Re: DIS: Re: BUS: New Rule: Onboarding of Newly Activated Players

2021-07-27 Thread Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
On 7/27/2021 3:13 PM, Trigon via agora-discussion wrote: >> 2. Players that are Active less than one month MUST actively be educated >> when their Action is IMPOSSIBLE within the current Ruleset. > > I'm not sure this is the best way to phrase this. Again, MUST means that > it is a rules

DIS: Re: BUS: New Rule: Onboarding of Newly Activated Players

2021-07-27 Thread Trigon via agora-discussion
I think I like the direction you're going with this. With a bit of workshopping, I would definitely vote FOR it. For now, though, allow me to make some comments. On 27/07/2021 16:30, D. Wet via agora-business wrote: I propose to create a new Rule in the Agoran commmunity to be adopted

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: New Rule: Onboarding of Newly Activated Players

2021-07-27 Thread Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
On 7/27/2021 1:55 PM, Ned Strange via agora-discussion wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2021, 2:31 AM D. Wet via agora-business < > agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > >> I propose to create a new Rule in the Agoran commmunity to be adopted >> according to the current rule adoption procedure.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: New Rule: Onboarding of Newly Activated Players

2021-07-27 Thread ais523 via agora-discussion
On Wed, 2021-07-28 at 06:55 +1000, Ned Strange via agora-discussion wrote: > I do believe this proposal is effective. It only needs to specify its text. > > For future reference, proposals usually have a title and an adoption index > equal to the power of what it does. Power is essentially a

DIS: Re: BUS: New Rule: Onboarding of Newly Activated Players

2021-07-27 Thread Ned Strange via agora-discussion
I do believe this proposal is effective. It only needs to specify its text. For future reference, proposals usually have a title and an adoption index equal to the power of what it does. Power is essentially a ranking of how important rules are and when creating a new rule it's important to note

DIS: [Proto] Independence Day

2021-07-27 Thread Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion
 [This is a draft based on our team’s Survivor entry. It’s a bit rough, not sure if some of the changes I made are worth the trouble, but better to get something out there and not keep sitting on it] Title: Independence Day Adoption Index: 3.0 Author: Gaelan Co-authors: G., Telna, nix,

DIS: Timing experiment

2021-07-27 Thread Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion
I am sending this email with the following procedure, using my normal mail client (Apple Mail): 1. Turning off my computer's wifi connection 2. Sending this message, allowing it to sit in the Outbox, at around 10:52 AM Pacific 3. A while later, turning on my wifi I suspect this message's Date

Re: DIS: proto on datestamps

2021-07-27 Thread Aspen via agora-discussion
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 8:35 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote: > > > On 7/26/2021 11:09 PM, Aspen via agora-discussion wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 2:56 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion > > wrote: > >> > >> > >> Proto: dating standards > >> > >> Amend Rule 478 (Fora) by

Re: DIS: proto on datestamps

2021-07-27 Thread Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
On 7/26/2021 11:09 PM, Aspen via agora-discussion wrote: > On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 2:56 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion > wrote: >> >> >> Proto: dating standards >> >> Amend Rule 478 (Fora) by replacing: >>performed at the time date-stamped on that message >> with: >>performed at

Re: DIS: proto on datestamps

2021-07-27 Thread Aspen via agora-discussion
On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 2:56 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote: > > > Proto: dating standards > > Amend Rule 478 (Fora) by replacing: >performed at the time date-stamped on that message > with: >performed at the earliest credible time date-stamped on that message > > ["earliest"