- Original Message -
From: Valentina Poletti
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 6:17 PM
Subject: [agi] just a thought
Not in reference to any specific current discussion,
I find it interesting that when people talk of human like intelligence
Vladimir Nesov wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 4:40 AM, Matt Mahoney matmaho...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Tue, 1/13/09, Valentina Poletti jamwa...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyways my point is, the reason why we have achieved so much technology, so much
knowledge in this time is precisely the
Valentina,
It's a v.g. point does refer. You're saying there is no individual without
social intelligence, and we'll need a society of AGI's. It does refer to
creativity. Every creative problem we face is actually, strictly, inseparable
from a whole body of creative problems. In trying to
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 4:40 AM, Matt Mahoney matmaho...@yahoo.com
wrote:
--- On Tue, 1/13/09, Valentina Poletti jamwa...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyways my point is, the reason why we have achieved so much technology,
so much knowledge in this time is precisely the we, it's the union of
2009/1/14 Valentina Poletti jamwa...@gmail.com:
Anyways my point is, the reason why we have achieved so much technology, so
much knowledge in this time is precisely the we, it's the union of several
individuals together with their ability to communicate with one-other that
has made us advance
Ron et al:
I suspect that you guys are thinking like classic nerds - ok we just
*multiply* the number of minds - a purely mathematical operation. But
actually social thinking is much more than that - the minds will really need
to *interact* - they can't just *parallel process* in the current
--- On Wed, 1/14/09, Christopher Carr cac...@pdx.edu wrote:
Problems with IQ notwithstanding, I'm confident that, were my silly IQ
of 145 merely doubled, I could convince Dr. Goertzel to give me the
majority of his assets, including control of his businesses. And if he
were to really meet
From: Matt Mahoney [mailto:matmaho...@yahoo.com]
--- On Wed, 1/14/09, Christopher Carr cac...@pdx.edu wrote:
Problems with IQ notwithstanding, I'm confident that, were my silly IQ
of 145 merely doubled, I could convince Dr. Goertzel to give me the
majority of his assets, including control
Cool,
this idea has already been applied successfully to some areas of AI, such as
ant-colony algorithms and swarm intelligence algorithms. But I was thinking
that it would be interesting to apply it at a high level. For example,
consider that you create the best AGI agent you can come up with
Chris: Problems with IQ notwithstanding, I'm confident that, were my silly
IQ
of 145 merely doubled,..
Chris/Matt: Hasn't anyone ever told you - it's not the size of it, it's what
you do with it that counts?
---
agi
Archives:
I guess something like this is in the plan of many, if not all, AGI
projects. For NARS, see
http://nars.wang.googlepages.com/wang.roadmap.pdf , under (4)
Socialization in page 11.
It is just that to attempt any non-trivial multi-agent experiment, the
work in single agent needs to be mature
and/or have other ideas for encouraging empathy (assuming you see empathy as
a good goal)?
From: Pei Wang mail.peiw...@gmail.com
Reply-To: agi@v2.listbox.com
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Subject: Re: [agi] just a thought
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:21:23 -0500
I guess something like this is in the plan
Not in reference to any specific current discussion,
I find it interesting that when people talk of human like intelligence in
the realm of AGI, they refer to the ability of a human individual, or human
brain if you like. It just occurred to me that human beings are not that
intelligent. Well, of
--- On Tue, 1/13/09, Valentina Poletti jamwa...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyways my point is, the reason why we have achieved so much technology, so
much knowledge in this time is precisely the we, it's the union of several
individuals together with their ability to communicate with one-other that
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 4:40 AM, Matt Mahoney matmaho...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Tue, 1/13/09, Valentina Poletti jamwa...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyways my point is, the reason why we have achieved so much technology, so
much knowledge in this time is precisely the we, it's the union of several
15 matches
Mail list logo
