 PM, Jaime Solorza
losguyswirel...@gmail.commailto:losguyswirel...@gmail.com wrote:
Here in the border we have to deal with interference on licensed and unlicensed
bands from another country! Even
Sort of off topic, but what would be the smallest AP we could get?
I'm thinking about using this system on a few of my towers to make sure we
never leave without a new customer, but I serve a very rural area.
I have some towers with 15 clients.
Is an omni + GPS sync or narrow channel out of
This is an interesting bit of commentary from one of our new customers. If he
wishes to identify himself, he will
Patrick Leary
M 727.501.3735
[cid:image003.png@01D055D9.2BA82B50]http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet
From:
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 2:31 AM
To: Patrick Leary; Nick Dewar
Subject:
I have yet to see a good FHSS radio get knocked off the air be it serial or
Ethernet. I can only speak about GE MDS, Freewave, MaXstream MicroHard and
CalAMP. Canopy 900MHz is still working in many areas of town even near
refinery and water companies MAS farm. TxDOT using MDS and Encom for
The 15 number comes from rural area. I have some towers that can only hit a few
homes. Of those few, some still have OTA TV and rotary phones. They have no
need nor want for Internet. Don't get hung up on that.
I'm looking at probably 4 of these strategically placed in my network to cover
any
Patrick's not here to make friends.
He does have a point, though. If a product is revolutionary, you can't look at
it the same way everything else.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Glen Waldrop
I figured it out, its the stupid office365 portal.
everytime i would run a check it had different errors and solutions, like
suggesting i remove the NS records because it thought they were MX records
(no clue on why)
at one point it saw one SRV record, but not the other, which was odd
because the
That gawd awful office365 portal gave me heartburn too.
I really hate the way they have taken something that should be really
simple and hosed up up beyond belief.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/3/2015 7:37 PM, That One Guy wrote:
I figured it out, its the stupid office365 portal.
so the minimum for a full 360 degree pop and still have near spec
performance would realistically start at 36k aside from site incidentals to
support the product?
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 9:21 PM, Glen Waldrop gwl...@cngwireless.net wrote:
That's what I needed to know.
- Original
Well, I'd say most of my friends are WISPs or in this business at this point.
One day I'll fire up an RV and do a 50 state tour, only staying on the property
of my WISP friends. I'd love it. I have LOTS of long time friends in this
space, but they tend to be as blunt as I am.
Patrick Leary
M
Tree density is seriously mixed.
Some places it is ridiculous, 100+ year growth, old forests. Nearly half of my
coverage area is over farmland (beef, catfish) so those places are usually an
easy shot.
The truly irritating thing about wireless in this area is cedar trees. There
won't be one
Population density is very low in some rural areas. New construction has been
pretty much nada, with the housing bust and wind farms, no new subdivisions, no
farmettes. The only houses are where farmhouses or 1 room schoolhouses used to
stand.
Then factor in you just can’t achieve 100%
Is the 50 user limit just a guideline or a software limitation?
On Tuesday, March 3, 2015, Patrick Leary patrick.le...@telrad.com wrote:
One BTS, included embedded EPC with MAC level authentication (cheapest
option) supporting up to 50 clients. Antenna could be swapped for any
other. NOTE:
Never mind, I see that now. How much is the 50 user license?
On Tuesday, March 3, 2015, Jason McKemie j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com
wrote:
Is the 50 user limit just a guideline or a software limitation?
On Tuesday, March 3, 2015, Patrick Leary patrick.le...@telrad.com
Patrick, I think I asked 2 or 3 times, and maybe it's my fault and I missed
your reply, but what are the costs besides the radio and the antenna?
Remember guys this isn't a pmp450 or rocket m5, there is a bunch of
software and hardware on the backend that must be in place before a
customer can
When: Thursday, March 05, 2015 2:00 PM-3:30 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US
Canada).
Where: via link below AND call in number
Note: The GMT offset above does not reflect daylight saving time adjustments.
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
...If you dareHell, if I dare. I have room for 100. No holds
Maybe. My time is tight. I think we last spoke when you were at Alvarion and we had acquired the old Friend.ly network...
John Woodfield, President
Delmarva WiFi Inc.
410-870-WiFi
-Original Message-From: "Patrick Leary" patrick.le...@telrad.comSent: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 9:08pmTo:
We use those 65 degrees even in a 3 sector arrangement. We have all the hard
data from the field that shows you gain nothing from using 90s or 120s over the
65s, and in fact you lose isolation and power density.
Patrick Leary
M 727.501.3735
I'll call you tomorrow John.
Patrick Leary
M 727.501.3735
[cid:image001.png@01D0560C.1758B470]http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of John Woodfield
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 10:14 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New feedback
Maybe. My time
Re-use of 1 is possible.
Patrick Leary
M 727.501.3735
[cid:image001.png@01D0560D.185BD720]http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jason McKemie
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 11:20 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] About $12k
Is there frequency
Not that I understand. I doubt we'll see much of that though in 3.65. I expect
the norm to be re-use of 2.
Patrick Leary
M 727.501.3735
[cid:image001.png@01D0560E.BB213170]http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jason McKemie
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015
Yes, that is correct. And right now I cannot them in stock.
Patrick Leary
M 727.501.3735
[cid:image001.png@01D055F7.8F916D20]http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 9:19 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG]
Which base station are you quoting, and what are the basic differences
between the models?
On Tuesday, March 3, 2015, Patrick Leary patrick.le...@telrad.com wrote:
Think of all the EPC options (and there are 3 forms) as shells:
1 is an shell embedded as a piece of software inside EACH
3x 65s for 360* coverage.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Jason McKemie j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 9:07:51 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] About $12k
Is there a
That's what I needed to know.
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Leary
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 8:16 PM
Subject: [AFMUG] About $12k
One BTS, included embedded EPC with MAC level authentication (cheapest
option) supporting up to 50 clients. Antenna
Not sure on the GUI, as I've never used it. We do have this set up for a
couple of customers though, and the following is what's in the zone file
for them:
_sip._tls IN SRV 100 1 443
sipdir.online.lync.com.
_sipfederationtls._tcp IN SRV 100 1 5061
If being the operative term. Until I personally test it, or I hear from
other regulars on this list that are using it, it's pie in the sky to me.
I'm not closed off to the idea, just skeptical for obvious reasons.
On Tuesday, March 3, 2015, Mike Hammett af...@ics-il.net wrote:
Patrick's not
The sauce better be really really good with all of those licenses. Seems
like u have a license for just about everything ? :)
On Mar 3, 2015 8:20 PM, Jason McKemie j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com
wrote:
Is there frequency re-use with a 3 BTS setup? If there is re-use, what's
the penalty?
On
The people here don't get out much.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Jason McKemie j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 10:25:50 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New feedback
tomorrow I'll post a 3 BTS arrangement. Do remember, I am not talking about any
sort of scale but onesy twosy.
Patrick Leary
M 727.501.3735
[cid:image001.png@01D0560C.C5AA4110]http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of That One Guy
Sent: Tuesday, March 03,
Probably 20k to start. Quality over quantity.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mar 3, 2015 8:56 PM, John Woodfield john.woodfi...@jwcn.biz wrote:
Patrick,
I haven't had time to read through all this emails. Can you summarize
No user limit, just the EPC limit in that form (embedded EPC). I can license
those in 50 to 500 user increments. For a centralized EPC, we have 2 gig
versions with 1000 user licenses (and a switch w/12 gigE ports and 2 SFPs), and
those are hot stackable.
Patrick Leary
M 727.501.3735
Cannot keep them in stock? Which one?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mar 3, 2015 9:20 PM, Patrick Leary patrick.le...@telrad.com wrote:
Yes, that is correct. And right now I cannot them in stock.
*Patrick Leary*
*M*
I certainly know that area well. I lived in GA for 10 years and did lots of
work in my fiber days around Tuscaloosa (and pretty much everywhere else in the
south).
Patrick Leary
M 727.501.3735
[cid:image001.png@01D05612.0EF483D0]http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet
From: Af
1+
Jaime Solorza
On Mar 3, 2015 7:08 PM, Patrick Leary patrick.le...@telrad.com wrote:
Have not heard Delmarva in a while. I grew up in No VA. The run out east
toward OC was a rite of passage...and my first ticket. Damned tricky MD
state troopers; they used to run 18 wheelers.
If I do
That's one antenna and no CPEs!
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mar 3, 2015 9:16 PM, Patrick Leary patrick.le...@telrad.com wrote:
One BTS, included embedded EPC with MAC level authentication (cheapest
option) supporting up to
Think of all the EPC options (and there are 3 forms) as shells:
1 is an shell embedded as a piece of software inside EACH BTS...a total one box
solution (we can do that since we are a SDR).
1 is a shell that's a small (1/2U) appliance supporting up to 10k subs and 2
gigs. These are stackable
Damn. I will be on tower if radio is bad or on drive back to El Paso on
Thursday afternoon . Next time
Jaime Solorza
On Mar 3, 2015 7:25 PM, Patrick Leary patrick.le...@telrad.com wrote:
When: Thursday, March 05, 2015 2:00 PM-3:30 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time
(US Canada).
Where: via link
is this msrp pricing with potential of vendor discounts or is it a hard set
price?
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 10:04 PM, That One Guy thatoneguyst...@gmail.com
wrote:
so the minimum for a full 360 degree pop and still have near spec
performance would realistically start at 36k aside from site
I suspect you could pull off omnis then. How's the tree density?
Patrick Leary
M 727.501.3735
[cid:image001.png@01D0560C.3C21D1B0]http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Glen Waldrop
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 10:19 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re:
No, could be much less. Give me a minute...
Patrick Leary
M 727.501.3735
[cid:image001.png@01D055F5.E1039040]http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 9:05 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New feedback
That's a tough nut. You need the power, but not the capacity, and it is the
power that cost the money.
Patrick Leary
M 727.501.3735
[cid:image001.png@01D055F4.F443A740]http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of That One Guy
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 8:56
What is epc?
I thought one radio was like 6500 or something ? Where does the other 5500
come from? Antenna and poe?
On Mar 3, 2015 6:26 PM, Patrick Leary patrick.le...@telrad.com wrote:
No user limit, just the EPC limit in that form (embedded EPC). I can
license those in 50 to 500 user
Right now our ramp is so sudden and massive it is taking time to adjust. An
exponential increase, literally. We buy components in 90 day cycles. 2 of those
cycles back I was quiet as a mouse. I waited until we were closer to LTE. No
one, least of me, cares much about WiMAX. Too much to overcome
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
