Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft Report

On Sunday, May 24, 2020 3:58:05 PM CDT you wrote: > > Grok's "Cantus Counterscam" (which has the author and co-author values > > that > > are incorrectly listed for "a Proposed Contract") is missing. > > I believe that e retracted it. Oh, looks like you're correct. -- nch

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft Report

On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 4:57 PM nchagora--- via agora-discussion wrote: > > On Sunday, May 24, 2020 3:42:06 PM CDT Aris Merchant via agora-discussion > wrote: > > ID Author(s)AITitle > > --- > > 8388f

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft Report

On Sunday, May 24, 2020 3:42:06 PM CDT Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote: > ID Author(s)AITitle > --- > 8388f nch 1.0 The Webmastor > 8389# G. 2.0

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft Report

On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 1:43 PM Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote: > > Here's my weekly draft. > > -Aris > > --- > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran > Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal > pool. For this decision, the vote

DIS: [Promotor] Draft Report

Here's my weekly draft. -Aris --- I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the quorum is 8, the voting method is AI-majority, and the valid

DIS: [Promotor] Draft Report

Here's a draft. While I obviously can't declare a deadline under the current rules, it would be highly appreciated if people could refrain from changing things for the next 24 hours or so. -Aris --- I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran Decision of whether to adopt it,

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft Report

I am the author of "Not so indestructible now, eh?". This is correct in the table but not correct in the text of the proposal. Jason Cobb On 6/11/19 7:31 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: Given how long it's been, and how many proposals there are, I'd like to send out a draft rather than just getting

DIS: [Promotor] Draft Report

Given how long it's been, and how many proposals there are, I'd like to send out a draft rather than just getting everything wrong. Here's that draft. There will be a small reward (plus my appreciation) for any corrections! -Aris --- I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran

DIS: [Promotor] Draft Report

Would someone look over this? I have a feeling I may be missing something, but it's possible activity has just been really low. -Aris --- I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft Report

Was Proposal 8089 ever resolved? I can't seem to find an resolution, which would make quorum 2 from Proposal 8087. Also, I have only a week to add them back to the pool, and that time has been expended. We could add them back by proposal though. I'll write one to do that. On Sun, Sep 9, 2018

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft Report

I make quorum 4. Voters on proposal 8089 were Aris, G., Murphy, Trigon, twg and Kenyon, making 6 valid ballots. Also, Aris, it would be helpful if you could redistribute proposals 8082-8089, except 8086 which doesn't exist. (8077A-8081A haven't met quorum yet either, but the CFJ on whether you

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft Report

On Sun, 9 Sep 2018, Aris Merchant wrote: > quorum is 7.0, the voting method is AI-majority, and the valid quorum is 3 I think.

DIS: [Promotor] Draft Report

Does this look right to everyone? It's been a while (entirely my fault), so I'm probably missing something, but this is the best I've got right now. With apologies, Aris --- I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft Report

In the full-text-of-proposals section, proposal 8085's title is incorrect. Also, you missed the proposal Kenyon submitted here: https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-business@agoranomic.org/msg32486.html Otherwise, it looks good to me! -twg ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On August 10, 2018

DIS: [Promotor] Draft Report

This is a draft report. Corrections are appreciated, as always. I have marked the proposals that are being distributed a second time A, as noted in the key. This identifies the distribution; the proposal is still the same and thus has the same ID. The distribution-qualified form should be useful

DIS: Promotor draft report

Here's my intermittent weekly draft. -Aris --- I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the quorum is 6.0 and the valid options are FOR and

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft Report

o. is a co-author of I Demand Faster Auctions, which you do not list here. On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:57 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > Also my two proposals about the mailing lists. > > On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 at 09:17 Alexis Hunt wrote: >> >> I believe my high power

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft Report

Also my two proposals about the mailing lists. On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 at 09:17 Alexis Hunt wrote: > I believe my high power cleanup proposal is missing. > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017, 09:11 ATMunn ., wrote: > >> Looks good to me. >> >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft Report

I believe my high power cleanup proposal is missing. On Mon, Oct 23, 2017, 09:11 ATMunn ., wrote: > Looks good to me. > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 2:14 AM, Aris Merchant < > thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Just a draft to make sure I haven't messed

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft Report

Looks good to me. On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 2:14 AM, Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Just a draft to make sure I haven't messed something up again. > > -Aris > > --- > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran > Decision of whether to adopt it,

DIS: [Promotor] Draft Report

Just a draft to make sure I haven't messed something up again. -Aris --- I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the quorum is 8.0 and the valid

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Promotor draft report

On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: > To be clear, I think your proposed fix of "making lots of simple ways to > earn shinies" would work just as well as a fixed basic income, as long as > there are enough of those things from the beginning for non-officer players > to do, that they can have

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Promotor draft report

On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, Nic Evans wrote: > On 08/31/17 16:50, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, Nic Evans wrote: > >>> I'm opposed to anything that doesn't scale with need. A regular payday > >>> would mostly benefit the already successful players. > > This is where I disagree,

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Promotor draft report

I withdraw the proposal titled Debts. On Sep 1, 2017 1:21 AM, "Aris Merchant" wrote: > nichdel, is debts being pulled? I should be releasing fairly soonish (as > in the next day or two). > > -Aris > > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 3:30 PM Nic Evans

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Promotor draft report

nichdel, is debts being pulled? I should be releasing fairly soonish (as in the next day or two). -Aris On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 3:30 PM Nic Evans wrote: > > > On 08/31/17 16:50, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, Nic Evans wrote: > >>> I'm opposed to anything

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Promotor draft report

On 08/31/17 16:50, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, Nic Evans wrote: >>> I'm opposed to anything that doesn't scale with need. A regular payday >>> would mostly benefit the already successful players. > This is where I disagree, primarily. We've never had a system that didn't > allow

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Promotor draft report

On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, Nic Evans wrote: > > I'm opposed to anything that doesn't scale with need. A regular payday > > would mostly benefit the already successful players. This is where I disagree, primarily. We've never had a system that didn't allow a base level of activity on a weekly or

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Promotor draft report

On 08/31/17 16:17, Nic Evans wrote: > (I've been a bit distracted lately but I'm keeping up with conversation.) > > The current economy was designed with the idea of coupling economics > closely to productivity. Creating work costs, and resolving work pays. > It's intentionally difficult to

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Promotor draft report

On 08/29/17 13:00, Owen Jacobson wrote: >> On Aug 29, 2017, at 10:54 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> >> >> >> On Tue, 29 Aug 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote: IDAuthor(s) AI Title ---

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Promotor draft report

> On Aug 29, 2017, at 10:54 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > On Tue, 29 Aug 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote: >>> IDAuthor(s) AI Title >>> --- >>> pp1 nichdel, o, grok, Aris 3.0

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Promotor draft report

On Tue, 29 Aug 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > IDAuthor(s) AI Title > > --- > > pp1 nichdel, o, grok, Aris 3.0 Debts > > pp2 nichdel 1.0 Better Accounting > > I pend each of these

DIS: Promotor draft report

I'm trying something new with my draft this week. I have attempted pleading, and begging and the like, and my previous reports have still had occasional errors. I check all my reports numerous times, and then do this whole drafting thing. Still occasional errors. So this week, I decided to