On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 7:50 AM ais523 via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2022-02-24 at 07:40 -0800, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
> > I judge 3941 as follows:
> >
> > First, to be clear, The Device switch and The Device rule are not
> > "devices" by virtue of their names alone.
> >
On 2/10/2022 7:52 PM, secretsnail9 via agora-official wrote:
> I recuse cuddlybanana from CFJ 3941, and note that an apology or
> explanation is in order.
>
> I assign G. to be the judge of CFJ 3941. ("Rule 2465 is a Device.")
proto-judgement:
First, "the device" (the switch) is different
On 2/10/2022 9:23 PM, Aspen via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 8:24 PM secretsnail9 via agora-business
> wrote:
>> I point a finger at Murphy for failure to judge CFJ 3940 in a timely
>> fashion,
>> in violation of Rule 591.
>> I note that this offense is minor (about two
On 2/8/2022 11:01 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-official wrote:
> PROPOSAL 8636 (Points)
> AUTHOR: G.
> CLASS: ORDINARY
> FOR (6): Aspen, G., Jason, Madrid!, Murphy, cuddlybanana
> AGAINST (0):
> PRESENT (2): Falsifian, ais523
> BALLOTS: 8
> AI (F/A): 16/0 (AI=1.5)
> POPULARITY: 0.750
> OUTCOME:
On 2/8/2022 12:59 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On 2/8/2022 12:28 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 2/8/2022 15:16, Jason Cobb via agora-official wrote:
>>> Well it looks like we're going with recording people reading the ruleset.
>>>
>>> Reading will be done using the Short Logical
On 2/8/2022 12:28 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 2/8/2022 15:16, Jason Cobb via agora-official wrote:
>> Well it looks like we're going with recording people reading the ruleset.
>>
>> Reading will be done using the Short Logical Ruleset published on 8 Feb
>> 2022, which has 146
On 2/7/2022 3:34 PM, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
> An FLR annotation to rule 1789 references CFJ 1594, whose appeal found
> that players could be deregistered in a Writ of FAGE even if there were
> no Registrar.
>
> However, rule 1789 looked a little different at the time – it stated
>
On 2/2/2022 10:10 AM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-02-02 at 12:04 -0600, secretsnail9 via agora-official wrote:
>> (Pretty sure this works because deputization is allowed when an office is
>> filled if the time limit has expired more than 14 days ago. I think this is
>>
On 2/1/2022 2:48 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 2/1/22 16:38, Rose Strong via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Unless I am completely misunderstanding the CFJ 3938 ruling a quorum can
>> never be 1.
>>
>
> That's under the current rules, due to the clause that would be changed
>
ok here's an actually-finished proto judgement for consideration/comment:
On 1/30/2022 11:10 PM, secretsnail9 via agora-official wrote:
> I plan to flip my focus to Legacy.
>
> CFJ: It is not possible under the current ruleset for a CFJ to be destroyed.
>
> I temporarily deputize for the
oops hit "send" instead of "save draft" there - obviously unfinished lol
On 1/31/2022 1:32 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On 1/30/2022 11:10 PM, secretsnail9 via agora-official wrote:
>> I plan to flip my focus to Legacy.
>>
>> CFJ: It is not possible under the current ruleset for a CFJ to be
On 1/30/2022 11:10 PM, secretsnail9 via agora-official wrote:
> I plan to flip my focus to Legacy.
>
> CFJ: It is not possible under the current ruleset for a CFJ to be destroyed.
>
> I temporarily deputize for the Arbitor to number the above CFJ #3942 and
> assign it to G.
>
> I award
On 1/30/2022 4:35 PM, ais523 via agora-official wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-01-31 at 01:25 +0100, nethack4.org dicebot via agora-
> business wrote:
>> The dice roll was: 144
>> This is R2655, The Mad Engineer.
>
> The Device is on. CoE: it may have been destroyed by the passage of
> time. I cite CFJ
On 1/26/2022 11:16 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On 1/25/2022 6:20 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>> On 1/21/22 11:38, Kerim Aydin via agora-official wrote:
>> 1. Ratify without objection that "Hillary Rodham Clinton is a player."
>> Ratification is at power 3.1 and overpowers the
On 1/25/2022 6:20 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> On 1/21/22 11:38, Kerim Aydin via agora-official wrote:
> 1. Ratify without objection that "Hillary Rodham Clinton is a player."
> Ratification is at power 3.1 and overpowers the restriction on consent
> in Rule 869/48.
This step
On 1/24/2022 1:38 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
>
>
>> On Jan 24, 2022, at 9:34 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
>> wrote:
>>
>> Further, if it's trying to take into account past-only but forcing the
>> assessor to calculate "inst
On 1/24/2022 1:20 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On Jan 23, 2022, at 10:02 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
>> wrote:
>>
>> Yup, and if more than one person have that idea and all change at about
>> the same time, the proposal might
On 1/23/2022 4:34 PM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, 2022-01-23 at 16:24 -0800, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
>> [Note: While the Arbitor's office has been vacant and I've been referee,
>> I've been purposefully leaving a few days between my finger-pointing and
>>
On 1/23/2022 1:56 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 1/23/22 16:53, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On Sun, 2022-01-23 at 13:49 -0800, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
>>> * Having submitted an unconditional ballot AGAINST a referendum to
>>> adopt a
On 1/19/2022 11:09 AM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-01-19 at 07:30 -0800, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
>> I submit the following proposal, AI=2, called "Points":
>>
>>
>>
>> Create the following power=2 rule,
On 1/18/2022 9:45 AM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-01-18 at 09:34 -0800, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>> "A device is an entity with positive power"
>>
>> [Would this (1) make all rules into devices or (2) make
On 1/17/2022 1:11 AM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-01-17 at 10:07 +0100, nethack4.org dicebot via agora-
> business wrote:
>> The dice roll was: 28
>> This is R1688, Power.
>
> For reference:
> {{{
> The Power of an entity is a non-negative rational number. An
>
On 1/6/2022 2:14 AM, Sarah S. via agora-discussion wrote:
> Must be noted that I don't think anything whatsoever that's in the FLR that
> isn't in the SLR has legal effect
Not exactly what scope you're considering "legal effect" but the date on
which a rule change was made has legal effect and
On 1/4/2022 9:44 PM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> For reference:
> {{{
> The voting strength of an entity on an Agoran decision is an
> integer between 0 and 15 inclusive, defined by rules of power 2
> or greater. If not otherwise specified, the voting strength of
>
On 1/2/2022 6:10 PM, Aspen via agora-business wrote:
> Last year, there were a few days that held great personal significance
> for me. As of the 13th of September, I had been a player for five
> years. Just over a month later, on the 21st of October, I had been
> your Promotor for five years as
On 12/31/2021 3:54 PM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> Arguably, because a singleton
> switch is a switch that pertains to Agora, adding a new one would
> involve creating a new Agora.
>
Nice! Not that intent matters, but in writing the proposal I put The
Device Rule before The Mad
On 12/17/2021 10:54 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 12/17/21 08:30, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Create a power-1 rule, titled “Foreign Bureaux”, with the following text: {
>> PodNomic Correspondent is an office.
>>
>> For the purposes of PodNomic, Agora Nomic’s
On 12/12/2021 5:36 PM, Aspen via agora-official wrote:
> with non-negative integer possible
> values, defaulting to 0,
For future reference, this could be replaced with "natural switch" (as
defined in R2509, including 0 being defined as the default default).
On 11/16/2021 5:26 PM, Ørjan Johansen via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2021, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>
>> On 11/16/2021 6:38 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-official wrote:
>>> I perform the following actions if and only if they all succeed:
>>&g
On 11/16/2021 6:38 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-official wrote:
> I perform the following actions if and only if they all succeed:
>
> {
>
> I destroy 150 of Jason's coins.
>
> I cause the Hot Potato Stone to be transferred to Jason.
>
> I wield the Hot Potato Stone, transferring it to ais523.
>
On 11/15/2021 8:48 AM, Trigon via agora-discussion wrote:
> El 15/11/2021 a las 15:02, ais523 via agora-discussion escribió:
>> On Mon, 2021-11-15 at 16:00 +0100, nethack4.org dicebot via agora-
>> business wrote:
>>
>> Lots of nice short sentences here, so it may well be possible to come
>> up
On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 1:11 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
> [*] R. Lee planned to flip to legislation on Sept 18th, while an
> active player. E then deregistered (in Sept). E re-registered in
> October. On October 18th, Rule 2638 was amended to define the concept
> of "winds changing" and inserted
The self-destruct timer is hard to resist:
> The time window of a device is W days, where W is the value
> explicitly stated by the device, or 60 if the device does not
> explicitly state a value. A device ceases to exist at the end of
> its time window.
(not sure I'd
On 10/18/2021 9:32 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 10/18/21 12:16, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 10/18/2021 9:11 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> On 10/18/21 06:18, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
>>> We fixed the
On 10/18/2021 9:11 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 10/18/21 06:18, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
> We fixed the case where a proposal might be applied twice:
>
>> 4. (if the indicated outcome was to adopt a proposal) such a
>> proposal existed, was adopted,
On 10/8/2021 12:00 PM, Shy Owl via agora-discussion wrote:
>> I don't think this is an error that self-ratifies/needs a CoE.
>
> Is it sufficient to just correct this in future reports then?
>
> --
>
> Shy Owl
Yes, that works fine. -G.
On 10/8/2021 11:24 AM, Shy Owl via agora-official wrote:
> 24-Aug-21 R. Lee deregisters slam_joe without 3 objections.
> 24-Aug-21 R. Lee deregisters Aenet without 3 objections.
> 24-Aug-21 R. Lee deregisters Ubercrow without 3 objections.
> 19-Sep-21 R. Lee deregisters in a Writ of
Proto: our game theory roots
coauthor: ATMunn
[
- Awards controversial proposals that are adopted instead of trivial
bugfixes that everyone feels obliged to vote for.
- Brings back some of our old (as in: original ruleset) concept of game
theory against voting.
Amend Rule 2623 (Popular
On 10/7/2021 9:55 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> THE INSANITY CLAUSES
While I didn't end up waiting past the 4-day waiting period, as can be
seen from the text that time frame is irrelevant.
Obviously I could still slip another doc in (and if worried about
dictatorship, pledges etc. aren't much
On 10/6/2021 12:08 PM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> I guess you could make the "act on behalf" prohibitions also act as
> prohibitions on things that a promise could do. That would sadden me a
> little, because the equivalent of an "I become inactive." promise
> (which I simulated using
One subject of conversation on discord this month has been what should
inactive players be allowed to do in general (thinking mostly about
minimally-present people) and also what limits there should be to
act-on-behalf. This parallels what happened with zombies in 2018, when
act-on-behalf was
On 10/6/2021 11:07 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On 10/6/2021 4:58 AM, Cuddle Beam via agora-business wrote:
>> With all due respects to Jumble who sees our contract as more of a way to
>> screw me than a deal at this point-
>>
>> I Plan to Flip my Focus to Compliance.
>> I Grant my Ministry's
On 10/6/2021 4:58 AM, Cuddle Beam via agora-business wrote:
> With all due respects to Jumble who sees our contract as more of a way to
> screw me than a deal at this point-
>
> I Plan to Flip my Focus to Compliance.
> I Grant my Ministry's Focus to myself.
If looking at the direct consequence
On 10/6/2021 7:10 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Planning History
> -
> 18-Sep Cuddlebeam Legacy -> Participation
> 18-Sep R. Lee Compliance -> Legislation (deregistered)
> 20-Sep Jason Legislation -> Legislation
> 29-Sep G.
On 10/5/2021 2:18 PM, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
>> 8613* Jason, Trigon 3.0 The Name of the Win Cards v2
> AGAINST (just a personal preference vote, I don't think this breaks
> anything, and think new names might be helpful to avoid the "V" clash,
> but don't like the choice
On 10/5/2021 2:29 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote:
>> 8617& nix, G. 1.0 Forgiveness
> PRESENT: Need context.
Context is that while the Fugitive list has been in the Scroll for a long
time, it was never official and is somewhat inaccurate for being not
maintained
On 10/3/2021 9:26 PM, Aspen via agora-official wrote:
> 8629* G., Telna, nix, [3] 3.0 Independence Day
> [3] CuddleBeam, cuddlybanana, Jason
Not a CoE (will leave that up to the Promotor if appropriate) but missing
coauthor Gaelan, who was really the main author and deserves the
I'm still accepting text for THE INSANITY CLAUSES. 10 coins per 80
characters - that's dirt cheap!!! Text can be provided privately.
[Addendum: I won't purposefully reveal who provided any particular text,
nor will I put anything in THE INSANITY CLAUSES or the surrounding message
other than
On 9/23/2021 10:00 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> However, Rule 2140 is not the only Rule that governs how lower-powered
> Rules affect higher-powered Rules. Rule 217's second paragraph states
> when lower-powered definitions may affect higher-powered Rules.
I don't think it's
On 9/26/2021 5:15 PM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-09-27 at 02:00 +0200, nethack4.org dicebot via agora-
> business wrote:
>> The dice roll was: 140
>> This is R2646, Activity.
>
> For reference:
>
> {{{
> Activity is a player switch tracked by the Registrar, with
On 9/26/2021 5:55 PM, Telna via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 2021-09-27 07:00, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Telna wrote:
>>> (and of course, while the idea of us permanently living in the shadow
>>> of a rule that claims absolute authority over us forever and nothing
>>> else
On 9/23/2021 11:03 AM, nix via agora-business wrote:
> This Finale Script has enough votes, so I apply it. I begin the Finale.
> Best of luck!
Remember, the first person to bet on the winner will get a Victory Card!
VALID BETS: Jason, Telna, Falsifian, cuddlybanana (rose), Aspen.
Bets are
[Just taking a snapshot, so sharing on DIS]
Focuses after Sept 1 Monthly Planning
(straight copy of R. Lee's 1-Sep ratified report)
Compliance (2): Telna, R. Lee
Legacy (6): ATMunn, Cuddlebeam, Falsifian,Trigon,
On 9/19/2021 7:42 PM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, 2021-09-19 at 18:52 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 9/19/2021 6:36 PM, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
>>> We
>>> used to have an explicit rule that allowed players to
On 9/19/2021 7:11 PM, Telna via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 2021-09-20 01:41, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>>
>> On 9/19/2021 2:02 AM, Telna via agora-official wrote:
>>> I recuse R. Lee from CFJs 3929 and 3930. (E is deregistered).
>>> I a
On 9/19/2021 6:36 PM, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
> We
> used to have an explicit rule that allowed players to win by proposal –
> wins as a consequence of a proposal passing wouldn't have been valid
> without that rule. It's since been repealed, and to win the game by
> proposal nowadays,
On 9/19/2021 2:02 AM, Telna via agora-official wrote:
> I recuse R. Lee from CFJs 3929 and 3930. (E is deregistered).
> I assign CFJs 3929 and 3930 to Jason.
Note that if R. Lee is not late judging, this fails. The rules are
written so that you must be a player to be assigned as a judge, but
On 9/17/2021 6:53 PM, Telna via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 2021-09-18 06:00, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 9/17/2021 12:52 PM, Sarah S. via agora-business wrote:
>>> I spend 2 BBGs to give one blot to Trigon and I spend 2 BBGs to give one
>>> blot to ATMunn
>>>
>>
>> Fun!
On 9/15/2021 11:05 AM, nix via agora-business wrote:
> {
>
> Agora formally forgives all fugitives listed on the most recent scroll
> of Agora.
>
> }
[Minor technical thing: Fugitives are now a term of art in R2555.
Shelvacu was the only one, now expunged. So there are *no* fugitives
listed
On 9/11/2021 1:52 AM, Aspen via agora-discussion wrote:
> 8603& Jason, Bucky2.0 Buying Strength Eligibility
> 8604& R. Lee, G. 2.0 Stony Silence
> 8605& G., Ørjan 1.0 Covered under warranty
Missing the proposal made by the adoption of proposal
On 9/5/2021 12:37 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On 9/5/2021 8:51 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 9/5/21 11:33, Sarah S. via agora-business wrote:
>>> Contract doesnt work, I said 'pendants' when i meant 'blot-b-gones'. I
>>> intend to destroy this contract without objection
>>
>>
>>
On 9/5/2021 8:51 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 9/5/21 11:33, Sarah S. via agora-business wrote:
>> Contract doesnt work, I said 'pendants' when i meant 'blot-b-gones'. I
>> intend to destroy this contract without objection
>
>
> This is not resolvable. Contracts can only be
On 9/4/2021 11:52 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-official wrote:
> [I'm not sure if the following is part of weekly duties or not, likely not
> but who knows]
>
> Mad Engineer's Weekly Device Report: The device is currently off.
>
Wanted to expand on this comment.
I think it's more likely that
On 9/1/2021 9:39 AM, Falsifian via agora-business wrote:
> (I didn't closely follow the CFJ about randomization so not sure if
> this intent was affected.)
>
Shouldn't affect it, the random discord draw was done about 24 hours
before I published the intent, and the cfj generally found that
On 8/31/2021 9:57 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On 8/30/2021 8:58 PM, Sarah S. via agora-discussion wrote:
>> - Hot Potato Stone (Weekly, 100%): This stone obeys special rules that
>> override other applicable rules to the extent they conflict. When this
>> stone is wielded, the wielder gains 8
On 8/30/2021 8:58 PM, Sarah S. via agora-discussion wrote:
> - Hot Potato Stone (Weekly, 100%): This stone obeys special rules that
> override other applicable rules to the extent they conflict. When this
> stone is wielded, the wielder gains 8 boatloads of coins if the wielder, in
> the same
On 8/31/2021 12:22 AM, Aspen via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 12:06 AM Sarah S. wrote:
>> I think the CFJ called on your proposal is the longest and most
>> controversial CFJ I at least have ever seen. Sorry for all the bother about
>> that.
>
> It's definitely in my top
On 8/29/2021 9:58 PM, Sarah S. via agora-business wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 10:15 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> I vote:
>>
>>>
>> ---
>>> 8602& R. Lee
On 8/24/2021 7:36 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On 8/23/2021 5:11 PM, Telna via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 2021-08-24 07:11, ATMunn via agora-business wrote:
>>> On 8/15/2021 22:39, Telna via agora-official wrote:
Following recusal, I assign the reconsideration of CFJ 3922 to ATMunn.
On 8/24/2021 1:52 AM, Sarah S. via agora-business wrote:
> - Hot Potato Stone (Weekly, 100%): You must transfer this stone to a player
> of your choice
> who has never owned this stone since the last time agora has owned it. Then
> the original wielder gains 8 boatloads of coins.
> SPECIAL RULE:
On 8/22/2021 11:39 AM, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
> G. wrote:
>
>> I submit the following proposal, "fix win lockouts", AI-2 please.
>
> Note: this doesn't cause winning conditions to override "impure players
> can't win", it just prevents post-win cleanups from occurring unless
On 8/16/2021 10:09 AM, Trigon via agora-business wrote:
>>> Title: Paradox Patch
>>>
>>> Adoption index: 1.0
>>>
>>> Author: Jason
>>>
>>> Coauthors: G.
>>
>> For N from 2 through 5, I intend to certify this proposal with N support.
>>
>
> I support.
>
Note that the win fix I just submitted
On 8/15/2021 2:43 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
> Aspen wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Aug 8, 2021 at 4:59 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-business
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/8/2021 3:33 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
The rules actually say "clearly specify" at one other point
On 8/9/2021 3:13 PM, D. Wet via agora-business wrote:
> I will wait for the final judgement of CFJ 3922 or August 16th, which
> ever comes first, before taking the next action.
As an alternative if you want, you can sent a public message now, that
says something like "I withdraw any proposal I
> CFJ: The quoted message is a distribution message as outlined in
> Regulation AM0.
I [proto-] deliver this judgement in CFJ 3923:
The interpretations in this judgement are made in keeping with this part
of Rule 2545/5:
> To further aid trade and
On 8/9/2021 7:36 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 8/9/21 9:17 AM, Cuddle Beam via agora-business wrote:
>> Alright, re-Judging:
>>
>> I Judge FALSE.
>>
>> Backed by the arguments provided, I have become convinced that it is
>> possible to try to simultaneously flip a Switch.
On 8/9/2021 5:37 AM, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-08-09 at 12:45 +0100, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
>> On Mon, 2021-08-09 at 13:31 +0200, Cuddle Beam via agora-business
>> wrote:
>>> I Judge FALSE.
>>
>> I intend, with 2 support, to group-file a Motion to Reconsider this;
>From https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3784, Judge Aspen
presiding:
"If a proposal fails to state that who is performing an action, Agorans
are sufficiently respectful to make the inference that the proposal is.
Thus, the proposal takes the place that a player would take for a
On 8/7/2021 11:29 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On 8/7/2021 11:19 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 8/7/21 2:13 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> On 8/7/2021 8:43 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>>>> Amend Rule 2653 by replaci
On 8/7/2021 11:19 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 8/7/21 2:13 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 8/7/2021 8:43 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>>> Amend Rule 2653 by replacing "A player's Voting Strength on referendum"
>>
On 8/7/2021 8:43 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> Amend Rule 2653 by replacing "A player's Voting Strength on referendum"
> with "A person's Voting Strength on a referendum".
Why are we catering to non-players like this exactly? if you want to
play, be a player. in particular, why
On 8/6/2021 9:48 PM, Aspen via agora-discussion wrote:
> While this is theoretically possible, it isn't doable in practice. To make
> all the timestamps completely identical, you'd have to control not just
> your mailserver, but all of the intermediate mail servers. If you didn't,
> we could
On 8/2/2021 12:50 PM, Trigon via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 02/08/2021 19:46, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> "Recommend against" might be too general. Selling might be a good
>> strategy depending on your goals (e.g. whether you're trying to win th
On 8/2/2021 12:02 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> On 8/2/21 2:51 PM, D. Wet via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 2021-07-30 22:09, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>>> On 7/30/21 3:04 PM, Cuddle Beam via agora-business wrote:
Would you be interested in selling your Victory Card
On 7/27/2021 3:13 PM, Trigon via agora-discussion wrote:
>> 2. Players that are Active less than one month MUST actively be educated
>> when their Action is IMPOSSIBLE within the current Ruleset.
>
> I'm not sure this is the best way to phrase this. Again, MUST means that
> it is a rules
On 7/27/2021 1:55 PM, Ned Strange via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2021, 2:31 AM D. Wet via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> I propose to create a new Rule in the Agoran commmunity to be adopted
>> according to the current rule adoption procedure.
On 7/26/2021 11:09 PM, Aspen via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 2:56 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Proto: dating standards
>>
>> Amend Rule 478 (Fora) by replacing:
>>performed at the time date-stampe
On 7/25/2021 8:39 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 25, 2021, 9:06 AM Cuddle Beam via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> I CFJ the following:
>>
>> "Be X the first Judge assigned to this CFJ, the entirety of the Ruleset
>> means the following:
>>
On 7/22/2021 3:01 PM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-07-22 at 14:53 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Proto: dating standards
>>
>> Amend Rule 478 (Fora) by replacing:
>>performed at the time date-stamped on that messa
Proto: dating standards
Amend Rule 478 (Fora) by replacing:
performed at the time date-stamped on that message
with:
performed at the earliest credible time date-stamped on that message
["earliest" because that's closest to hitting the send key, "credible" to
make it clear that it's a
On 7/16/2021 9:45 AM, Falsifian via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 06:16:24PM +1000, Telna via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 2021-07-15 10:37, Falsifian via agora-business wrote:
>>> At the start of the paragraph beginning "The Trustee CAN transfer the
>>> Trust", insert this
On 7/12/2021 12:39 PM, Falsifian via agora-business wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 03:12:18PM +1000, Rebecca Lee via agora-business
> wrote:
>> I call a CFJ: Each player may claim a justice card this Agoran week.
>>
>> Rule 2478 states in relevant part "The player who initiated the most Finger
On 6/20/2021 6:27 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>
> I change my vote on that proposal to AGAINST
>
> It's not an (intentional) scam, though I think the better solution is to
> remove that ability from emergency regs than to let non-Festive people
> object to them.
>
sorry
On 6/13/2021 3:24 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
> Surely being the owner's nephew ought to carry an advantage? Except it
> doesn't do anything with Bonuses yet (presumably they would be tied into
> voting strength somehow).
I was thinking "despised in the company and given no
Proto: The Firm
[A change in the way vote cards lead to votes]
Enact a Rule, "The Firm" (Power 2), with this text:
The Firm is a secured ordered list of players. HR is an office;
the firm as it was at the beginning of the week is part of HR's
weekly report. A player's position
On 6/11/2021 8:02 AM, Falsifian via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 06, 2021 at 03:27:54PM -0400, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>> I submit (but do not pend) the following proposal (stolen from Trigon
>> with permission):
>>
>> Title: The Name of the Win Cards
>>
>> Adoption index:
On 6/10/2021 11:46 AM, Falsifian via agora-business wrote:
> I vote as follows.
>
>> ID Author(s) AITitle
>> ---
>> 8561& G., nix 2.0 Election Cycle
> AGAINST
>
> [Just because it
On 6/8/2021 9:39 AM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-06-08 at 09:22 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> I had a feeling you'd bring this one up when I saw you register and saw
>> that your computer delivery was faster than mine :) !
> My CFJ ea
On 6/8/2021 9:01 AM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-06-08, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
>> I pay a fee of 1 Extra Vote to Buy Strength.
>> I pay a fee of 1 Extra Vote to Buy Strength.
>> I pay a fee of 1 Extra Vote to Buy Strength.
>> I pay a fee of 1 Extra Vote to
On 6/8/2021 8:56 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/8/21 11:53 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Oh crap well that's completely broken. I was madly trying to sculpt
>> Murphy's text and missed those differences.
>
>
> It seems to ju
201 - 300 of 1009 matches
Mail list logo
