DIS: Fwd: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Zombie auction - 4 zombies

FWIW, I believe this auction has terminated by virtue of there having been no bids made or withdrawn in the past 96 hours. -- Forwarded message - From: D Margaux Date: Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 8:27 AM Subject: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Zombie auction - 4 zombies To: Agora Business

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Weekly report: Please don't summarily judge me

In the coming days, unless persuaded otherwise, I plan to uphold this Finger Pointing and impose a forgiveable fine of 2 blots. On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 12:28 PM Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > I favor this case. > > On Sun, 9 Sep 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > > On August 27, 2018, I initiated a CFJ

DIS: Re: BUS: Some moves and such

On Sunday, 9 September 2018 17:48, D Margaux wrote: > I cause nichdel pay 3 apples to stake a land claim to (-3, 1) with > land type Black. > > I cause nichdel to transfer the land at (-3, 1) to D. Margaux. > > I cause nichdel to pay 1 apple to move to (-2, 1). These three actions fail; zombies

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Some moves and such

Ack! I missed that. Too bad. Thanks for catching. On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 1:53 PM Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > On Sunday, 9 September 2018 17:48, D Margaux > wrote: > > I cause nichdel pay 3 apples to stake a land claim to (-3, 1) with > > land type Black. > > > > I cause nichdel to transfer the

DIS: Re: BUS: Some moves and such

On Sun, 9 Sep 2018, D Margaux wrote: > I cause nichdel pay 3 apples to stake a land claim to (-3, 1) with > land type Black. You must be active to stake a land claim, so this fails: > 7. 3 apples to Stake a Land Claim on a specified land unit that is > adjacent to the Entity's

DIS: Re: BUS: Elections

Not an awful lot, I'll admit. Late August and September are always quite busy for me and I haven't really found time to get around to it. I have all the information I need - Trigon did a prototype SLR a while ago, I also have summaries of CFJs since the last FLR, and as Assessor I have been

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft Report

On Sun, 9 Sep 2018, Aris Merchant wrote: > quorum is 7.0, the voting method is AI-majority, and the valid quorum is 3 I think.

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft Report

I make quorum 4. Voters on proposal 8089 were Aris, G., Murphy, Trigon, twg and Kenyon, making 6 valid ballots. Also, Aris, it would be helpful if you could redistribute proposals 8082-8089, except 8086 which doesn't exist. (8077A-8081A haven't met quorum yet either, but the CFJ on whether you

DIS: Re: BUS: Elections

On Sun, 9 Sep 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > (I do still plan to take over Rulekeepor in the future if nobody finds > this objectionable, but I'm not yet prepared to do so.) No pressure whatsoever, but have you put much work into this so far? If I come to writing a land overhaul in a few

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Elections

If you think an SLR is close I won't work on it in parallel :). The trick to avoiding an obligation as an Officer is to not hold the office the instant a time limit expires (i.e. at the moment of the end of the week or month). You could hold the office all month and if you resign an instant

DIS: [Promotor] Draft Report

Does this look right to everyone? It's been a while (entirely my fault), so I'm probably missing something, but this is the best I've got right now. With apologies, Aris --- I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the

DIS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

On Sun, 9 Sep 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote: Fora (Rule 478, self-ratifying) Discussion irc://irc.freenode.net:6667/##nomic discussion There seems to be a http: in the link, which doesn't work. However, for people without irc: set up,

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft Report

Was Proposal 8089 ever resolved? I can't seem to find an resolution, which would make quorum 2 from Proposal 8087. Also, I have only a week to add them back to the pool, and that time has been expended. We could add them back by proposal though. I'll write one to do that. On Sun, Sep 9, 2018

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Cartographor] The Map of Arcadia -- September week 2

Second one is denied since it was already white when you tried to turn it gray and therefore INEFFECTIVE. Also, show me where you paid upkeep on that one and I'll add it back. On Sun, Sep 9, 2018, 21:25 Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > CoE: Corona's loom at (3, 1) was also destroyed (e attempted to

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Cartographor] The Map of Arcadia -- September week 2

On Monday, 10 September 2018 03:28, Reuben Staley wrote: > Second one is denied since it was already white when you tried to turn it > gray and therefore INEFFECTIVE. I don't believe that matters? Rule 2003 says: 3. 2 apples to set Land Type of a Land Unit which e owns to any

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Cartographor] The Map of Arcadia -- September week 2

Understood. Boy do I hate being wrong. On Sun, Sep 9, 2018, 21:37 Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > On Monday, 10 September 2018 03:28, Reuben Staley > wrote: > > Second one is denied since it was already white when you tried to turn > it gray and therefore INEFFECTIVE. > > I don't believe that

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Cartographor] The Map of Arcadia -- September week 2

I mean, at least you're not the one who turned your loom into some sort of weird monument-like thing... -twg ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Monday, 10 September 2018 03:38, Reuben Staley wrote: > Understood. Boy do I hate being wrong. > > On Sun, Sep 9, 2018, 21:37 Timon Walshe-Grey