Before reading 4st's response, I drafted this:
{
The Ghost is an Office.
The Timeline is a list of when did any player perform a particular
Reversible action. To record an action in the Timeline is to append
that action (and player, and time) to The Timeline. To erase an action
from the Timeline
On 6/20/23 17:48, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> I believe I won the rice game on 12 June - not sure though. Here are
> my notes, wouldn't be at all surprised if I missed something critical.
>
> ---
> 5-22 harvested plan
> Created: snail
> Up: {4st, beokirby,
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 2:02 PM juan via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> 4st nomic via agora-discussion [2023-06-20 13:49]:
> > On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 1:34 PM juan via agora-discussion <
> > agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> > > Ok. I get it. What you are
On 6/20/23 18:33, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 3:16 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>> On 6/20/23 17:48, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> I believe I won the rice game on 12 June - not sure though. Here are
>>> my notes, wouldn't be at
4st nomic via agora-discussion [2023-06-20 13:49]:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 1:34 PM juan via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> > Ok. I get it. What you are trying to do is set up some structure that
> > tracks what events happen relating to some scope of values, all
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 11:10 AM juan via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> 4st nomic via agora-discussion [2023-06-20 09:24]:
> > I am trying to figure out how to make "retroactive" instead of
> retroactive
> > changes, at least for certain scopes...! This is crazy to
4st nomic via agora-discussion [2023-06-20 11:42]:
> Hm... ok, basic explanation of what I want...
> I want some sort of way where there is a switch (Unfathomability in this
> example) that acts like changes to it are retroactive. So anything that
> depends on that switch also has to be redone due
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 3:40 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> Oh, oops, sorry. Reading is hard.
>
> If you're confidently saying that ais523's conditional vote should have
> resolved to AGAINST, I can easily handle that. Thanks for untangling that.
>
> I do disagree about P8988. I'll
4st nomic via agora-discussion [2023-06-20 09:24]:
> I am trying to figure out how to make "retroactive" instead of retroactive
> changes, at least for certain scopes...! This is crazy to think about! I'm
> posting as a draft so it can undergo review.
> I will keep working thru this, but I do plan
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 1:34 PM juan via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> 4st nomic via agora-discussion [2023-06-20 11:42]:
> > Hm... ok, basic explanation of what I want...
> > I want some sort of way where there is a switch (Unfathomability in this
> > example) that
I believe I won the rice game on 12 June - not sure though. Here are
my notes, wouldn't be at all surprised if I missed something critical.
---
5-22 harvested plan
Created: snail
Up: {4st, beokirby, blob, inalienableWright, nix, snail, Yachay},
Down: {Aspen, ais523,
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 3:33 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
> To resolve this, if you don't have the energy, I'll deputize to
> resolve 8989 myself (I think the resolution is 14 days overdue, of
> course up to now that's been due to uncertainty).
ooh if this sounded like a threat to steal the office i
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 3:16 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On 6/20/23 17:48, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> > I believe I won the rice game on 12 June - not sure though. Here are
> > my notes, wouldn't be at all surprised if I missed something critical.
> >
> >
On 6/20/23 21:57, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> Given the existence of this, players are incentivized to object to every
> single report they did not publish.
(Not going to get too involved in this discussion, I'll leave refining
to current players overall.)
I think this is only
> On Jun 20, 2023, at 7:40 PM, nix via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> =
> I. Amendments
> =
>
> Any participant CAN amend these regulations in a specified way with
> Agoran Consent. For this action, only support and objections from
> participants count.
>
>
On 6/20/23 22:40, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> =
> I. Amendments
> =
>
> Any participant CAN amend these regulations in a specified way with
> Agoran Consent. For this action, only support and objections from
> participants count.
The perennial impossibility of
On 6/20/23 22:00, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
> - It’s worth explicitly specifying whether Agora’s current switch values
> carry over to Agoran’t or if Agoran’t starts with all switches at default
> values. Same with other non-rule gamestate, eg entities and other
> miscellaneous
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 9:25 AM 4st nomic via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I am trying to figure out how to make "retroactive" instead of retroactive
> changes, at least for certain scopes...! This is crazy to think about! I'm
> posting as a draft so it can undergo
I am trying to figure out how to make "retroactive" instead of retroactive
changes, at least for certain scopes...! This is crazy to think about! I'm
posting as a draft so it can undergo review.
I will keep working thru this, but I do plan to eventually propose this if
someone else doesn't first.
19 matches
Mail list logo