Chuck what do you think of the upgraded battery? $5,500
[Image]
From: Af on behalf of Craig Schmaderer
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 8:04:11 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] Tesla solar roof
Looks sweet.
OK, so you mean like ccr.net.
I’ve had some experience with DSR Global. What a mess. They in turn outsource
billing to AT Recently I was contacted by yet a 3rd level of outsourcing
that was looking to switch payment to a credit card. They had the customer as
AT They seemed amazed when
True. I wonder how many cycles it will do at that DOD.
From: Bill Prince
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2016 9:42 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Tesla solar roof
But did you notice that it allows 100% discharge?
Doing the same thing with lead acid would require 27,000 watt hours.
I think that the Rural Electrification Administration (REA, later renamed the
RUS) was probably the best government program ever created. You could borrow
at 1% or 2%, build a power company or later a telephone company, and serve
unserved people.
Create businesses that would help other
5000 watt of inverter is worth $1250.
(5500-1250)/13500=
31 cents per watt hour.
You guys have posted battery costs of half that.
From: Craig Schmaderer
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2016 6:14 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Tesla solar roof
Chuck what do you think of the upgraded
I read somewhere something about the number of cycles, and all I
remember was that it could do more than lead acid. I think it was
significantly more, but I just don't remember the details.
bp
On 10/29/2016 8:44 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
True. I wonder how many
Good thing they didn’t loan people money to build hotels or casinos.
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2016 11:33 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
I think that the Rural Electrification Administration (REA,
A loan at sub market rates is a subsidy. The government could have
collected more interest in a bond and therefore, lost money. I am not
saying there was absolutely zero positive outcome, just that there is
always a substantial negative impact as well. No innovation due to a lack
of demand being
I have a couple friends with season tickets that they have been selling
when they couldn't make the games. They're not going for THAT much, still a
lot more than I'd pay though.
On Friday, October 28, 2016, Bill Prince wrote:
> i heard much higher. First game was around
The RUS did benefit everyone. Lower food prices due to farms and ranches
having access to electrical power and communications.
The government made money on the loans. That was a benefit to everyone.
The telcos and power companies created jobs, commerce, tax revenue. That was a
benefit
About 1.5 time lead acid will do. It's something I am drooling over for
my remote sites... But the charging situation is the deal breaker...
double conversion in and out of AC... and you have to use their solar
If I remember right...
On 10/29/2016 08:44 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
True. I
OK, I’ll risk looking foolish. I have no idea what you mean by “CCR”.
Assuming you don’t mean the band or the router.
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of That One Guy /sarcasm
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 11:55 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Finding Sales People
Any worries about warranty, support, or firmware updates not buying from an
authorized reseller? I guess for that price difference some risks would be
justified. On the other hand, I wouldn’t want to get old stock with the
hardcoded passwords.
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On
Compound question.
They open up market to content providers and others that do not own
infrastructure in a given area. Similar to the whole CLEC idea 20 years
ago. But this time the facility owners are not forced to share, they are
going into it with the idea of sharing. Much greater chance
But did you notice that it allows 100% discharge?
Doing the same thing with lead acid would require 27,000 watt hours.
Double the cost.
bp
On 10/29/2016 8:34 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
5000 watt of inverter is worth $1250.
(5500-1250)/13500=
31 cents per watt
On the surface it sounds like broken DNSSEC …
My first few queries using our name servers failed and then they started
returning valid responses that were cached … strange...
> On Oct 29, 2016, at 11:40 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
>
> Not sure what you're talking about.
Chuck,
Do you feel government built/owned last mile open acces dark fiber networks are
a detriment to the market and/or compete with private companies?
Jared
> Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 at 11:37 PM
> From: ch...@wbmfg.com
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
>
>
Private money can be as stupid as it wants.
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016, 11:48 AM Ken Hohhof wrote:
> Good thing they didn’t loan people money to build hotels or casinos.
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Chuck McCown
> *Sent:* Saturday, October 29, 2016
On 10/28/16 6:04 PM, Craig Schmaderer wrote:
Looks sweet. I hope it doesn't cost more than the house.
I wonder how they'll handle all the roof penetrations you normally find
on a house.
~Seth
A broker that is hired by big companies to find bandwidth places. They sub it
out to WISPs, cable companies, etc.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Hohhof"
To:
You will have CALEA and 911 requirements too.
From: Adam Moffett
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 7:27 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Finding Sales People
I think the reality is somewhere in between what your boss and Joe are saying.
I'm sure it varies somewhat by state too.
As a
No Ken that's me as well... I skip all the Mikrotik posts Yawn
On Oct 29, 2016 9:22 AM, "Ken Hohhof" wrote:
> Am I the only one that can’t follow what you are talking about?
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *David Milholen
> *Sent:* Saturday,
Not sure what you're talking about. However, I tried the same lookup
using google DNS from here and got this result:
nslookup wletc.com 8.8.8.8
Server: 8.8.8.8
Address:8.8.8.8#53
** server can't find wletc.com: NXDOMAIN
I then tried it using our internal DNS
And TRS fund and NANP fees.
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2016 10:31 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Finding Sales People
You will have CALEA and 911 requirements too.
From: Adam Moffett
Sent: Friday, October
Yes, And I monitor the list of ips it bans. These bans are from our dns
server only.
If I turn off the rule asc with all DNS server bans then the command
functions as normal.
Somewhere in that list there is a misbehaving ip asc with the ability to
resolve from google dns
On 10/28/2016
I am confused. I don't know why anyone should get government money for not
doing something or being unable to compete. Of course once the government
gets involved in subsidizing anything it skews the whole market so it's
difficult to get them out.
That lambeth utopia explanation is a great
That reminds me, I guess you can get battery packs out of wrecked electric cars
for cheap. Saw an article in a magazine about the off gridders going that
route. Be great for solar comm sites.
From: Bill Prince
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2016 10:10 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG]
Same here. My DNS servers as well as AT DNS servers can find you, 8.8.8.8
can’t.
I see that your domain has 6 authoritative nameservers listed ns1.wletc.com
through ns6.wletc.com. Are you sure that your registrar has put glue records
for your nameservers in the parent zone (.com)? To
I asked the bills in my wallet about this; they seem fairly stupid.
Maybe a speech impediment or maybe they just don't hear me?
bp
On 10/29/2016 9:50 AM, Lewis Bergman wrote:
Private money can be as stupid as it wants.
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016, 11:48 AM Ken Hohhof
That may be.. I really never finished setting dnssec up
On 10/29/2016 11:33 AM, Paul Stewart wrote:
On the surface it sounds like broken DNSSEC …
My first few queries using our name servers failed and then they
started returning valid responses that were cached … strange...
On Oct 29,
How much of the first bond is left to pay?
Jared
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2016 at 12:42 AM
From: "Roger Timmerman"
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
As far as the first bond, the cities are covering it for now. We could be
contributing some of
Am I the only one that can’t follow what you are talking about?
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of David Milholen
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2016 10:18 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] google dns
Yes, And I monitor the list of ips it bans. These bans are from our
Yes, all that should be good.
I ran a DNSStuff check on it and its all Green.
On 10/29/2016 11:27 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
Same here. My DNS servers as well as AT DNS servers can find you,
8.8.8.8 can’t.
I see that your domain has 6 authoritative nameservers listed
ns1.wletc.com through
Just checked one outlet. Here's some bleacher seats:
For a box seat, quite a bit more:
bp
On 10/29/2016 10:18 AM, Jason McKemie wrote:
I have a couple friends with season tickets that they have been
selling when they couldn't make the games. They're not going for
I am reading this wondering how Huntsville Alabama will be proceeding. They
say the fiber will go in the ground because "Huntsville Utilities needs it for
its own monitoring network". Sure they do - there is a substation on every
road, right?
They were going to put the fiber in the ground
OMG
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016, 12:23 PM Bill Prince wrote:
> Just checked one outlet. Here's some bleacher seats:
>
> For a box seat, quite a bit more:
>
>
> bp
>
>
>
> On 10/29/2016 10:18 AM, Jason McKemie wrote:
>
> I have a couple friends with
> In all fairness, we are talking about fairly small projects done by local
> governments. It's not like there is a >Big Bad Fiber Network being built by
> the Feds.
Not yet.
> A great hospital might be stretching it, but why should you not have fiber?
Because you chose to live in BFE.
Depends on how confident you are in your market projections. Some would say
build the temporary solution to find where the customers are, then build the
long term solution. Of course if that were true, the LECs would all be
replacing their copper with fiber.
You may assume if you build fiber
Ken Hohhof wrote:
> Depends on how confident you are in your market projections.
True.
However, if we were to spend a trillion dollars on wiring the nation, I think
we could spare a few dollars to hire some guys with some applicable skills that
could get it right, on average.
Internet
I am getting >80% and it is still growing.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Hohhof
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2016 4:00 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
Depends on how confident you are in your market projections. Some would say
build the temporary solution to
That probably makes as much sense as I was trying to say. I think it was
"what a great many people deem to be a right" or something like that.
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016, 3:04 PM Ken Hohhof wrote:
> OK, you need better auto correct. I can’t decipher “dem to be a touchy”.
>
>
>
>
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016, 3:18 PM wrote:
> Lewis Bergman wrote:
> > I understand the attractiveness of the big government to solve a problem.
> In all fairness, we are talking about fairly small projects done by
> local governments. It's not like there is a Big Bad Fiber Network
Bill Prince wrote:
> We are now debating this same thing with regard to internet service, and
> further whether it should or should not be provided over fiber.
>
> I sit firmly on the fence on that last one.
I'm not. I'm firmly in the NO camp.
Fiber is just a tool. There is nothing magical
I would argue that they may be different, and perhaps incrementally more
expensive than lead acid to charge manage. But not double. so perhaps a
27,000 watt-hour charge controller for lead acid is $2000 (pure
speculation). The charge controller for a 13,500 watt-hour LI charge
controller might
What's stopping the WISP from using the same government fiber to provide
service?
They've already got the advantage as they are established and have the
customers.
Cost to connect, MRC costs while you build to break even, loss of margin
and ARPU per customer.
But yes, they compete with
> I'd just like to see how the whole cost structure comes out
$5 per MST port (12k MSTs total)
$100 per NAP port (2.6k NAPs total)
$3500 per bckbone fiber strand
Prices are 40% higher for small (<40k) or low density (<80 subs per mile)
deployments.
Google pays $208k per month.
Sounds like someone should read Atlas Shrugged
>
> Why not. If the government wants to help commerce, it should help
> commerce.
> If they can pay farmers for not farming, they should pay WISPS they injure.
> If they wipe out service providers they should be forced to buy them out.
> Just like
Chuck,
Thanks for taking the time to reply.
> I am not wholly against muni fiber systems in concept. But harm to existing
> service providers must be mitigated.
A publicly funded fiber network is years in the making. It should not come as
a surprise to any local business. WISPs are
I understand the attractiveness of the big government to solve a problem.
It just always that is a fairly poor short term solution and an even worse
long term one that always serves to stifle innovationand extend the life of
entities that should already be out of business.
I live in a rural area
One issue is cherry picking, if a fiber deployment will only serve the easiest
or most lucrative customers, that tells existing providers they should switch
to differential pricing where the less desirable customers have to pay more.
Or just shut down when the fiber project comes to fruition,
Funny. I was trying to figure that out too. You beat me to it.
I also tend to parse what Lewis is saying based on my feelings about the
aggressiveness of his auto correct...
bp
On 10/29/2016 1:04 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
OK, you need better auto correct. I can’t
Ken Hohhof wrote:
> One issue is cherry picking, if a fiber deployment will only serve the
> easiest or most lucrative customers,
> that tells existing providers they should switch to differential pricing
> where the less desirable customers
> have to pay more. Or just shut down when the
Chuck wrote:
>> In all fairness, we are talking about fairly small projects done by local
>> governments. It's not like there
>> is a Big Bad Fiber Network being built by the Feds.
>
> Not yet.
You know something I don't know? :)
I'm having a hard time believing BBFN would ever get off the
First, a subsidized rate below market is still cost. Maybe to those who do
accounting the way the government does it is zero cost. If the rate you
could get us 4% below the bond rate you just subsidized (or spent) 4%. I
really don'tunderstand why that is difficult to comprehend.
I have seen the
Lewis Bergman Wrote:
> First, a subsidized rate below market is still cost.
Who said anything about below market rates? Municipal bond rates are set by
the market.
> I have seen the size of Comcast. And concatenation uses its own money not
> mine.
I beg to differ. It's not like Comcast
Watching rerun from 2012, but anything to avoid election coverage and ads.
OK, just starting 2013 rerun.
Website says the competition is Nov. 4-6 this year, to be broadcast on Nov.
26.
https://www.punkinchunkin.com/
http://www.sciencechannel.com/tv-shows/punkin-chunkin/
> Great if I am a provider of services, and then I can come into your area,
> compete with you wireless system, using guvmnt provided fiber...
What's stopping the WISP from using the same government fiber to provide
service?
They've already got the advantage as they are established and have
I am not wholly against muni fiber systems in concept. But harm to existing
service providers must be mitigated. They must be allowed to connect for
free and be given some kind of pioneers preference such as no MRC marginal
costs for the first year or something like that.
-Original
"+1'
On Oct 29, 2016 4:56 PM, "Jaime Solorza" wrote:
> Hola kool kats
>
Lewis Bergman wrote:
> Government is rarely small at the level where it competes with an enterprise,
> be it local or otherwise.
You are kidding me, right?
Have you seen the size of Comcast?
> My apologies. Railing against government as a solution instead of the pariah
> it normally
If big money is being spent, spend it on fiber. He who brings fiber to the
home wins the whole game. Been saying that for years.
-Original Message-
From: fiber...@mail.com
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2016 3:48 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
Bill Prince
I'm not disagreeing with you in general, not even much in detail. However,
there are some instances of BFE where fiber really isn't the answer. Sometimes
it's just better for everyone to put them on satellite or pay them to relocate
:)
Jared
> Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2016 at 12:51 AM
>
So it forwards the argument Chuck proposed; salvage battery packs from
electric cars. DC all the way.
bp
On 10/29/2016 10:35 AM, Robert Andrews wrote:
About 1.5 time lead acid will do. It's something I am drooling over
for my remote sites... But the charging
I am kind of thinking the same thing when I hear the big carriers want CBRS to
be LTE only. So between the government selling licenses and the big carriers
getting additional spectrum for cellular data in big cities, how about somebody
take a little of that money and compensate us WISPs who
OK, you need better auto correct. I can’t decipher “dem to be a touchy”.
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Lewis Bergman
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2016 2:49 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
I understand the attractiveness of the big government
Lewis Bergman wrote:
> I understand the attractiveness of the big government to solve a problem.
In all fairness, we are talking about fairly small projects done by local
governments. It's not like there is a Big Bad Fiber Network being built by the
Feds.
> It just always that is a fairly
It kind of depends on what the majority of people in the entire country
thinks ought to be standard levels of infrastructure.
If you live in the country, which things are you willing to not have
just because there aren't as many people to distribute the cost for?
Certainly street lights
Long term, the result of the government proving any kind of service and
destroying the free-enterprise or a competitive market
1) R reduced or eliminated. Nobody making a profit, nobody investing in R
2) Corruption or excessive cost increases. Unions step in, cronyism,
government pensions,
Rory Conaway wrote:
> Long term, the result of the government proving any kind of service and
> destroying the free-enterprise or a
> competitive market
Hold up! Before we take the above as a given, we'll have to establish a few
facts.
- will government proving *any* kind of service
But charging Li batteries is nothing like charging lead acid and you
need to have the right kind of charger for specific types of Li
batteries... That's the issue right now. Otherwise I would be buying
Li batteries like Pez...
On 10/29/2016 10:47 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
So it forwards the
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016, 5:48 PM wrote:
> Lewis Bergman Wrote:
> > First, a subsidized rate below market is still cost.
> Who said anything about below market rates? Municipal bond rates are set
> by the market.
>
Chuck mentioned 1% rates for RUS. Definitely below market. If
Negra Modelo
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 10:27 PM, Jaime Solorza
wrote:
> Tecate is stronger.
>
> On Oct 29, 2016 7:01 PM, "Lewis Bergman" wrote:
>
>> I'm going to have to try Tecate. You sure are all over that stuff. I
>> drink XX currently but
John Wesley Hardin grave
On Oct 29, 2016 5:06 PM, "Josh Reynolds" wrote:
> "+1'
>
> On Oct 29, 2016 4:56 PM, "Jaime Solorza"
> wrote:
>
>> Hola kool kats
>>
>
most of this tesla nonsense i ignore, green liberal puffery
but this looks promising, as in really promising
and if batteries can fully discharge multiple times the $/kw is way offset
I envision a day when all shingles are solar cells. I hate the liberal
green puffery on solar because of the
I'm going to have to try Tecate. You sure are all over that stuff. I drink
XX currently but you have convinced me.
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016, 7:57 PM Jaime Solorza
wrote:
> Salud
>
> On Oct 29, 2016 5:57 PM, "Jaime Solorza"
> wrote:
>
> John
thats the point, its not additional, consolidating two things into one. Not
a fan of regulation, but considering some of the roof repairs ive done
coming in after a shoddy crafstman, I would hope some serious safety regs
go into play on this stuff
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Lewis Bergman
I don't think they would be more expensive, just more finicky... And
matching your charge controller cycling/dwell, etc. is much more
important for Li than just wet or dry for what we have now. And just
getting a Solar charge controller for Li is problematic right now, not
even matching
They look great butit is going to have to compete with both regular
shingles and electricity. Pretty tough. Maybe if California mandates it.
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016, 7:26 PM That One Guy /sarcasm <
thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> most of this tesla nonsense i ignore, green liberal puffery
> but
I understand it isn't additional but it is likely to coat now than double
of both combined.
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016, 8:16 PM That One Guy /sarcasm <
thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> thats the point, its not additional, consolidating two things into one.
> Not a fan of regulation, but considering
Tecate is stronger.
On Oct 29, 2016 7:01 PM, "Lewis Bergman" wrote:
> I'm going to have to try Tecate. You sure are all over that stuff. I drink
> XX currently but you have convinced me.
>
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2016, 7:57 PM Jaime Solorza
>
80 matches
Mail list logo