Isn't it? They seem to be the same in terms of the proportion of people
you need to get on side, it's hard to see how they aren't intended to be
similar. It seems kind of strange that it's easier to award a patent
title by making an AI1.5 proposal than it is to get the herald to use
the intende
into ways to at least do something myself.
On 2017-10-25 17:25, Owen Jacobson wrote:
On Oct 25, 2017, at 1:51 AM, Madeline <mailto:j...@iinet.net.au>> wrote:
I'm not the only one who feels like this is a horribly designed rule?
For a start, basic income is designed to overcome t
I'm not the only one who feels like this is a horribly designed rule?
For a start, basic income is designed to overcome the cost of living,
which in Agora is 0. You could also argue its purpose is already
fulfilled by Action Points, which are far simpler, far more effective,
and far less damagi
I can't find any references to the Superintendent in the rules. Were
they part of something that got repealed recently?
On 2017-10-25 10:34, ATMunn wrote:
My first report! You may notice that this looks different in some ways
than what you're used to; I have changed some formatting things from
I certainly don't have beef with underutilised mechanics either, and
I'll confess I looked at this wincon as perhaps the most achievable
without catching onto a scam. I wouldn't vote to repeal any wincons
without adding new ones.
On 2017-10-24 12:07, Josh T wrote:
I think I have one trust tok
Class-N is a leftover, I remember crimes working that way back when I
was around originally.
I use Thunderbird, which works well enough? Made by Mozilla and
certainly decent.
CAN suggests that it's possible to do, MAY suggests that it's legal to
do (ie if it's already been established elsewhere
You missed Contracts v8 in this list of passed proposals D:
On 2017-10-22 23:31, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
I resolve the decision(s) to adopt proposal(s) 7923-7929 below.
[This notice resolves the Agoran dec
And of course now that I think about it that's a ridiculously roundabout
way of specifying it but oh well
On 2017-10-22 15:29, Telnaior wrote:
There's plenty of dissent, so may as well?
I spend an action point to initiate a Call For Judgement on the
statement "Telnaior attempted to publish a
I mean... I had noticed :P and the ADoP office itself being in confusion
is really troubling...
On 2017-10-22 15:10, VJ Rada wrote:
The FLR hasn't had them in a long time: certainly not since I've been
a player. I think Gaelan took them out.
JDGA: I'm ironically not sure what you can deputize
Could be a potential option for the HLR? (if officialising that is even
a good idea)
Would be really useful to have if we don't just want to officially add
(or overrule) CFJs through proposal, though. There really is a lot to
absorb as a newbie :P
As for the late reports in offices, is there muc
Is there any real reason for the subject line not to count,
incidentally, or is it worth CFJing?
On 2017-10-22 14:46, Telnaior wrote:
This is a notice of honour. (Apparently the subject line doesn't count)
Alexis gains a Karma for being extra helpful, Gaelan loses a Karma for
being slack on r
Thankyou :D
Though I haven't been able to figure out what the karma actually is or
where it comes from? If someone could explain or link to where it was
set up, that might be helpful...
On 2017-10-22 13:25, Alexis Hunt wrote:
This is a Notice of Honour: Cuddle Beam loses a Karma for blocking
wrote:
Absolutely! You're on the list. I'll try to look out for ones that aren't
"super-complicated" to start.
On Sun, 22 Oct 2017, Madeline wrote:
Would I be able to give the Weekend Court a try, perhaps? I might need some
assistance at first with learning the ropes o
Would I be able to give the Weekend Court a try, perhaps? I might need
some assistance at first with learning the ropes of what to consider
when making a judgement and how to consider it, but I'm definitely
interested in trying.
On 2017-10-22 11:18, Kerim Aydin wrote:
==
This is a really cool idea, I'm looking forward to seeing how it works.
One issue I can see is that if you're going to have the oligarchs vote
among each other, we'll need to amend the voting system to allow for
Decisions where not everyone is eligible to vote.
On 2017-10-21 10:59, Kerim Aydi
Is the inactivity tax really necessary? Shinies of deregistered players
already don't count towards the supply limit. I'm alright with the idea
of a wealth tax, but you might want to tie your shiny values to the
supply limit rather than hardcoding them so that it's futureproof.
(Something like
Another option could be to go all the way with this and remove the
supply limit altogether, making shinies destructible and having costs
based on how many are possessed by players, then rewards either fully
constant or based on some kind of logarithmic function? (Having them
tied linearly to ho
e you registered (I think), so I'm still learning the ropes.
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Madeline wrote:
That's both the most disappointing (but perhaps the most sensible)
interpretation and means I'm stuck being broke D:
On 2017-10-21 07:47, Aris Merchant wr
at 1:46 PM, Madeline wrote:
Alright, so what... does happen? It specifies you can't destroy a stamp if
Agora can't pay the balance, but nothing else has a similar clause which
suggests it's intended to still be possible.
On 2017-10-21 07:44, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
The
Alright, so what... does happen? It specifies you can't destroy a stamp
if Agora can't pay the balance, but nothing else has a similar clause
which suggests it's intended to still be possible.
On 2017-10-21 07:44, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
The shiny balance can not be negative bec
201 - 220 of 220 matches
Mail list logo
