i submit and pend this proposal:
Title: Dependent Action Cleanup Act
Author: D Margaux
Co-author: Gaelan
AI: 3
Retitle Rule 1728 to “Dependent Action Methods.”
Amend Rule 1728 to replace its entire text with the following:
{
The following methods of taking actions are known as "dependent
I thought for sure people would object and that I wouldn’t be able to execute
these intents without the aid of the contract scam... but somehow, no one seems
to have objected to these intents?
So... I act as follows:
Begin forwarded message:
> From: "D. Margaux"
> Date: February 9, 2019 at
I intend with 2 days’ notice to deputise for PM to appoint twg to be Speaker.
> On Feb 12, 2019, at 4:49 PM, D. Margaux wrote:
>
> Similar to the intent to demand resignation, this isn’t an intent with T
> notice. It’s a separate procedure. See CFJ 3679. So the dependent action
> standards
I award 6 favours in PLA to G. for judging these CFJs.
(These CFJ numbers are correct; I renumbered the ones assigned to Aris.)
> On Feb 13, 2019, at 10:24 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I earned 5 coins for judging 3705.
> I earned 5 coins for judging 3708.
>
> (If CFJ ID #s are borked here,
Yes, I do so. CFJ is judged FALSE.
> On Feb 13, 2019, at 6:56 PM, Aris Merchant
> wrote:
>
> You adopted the reasons, but arguably not the judgement. Could you say that
> you judge it FALSE, just in case?
>
> -Aris
>
>> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 3:54 PM D. Margaux wrote:
>>
>>
>> I adopt
> This may violate Rule 2478. In particular, under that rule the Referee SHALL
> declare a pointing to be shenanigans if e believes it would be ILLEGAL or
> INEFFECTIVE to impose a fine for it; otherwise e SHALL impose the cold hand
> of justice.
Not quite.
When a player Points a
[Please tell me this is my last one and I can finish up the Read the Ruleset
contest instead of judging stuff tomorrow].
CFJ 3706: "All Players are parties to the Rules as a contract."
I deliver the following judgement in CFJ 3706:
- First and foremost, Agora is [an instance of] a game
I adopt the below reasons as my final judgment In this CFJ.
I earn 5 coins and award myself 3 PLA favours for issuing the CFJ.
Begin forwarded message:
> From: "D. Margaux"
> Date: February 12, 2019 at 8:17:07 PM EST
> To: agora-business@agoranomic.org
> Subject: Re: BUS: Registration and
On Wednesday, February 13, 2019 10:08 PM, Gaelan Steele
wrote:
> For each player, I point my finger at that player for failing to reenact rule
> 2452 (“Trust Tokens”) with the same ID number and the next change identifier,
> in violation of rule 105.
The relevant clause of R105 says:
> On Feb 13, 2019, at 9:54 AM, D. Margaux wrote:
>
> I act on behalf of twg to support the intent to award D. Margaux the A.N.
> degree. Having received 2 Agoran Consent, I award D. Margaux that agree,
> with one supporter (twg) and zero objectors.
>
> I act on behalf of twg to support
I submit the following essays for peer review and degree awarding:
Beginner's strategy guide for Blognomic:
https://wiki.blognomic.com/index.php?title=Beginner%27s_Strategy_Guide
AOV Nomic's history: https://wiki.blognomic.com/index.php?title=AOVNomic
(The titles are "X of Nomic", not "X of
For each player, I point my finger at that player for failing to reenact rule
2452 (“Trust Tokens”) with the same ID number and the next change identifier,
in violation of rule 105.
Gaelan
> On Feb 9, 2019, at 9:51 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
>
> First off, NttPF.
>
> On 2/9/19 10:09 PM,
To satisfy the "The Herald SHOULD coordinate the peer-review process
and the rewarding of the degree", I invite commentary including
suggestions on appropriate Degrees for this, if any, to be provided in
a timely fashion. I'll do my best to give comments myself. Then if
there is any commentary,
I judge CFJ 3708 as follows:
When a person becomes a player, e agrees to the Rules, which includes
agreeing to the power structures in the rules. In that, e is agreeing that
the clauses in R869 overrule clauses in R1742, when there is a conflict.
So this clause in R869 power-3:
I submit the following proposal, No Academic Fraud, AI-1:
--
The A.N Degrees for D. Margaux and twg are hereby revoked.
--
On 2/10/2019 10:39 AM, D. Margaux wrote:>> On Feb 9, 2019, at 8:30 AM, Timon
Walshe-Grey wrote:>> I award myself an Indigo Ribbon.>> I
CFJ: "I own an Indigo Ribbon."> > This is CFJ 3705.
I judge the above CFJ as follows:
This is FALSE by the precedent in CFJ 3708 (noting this
I earned 5 coins for judging 3705.
I earned 5 coins for judging 3708.
(If CFJ ID #s are borked here, this refers to my two most recent
judgements).
17 matches
Mail list logo
