Re: DIS: Proto-proto proposal

Also, apparently the bad formatting is my fault; the plain text of my email looks atrocious. Sorry! On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 at 21:47 Alexis Hunt wrote: > On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 at 21:41 Madeline wrote: > >> Can I ask what the deal with Spivak pronouns is anyway?

Re: DIS: Proto-proto proposal

On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 at 21:41 Madeline wrote: > Can I ask what the deal with Spivak pronouns is anyway? It's not in the > rules so I assume it's just a matter of convention, but having a full > list somewhere might be nice. (What do I use for his/her?) > I don't know when they

Re: DIS: Proto-proto proposal

On 11/2/2017 9:41 PM, Madeline wrote: Can I ask what the deal with Spivak pronouns is anyway? It's not in the rules so I assume it's just a matter of convention, but having a full list somewhere might be nice. (What do I use for his/her?) Yeah, it's just a convention thing. I don't know

Re: DIS: Proto-proto proposal

On 2017-11-03 12:22, ATMunn wrote: Overall seems like a fun idea. Comments below. On 11/2/2017 7:05 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: Here is a silly minigame that I would like feedback on:   *     The Clork (pronounced ‘clark’) tracks everything in this proposal and additionally names politicians

Re: DIS: Proto-proto proposal

On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 at 21:22 ATMunn wrote: > Seems kind of strange to me that Politicians are just created out of thin > air. Maybe players can "elect" Politicians by submitting names to some sort > of pool, and the Clork chooses eir favorite when new ones are needed? >

Re: DIS: Proto-proto proposal

Overall seems like a fun idea. Comments below. On 11/2/2017 7:05 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: Here is a silly minigame that I would like feedback on: * The Clork (pronounced ‘clark’) tracks everything in this proposal and additionally names politicians (puns are encouraged). Yay offices,

Re: DIS: Proto-proto proposal

On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 at 21:12 Madeline wrote: > That's a rather minor one; the big one is political party vs house party. > > ...ow. > I will cite this as evidence in any related CFJ.

Re: DIS: Proto-proto proposal

On 2017-11-03 12:09, Alexis Hunt wrote: On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 at 21:07 Madeline > wrote: On 2017-11-03 12:02, Alexis Hunt wrote: On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 at 20:59 Madeline > wrote: Yeah, I

Re: DIS: Proto-proto proposal

On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 at 21:07 Madeline wrote: > On 2017-11-03 12:02, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 at 20:59 Madeline wrote: > >> Yeah, I was thinking "they wouldn't be gathering balloons and everyone >> could dump theirs into a proposal to just

Re: DIS: Proto-proto proposal

On 2017-11-03 12:02, Alexis Hunt wrote: On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 at 20:59 Madeline > wrote: Yeah, I was thinking "they wouldn't be gathering balloons and everyone could dump theirs into a proposal to just wreck the favours of a hoarder" but

Re: DIS: Proto-proto proposal

On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 at 20:59 Madeline wrote: > Yeah, I was thinking "they wouldn't be gathering balloons and everyone > could dump theirs into a proposal to just wreck the favours of a hoarder" > but then I know some people would vote against that kind of thing by > principle

Re: DIS: Proto-proto proposal

On 2017-11-03 11:55, Alexis Hunt wrote: On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 at 20:53 Madeline > wrote: The real trouble might just be stopping people from stocking up a huge amount of favours before doing anything, but I'm not entirely sure there isn't a

Re: DIS: Proto-proto proposal

On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 at 20:53 Madeline wrote: > The real trouble might just be stopping people from stocking up a huge > amount of favours before doing anything, but I'm not entirely sure there > isn't a counter to this (a tax on them might be the best, destroying some > small

Re: DIS: Proto-proto proposal

The real trouble might just be stopping people from stocking up a huge amount of favours before doing anything, but I'm not entirely sure there isn't a counter to this (a tax on them might be the best, destroying some small percentage of unused favours each week to effectively implement a soft

Re: DIS: Proto-proto proposal

On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 at 20:43 Madeline wrote: > Who this looks awesome > :D > So you can claim a win if you can hold advisor positions over a majority > of the government for two weeks? That feels... suitably unachievable :D > I think the elections many be sufficiently

Re: DIS: Proto-proto proposal

Who this looks awesome So you can claim a win if you can hold advisor positions over a majority of the government for two weeks? That feels... suitably unachievable :D And I'm impressed that every post gets a unique power. (I'd also be down for being Clork) One thing that isn't particularly

DIS: Proto-proto proposal

Here is a silly minigame that I would like feedback on: - The Clork (pronounced ‘clark’) tracks everything in this proposal and additionally names politicians (puns are encouraged). - Have Politicians, each of whom has a Party. - 5 Parties (in order): - Platonic

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Herald] Thesis Award

Actually, without eir support, neither would have had enough support to succeed. So it was good e did. But that's more a reflection of most other players' apathy... On Thu, 2 Nov 2017, ATMunn wrote: > Congratulations! > Notice of Honour: > Alexis gains 1 karma for putting the time into

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Herald] Thesis Award

On Thu, 2 Nov 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > H. Herald, I believe that another Patent Title award is also in order, to > another distinguished colleague. > Actually, I want to extend that award attempt into a bit of a policy going forward, will do by tomorrow I hope... ...also curious to see

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: I buy a Stamp, transferring 6 shinies to Agora to do so.

That CFJ is actualy where I got the idea to do this from. It's also how I found out about CFJ 3409. On 11/2/2017 1:31 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: On Thu, 2 Nov 2017, Benjamin Schultz wrote: On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 9:34 AM, ATMunn wrote: Let's test the limits of how

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: I buy a Stamp, transferring 6 shinies to Agora to do so.

Additional arguments: See CFJ 3409. It lists the following as tests of subject line action effectiveness: 1. Are there multiple actions that can be inferred? No. 2. Is there a real doubt as to what is intended?. No. 3. Is timing an issue? (multiple events in the message). No. 4.

DIS: Re: BUS: I buy a Stamp, transferring 6 shinies to Agora to do so.

On Thu, 2 Nov 2017, Benjamin Schultz wrote: > On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 9:34 AM, ATMunn wrote: > Let's test the limits of how far subject line actions can go... > Feel free to CFJ. > > > Challenge accepted. > > I CFJ on the following statement: ATMunn bought

DIS: Re: BUS: I buy a Stamp, transferring 6 shinies to Agora to do so.

Arguments: TRUE; CFJ 2916, in which Wooble was found not to be a player (that time, anyway). On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 at 13:22 Benjamin Schultz wrote: > On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 9:34 AM, ATMunn wrote: > >> Let's test the limits of how far subject

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Surveyor] November Estate Auction

I bid 26 Shinies On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 6:28 AM, Reuben Staley wrote: > I bid 25 shinies because why not. > > -- > Trigon > > On Nov 1, 2017 11:26 PM, "Cuddle Beam" wrote: > >> I bid 21 Shinies. >> >> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 3:28 AM, VJ Rada