On 7/12/2020 10:13 PM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-07-12 at 21:23 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>> Here are the votes withdrawals, 2 seconds before the voting period
>> ended:
>
> Did I really cut it that close? My usual aim for "before the thing
>
On Sun, 2020-07-12 at 21:23 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Here are the votes withdrawals, 2 seconds before the voting period
> ended:
Did I really cut it that close? My usual aim for "before the thing
happens" timing scams is at least 2 minutes, to allow for potential
email
On July 12, 2020 11:24:19 p.m. EDT, "N. S. via agora-business"
wrote:
>I vote like this and have tcbapo vote the same, except where indicated
Tcbapo is no longer registered. E stopped being your zombie when you were
exiled.
Falsifian
On 7/12/2020 9:02 PM, Nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Sunday, July 12, 2020 10:09 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>>
>> Scam, dunno details, nch is listed as conspirator, it involved Rule 2492?
>> 2017-06-28 Quazie +K
>
> Scam where I as
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Sunday, July 12, 2020 10:09 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> Scam, dunno details, nch is listed as conspirator, it involved Rule 2492?
> 2017-06-28 Quazie +K
Scam where I as Assessor manipulated the assessment order in order to give
ais523 and
On 7/12/2020 7:40 PM, Falsifian via agora-discussion wrote:
>> For the most part, this has turned into "when there's enough player
>> turnover that a majority don't have black ribbons, pass an AI-1 proposal".
>> So most defense for such proposals has been token at best (e.g. in the
>> current
For the most part, this has turned into "when there's enough player
turnover that a majority don't have black ribbons, pass an AI-1 proposal".
So most defense for such proposals has been token at best (e.g. in the
current rules I doubt anyone thinks it's worth spending Extra Votes to
stop it).
On 2020-07-13 1:57 a.m., ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
On 7/12/2020 9:54 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
I now fully understand conditionals.
If Germany attempts to move eir fleet to Swe, then I would like to
build a fleet in Stp/sc. Otherwise, build an army in War. (If only one
i think this was mistakenly sent here.
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 11:55 AM ATMunn via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I now fully understand conditionals.
>
> If Germany attempts to move eir fleet to Swe, then I would like to build
> a fleet in Stp/sc. Otherwise, build
On 2020-07-12 5:24 p.m., Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
Jason wrote:
Contracts are not bodies of law - currently the only body of law is the
one composed of entities with non-zero power, which means R2613 doesn't
necessarily apply to contracts (it could, but I think that would need
On 2020-07-12 3:43 p.m., Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
Falsifian wrote:
Our new economy chugged along this week, despite the looming threat of a
reset caused by the scam. A card-pooling lottery concluded and a new
trading system opened, both handled by contracts subsidiary to the
On 7/12/2020 9:54 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
I now fully understand conditionals.
If Germany attempts to move eir fleet to Swe, then I would like to build
a fleet in Stp/sc. Otherwise, build an army in War. (If only one build
is available, this is the order I would prefer)
For
I now fully understand conditionals.
If Germany attempts to move eir fleet to Swe, then I would like to build
a fleet in Stp/sc. Otherwise, build an army in War. (If only one build
is available, this is the order I would prefer)
For my other build, build a fleet in Sev unless it is occupied,
On 7/12/2020 6:10 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On 7/12/2020 5:53 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
>>
>> I'm not sure I entirely understood that conditionals were even a thing.
>> Could you give some sort of example of a conditional?
>>
>
> It's only for builds and retreats. In normal
Conditionals can only be used for orders that would need to be given after the
initial orders: retreat, disband, and build. I’ll give two examples (put in the
US to avoid revealing information):
If there are any New Yorker troops in Trenton, build a troop at Princeton;
otherwise, build it at
On 7/12/2020 5:53 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> I'm not sure I entirely understood that conditionals were even a thing.
> Could you give some sort of example of a conditional?
>
It's only for builds and retreats. In normal diplomacy, there's a brief
"retreats and builds" phase
On 7/12/2020 8:37 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-discussion wrote:
First of all, the first set of orders with conditionals is coming in
reasonably well. I've had to request a few clarifications or expansions,
but people have been helpful and responsive. I would like to make it
First of all, the first set of orders with conditionals is coming in
reasonably well. I've had to request a few clarifications or expansions,
but people have been helpful and responsive. I would like to make it
publicly known that I have prodded and asked for orders in instances
where I found them
I leave the Pirate Plundership.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Sunday, July 12, 2020 7:22 PM, Nch via agora-business
wrote:
> I consent to the following contract:
>
> {
>
> The Platonic Parrot
>
> A party to this contract is also known as a Platonic Pirate. Any player
> who is not
On 2020-06-22 08:10, nch via agora-business wrote:
The Purse of NAX is 5. I transfer 5 coins from NAX to myself, making
the Purse 0.
I missed this action a couple weeks ago and it self-ratified that NAX
has owned these 5 coins all along and they now exist in the possession
of the Lost and
On 7/12/2020 2:10 PM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-07-12 at 13:32 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
>> That presumes that I think bribery proposals are legitimate. I don't,
>> but if the rules explicitly make it so there's no legitimate way to
>> do something one is clearly
On Sun, 2020-07-12 at 13:32 -0700, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
wrote:
> That presumes that I think bribery proposals are legitimate. I don't,
> but if the rules explicitly make it so there's no legitimate way to
> do something one is clearly intended to do, I suppose that makes it
>
On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 1:28 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> On 7/12/2020 1:13 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote:
> > I vote as follows:
> >
> >> ID Author(s)AITitle
> >>
>
On 7/12/2020 1:13 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote:
> I vote as follows:
>
>> ID Author(s)AITitle
>> ---
>> 8473p Jason, G.1.0 Plain Old Bribery
> FOR. Consider this a
On 7/12/20 1:24 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
> Jason wrote:
>
>> Contracts are not bodies of law - currently the only body of law is the
>> one composed of entities with non-zero power, which means R2613 doesn't
>> necessarily apply to contracts (it could, but I think that would
Jason wrote:
Contracts are not bodies of law - currently the only body of law is the
one composed of entities with non-zero power, which means R2613 doesn't
necessarily apply to contracts (it could, but I think that would need
arguments rather than just assuming it to be true). AFAIK contracts
PSS wrote:
On 7/12/20 12:09 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
I wrote:
=== CFJ 3863
===
FALSE.
I award myself Blue Glitter for this judgement (10 coins according to
latest Tailor's weekly report).
Just wanted to note
ATMunn wrote:
On 7/12/2020 12:21 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-official wrote:
OFFICES
Office Holder[1] Since Last Election
Notary ATMunn 2020-06-07 2020-06-15
Not a CoE because
On 7/12/20 12:09 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
> I wrote:
>
>>> === CFJ 3863
>>> ===
>
>> FALSE.
>
> I award myself Blue Glitter for this judgement (10 coins according to
> latest Tailor's weekly report).
>
Just wanted to
Diplonomic Proto: anonymous, turn-based proposals
[I will submit some version of this before the next turn; technical
comments very welcome]
Replace Rule 8 with the following:
During the negotiation or order-submission periods, any Contestant CAN
submit a proposal to change these rules
On 7/12/2020 12:21 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-official wrote:
OFFICES
Office Holder[1] Since Last Election
Notary ATMunn 2020-06-07 2020-06-15
Not a CoE because I could be
On 7/12/20 11:39 AM, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
> While the contract attempts to overrule the Rule definition of the
> phrase in question, it does not explicitly attempt to overrule this
> clause from Rule 2613 (Effects of Instruments):
>
>An instrument or body of law is not,
Falsifian wrote:
Our new economy chugged along this week, despite the looming threat of a
reset caused by the scam. A card-pooling lottery concluded and a new
trading system opened, both handled by contracts subsidiary to the
Dragon Corporation. Discussion this week included the impact of
On 7/12/2020 1:49 AM, N. S. via agora-business wrote:
Cuddlebeam, nch, R. Lee, P.S.S., G., Bögtil, Jason, Falsifian,
Aris, ATMunn
Each of the above listed players has 125/10=12 doubloons.
I destroy my 12 doubloons in exchange for the plundership coins.
problem: Bögtil is not a player,
On 2020-07-12 6:11 a.m., N. S. via agora-business wrote:
I gave notice a while ago, forgot where but whatever. I flip Telnaiors
talisman to agora.
I already did that ~12h ago.
--
Falsifian
On 7/12/2020 1:31 AM, Falsifian via agora-official wrote:
Agorans' contract fun continues to keep our Notary busy, but not too
busy to announce some new (informal) Contract Awards. Let's hope this
becomes a tradition.
I intend on it becoming so, I just haven't had much time with Diplonomic
On 7/11/20 11:59 PM, omd via agora-business wrote:
> at 8:42 PM, Falsifian via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
>> I think this is missing 'replacing "more supply centers than units" with
>> "more Supply than its number of units"'.
>>
>> I'm not sure what the proposal does in the case that a
Ok i will give em this next whole week then
On Sun., 12 Jul. 2020, 10:26 pm Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-discussion, wrote:
> On 7/12/20 7:55 AM, N. S. via agora-business wrote:
> > Murphy missed eir report last week, I'll give him 2 days from now. I
> intend
> > to deputise for
On 7/12/20 7:55 AM, N. S. via agora-business wrote:
> Murphy missed eir report last week, I'll give him 2 days from now. I intend
> to deputise for ADoP to publish eir weekly report.
>
I think that could be violating the spirit of Rule 1769
Here's a draft. Comments on my notation for sponsored and unsponsored
proposals are welcome in addition to pointing out the usual errors.
-Aris
---
PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW
I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating a referendum on it,
and removing it from the proposal pool.
40 matches
Mail list logo
