DIS: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7818-19

I vote as follows: > > 7818+ ais523 1.0 Make Spending Power More Useful FOR, on the grounds that the ADoP can remove the Promotor (or at least start an election) Besides, you can always have a new election, you just need a lot of support. > > > 7819+ Alexis 1.0 Legislating

DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Promotor election

On Friday, October 21, 2016, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > > Except if G. managed to counterscam... > > Greetings, > Ørjan. Good point, although the ratification without objection should do it. Still... G., would you do an Alexian collapse (as I will try to get people to call it,

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Promotor election

On Fri, 21 Oct 2016, ais523 wrote: On Fri, 2016-10-21 at 22:02 +, Alexis Hunt wrote: On Fri, Oct 21, 2016, 13:41 Luis Ressel wrote: Congrats to our new Promotor! I'm glad something is interested in taking this over after almost two years. If you've got any questions

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Promotor election

On Friday, October 21, 2016, ais523 wrote: > On Fri, 2016-10-21 at 22:02 +, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016, 13:41 Luis Ressel > > wrote: > > > Congrats to our new Promotor! I'm glad something is interested in > > >

DIS: Re: BUS: Pend war!

On Friday, October 21, 2016, ais523 wrote: > I submit the following proposal (AI 1, "Make Spending Power More > Useful"): > > In rule 2445, replace the following paragraph: > {{{ > A player can flip a proposal's imminence to "pending" by >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: The List

On Friday, October 21, 2016, ais523 wrote: > On Fri, 2016-10-21 at 12:11 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote: > > On Friday, October 21, 2016, ais523 > > > wrote: > > > I submit the following proposal (AI 1, "The List"): > > >

DIS: Re: BUS: The List

On Friday, October 21, 2016, ais523 wrote: > I submit the following proposal (AI 1, "The List"): > > Enact a new power-1 rule with the following text: > {{{ > A player is on the List if they have ever mentioned the List in a > public forum or a discussion

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: The List

On Fri, 2016-10-21 at 12:11 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote: > On Friday, October 21, 2016, ais523 > wrote: > > I submit the following proposal (AI 1, "The List"): > > > > Enact a new power-1 rule with the following text: > > {{{ > > A player is on the List if they

DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Promotor election

On Friday, October 21, 2016, Luis Ressel wrote: > > Outcome: Aris > > = > > Congrats to our new Promotor! I'm glad something is interested in > taking this over after almost two years. If you've got any questions > about your new job, feel free to write me an email. > > -- >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Deputy ADoP] Correct (Abridged) Payroll & Metareport

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:25 AM Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Fri, 21 Oct 2016, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > Rule 2143 has an exacting standard. It says that the information must > > be published. A mostly-correct report is not, by its definition, > > sufficient to fulfill the

DIS: Re: BUS: [Deputy ADoP] Correct (Abridged) Payroll & Metareport

On Fri, 21 Oct 2016, Alexis Hunt wrote: > Rule 2143 has an exacting standard. It says that the information must > be published. A mostly-correct report is not, by its definition, > sufficient to fulfill the duties of the office. Therefore aranea has > failed to publish the ADoP's report since

Re: DIS: BUS: There Really Is A Scam This Time

On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 12:43:13 +0200 Luis Ressel wrote: > Btw, there is a way to immediately force Alexis out of office, if you > want to prevent him from pending his proposal. However, it's somewhat > cheaty and would require coordinated activity by three players. > > Let's see

Re: DIS: BUS: (attn aranea) There Really Is A Scam This Time

On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 12:34:21 +0200 Luis Ressel wrote: > On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 11:03:52 +0100 > ais523 wrote: > > > On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 23:46 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote: > > A good first move in this situation might be to flip the spending > >

Re: DIS: BUS: (attn aranea) There Really Is A Scam This Time

On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 11:03:52 +0100 ais523 wrote: > On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 23:46 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote: > A good first move in this situation might be to flip the spending > power of all offices Alexis holds (Referee, in this case) to 0, thus > making the

Re: DIS: BUS: (attn aranea) There Really Is A Scam This Time

On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 23:46 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote: > And why would anyone vote for this? What's the loophole you're using? I > assume we have to wait and see, but unless you have a loophole... Stoping > this from working may require CFJs, but the damage can be minimized even if > it passes...

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7815-17

On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 06:13:33 + Alexis Hunt wrote: > I award aranea a Green Card for distributing Proposal 7816 which was > not pending. Proposal 7816 was pending. Read my distribution message again. > P.S. Please remember to use Spivak pronouns. Meh. I usually don't

DIS: Ideas from a bastion of democracy

On Thursday, October 20, 2016, Alexis Hunt > wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:51 AM Aris Merchant < > thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Would people be interested in a thesis explaining what can be found about >

DIS: BUS: There Really Is A Scam This Time

On Thursday, October 20, 2016, Alexis Hunt > wrote: > I submit the following proposal: > > This One's A Scam (AI=3) > {{{ > Enact a new rule of power 3 entitled "Dictatorship" reading as follows: > A Decree is a document