On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 9:29 PM Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 23:46, Aris Merchant via agora-business
> wrote:
> >
> > [Sorry if this came out a bit confusing or has errors. I'm a bit
> > rushed and I don't have time to edit ATM.]
>
> I'm disappointed that you
On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 23:46, Aris Merchant via agora-business
wrote:
>
> [Sorry if this came out a bit confusing or has errors. I'm a bit
> rushed and I don't have time to edit ATM.]
I'm disappointed that you didn't go for PROBABLY instead.
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 8:16 PM James Cook wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2 Feb 2020 at 02:42, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 6:25 PM James Cook via agora-discussion
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Questions for anyone interested in Agora:
> > >
> > > 1. Would you be
On 2/7/20 12:07 AM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Thanks! I added it because Aris suggested some interpretive element
>> would be nice in the weekly summaries. Seems like a good payoff for
>> not much extra effort.
> Yeah, I really do like it! It somehow changes the character of the
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 8:04 PM James Cook via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 23:52, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > Falsifian wrote:
> > > Welcome Tcbapo!
> > >
> > > A lot happened last week. twg won the game the hard way. Many parts of
> > > the rules are
On 2/6/20 7:26 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business wrote:
> I object to the lists one because the example given is very confusing.
> It's not an inline list because it's separated from the surrounding
> prose, and it's not a block list because the elements aren't separated
> by line breaks.
On Sun, 2 Feb 2020 at 02:42, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 6:25 PM James Cook via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> >
> > Questions for anyone interested in Agora:
> >
> > 1. Would you be interested in seeing an Agoran newsletter? Not like
> >"Last week in
On Sun, 2 Feb 2020 at 13:34, Tanner Swett via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 1, 2020, 21:25 James Cook via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > 2. Do you think my "Last Week in Agora" summaries are useful? Any other
> >comments? So far I've acted
On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 23:52, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Falsifian wrote:
> > Welcome Tcbapo!
> >
> > A lot happened last week. twg won the game the hard way. Many parts of
> > the rules are changed after the adoption of twelve proposals, and
> > voting began on several more,
> voting began on several more, including ways to make the decision
> process smoother.
Small correction: I think only one proposal currently being voted on
is related to improving the decision process.
- Falsifian
On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 22:06, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On 2/6/20 7:47 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-business wrote:
> > "I intend, with Agoran consent, to enact the following Editorial
> > Guidelines:"
> >
> > does not seem like multiple separate intents.
>
>
> Whoops, you're right.
On 2/6/20 7:47 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-business wrote:
> "I intend, with Agoran consent, to enact the following Editorial Guidelines:"
>
> does not seem like multiple separate intents.
Whoops, you're right. I was thinking the rule said CAN enact a
(singular) Guideline, not CAN enact (plural)
I wrote:
> I object to the capitalisation one for the same reason as Alexis.
>
> I object to the lists one because the example given is very confusing.
> It's not an inline list because it's separated from the surrounding
> prose, and it's not a block list because the elements aren't separated
>
Falsifian wrote:
> Welcome Tcbapo!
>
> A lot happened last week. twg won the game the hard way. Many parts of
> the rules are changed after the adoption of twelve proposals, and
> voting began on several more, including ways to make the decision
> process smoother. The Herald invents the Patent
Falsifian wrote:
> Sigh. I repeal Blink test v1.1 and submit:
>
> Title: Blink test v1.2
> AI: 1
> Chamber: Legislation
> Co-authors: Jason
> Text: {
>
> Amend Rule 2601 to read in full:
>
> If this is the only paragraph in this rule, and it has been at
> least one week since this rule was last
Falsifian wrote:
>> hope that the economy gets reset or something
Also sorry: I was planning to try something hyper-inflationary on my
Agoran Birthday earlier this week, to try to force the need for a
reset (e.g. pledging to give back 2/3 of coins of anyone who gave me
them) but it's been a heck
> My apologies for the delayed reply here, but this was intentional and
> I would ask that everyone who voted against it for this reason
> consider voting in favour. This is done to match up with the way that
> proposals work: an AI=1 proposal requires a strict majority, but an
> AI=2 proposal can
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 11:55 AM James Cook via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 18:09, James Cook wrote:
> > Are we just going to let a steady stream of sufficiently dedicated
> > players claim their standard victories? I say we raise the bar a
> > little.
>
> By the way, I
On Fri, 31 Jan 2020 at 11:24, James Cook wrote:
>
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 21:46, Alexis Hunt via agora-business
> wrote:
> > 3. Replacing "The action is to be performed with N Agoran consent, and
> > the number
> > of Supporters of the intent is less than or equal to N times the number of
> >
On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 23:42, Gaelan Steele via agora-business
wrote:
> >> 8317e Alexis 2.0 Zombie trade
> >
> > FOR, although I note that there’s a minor scam: you can prevent a zombie
> > from expiring by putrefying it after it’s already been putrified to
> > increase its
On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 14:55, James Cook via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 18:09, James Cook wrote:
> > Are we just going to let a steady stream of sufficiently dedicated
> > players claim their standard victories? I say we raise the bar a
> > little.
>
> By the way, I don't
On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 18:09, James Cook wrote:
> Are we just going to let a steady stream of sufficiently dedicated
> players claim their standard victories? I say we raise the bar a
> little.
By the way, I don't mean for this comment to take away from G.'s
victory. G. built quite a large
On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 18:52, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On 2/6/20 1:49 PM, James Cook wrote:
> > Title: Blink test v1.1
> > AI: 1
> > Chamber: Legislation
> > Text: {
> >
> > Amend Rule 2601 to read in full:
> >
> > If this is the only sentence in this rule, and it has been at
On 2/6/20 1:49 PM, James Cook wrote:
> Title: Blink test v1.1
> AI: 1
> Chamber: Legislation
> Text: {
>
> Amend Rule 2601 to read in full:
>
> If this is the only sentence in this rule, and it has been at
> least one week since this rule was last amended, then any player
> CAN
On 2/6/20 1:41 PM, James Cook via agora-business wrote:
> least one week since this rule was last amended, then any player
> CAN repeal this rule by announcement.
Per Rule 105, only Instruments can cause rule changes, and persons are
not Instruments.
--
Jason Cobb
On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 17:58, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 9:47 AM James Cook via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 17:34, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
> > wrote:
> > > On 2/6/20 12:02 PM, James Cook wrote:
> > > > It's not clear to
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 9:47 AM James Cook via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 17:34, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > On 2/6/20 12:02 PM, James Cook wrote:
> > > It's not clear to me your judgement would break self-ratification of
> > > switch reports. Aris's
On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 17:34, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On 2/6/20 12:02 PM, James Cook wrote:
> > It's not clear to me your judgement would break self-ratification of
> > switch reports. Aris's documents were written in an unusual way: they
> > said that at some earlier date, the
On 2/6/20 12:02 PM, James Cook wrote:
> It's not clear to me your judgement would break self-ratification of
> switch reports. Aris's documents were written in an unusual way: they
> said that at some earlier date, the values of two switch instances
> changed. Self-ratifying switch reports
Thought of another comment:
On Sun, 2 Feb 2020 at 22:56, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
> that revert what it has already done. Additionally, this interpretation
> would likely break self-ratification of switch reports, which would be
> against the best interests of the game, so Rule 217
On Sun, 2 Feb 2020 at 22:56, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On 2/1/20 7:05 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
> > On 2/1/20 6:57 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote:
> >> I intend, with 2 support, to group-file a motion to reconsider.
> > I self-file a motion to reconsider in CFJ 3788.
> >
>
Archived at https://github.com/AgoraNomic/Reporter/tree/master/weekly_summaries
Report for the week of 2020-01-27..02-02:
# Summary
Welcome Tcbapo!
A lot happened last week. twg won the game the hard way. Many parts of
the rules are changed after the adoption of twelve proposals, and
voting
32 matches
Mail list logo
