On Apr 17, 2017, at 9:28 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017, Aris Merchant wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 9:42 PM, Quazie wrote:
>>> Please define 'Lost and found department' - It seems to be a non-player
>>> entity capable of holding
I rather like this proposal, and I’m looking forward to the second draft. I do
have one (sincere, not critical) question:
On Apr 19, 2017, at 9:33 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> If a performer does so, clearly specifying that eir action is
> intended to fulfill a
And as of this moment I have only willfully consented to being made a
player if Murphy has made me a player - at least I believe that's all i've
consented to.
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 10:28 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 21 Apr 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> > On Fri,
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 09:44 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > This leaves open the question of what happens if a person does
> > consent without registering (might be hard to do, as a statement of
> > consent is generally taken to be a registration attempt).
On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 09:44 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> This leaves open the question of what happens if a person does
> consent without registering (might be hard to do, as a statement of
> consent is generally taken to be a registration attempt).
What about consent to a foreign forum? It seems
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 7:26 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> > Interesting. Rule 869 says that “A registered person is a player” and
> > secures registration (with power=3). Rule 1551 (Ratification) has power 3.1,
> > so it’s actually possible that ratification could register
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> My idea here is separate from the gig economy because it is for one-time or
> irregular actions:
>
> Any player MAY with 2 support add an item to the to-do list with a specified
> number of Shinies
> associated with it. The to-do
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> My Copy of RONR11 would also suggest that it is a point of order, given
> that it is a custom of the Assembly.
>
>
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>
> RONR is up to edition
Would the authors of The Agora Guidebook mind if I wrote and published the
third edition? I am sending it to the list in case their old email no
longer works.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
My idea here is separate from the gig economy because it is for one-time or
irregular actions:
Any player MAY with 2 support add an item to the to-do list with a
specified number of Shinies associated with it. The to-do list shall be
maintained by the Lister. Any person MAY complete an item on
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 7:53 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> I CFJ on the statement “The Warrigal and Zachary Watterson are the same
> person.”
>
> Until this CFJ is resolved, I intend to track eir respective budgets
> separately. This will cause em to receive more Shinies than e
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 9:00 PM Owen Jacobson wrote:
> On Apr 19, 2017, at 11:55 PM, Aris Merchant gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 8:29 PM Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
>
> Leaving aside that one budget is not fully
CFJ 1836 states that a self ratifying report does not ratify
information it incidentally contains, particularly the list of
players. The logic behind that is rather interesting, but anyways, it
applies in this case.
-Aris
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 7:26 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
13 matches
Mail list logo