> On Mar 12, 2024, at 10:48 PM, nix via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> This is related to CFJ 4072, but you don't need to be familiar with all
> of the arguments there.
>
> I just want everyone's reading on one (crucial) element. R105 requires
> an "unambiguous and clear specification of the
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 3:49 PM nix via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> This is related to CFJ 4072, but you don't need to be familiar with all
> of the arguments there.
>
> I just want everyone's reading on one (crucial) element. R105 requires
> an "unambiguous and
This is related to CFJ 4072, but you don't need to be familiar with all
of the arguments there.
I just want everyone's reading on one (crucial) element. R105 requires
an "unambiguous and clear specification of the method to be used for
changing the rule". For rule changes in proposals, what would
On 3/12/24 14:39, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-03-12 at 14:29 -0400, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>> Or, in the alternative, based on the authority Rule 2125, Rule 2471
>> prohibits sending a message with certain attributes, and that is what
>> the infraction is. So,
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 11:29 AM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 3/12/24 03:51, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
> >
> >> On Mar 12, 2024, at 2:46 AM, secretsnail9 via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> I confirm,
On Tue, 2024-03-12 at 14:29 -0400, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> Or, in the alternative, based on the authority Rule 2125, Rule 2471
> prohibits sending a message with certain attributes, and that is what
> the infraction is. So, the infraction isn't contained within the message
> in any
> On Mar 12, 2024, at 3:04 PM, nix via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> I haven't started drafting, but not sure I quite agree with this. A rule
> change is defined as "any effect that falls into the above classes", so
> the "full text" would be the full text of the change. Your reading seems
>
On 3/12/24 09:28, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
> 105 requires us to publish the “full text” of a rule change. What
> is that?
>
> Clearly what was intended is “a full description of the change to
> be made”, that feels like a somewhat counterintuitive interpretation.
> It seems like
> On Mar 12, 2024, at 2:39 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
>
>> On Mar 9, 2024, at 6:37 PM, nix via agora-business
>> wrote:
>>
>> On 1/28/24 00:59, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>>> I CFJ: "Proposal 9051, as part of its effect, applied a rule change."
>>>
>>
> On Mar 9, 2024, at 6:37 PM, nix via agora-business
> wrote:
>
> On 1/28/24 00:59, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>> I CFJ: "Proposal 9051, as part of its effect, applied a rule change."
>>
>
> I number this CFJ 4062. I assign CFJ 4062 to Gaelan.
This is a draft judgement, as I
> On Mar 12, 2024, at 2:31 AM, nix via agora-business
> wrote:
>
> On 3/11/24 19:16, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>> I CFJ: "There exists an entity that is a Rule with ID number 2687."
>
> I number this CFJ 4072. Unfortunately, I assign CFJ 4072 to nix.
>
> --
> nix
>
A related
11 matches
Mail list logo
