Mike,
On 4/14/08, Mike Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have little interest in downloading your software and tables and
> arcane howto for making it all work. In my opinion, you really can't
> call your product AGI until I can converse with it directly - either
> via it's own email addr
Jim Bromer wrote:
Ben G wrote: >>...<<
...
Concerning beliefs and scientific rationalism: Beliefs are the basis
of all thought. To imply that religious belief might be automatically
different from rational beliefs is naïve. However, I think there is
an advantage in defining what a rational thou
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Steve Richfield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You've merely been a *TROLL* and gotten the appropriate response. Thanks
> for playing but we have no parting gifts for you.
>
> Who is the "we" you are referencing? Do you have a mouse in your pocket, or
> is that the
--- Steve Richfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why go to all that work?! I have attached the *populated* Knowledge.mdb file
> that contains the knowledge that powers the chronic illness demo of Dr.
> Eliza. To easily view it, just make sure that any version of MS Access is
> installed on your c
Łukasz wrote:
Perhaps you could get some linguist to capitalize on your work with a
publication?
Coincidentally, my abstract for the Fifth International Conference on
Construction Grammar has been accepted for presentation at its poster session
this September. Because the conference this ye
2008/4/14 Lukasz Stafiniak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Stephen Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Serial processing [word by word parsing] with algorithmic backtracking has
> > no hope for on-line processing in real-time in a large coverage NLP system.
>
> I thi
Concerning beliefs and scientific rationalism: Beliefs are the basis
of all thought. To imply that religious belief might be automatically
different from rational beliefs is naïve. However, I think there is
an advantage in defining what a rational thought is realitve to AI
programming and how s
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Stephen Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My first solution to this problem is to postpone it by employing a
> controlled English, in which such constructions will be avoided if possible.
> Secondly, Jerry Ball demonstrated his solution in Double R Grammar at the
Ben G wrote: >>
FWIW, I wasn't joking about your algorithm's putative
divine inspiration in my role as moderator, but rather in my role
as individual list participant ;-)
Sorry that my sense of humor got on your nerves. I've had that effect
on people before!
Really though: if you're going to pos
This reminds me of Rod Brooks saying that AGI may already be here but nobody
has noticed it yet. With an AGI running a nice little business for you
there may be no great incentive to advertise the fact openly to the world.
If done well with a suitably flexible AI this kind of automatic content
ge
Publishing computer-generated books on demand, aggregating many small profits,
is an interesting illustration of The Long Tail.
Considering an AGI, I anticipate that knowledge and skill acquisition will be
facilitated by this principle. Obscure knowledge and skills can be acquired
from, and
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/14/business/media/14link.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
---
agi
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription:
http://www.listbox.com/member/?
Lukasz,
Thanks for the information about Word Grammar, which for anyone else
interested, is described here,
You asked:
(4) I'm interested in how do you handle backtracking: giving up on
application of a construction when it leads to inconsistency.
Chart-based unification parsing can be optimized
Well, that's embarrassing . . . . flame somebody and realize that you got part
of it wrong yourself . . . . ;-)
__
Mark> If you can't prevent a program from sucking up 100% of your CPU, you
aren't competent to be
ROTFLMAO! Excellent! Thank you.
- Original Message -
From: Steve Richfield
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2008 6:09 PM
Subject: Re: [agi] Comments from a lurker...
Mark,
On 4/13/08, Mark Waser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I then asked if anyone i
Steve > Perhaps you can relate your own experiences in this area.
Argument from Authority . . . . but what the heck . . . . :-)
Earliest scientific computing papers (one from the science side, one from the
computing side)
Computer Modeling of Muscle Phosphofructokinase Kinetics
Journal of Th
These things of course require a balance.
In many academic or corporate fora, radical innovation is frowned upon
so profoundly (in spite of sometimes being praised and desired, on the
surface, but in a confused and not fully sincere way), that it's continually
necessary to remind people of the nee
Bob Mottram writes:
>
> Good advice. There are of course sometimes
> people who are ahead of the field,
Like Ben Goertzel (glad to send him a referral
recently from South Africa on the OpenCog list :-)
> but in conversation you'll usually find that the
> genuine inovators have a deep - border
Good advice. There are of course sometimes people who are ahead of the
field, but in conversation you'll usually find that the genuine inovators
have a deep - bordering on obsessive - knowledge of the field that they're
working in and are willing to demonstrate/test their claims to anyone even
rem
Dear Fellow AGI List Members:
Just thought I'd remind the good members of this list about some strategies for
dealing with certain types of postings.
Unfortunately, the field of AI/AGI is one of those areas where anybody with a
pulse and a brain thinks they can design a "program that thinks."
20 matches
Mail list logo
