Re: DIS: What's the deal with the ADoP election?

2017-10-18 Thread VJ Rada
I made a new intent, yes. The old one, I'm told, was totally ineffective for lacking "without objection". On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 12:40 PM, ATMunn . wrote: > ah, ok. I figured I wasn't. > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: >> >> G.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: I revoke my agency ORP

2017-10-18 Thread VJ Rada
October 16. ORP hasn't existed for 14 days. It was in a BUS thread called "Community Chest". On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > On Thu, 19 Oct 2017, VJ Rada wrote: > >> I gave notice a while ago. I revoke the agency ORP. > > > How long ago? Remember

Re: DIS: What's the deal with the ADoP election?

2017-10-18 Thread ATMunn .
ah, ok. I figured I wasn't. On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > G. raised the question of what happened to the ongoing elections, given > that my proposal changed the election rules without a proviso to continue > the ongoing ones. Then VJ pointed out that e

DIS: Re: BUS: I revoke my agency ORP

2017-10-18 Thread Ørjan Johansen
On Thu, 19 Oct 2017, VJ Rada wrote: I gave notice a while ago. I revoke the agency ORP. How long ago? Remember there's a 14 day limit. Greetings, Ørjan.

Re: DIS: What's the deal with the ADoP election?

2017-10-18 Thread Ørjan Johansen
On Thu, 19 Oct 2017, VJ Rada wrote: In about a day I can ratify my document making you the ADoP. I don't remember if you made a new intent after the one where you forgot to say it was a lie. Note that Rule 2202 (last published Ruleset, which is getting pretty out of date *grumble*) says:

Re: DIS: What's the deal with the ADoP election?

2017-10-18 Thread VJ Rada
In about a day I can ratify my document making you the ADoP. On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:34 AM, VJ Rada wrote: > Oh whoops I should probably publish a report! > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 4:23 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote: >> G. raised the question of what happened

Re: DIS: What's the deal with the ADoP election?

2017-10-18 Thread VJ Rada
Oh whoops I should probably publish a report! On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 4:23 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > G. raised the question of what happened to the ongoing elections, given that > my proposal changed the election rules without a proviso to continue the > ongoing ones. Then VJ

Re: DIS: What's the deal with the ADoP election?

2017-10-18 Thread Alexis Hunt
G. raised the question of what happened to the ongoing elections, given that my proposal changed the election rules without a proviso to continue the ongoing ones. Then VJ pointed out that e had failed to initiate the decision correctly (e had left out the valid options, per rule 107 this

Re: DIS: What's the deal with the ADoP election?

2017-10-18 Thread ATMunn .
Oh, wait, the argument was about the resolution of proposals 7908-7921. Still, the main focus of this was around this election. On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 1:18 PM, ATMunn . wrote: > So I know that earlier, VJ Rada intended ratified the document saying > {Just now, ATMunn

DIS: What's the deal with the ADoP election?

2017-10-18 Thread ATMunn .
So I know that earlier, VJ Rada intended ratified the document saying {Just now, ATMunn won an election for ADoP. Just now, Alexis won an election for Prime Minister}, however e then pointed the finger at emself for not stating that the document was wrong. This was then followed by a bunch of