DIS: Re: BUS: Gramatically Correct

2009-06-14 Thread C-walker
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.comwrote: On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Charles Walkercharles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote: I submit the following proposal and intend to make it Distributable without objection: I agree to the following: {{ This is

DIS: Re: BUS: Gramatically Correct

2009-06-13 Thread Charles Walker
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote: On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Charles Walker wrote: I was just trying to keep the Janitor in work, honest. I submit the following proposal and intend to make it Distributable without objection: Again, I object.  -G. I feel

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Gramatically Correct

2009-06-13 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Charles Walkercharles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote: On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote: On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Charles Walker wrote: I was just trying to keep the Janitor in work, honest. I submit the following proposal

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Gramatically Correct

2009-06-13 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Aaron Goldfeinaarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote: Isn't the point of the game to have arbitrary proposals? As it is, the number of proposals (including good proposals) will drop. I know I won't be submitting as many. The point of the game is that the rules can

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Gramatically Correct

2009-06-13 Thread comex
Make all your proprosals ii-3, it's not like it affects voting ;) Sent from my iPhone On Jun 13, 2009, at 12:20 PM, Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote: On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote: On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Charles Walker wrote:

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Gramatically Correct

2009-06-13 Thread Alex Smith
On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 15:17 -0400, comex wrote: Make all your proprosals ii-3, it's not like it affects voting ;) Proposals have been rejected for having IIs too high before now. -- ais523

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Gramatically Correct

2009-06-13 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Aaron Goldfeinaarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote: Isn't the point of the game to have arbitrary proposals? As it is, the number of proposals (including good proposals) will drop. I know I

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Gramatically Correct

2009-06-13 Thread Alex Smith
On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 14:43 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote: I don't think Agora would be much of a game if its rules were only amended 27 times in 230 years. Sounds like the FRC! (Ordinance change proposals have been voted against there solely for the reason that the rules had been changed a few

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Gramatically Correct

2009-06-13 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Charles Walker wrote: Again, I object.  -G. I feel this is grossly unfair. I am a new player with very few notes and intend to gain most my Notes/ new currency of them through proposals. If I have to pay to get them distributed, then this becomes almost impossible for

DIS: Re: BUS: Gramatically Correct

2009-06-13 Thread Benjamin Caplan
Geoffrey Spear wrote: On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Charles Walkercharles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote: I submit the following proposal and intend to make it Distributable without objection: I agree to the following: {{ This is a public contract governed by the rules of Agora and a