On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 6:12 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On 9/10/2019 4:43 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > If not, we’re gating proposals out of an
> > abstract opinion that they ought to be gated rather than because it’s in
> > anyone’s interest.
>
> I could say it's a load on everyone (i.e. the
On 9/10/2019 4:43 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
> If not, we’re gating proposals out of an
> abstract opinion that they ought to be gated rather than because it’s in
> anyone’s interest.
I could say it's a load on everyone (i.e. the "voters") when lots of
proposals get submitted without much
On 9/10/19 8:21 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
I've written a script to parse the distributions, so the fact that
there are proposals doesn't affect me there.
Whoops - yes the fact that proposals exist does affect me, but the
number doesn't.
--
Jason Cobb
On 9/9/19 6:10 AM, Reuben Staley wrote:
Create a new rule with title "Interest Groups", power 1, and text:
An interest group is an entity defined as such by this rule. Each
interest group has a goal. The following are the interest groups
of Agora and their goals:
A.
On 9/10/19 7:43 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
Who do infinite free proposals hurt? The only people I can think of who
might be adversely affected are the Promotor and the Assessor (if the
proposals are really bad, they’ll never hit the Rulekeepor, and extra the
amount of work for voters isn’t big).
On 9/10/19 9:43 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I really *do* like the idea of different sectors with different
"performance
values" with currency speculation between them, and the event-constrained
random walk governing the various values (i.e. something
semi-predictable so
an attentive player can
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 4:20 PM Reuben Staley
wrote:
> On 9/10/19 4:10 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:> I do wonder if maybe "all
> the interlocking cogs... turning fine" is part of the problem. In
> real-life political systems, things keep changing because people still
> feel that they are
On 9/10/19 4:10 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:> I do wonder if maybe "all
the interlocking cogs... turning fine" is part of the problem. In
real-life political systems, things keep changing because people still
feel that they are inadequate or unjust, or because there are current
events that
On 9/9/2019 3:10 AM, Reuben Staley wrote:
>During the first Eastman week of each month, the Treasuror CAN and
>SHALL perform the following actions, collectively known as
>Balancing, in sequence:
Now that I look more closely, my specific concerns are doubled - this
On 9/10/2019 3:10 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> Perhaps it's time to deliberately tinkering some of the core rules and
see > what happens? For example, I know from archives that proposals tend to
> oscillate between "free and accessible to everyone" and "gated behind
game > mechanics". When
On 9/9/2019 3:10 AM, Reuben Staley wrote:
> Their recordkeepor is the Treasuror.
After the last couple debacles, I'm making a firm policy of voting against
any minigame, no matter how good on paper, that where the proposor emself
isn't installed into office as the game runner (whether via a
On Tuesday, September 10, 2019 7:58 AM, Reuben Staley
wrote:
> I don't know what you want to improve about the core system. The most
> change that has been enacted in the past few months to the core system
> are minor fixes that clarify things. Sure, we find a broken bit
> sometimes, but those
On 9/10/19 1:10 AM, Aris Merchant wrote:
No comment on the specific proposal yet, but a general comment. I
think we should wait a while before having another mini-game. The last
few we've had have died, not because they were bad ideas, but partly
because of bugs and most of all because there
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 12:10 AM Aris Merchant
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 3:07 AM Reuben Staley wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > This idea has been stewing for a long time, and this is the rough draft
> > of a proposal that
On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 3:07 AM Reuben Staley wrote:
>
>
> This idea has been stewing for a long time, and this is the rough draft
> of a proposal that captures my initial thoughts somewhat.
>
> I am putting this out there
On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 10:02 PM Jason Cobb wrote:
>
> On 9/8/19 12:57 AM, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > Here's another draft, sorry for the inconvenience.
> >
> > -Aris
> >
> > ---
> > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
> > Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it
16 matches
Mail list logo
