Proposals take effect clause by clause via this part of 106:
Except as prohibited by other rules, a proposal that
takes effect CAN and does, as part of its effect, apply the
changes that it specifies.
That prohibition is generally applied to proposals clause by
You could probably enact a rule with a similar text to the quoted
proposal that amends itself to contain the text of the most current
Memes submission. That would probably work closer to the way you intended.
On 11/13/2018 08:08 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018, Rebecca wrote:
On Wed, 2018-11-14 at 14:12 +1100, Rebecca wrote:
> It's not really a meme it's just the sort of joke proposal that I
> like but I know won't get passed.
This sort of joke proposal actually passes surprisingly often, and
frequently threatens to do a lot of damage to the gamestate when it
does
It's not really a meme it's just the sort of joke proposal that I like but
I know won't get passed.
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 2:08 PM Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2018, Rebecca wrote:
>
> > I create the following proposal
> > Title: I hate myself
> > AI: 3
> > Text: Rules or Instruments
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018, Rebecca wrote:
I create the following proposal
Title: I hate myself
AI: 3
Text: Rules or Instruments to the contrary notwithstanding, this proposal
shall act as though its text is the text submitted to a public forum and
clearly marked "Memes submission" by the last person
Given that the reason for the voting change had nothing to do with coins,
why not adjust the coin reward part instead of undoing the voting part?
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> So this is having some unintended interactions with the rule about earning
> coins. My current
CFJ 3663 (I think?) that I judged recently (can't remember which) that if
the Actor is explicitly named, and it's clear (with "on behalf") that it's an
act-on-behalf, the grammar of "On behalf of pokes, pokes does..." versus
"on behalf of pokes, I do" is inconsequential variation.
(It's based
> On Nov 13, 2018, at 10:02 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> I vote {ATMunn, D. Margaux, Murphy} for PM.
>
> On behalf of pokes, pokes votes Endorse G. in the PM election.
Does this work? Intention is clear, but reads like e’s voting on behalf of
emself.
Gaelan
>
> On Sun, 11 Nov 2018,
8 matches
Mail list logo
