Re: DIS: Proto: But what is truth?

2008-07-14 Thread Zefram
comex wrote: For every other action, If possible I do X and I attempt to do X do not satisfy Rule 478's criterion-- that the person performing the action announces that e performs it-- We have historically allowed quite a bit of latitude in the use of conditionals. It's not codified, but we seem

DIS: Proto: But what is truth?

2008-07-13 Thread Ed Murphy
Proto-Proposal: But what is truth? Zefram and Goethe are co-authors of this proposal. Amend Rule 2149 (Truthfulness) to read: A person SHALL NOT make a public statement unless e reasonably believes it is true. For the purpose of this rule: a) Merely quoting a false

Re: DIS: Proto: But what is truth?

2008-07-13 Thread Elliott Hird
2008/7/13 Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: A person SHALL NOT make a public statement unless e reasonably believes it is true. This is a fundamentally flawed and dangerous idea and should not pass.

Re: DIS: Proto: But what is truth?

2008-07-13 Thread Zefram
Elliott Hird wrote: This is a fundamentally flawed and dangerous idea and should not pass. What is the nature of the flaw? Does the current R2149 share it? -zefram

Re: DIS: Proto: But what is truth?

2008-07-13 Thread Taral
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Elliott Hird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/7/13 Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: A person SHALL NOT make a public statement unless e reasonably believes it is true. This is a fundamentally flawed and dangerous idea and should not pass. I just think it

Re: DIS: Proto: But what is truth?

2008-07-13 Thread Elliott Hird
2008/7/13 Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Elliott Hird wrote: This is a fundamentally flawed and dangerous idea and should not pass. What is the nature of the flaw? Does the current R2149 share it? An announcement is a vessel for performing or trying to perform an action. A failing action is not

Re: DIS: Proto: But what is truth?

2008-07-13 Thread Ed Murphy
ais523 wrote: I would strongly prefer it if rule 2149 was amended the other way, to make failed attempts to perform acts legal (e.g. what happens if a contest is decontestified but the contestmaster still has to try to award points). Easy argument for EXCUSED for failing to award them,

Re: DIS: Proto: But what is truth?

2008-07-13 Thread Zefram
ais523 wrote: I would strongly prefer it if rule 2149 was amended the other way, to make failed attempts to perform acts legal As has been repeatedly pointed out, failing attempts at speech actions can still avoid false statements, provided that the statement carries an appropriate qualifier.

Re: DIS: Proto: But what is truth?

2008-07-13 Thread Zefram
Taral wrote: A person SHALL not make a public statement e believes to be false. We tried that, in the original version of rule 2149, and eventually rejected it when restoring the rule after the truthiness era. The problem is that a reckless falsehood is still dishonest and problematic. -zefram

Re: DIS: Proto: But what is truth?

2008-07-13 Thread Ed Murphy
Taral wrote: On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Elliott Hird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/7/13 Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: A person SHALL NOT make a public statement unless e reasonably believes it is true. This is a fundamentally flawed and dangerous idea and should not pass.

Re: DIS: Proto: But what is truth?

2008-07-13 Thread Zefram
Elliott Hird wrote: An announcement is a vessel for performing or trying to perform an action. We announce a lot of things other than actions. An announcement is a vessel for informing players about the game state. A failing action is not an illegal lie. It doesn't have to be, as already

Re: DIS: Proto: But what is truth?

2008-07-13 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, ais523 wrote: Hmm... I seem to have a veto right now and rule 2149 is power 1. I don't really like using vetos, but now might seem to be a good time. Would this be massively against the Agoran Spirit if I try? Would people just try to make it democratic? In my opinion,

Re: DIS: Proto: But what is truth?

2008-07-13 Thread Ben Caplan
On Sunday 13 July 2008 06:29:26 pm Kerim Aydin wrote: That being said, even taking on a more conservative role, the fact that something like this particular rule is pretty darn important to the tone of play but at power-1 means a veto is particularly apt. If something of this importance

Re: DIS: Proto: But what is truth?

2008-07-13 Thread comex
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 7:08 PM, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As has been repeatedly pointed out, failing attempts at speech actions can still avoid false statements, provided that the statement carries an appropriate qualifier. Formulations such as If possible I do X. and I attempt to do

Re: DIS: Proto: But what is truth?

2008-07-13 Thread Michael Norrish
Ed Murphy wrote: A person SHALL NOT make a public statement unless e reasonably believes it is true. For the purpose of this rule: c) A public statement that one performs an action is true if and only if one thereby succeeds in performing that

DIS: Proto: But what is truth?

2008-07-13 Thread Ed Murphy
Proto-Proposal: But what is truth? (AI = 2, please) Zefram and Goethe are co-authors of this proposal. Change the power of Rule 2149 (Truthfulness) to 2, and amend it to read: A person SHALL NOT make a public statement unless e reasonably believes it is true, or else makes eir