On 6/20/23 22:00, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
> - It’s worth explicitly specifying whether Agora’s current switch values
> carry over to Agoran’t or if Agoran’t starts with all switches at default
> values. Same with other non-rule gamestate, eg entities and other
> miscellaneous
On 6/20/23 21:57, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> Given the existence of this, players are incentivized to object to every
> single report they did not publish.
(Not going to get too involved in this discussion, I'll leave refining
to current players overall.)
I think this is only
> On Jun 20, 2023, at 7:40 PM, nix via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> =
> I. Amendments
> =
>
> Any participant CAN amend these regulations in a specified way with
> Agoran Consent. For this action, only support and objections from
> participants count.
>
>
On 6/20/23 22:40, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> =
> I. Amendments
> =
>
> Any participant CAN amend these regulations in a specified way with
> Agoran Consent. For this action, only support and objections from
> participants count.
The perennial impossibility of
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 2:02 PM juan via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> 4st nomic via agora-discussion [2023-06-20 13:49]:
> > On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 1:34 PM juan via agora-discussion <
> > agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> > > Ok. I get it. What you are
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 3:40 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> Oh, oops, sorry. Reading is hard.
>
> If you're confidently saying that ais523's conditional vote should have
> resolved to AGAINST, I can easily handle that. Thanks for untangling that.
>
> I do disagree about P8988. I'll
On 6/20/23 18:33, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 3:16 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>> On 6/20/23 17:48, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> I believe I won the rice game on 12 June - not sure though. Here are
>>> my notes, wouldn't be at
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 3:33 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
> To resolve this, if you don't have the energy, I'll deputize to
> resolve 8989 myself (I think the resolution is 14 days overdue, of
> course up to now that's been due to uncertainty).
ooh if this sounded like a threat to steal the office i
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 3:16 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On 6/20/23 17:48, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> > I believe I won the rice game on 12 June - not sure though. Here are
> > my notes, wouldn't be at all surprised if I missed something critical.
> >
> >
On 6/20/23 17:48, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> I believe I won the rice game on 12 June - not sure though. Here are
> my notes, wouldn't be at all surprised if I missed something critical.
>
> ---
> 5-22 harvested plan
> Created: snail
> Up: {4st, beokirby,
I believe I won the rice game on 12 June - not sure though. Here are
my notes, wouldn't be at all surprised if I missed something critical.
---
5-22 harvested plan
Created: snail
Up: {4st, beokirby, blob, inalienableWright, nix, snail, Yachay},
Down: {Aspen, ais523,
4st nomic via agora-discussion [2023-06-20 13:49]:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 1:34 PM juan via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> > Ok. I get it. What you are trying to do is set up some structure that
> > tracks what events happen relating to some scope of values, all
Before reading 4st's response, I drafted this:
{
The Ghost is an Office.
The Timeline is a list of when did any player perform a particular
Reversible action. To record an action in the Timeline is to append
that action (and player, and time) to The Timeline. To erase an action
from the Timeline
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 1:34 PM juan via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> 4st nomic via agora-discussion [2023-06-20 11:42]:
> > Hm... ok, basic explanation of what I want...
> > I want some sort of way where there is a switch (Unfathomability in this
> > example) that
4st nomic via agora-discussion [2023-06-20 11:42]:
> Hm... ok, basic explanation of what I want...
> I want some sort of way where there is a switch (Unfathomability in this
> example) that acts like changes to it are retroactive. So anything that
> depends on that switch also has to be redone due
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 11:10 AM juan via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> 4st nomic via agora-discussion [2023-06-20 09:24]:
> > I am trying to figure out how to make "retroactive" instead of
> retroactive
> > changes, at least for certain scopes...! This is crazy to
4st nomic via agora-discussion [2023-06-20 09:24]:
> I am trying to figure out how to make "retroactive" instead of retroactive
> changes, at least for certain scopes...! This is crazy to think about! I'm
> posting as a draft so it can undergo review.
> I will keep working thru this, but I do plan
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 9:25 AM 4st nomic via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I am trying to figure out how to make "retroactive" instead of retroactive
> changes, at least for certain scopes...! This is crazy to think about! I'm
> posting as a draft so it can undergo
I am trying to figure out how to make "retroactive" instead of retroactive
changes, at least for certain scopes...! This is crazy to think about! I'm
posting as a draft so it can undergo review.
I will keep working thru this, but I do plan to eventually propose this if
someone else doesn't first.
19 matches
Mail list logo