My dim recollection is that it took a kind of high level scam (in the sense
of loophole exploitation, there was no attempt to win) to move away from
the Mutable/Immutable distinction. But we didn't get straight to the Power
system - that came later. The intermediate stage involved the definition
[ A replacement Ribbons system in which all awards are hard. Some of
the easier Photons are the same difficulty as some of the harder
Ribbons. I've tried to cover the full range of ways of participating
in Agora, but the requirement of no easy awards means there's
nothing to do with judging a case
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
[ A replacement Ribbons system in which all awards are hard. Some of
the easier Photons are the same difficulty as some of the harder
Ribbons. I've tried to cover the full range of ways of participating
in Agora,
On 3 July 2013 16:09, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
[ A replacement Ribbons system in which all awards are hard. Some of
the easier Photons are the same difficulty as some of the harder
Ribbons.
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Er, not sure what you're on about. I'm aware of the fix proposal and
the proposal to repeal Ribbons. I was protoing this in the expectation
that the latter will pass.
-- Walker
I mean the 2010-ish version.
On 3 July 2013 16:31, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Er, not sure what you're on about. I'm aware of the fix proposal and
the proposal to repeal Ribbons. I was protoing this in the expectation
that
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
I just looked at a couple of 2010 SLRs. Looks similar to the current
Ribbons. What about it?
-- Walker
Among other things, a thesis was required.
-scshunt
On 3 July 2013 16:39, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
I just looked at a couple of 2010 SLRs. Looks similar to the current
Ribbons. What about it?
-- Walker
Among other things, a thesis was
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013, Steven Gardner wrote:
My dim recollection is that it took a kind of high level scam (in the sense
of loophole exploitation, there was no attempt to win) to move away from the
Mutable/Immutable distinction. But we didn't get straight to the Power
system - that came later. The
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013, Charles Walker wrote:
The Herald is the recordkeeper of Photons.
I think this goes too far the other direction. Looking for a middle
ground. Here's the suggestions I posted a couple weeks ago:
On Sun, 23 Jun 2013, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Had a pass on possible Ribbon
Are objects of this type (Ribbons, and Yaks for that matter) considered
inherently transferable, or does a rule need to exist to make them so?
Matthew Berlin
arkes...@gmail.com
535 Misty Patch Rd.
Coatesville, PA 19320
(484) 832-1055
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Kerim Aydin
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Matt Berlin arkes...@gmail.com wrote:
Are objects of this type (Ribbons, and Yaks for that matter) considered
inherently transferable, or does a rule need to exist to make them so?
Assets are transferable unless defined as fixed.
-scshunt
By default they are transferable (liquid). But if the rules define them as
fixed, they are not transferable. Ribbons are fixed (R2387 first sentence),
Yaks are liquid since nothing calls them fixed.
This is defined in the second-to-last paragraph in Rule 2166 (Assets).
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013,
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013, Sean Hunt wrote:
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
3343: FALSE
If any party's constitution actually authorized party members to act on
its behalf, then such an inference would be valid. However, no party's
constitution
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:35 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
Second, does authorizing scshunt to perform a complicated action that
includes awarding a Patent Title count as authorizing em to award a
Patent Title? In that case, there would be no Power issue.
Arguments: Even if it does, the
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013, Sean Hunt wrote:
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:35 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
Second, does authorizing scshunt to perform a complicated action that
includes awarding a Patent Title count as authorizing em to award a
Patent Title? In that case, there would be no Power
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 11:39 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
I create the following promise and transfer it to G.:
* Text: I act as specified by the casher in the same message
as the cashing.
* Title: Murphy 20130703 Trust Fund
* Condition to cash: The casher is a player
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 19:56 +0100, Alex Smith wrote:
I guess the answer is to make it generic enough that although people
know of it's existence, it's unclear what it will be used for.
Wow, I haven't made that particular typo in /years/.
--
ais523
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013, Alex Smith wrote:
I was wondering how you created a submarine contract using promises.
What exactly do you mean by a submarine contract? Just a private
one? Or something else. -G.
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 12:03 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013, Alex Smith wrote:
I was wondering how you created a submarine contract using promises.
What exactly do you mean by a submarine contract? Just a private
one? Or something else. -G.
Basically an agreement to do
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013, Alex Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 12:03 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013, Alex Smith wrote:
I was wondering how you created a submarine contract using promises.
What exactly do you mean by a submarine contract? Just a private
one? Or
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 12:59 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Ah, when you said 'contract', I thought you meant something enforceable,
which the promise can't do (but private contracts could). That is, if
Murphy and I made a private agreement resulting in this PoA, but I abuse
the PoA outside of
You could probably use encryption to get all of it.
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013, Alex Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 12:59 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Ah, when you said 'contract', I thought you meant something enforceable,
which the promise can't do (but private contracts could). That is, if
Murphy and I made a private agreement resulting in
On 3 July 2013 18:32, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013, Charles Walker wrote:
The Herald is the recordkeeper of Photons.
I think this goes too far the other direction. Looking for a middle
ground. Here's the suggestions I posted a couple weeks ago:
Well, as I
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 13:13 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Would the following meet the reasonably available test:
Conditions for Cashing: the message is within the bounds of messages
allowed by the private NONDEAD agreement. This is assumed to be
true unless the author publicly CoEs
On 3 July 2013 22:11, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
I think ehird's suggestion works, though; you could promise I perform
the specified action with the sha-1 hash long hex string here. For
bonus points, you could even transfer it to the Tree, leaving it unclear
who you'd made the promise
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 22:25 +0100, Elliott Hird wrote:
On 3 July 2013 22:11, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
I think ehird's suggestion works, though; you could promise I perform
the specified action with the sha-1 hash long hex string here. For
bonus points, you could even transfer it
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
Arguments: Even if it does, the award is pragmatic, and since the
Herald did not award Renascent to me before I awarded myself a
Transparent Ribbon, the award still succeeds.
It's not the Herald that would be
Agora is older than Eternal September...
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013, Sean Hunt wrote:
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
3343: FALSE
If any party's constitution actually authorized party members to act on
its behalf, then such an inference would be valid. However, no party's
constitution currently does
On Thu, 4 Jul 2013, Elliott Hird wrote:
I intend, with 3 elder support, to declare a gerontocracy.
Is the joke that I've been a Player before y'all and still am not an
Elder? (Or even registered.)
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Good spot. I initiate an election for Ambassador at Large and nominate myself.
Manifesto:
- I'll actively search for foreign nomics and attempt to recognise
them, while maintaining strict criteria for which
AGAINST until the party bug is fixed.
-scshunt
On Jul 3, 2013 9:33 PM, Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
I submit the following proposal and request that the H. Promotor
distribute it as soon as possible, because waiting four days for
support actions for the next month might
On Thu, 2013-07-04 at 02:33 +0100, Charles Walker wrote:
I submit the following proposal and request that the H. Promotor
distribute it as soon as possible, because waiting four days for
support actions for the next month might get annoying. (It would not
violate R1607 to distribute this
On 4 July 2013 02:06, Ørjan Johansen oer...@nvg.ntnu.no wrote:
Is the joke that I've been a Player before y'all and still am not an Elder?
(Or even registered.)
The joke is that I needed a subject line and am tired. But you should
totally register!
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2013-07-04 at 02:33 +0100, Charles Walker wrote:
I submit the following proposal and request that the H. Promotor
distribute it as soon as possible, because waiting four days for
support actions for the next month
On 4 July 2013 02:40, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2013-07-04 at 02:33 +0100, Charles Walker wrote:
I submit the following proposal and request that the H. Promotor
distribute it as soon as possible,
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 21:40 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote:
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
You're requesting speedy distribution without paying the fee for speedy
distribution?
There's a fee?
I thought the idea behind proposal fees was that the proposals with
There's no fee for disinterested proposals; I'm not sure what happened
to the proposal to distribute interested proposals for free (MI
permitting).
-- Walker
Passed, I believe.
On 4 July 2013 02:46, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 21:40 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote:
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
You're requesting speedy distribution without paying the fee for speedy
distribution?
There's a fee?
I thought
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 8:39 PM, woggle woggl...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend, with two Independent Support, to form the Inflationary Party with
the following Constitution:
Heh... I had the same idea, but I was going to wait until the wins for
Yaks proposal passed.
Got to wait 4 days...
On Jul 3, 2013 9:56 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2013-07-04 at 02:50 +0100, Charles Walker wrote:
On 3 July 2013 19:21, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com
wrote:
3343:
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Amend Rule 2410 (Parties) by replacing Party members SHALL obey their
party's constitution. with Party members SHALL obey their party's
constitution, except where this would cause them to violate a Rule in
the
On 4 July 2013 03:01, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Amend Rule 2410 (Parties) by replacing Party members SHALL obey their
party's constitution. with Party members SHALL obey their party's
constitution, except
On 03/07/2013 10:07 PM, Charles Walker wrote:
On 4 July 2013 03:01, omdc.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Amend Rule 2410 (Parties) by replacing Party members SHALL obey their
party's constitution. with Party members
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
I act.
FYI, as Registrar, I am not treating this as making you active.
47 matches
Mail list logo
