You see John? This is the problem. You get asked a direct question about
AGI, and you cannot even reply properly. Not even after decades of
learning. Shall I repeat it differently then?
How the hell is AGI ever going to function without one of the atomic keys
on Earth?
There are a few of those
One cannot disparage that which already makes no difference either way.
John's well, all about John, as can be expected.
I've completed work and am still researching. Latest contribution is my
theory as to the "where from?" and "why?" of the fine structure constant.
Can't imagine achieving AGI
On Wednesday, March 27, 2024, at 3:15 PM, Matt Mahoney wrote:
> In my 2008 distributed AGI proposal (
> https://mattmahoney.net/agi2.html ) I described a hostile peer to peer
> network where information has negative value and people (and AI)
> compete for attention. My focus was on distributing
This guy's non sequitur response to my position is so inept as to exclude the
possibility that it is a LLM.
--
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink:
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T5c24d9444d9d9cda-M09295b0b8f3b9a1334921b1e
Delivery
On Thursday, March 28, 2024, at 1:45 AM, Quan Tesla wrote:
> If yes, what results have you to show for it?
There’s no need to disparage the generous contributions by some highly valued
and intelligent individuals on this list. I’ve obtained invaluable knowledge
and insight from these
On Thursday, March 28, 2024, at 8:44 AM, Quan Tesla wrote:
> One cannot disparage that which already makes no difference either way.
> John's well, all about John, as can be expected.
What?? LOL listen to you
On Thursday, March 28, 2024, at 8:44 AM, Quan Tesla wrote:
> I've completed work and
Counter argument. How did neural networks evolve at all on Earth without
the fine structure constant (alpha)?
For AGI, thinking a biotech jumpstart would do the physics trick, it won't.
It's merely a desperate hack, most inelegant and riddled with single points
of failure. Essentially, a serial
Would you like a sensible response? What's your position on the probability
of AGI without the fine structure constant?
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024, 18:00 James Bowery wrote:
> This guy's non sequitur response to my position is so inept as to exclude
> the possibility that it is a LLM.
> *Artificial
John, in terms of dependencies, what came first, the fine structure
constant, or AGI? Thus, AGI is indirectly a function of the fine structure
constant. If alpha didn't trigger the triple-alpha process, what would be
on Earth today?
I'm not out to make my theory secretive. I shared these same
>
> The problem with finer grades of
> like/dislike is that it slows down humans another half a second, which
> adds up over thousands of times per day.
>
I'm not sure the granularity of feedback mechanism is the problem. I think
the problem lies in us not knowing if we're looping or contributing
On Thursday, March 28, 2024, at 10:06 AM, Quan Tesla wrote:
> At least with an AI-enabled fine structure constant, we could've tried
> repopulating selectively and perhaps reversed a lot of the damage we caused
> Earth.
The idea of AI-enabling the fine-structure constant is thought provoking
It is nonsense to respond to the OP the way you did unless your purpose is
to derail objective metrics of AGI. I can think of lots of reasons to do
that, not the least of which is you don't want AGI to happen.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 1:34 PM Quan Tesla wrote:
> Would you like a sensible
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024, 2:34 PM Quan Tesla wrote:
> Would you like a sensible response? What's your position on the
> probability of AGI without the fine structure constant?
>
If the fine structure constant were much different than 1/137.0359992 then
the binding energy between atoms relative to
I'm curious, "Tesla". What do you have against metrics?
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 9:08 AM Quan Tesla wrote:
> You see John? This is the problem. You get asked a direct question about
> AGI, and you cannot even reply properly. Not even after decades of
> learning. Shall I repeat it differently
Except for the measurement problem, nothing wrong with metrics at all.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024, 21:56 James Bowery wrote:
> I'm curious, "Tesla". What do you have against metrics?
>
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 9:08 AM Quan Tesla wrote:
>
>> You see John? This is the problem. You get asked a direct
15 matches
Mail list logo
