On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Sgeo wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 7:32 PM, comexcom...@gmail.com wrote:
A player CAN flip a specified proposal to Distributable by
spending 1 Note.
I spend a G# note to make this Distributable. I flip my key to G.
I really don't like this. It makes it
On Sat, 6 Jun 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 22:43 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz
zeckal...@gmail.com wrote:
I understood that. To clarify: How soon after a player CFJs is the
CFJ typically listed on the CotC page?
When Murphy
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
I publish an NoV alleging that Murphy violated Rule 1868, a power-2 rule, by
failing to assign a judge to CFJ 2547 as soon as possible.
Looks like I spoke too soon if it's been a week... -G.
On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 23:02 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
= Criminal Case 2480 =
Appeal: 2480a
Decision: REMAND
Judge: Taral
Judgement:
Rodlen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk
mailto:ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 23:02 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
= Criminal Case 2480
=
Appeal:
On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 23:14 -0700, Rodlen wrote:
I do that rest destruction stuff.
Unfortunately, you need the support of the other two panelists. Intend
to do it, and you can do it if the other two agree. (Which they have to;
Agora is weird and/or strange sometimes. They have to do it, but you
ehird wrote:
2009/6/5 Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
2009/6/5 Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com:
Legitimately as in you overlooked a message?
http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/2009-May/006402.html
Arguments on
On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 23:21 -0700, Rodlen wrote:
Okay, I hereby consent to that rest destruction stuff.
Oh dear, now we're going to have an argument about what unanimous
Support of the panel's other members in rule 2157 means. Just to make
things unambiguous, could you intend, with unanimous
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
= Criminal Case 2537 =
Wooble violated R2202 and committed the Class-8 Crime...
Er, looks like arguments leaped in from a
G. wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
== CFJ 2547 ==
Yally created a pledge in the above message
I recuse myself from this case. Apologies, will
G. wrote:
Er, looks like arguments leaped in from a different case starting halfway
down... Hopefully OscarMeyr isn't required to make sense of those... :)
Not sure how that happened, but in any case 2537 and 2545 have been
fixed in the DB.
On Sat, 6 Jun 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
I recuse myself from this case. Apologies, will let someone else
sort out subject lines. Note: I previously favored this one:
http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2009-May/020706.html
I actually changed the random suggestion
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
I judge CFJs 2561-2565 FALSE, citing the evidence given and the third
paragraph of R869:
A first-class person CAN (unless explicitly forbidden or
prevented by the rules) register by announcing
{ AI 2, II 2
[ This allows players to choose Representatives through contracts, who can
vote on their behalf in decisions
Create a new power 2 Rule:
{{
A Constituency is a public contract identifying itself as such. A
Constituency requires at least 3 parties.
A player SHALL NOT attempt to
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Yally wrote:
I intend, without 2 objections, to flip the II of the Promotor office
to 3. Distributability on its own, IMO, warrants this change;
messages like this one make it even more appropriate.
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 3:48 AM, Charles
Walkercharles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
I judge CFJs 2561-2565 FALSE, citing the evidence given and the third
paragraph of R869:
A first-class person CAN (unless explicitly forbidden or
prevented by the rules) register by announcing that
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 4:27 AM, Paul VanKoughnettallisp...@gmail.com wrote:
e registers,
wishes to register, requests registration, or requests
permission to register.
I registers, wish to register, request registration, or requests
permission to register.
Kyle Marek-Spartz -
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
{ AI 2, II 2
[ This allows players to choose Representatives through contracts, who
can vote on their behalf in decisions
I didn't finish this description, so here's a completed one:
[ This allows
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 2:16 AM, Rodlen rodlenj...@gmail.com wrote:
I judge both CFJ 2553 and CFJ 2556 TRUE.
Ignoring the non-animal meaning of pig, some pigs fly. The inflatable
pigs used in the live shows of
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Elliott
Hirdpenguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/6/6 Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2548
== CFJ 2548 ==
Proposal 6335 had the
comex wrote:
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Elliott
Hirdpenguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/6/6 Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2548
== CFJ 2548 ==
Proposal
Elliott Hird wrote:
2009/6/6 Jonatan Kilhamn jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com:
I judge TRUE.
--
-Tiger
I intend to appeal this with two support because SERIOUSLY?
I support.
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Alex Smithais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
I remind the appeals panel in CFJ 2480a ({Wooble, Rodlen, Tiger}) that
they CAN and SHALL destroy the 4 rests I own:
{{{
If a verdict or sentence that led to
the creation of Rests is overruled, remanded, or
2009/6/6 comex com...@gmail.com:
Then did the amendment take place, or was it just entirely too vague?
I'll say yes, it worked (but my Pedantic Hat says no).
2009/6/6 Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com:
I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this judgment as homonyms (and hence
the bad puns used here) are not a valid means of interpreting a statement.
Typo rule, you... you uncouth... person!
This is ridiculously easy money.
ehird wrote:
This is ridiculously easy money.
Only if your guess is one of the closest. The more contestants, the
larger the prize, but the less likely (assuming all guesses are equally
likely to be accurate) that any given player will get it.
2009/6/6 Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com:
Elliott Hird wrote:
2009/6/6 Jonatan Kilhamn jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com:
I judge TRUE.
--
-Tiger
I intend to appeal this with two support because SERIOUSLY?
I support.
I really couldn't find any other way of reading that rule that made as
much sense
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I destroy 10+10i points in my own possession
Huh?
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I destroy 10+10i points in my own possession
Huh?
It's my act of repentance.
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
I destroy 10+10i points in my own possession
Weirdest Action of the Week.
--
Taral tar...@gmail.com
Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you.
-- Unknown
2009/6/6 Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com:
I personally believe that if time did have a beginning it was more than
100 years ago that it began
Around 6000 FYI.
ehird wrote:
2009/6/6 Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com:
I personally believe that if time did have a beginning it was more than
100 years ago that it began
Around 6000 FYI.
OVER 9000
BobTHJ wrote:
I recuse myself from this case and (if possible) increase it's
interest index to 2.
Doing it directly requires without N objections [R2225(1)], but
its II was 1 and your rank is 1 so your recusal had the side effect
of increasing its II [R2225(2)].
On Sat, 6 Jun 2009, Rodlen wrote:
However, the regular English definition could very well also be said to be
the definitions of each word applied to make a phrase.
No.
On Sat, 6 Jun 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
A player CAN flip a specified proposal to Distributable with
3 support, or without objection, or by spending 1 Note.
Why bother with distributability then. -G.
Goethe wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
A player CAN flip a specified proposal to Distributable with
3 support, or without objection, or by spending 1 Note.
Why bother with distributability then. -G.
To avoid going through the motions for proposals that no one else
is
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Jonatan
Kilhamnjonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
I really couldn't find any other way of reading that rule that made as
much sense as the one I ruled about. Your alleged office is part of
your alleged identity the way I see it.
I CFJ on:
Ed Murphy wrote:
coppro wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
Proposal: s/object/either
(AI = 2, please)
Amend Rule 1607 (The Promotor) by replacing the sentence beginning
A player CAN flip a specified proposal to Distributable with
the following sentence:
A player CAN flip a specified
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 12:42, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Guesses for May 25-31 Proposals CFJs
---
Tue 19 May 13:21:18 BobTHJ20 17
Tue 19
2009/6/7 Benjamin Caplan celestialcognit...@gmail.com:
Sean Hunt wrote:
I guess 7 proposals and 13 CFJs for next week.
5 proposals, 10 CFJs.
Pavitra
If I haven't already guessed, I guess 10 proposals, 19 CFJs
--
-Tiger
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com
mailto:aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Aaron Goldfein
aarongoldf...@gmail.com mailto:aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 29,
Yally wrote:
I appeal this judgment.
This appeal seems to have been ignored by the CotC.
I had the message filed in a might-appeal-with-support subfolder,
had missed that you appealed unilaterally. Will process later tonight.
Pavitra wrote:
I support.
NttPF
Yally wrote:
I guess 10 proposals and 10 CFJs.
NttPF
Yally wrote:
I guess 10 proposals and 10 CFJs.
And you guessed already on June 2, anyway.
Tiger wrote:
If I haven't already guessed, I guess 10 proposals, 19 CFJs
NttPF and you also already guessed on June 2.
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
I personally believe...
I appeal based on the following:
R1727 points out that the game was not called Agora until much later,
which goes against the Agora began on June 30th, 1993 argument.
R104 does cause Michael to be
Tiger wrote:
I reatract my previous guesses and guess 11 proposals and 9 CFJs.
The contract doesn't recognize retraction. Feel free to propose
changing that; it would change the dynamic somewhat.
2009/6/7 Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com:
Tiger wrote:
I reatract my previous guesses and guess 11 proposals and 9 CFJs.
The contract doesn't recognize retraction. Feel free to propose
changing that; it would change the dynamic somewhat.
I'll think about it. For now I'll just be happy
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.comwrote:
The following proposal constitutes the Anarchists weekly duties.
Anarchist Anarchy
AI=1, II=0
((
Repeal Rule 2216 (The repeal-o-matic)
))
This message was sent Fri 6 May
These duties were last fulfilled Sun
2009/6/7 Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com
wrote:
The following proposal constitutes the Anarchists weekly duties.
Anarchist Anarchy
AI=1, II=0
((
Repeal Rule 2216 (The repeal-o-matic)
))
This message was
Pavitra wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
I guess 7 proposals and 13 CFJs for next week.
5 proposals, 10 CFJs.
This was ttPF but you already guessed on June 2.
Tiger wrote:
2009/6/7 Benjamin Caplan celestialcognit...@gmail.com:
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Jonatan
Kilhamnjonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
I really couldn't find any other way of reading that rule that made as
much sense as the one I ruled about. Your alleged
zeckalpha wrote:
I appeal based on the following:
You need 2 support (unilateral appeal only works for criminal and
equity cases).
On Sat, 6 Jun 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
Goethe wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
A player CAN flip a specified proposal to Distributable with
3 support, or without objection, or by spending 1 Note.
Why bother with distributability then. -G.
To avoid going through the
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 17:36, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
~~~ Far to much quoting done here, omitted for brevity ~~~
This appeal seems to have been ignored by the CotC.
NoV em for it, then.
Please! Trim these messages before responding.
BobTHJ
Yally wrote:
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 2:16 AM, Rodlen rodlenj...@gmail.com
mailto:rodlenj...@gmail.com wrote:
I judge both CFJ 2553 and CFJ 2556 TRUE.
[snip]
I intend, with two support, to appeal this judgement. As when pigs fly
Which one? I'm treating this as ineffective due to
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com
mailto:ride...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend, with Support, to publish an NoV alleging that ehird violated
Rule 2158, a power-2 rule, by assigning an inappropriate judgment to CFJ
2574's question on
BobTHJ wrote:
Please! Trim these messages before responding.
Or at least quote using so my QuoteCollapse add-on will work.
Ed Murphy wrote:
BobTHJ wrote:
Please! Trim these messages before responding.
Or at least quote using so my QuoteCollapse add-on will work.
I do. It's the GMail guys who use tabs.
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartzzeckal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 4:27 AM, Paul VanKoughnettallisp...@gmail.com wrote:
e registers,
wishes to register, requests registration, or requests
permission to register.
I registers, wish to register,
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 3:26 AM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
This report is governed by 3-Scroll Rodney; a contest.
=SCROLL EFFECTS=
When performing the following actions, if I specify that I both award
and revoke points from a
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 5:08 AM, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Guesses for June 8-14 Proposals CFJs
I guess 40 CFJs and 7 proposals.
I guess 20 CFJs and 9 proposals.
Paul VanKoughnett wrote:
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartzzeckal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 4:27 AM, Paul VanKoughnettallisp...@gmail.com wrote:
e registers,
wishes to register, requests registration, or requests
permission to register.
I
allispaul wrote:
I guess 20 CFJs and 9 proposals.
NttPF
66 matches
Mail list logo
