Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

Janet Cobb via agora-discussion [2024-04-23 00:59]: > On 4/23/24 00:55, mqyhlkahu via agora-discussion wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Janet (randomnetcat) responded to our Declaration of Intent to Push the > > Boulder[1] with the following[2]: > > > >> this is *very* close to accidentally being a

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On 4/23/24 00:55, mqyhlkahu via agora-discussion wrote: > Hello, > > Janet (randomnetcat) responded to our Declaration of Intent to Push the > Boulder[1] with the following[2]: > >> this is *very* close to accidentally being a tabled intent under R1728 rather >> than actually pushing the bolder. >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

Hello, Janet (randomnetcat) responded to our Declaration of Intent to Push the Boulder[1] with the following[2]: > this is *very* close to accidentally being a tabled intent under R1728 rather > than actually pushing the bolder. To our understanding, our action is not a Tabled Action[3] because

DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On 4/23/24 00:21, mqyhlkahu via agora-business wrote: > Hello, > > We formally declare our intent to perform the following action(s): > {{{ > In accordance with [1], we announce that we Push the Boulder, thereby > increasing its Height by 1. > >[1] Rule 2683/1 (Power=0.5) > }}} >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On 10/12/23 20:17, Ned Strange via agora-discussion wrote: > This is not a working link if you aren't aware.; > > Regards > > On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 9:18 AM nix via agora-business < > agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > >> file:///tmp/Screenshot_2023-10-12_17-16-26.png >> > > Yea, we

DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

This is not a working link if you aren't aware.; Regards On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 9:18 AM nix via agora-business < agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > file:///tmp/Screenshot_2023-10-12_17-16-26.png > -- >From R. Lee

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

> On Jul 25, 2023, at 3:14 PM, Battadia via agora-discussion > wrote: > > I express my desire to register! > Once the registration process is complete, I award myself a Welcome Package. > >> On Wed, 26 Jul 2023 at 00:55, juan via agora-discussion < >> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

Battadia via agora-discussion [2023-07-26 08:13]: > I express my desire to register! > Once the registration process is complete, I award myself a Welcome Package. Welcome Battadia! You are registered. -- juan

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

I express my desire to register! Once the registration process is complete, I award myself a Welcome Package. On Wed, 26 Jul 2023 at 00:55, juan via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > Battadia via agora-business [2023-07-25 20:08]: > > I award myself a Welcome Package.

DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

Battadia via agora-business [2023-07-25 20:08]: > I award myself a Welcome Package. I don't know if this is enough to register. Someone may know more, but as far as I understand, you must clearly put forth intent to register. -- juan Registrar

DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

Aenet Thank you for the welcome package Trigon On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 7:41 PM Reuben Staley via agora-business < agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On 3/16/21 5:33 PM, Aidan Anthony via agora-business wrote: > > I register > > > > I cause the above player to gain a Welcome Package. > >

DIS: Re: BUS: (No Subject)

(...did this create a proposal? It was sent to business but doesn't say "proposal".)

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (No Subject)

Thank you for the package, whatever it may contain (I'm still working my way through the current game-state). I'm deciding to play again while starting both a new job and a graduate degree (after all, I'll need some sort of equally-stressful distraction when those things stress me out), so I

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (No Subject)

I thought it might be you :) Welcome back!!! On 7/14/2019 2:24 PM, nch wrote: You're right, I'm rusty. And regrettably the Protonmail IMAP bridge doesn't have a Linux release yet, so I guess I'll revive this account. I register with the name nch. On 7/14/19 3:37 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:

DIS: Re: BUS: (No Subject)

If you were hoping that the cc would register you, it likely doesn't: actions can only be taken "within" messages (within the bodies). You can refer to other parts of the email in the body (e.g. "I do what the subject line says") but you can't straight-out take actions without some indication

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

Welcome to the game! Just doing a reply works. The one thing to remember is that by default your reply will go to agora-discussion. If you want to reply to the same list as the previous email for some reason, make sure you change the address. Failing to change the adress is in fact such a common

DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

Bernie is fine. Also, how do I reply to you? I just pressed the reply button on gmail, so I'm hoping that works. On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 9:12 AM Reuben Staley wrote: > Welcome, again. > > What would you like others to refer to you as? Is "Bernie" okay? > > -- > Trigon > > On Sat, Apr 6, 2019,

DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

Doesn't Rule 2240 imply the opposite of your argument? In a conflict between clauses of the same Rule, if exactly one claims precedence over the other, then it takes precedence; otherwise, the later clause takes precedence. Greetings, Ørjan. On Tue, 21 Nov 2017, Kerim Aydin

DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

I agree with this intepretation, but I believe it is problematic and should be fixed. On 11/21/2017 01:32 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > I shiny-CFJ on the following statement: > > G. CAN assign this CFJ to emself by announcement. > > > ARGUMENTS > > Rule 991 last paragraph paraphrases as

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

True, I missed that. Thanks. -Aris On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > On Sun, 5 Nov 2017 at 16:06 Aris Merchant > wrote: >> >> On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 6:57 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: >> > Proposal: A Most

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On Sun, 5 Nov 2017 at 16:06 Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 6:57 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > Proposal: A Most Ingenious Paradox (AI=1.7) > > {{{ > > Text in square brackets is not a part of this proposal and has no > >

DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 6:57 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > Proposal: A Most Ingenious Paradox (AI=1.7) > {{{ > Text in square brackets is not a part of this proposal and has no > effect. > > Enact a new power-1 rule entitled "Win by Paradox": > > If a CFJ has been assigned a

DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 6:57 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > Proposal: A Most Ingenious Paradox (AI=1.7) Do you want to pend this? -Aris

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

"nor is it appropriate if the undecidability arises from the case itself." On Sun, 29 Oct 2017, VJ Rada wrote: > I suppose that's IRRELEVANT. > > On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 1:09 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > Doesn't this allow for making statements that include well-known >

DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

Doesn't this allow for making statements that include well-known logical paradoxes that have no bearing on the game itself? (Eg: A barber who must shave all who do not shave themselves and nobody else, cannot shave emself) On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:

DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

I suppose that's IRRELEVANT. On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 1:09 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > Doesn't this allow for making statements that include well-known logical > paradoxes that have no bearing on the game itself? (Eg: A barber who must > shave all who do not shave themselves and

DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On Sun, 22 Oct 2017, Aris Merchant wrote: I submit the following proposal, and pend it for 1 AP. An entity's tax amount is, at any given time, (max(ceil(T% of (S - 10)), 0)), where max is the maximum of its inputs, ceil is the operation of rounding up to the nearest integer, T is the tax

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

>entity's shiny abalance. abalance should be balance? On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > Then, we need to rename the Tax Rate. > > > On 10/22/2017 07:43 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: >> Not apart from deregistration and

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

Then, we need to rename the Tax Rate. On 10/22/2017 07:43 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > Not apart from deregistration and administrative fees, neither of > which would normally be considered taxes. > > -Aris > > > > On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

Not apart from deregistration and administrative fees, neither of which would normally be considered taxes. -Aris On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > We already have taxes. > > > On 10/22/2017 07:39 PM, Aris Merchant

DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

We already have taxes. On 10/22/2017 07:39 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > I submit the following proposal, and pend it for 1 AP. > > -Aris > --- > Title: It's death _and_ taxes > Adoption index: 1.0 > Author: Aris > Co-author(s): > > > Lines beginning with hashmarks ("#") and comments in square

DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On Nov 19, 2016, at 7:54 PM, Josh T wrote: > 皆さん、 > > I announce the formation of the Organization with name "蘭亭社" and the > following Charter: > > 1. この憲章には、以下の同じ行に書かれている用語が同意義です。 > * Agora, アゴラ, 阿呉羅 > * Announcement, 公表 > * Appropriate, ふさわしい, 相応しい >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On 03/05/2012 12:21 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: Transfer half from each first-class person rounded down, and half from each golem rounded up? I like this last one.

DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, FKA441344 wrote: I submit a proposal with title {Only Some Players} and text { Amend Rule 2362 by replacing the text {      At the start of each week, half of each person's rubles (rounded      down to the nearest integer) are destroyed, then two rubles are      

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Kerim Aydin wrote: On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, FKA441344 wrote: I submit a proposal with title {Only Some Players} and text { Amend Rule 2362 by replacing the text {      At the start of each week, half of each person's rubles (rounded      down to the nearest integer)

DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote: I cash the promise titled {Anyone Can Mislead The Leader}. Note to H. Promotor omd:  if this was effective (I don't remember anyone causing the President to taunt the police), then it caused FKA441344 to submit two

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

I don't recall reading any message that did that, though my memory is probably faulty. On Feb 23, 24 Heisei, at 5:31 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote: I cash the promise titled {Anyone Can Mislead The Leader}.

DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 5:28 PM, 441344 441...@gmail.com wrote: I initiate a criminal case naming omd as the Accused, failing to publish the Promotor's report during the week Mon. 16 - Sun. 22 and distribute the proposals currently in the proposal pool that were in there at the beginning of

DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On 01/22/2012 03:28 PM, 441344 wrote: I intend to deputise for Horton to publish Horton's weekly report for the week Mon. 23 - Sun. 29. I intend to deputise for the Promotor to publish the Promotor's report for the week Mon. 16 - Sun. 22 and distribute the proposals currently in the proposal

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On 1/18/12, Pavitra celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote: On 01/18/2012 04:14 PM, 441344 wrote: *Pavrita Probably effective anyway. Oops, sorry about that. Golem by announcement, specifying it's Alarm. its Alarm. Thanks for the correction. Decreasing the Alarm of a Clock Golem is

DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On 01/18/2012 04:14 PM, 441344 wrote: *Pavrita Probably effective anyway. Golem by announcement, specifying it's Alarm. its Alarm. Decreasing the Alarm of a Clock Golem is secured. Can I increase the Alarm of someone else's Clock Golem, since it's not secured? The Golemkeepor's

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On 15 January 2012 15:24, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote: On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 9:15 AM, 441344 441...@gmail.com wrote:  Amend Rule 1950 by replacing the text  {  Adoption index is a switch possessed by Agoran decisions, whose value is  either none (default) or an integral multiple

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On 01/17/2012 05:03 AM, Arkady English wrote: On 15 January 2012 15:24, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote: On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 9:15 AM, 441344 441...@gmail.com wrote: Amend Rule 1950 by replacing the text { Adoption index is a switch possessed by Agoran decisions, whose value is

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On 17 January 2012 23:39, Pavitra celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote: On 01/17/2012 05:03 AM, Arkady English wrote: On 15 January 2012 15:24, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote: On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 9:15 AM, 441344 441...@gmail.com wrote:  Amend Rule 1950 by replacing the text  {  

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On 01/17/2012 06:27 PM, Arkady English wrote: And the thing here is that total votes DO matter. There are Tv = Vf+Va voters, so if 1 person votes against (i.e. Va = 1) the highest possible adoption index that could be reached is (T-1). Thus by setting the adoption index greater than (T-1) a

DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 9:15 AM, 441344 441...@gmail.com wrote:  Amend Rule 1950 by replacing the text  {  Adoption index is a switch possessed by Agoran decisions, whose value is  either none (default) or an integral multiple of 0.1 from 1.0 to 9.9.  } with the text  {  Adoption index is a

DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

teucer wrote: I initiate an inquiry CFJ on the statement {No actions were performed by announcement due to the first 6 lines of the above-quoted message} with arguments {Any specification of an action in those lines is unclear due to, if those lines are an encoded message rather than just

DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On 14 January 2012 21:30, 441344 441...@gmail.com wrote:  Any player CAN, with Agoran Consent, cause Agora to post a blog post  (specifying its title, text, and list of categories) or comment  (specifying its text) to BlogNomic. Not really. If this was done, then Agora's gamestate would

DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

Maybe it would be better that Agora was not actually a person at all. I don't see why it has to be one. On Jan 14, 24 Heisei, at 7:06 AM, 441344 441...@gmail.com wrote: I submit a promise with title {Anyone Can Mislead The Leader} and conditions {The president has taunted the police, and at

DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

omd wrote: This doesn't work because Rule 105 prevents persons from making Rule Changes. In general, what is this supposed to fix? FYI for 441344: the usual workaround is any player CAN by announcement cause this rule to repeal itself.

DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

omd wrote: Proposal: The rule already says that N is 1 unless otherwise specified (AI=3) Amend Rule 1728 by removing: (Without Objection is shorthand for this method with N = 1.) and by removing: (With Support is shorthand for this method with N = 1.) But then only Without 1

DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 01:31 +, 441344 wrote: I hereby register. I declare an intent to sit without objection. I submit a proposal with title {fix to 1023/28} and text {Amend Rule 1023/28 by replacing the text {Agoran weeks begin at midnight UTC on Monday.} with {Agoran weeks begin when

DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On 13 January 2012 01:31, 441344 441...@gmail.com wrote: I submit a proposal with title {fix to 1023/28} and text {Amend Rule 1023/28 by replacing the text {Agoran weeks begin at midnight UTC on Monday.} with {Agoran weeks begin when Mondays begin.} and replacing the text {Agoran months begin

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On Fri, 13 Jan 2012, Elliott Hird wrote: On 13 January 2012 01:31, 441344 441...@gmail.com wrote: I submit a proposal with title {fix to 1023/28} and text {Amend Rule 1023/28 by replacing the text {Agoran weeks begin at midnight UTC on Monday.} with {Agoran weeks begin when Mondays

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: At first I thought putting on the revision number means it breaks if another proposal changes the revision number in the meantime but then I thought is it even possible to amend a specific revision number of a rule? so

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: At first I thought putting on the revision number means it breaks if another proposal changes the revision number in the meantime but then I thought is it even possible to amend a specific revision number of a rule? so

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On 01/13/2012 04:01 PM, Arkady English wrote: How about we put to the test: CFJ: {The statement Amend Rule /yy is equivalent to Amend Rule IFF its revision number is yy.} Missing trailing quote.

DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 8:31 PM, 441344 441...@gmail.com wrote: I submit a proposal with title {fix to 1023/28} and text {Amend Rule 1023/28 by replacing the text {Agoran weeks begin at midnight UTC on Monday.} with {Agoran weeks begin when Mondays begin.} and replacing the text {Agoran months

DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

Welcome! Charles Walker Sent from my mobile. On 30 Mar 2011 19:00, Tedd Williams wofi...@yahoo.com wrote: I wish to register. I am a first-class person, being composed mostly of Carbon, Oxygen, and Hydrogen. I wish to be known as Wofi, or Woofie if that is not available.

DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 9:04 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote: I was going to deregister, So I'll just twiddle a line of CotC's report. Thank you. -- Taral tar...@gmail.com Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you.     -- Unknown

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 11:52 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Zac Sipes zac0...@gmail.com wrote: zac0...@gmail.com Do you want to register as a player?  If so, you should say so-- sorry, I think this is a bit too unclear. What, no CFJ? :)

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 08:34 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote: On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 11:52 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Zac Sipes zac0...@gmail.com wrote: zac0...@gmail.com Do you want to register as a player? If so, you should say so-- sorry, I think

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, ais523 wrote: On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 08:34 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote: On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 11:52 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Zac Sipes zac0...@gmail.com wrote: zac0...@gmail.com Do you want to register as a player?

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, ais523 wrote: On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 08:34 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote: On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 11:52 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Zac Sipes

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Jonathan Rouillard jonathan.rouill...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, ais523 wrote: On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 08:34 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote: On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 11:52 PM,

DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Zac Sipes zac0...@gmail.com wrote: zac0...@gmail.com Do you want to register as a player? If so, you should say so-- sorry, I think this is a bit too unclear.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On 10-10-20 11:52 PM, omd wrote: On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Zac Sipeszac0...@gmail.com wrote: zac0...@gmail.com Do you want to register as a player? If so, you should say so-- sorry, I think this is a bit too unclear. Yes, yes it is.

DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

Am Donnerstag, den 16.09.2010, 20:07 -0400 schrieb comex: Proposal: individualism (AI=2, II=0, Distributable) Repeal Rule 2303 (Teams), Rule 2304 (The Referee), Rule 2305 (Fans), and Rule 2306 (Team Tactics). II=0? -- Keba

DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

2009/5/19 thespyguy thespy...@gmail.com: I register Your HTML email is no match for my client.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 2:29 PM, ais523 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 17:35 -0700, Quazie wrote: I post the following Sell Ticket: 1 VP, I will object or support a change to the ?? pledge. This ticket may be filled mutiple times, though only

DIS: Re: BUS: This subject is only a subject if it is a subject

Elliott Hird wrote: If the above statement is false, This condition cannot be evaluated by any reasonable effort, so the attempted action is invalid due to unclarity. -zefram

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: This subject is only a subject if it is a subject

2008/7/16 Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Elliott Hird wrote: If the above statement is false, This condition cannot be evaluated by any reasonable effort, so the attempted action is invalid due to unclarity. -zefram It can be evaluated trivially - ask me.

DIS: Re: BUS: This subject is only a subject if it is a subject

tusho wrote: I am drinking coffee. If the above statement is false, I initiate a criminal CFJ against tusho for violating rule 2149 by making a false statement in the message that initiated this CFJ. I'm treating this as not communicating intent with sufficient clarity to be effective.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: This subject is only a subject if it is a subject

2008/7/16 Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'm treating this as not communicating intent with sufficient clarity to be effective. Want to ask me whether I was drinking coffee?

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: This subject is only a subject if it is a subject

tusho wrote: 2008/7/16 Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Elliott Hird wrote: If the above statement is false, This condition cannot be evaluated by any reasonable effort, so the attempted action is invalid due to unclarity. -zefram It can be evaluated trivially - ask me. All right, I'll bite.

DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Elliott Hird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I agree to the following, known as ??: { This is a public contract. This is a pledge iff it has one party. Any person may join or leave this contract by announcement. This contract can

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

2008/7/10 Sgeo [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This doesn't seem to require that the supporters or objectors of an amendment to this contract be parties to this contract. Correct

DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On 8/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: