Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: Late monthly Reports: ATMunn, Kenyon

2018-06-13 Thread Aris Merchant
I have a criminal justice proto that makes it slightly harder to convict someone, while having the monthly free incense to one and doubling the standard violation. It's not really a very high priority at the moment though. If someone wants to adjust the relevant quantities now, it probably

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: Late monthly Reports: ATMunn, Kenyon

2018-06-13 Thread Kerim Aydin
Watching the balances in the last month I've was thinking that we have an oversupply and overproduction of incense will make penance very cheap. On Thu, 14 Jun 2018, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > On Wed, 13 Jun 2018, ATMunn wrote: > > > Assuming I have incense, I apologize and spend 2 of it to

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: Late monthly Reports: ATMunn, Kenyon

2018-06-13 Thread Ørjan Johansen
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018, ATMunn wrote: Assuming I have incense, I apologize and spend 2 of it to make my blots disappear into oblivion. ...If that wording somehow doesn't work, I apologize and spend 2 incense to expunge my blots. It works, but it may not be what you wanted anyhow. Incense

Re: BAK: DIS: Re: [Assessor] Humiliations Galore

2018-06-13 Thread Ørjan Johansen
I sent omd an email. I don't think e's paying close attention as e's been extremely idle on IRC. Greetings, Ørjan. On Wed, 13 Jun 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote: On Wed, 13 Jun 2018, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: Did this copy bounce? That would be concerning. I appreciate the severe

Re: BAK: DIS: Re: [Assessor] Humiliations Galore

2018-06-13 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
That email server is much more entertaining than mine! :) On 06/13/2018 03:50 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Wed, 13 Jun 2018, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: >> Did this copy bounce? That would be concerning. I appreciate the severe >> humiliation that you have brought upon me. > So the

Re: DIS: Draft: Minimalist Contracts v1

2018-06-13 Thread Aris Merchant
The most important element of a contract is the voluntary exchange of promises, which is what actually makes it binding. Defying expectations is always potentially interesting, but usually only makes sense if it can be executed in way which makes logical sense. I really don't see how we would do

Re: DIS: Draft: Minimalist Contracts v1

2018-06-13 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
I think that it would be interesting to try to model zombies as a contract that was mandatory and would be automatically agreed to be the zombie party at the completion of the auction, in a similar way to the way that covering songs works in the United States. What do others think about trying

Re: DIS: Re: BAK: [Assessor] Humiliations Galore

2018-06-13 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
On June 13, 2018 7:50 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > So the second copy (sent to both BAK and BUS) came to both BAK and BUS, > > I got both copies. Then your reply to DIS came through. I replied to you > > in DIS, and my reply seems to have been eaten too. Also, the mailman web > > archives aren't

Re: DIS: Re: BAK: [Assessor] Humiliations Galore

2018-06-13 Thread Aris Merchant
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 1:03 PM Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Wed, 13 Jun 2018, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > > Did this copy bounce? That would be concerning. I appreciate the severe > > humiliation that you have brought upon me. > > No, this copy came through on both BUS and BAK. I

Re: DIS: Re: BAK: [Assessor] Humiliations Galore

2018-06-13 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > Did this copy bounce? That would be concerning. I appreciate the severe > humiliation that you have brought upon me. No, this copy came through on both BUS and BAK. I was a bit concerned, because the previous one came back pretty

Re: DIS: Re: BAK: [Assessor] Humiliations Galore

2018-06-13 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > Did this copy bounce? That would be concerning. I appreciate the severe > humiliation that you have brought upon me. So the second copy (sent to both BAK and BUS) came to both BAK and BUS, I got both copies. Then your reply to DIS

DIS: Re: BAK: [Assessor] Humiliations Galore

2018-06-13 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
Did this copy bounce? That would be concerning. I appreciate the severe humiliation that you have brought upon me. On 06/13/2018 03:04 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > [note: an earlier version of this email to agora-business bounced]. > > > FACT: Seven Days have passed since Proposal 8052 was

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Re: [Cartographor] The Map of Arcadia -- June 11, 2018

2018-06-13 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > I'm not entirely clear whether revised reports are supposed to reflect > the game state at the time of the original report, or at the time of > the revision. > > Just in case, I submit a CoE: I built an orchard at (+5, 0) in this > message: >

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

2018-06-13 Thread Kerim Aydin
It's for consistency (Sanskrit works too). On Tue, 12 Jun 2018, ATMunn wrote: > Ah, ok. > > On 6/12/2018 7:46 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > > Ancient Greek, not modern Greek. It's from the start of the Iliad. [1] In > > fact, it's the first words, or incipit, of the text. > > > > [1]

DIS: Re: BUS: Pay Agora for your land units! (attn: Murphy, twg)

2018-06-13 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
I was under the impression that, per rule 2551/1, paying for an auction lot is done by transferring the amount of the bid to the auctioneer (in this case, Agora), not by destroying the coins. I already did the former, here:

Re: DIS: trades

2018-06-13 Thread Aris Merchant
No, I agree that they shouldn't be merged right now, I'm just pointing out that this can be done as soon as we have new-model-contracts. These are standard terms, available to everyone. So someone could make an offer, exactly as if this were a rule, and then as soon as another person fufuiled it,