Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: CFJ 3537 assigned to V.J. Rada

2017-07-07 Thread V.J Rada
Oh blimey. I might just keep my judgement in place and add an explanatory note later. Unless anyone wants to support the moot. One more for that. On Thursday, July 6, 2017, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > NttPF. > > Greetings, > Ørjan. > > On Thu, 6 Jul 2017, V.J Rada wrote: > > I move reconsideration.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: CFJ 3537 assigned to V.J. Rada

2017-07-06 Thread Ørjan Johansen
NttPF. Greetings, Ørjan. On Thu, 6 Jul 2017, V.J Rada wrote: I move reconsideration. I recuse myself. On Thursday, July 6, 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: TTttPF Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.co

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: CFJ 3537 assigned to V.J. Rada

2017-07-06 Thread V.J Rada
I'm recused now, the judgement doesn't count. I refused because I'm on mobile and don't really want to deal with the linked deputization issue. I recommend both cfjs be assigned to the same person. I arbitrarily recommend quazie. The point PSS raised doesn't matter though. In a car auction, the au

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: CFJ 3537 assigned to V.J. Rada

2017-07-06 Thread V.J Rada
I move reconsideration. I recuse myself. On Thursday, July 6, 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > TTttPF > > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > > > > > On Jul 5, 2017, at 5:16 PM, Publius Scribonius

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: CFJ 3537 assigned to V.J. Rada

2017-07-05 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
I move to enter this judgement into moot. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Jul 5, 2017, at 4:35 PM, V.J Rada wrote: > > This contains my motion to reconsider and my > adressing your argument (although cursorily) > > On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 6:42 PM,

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: CFJ 3537 assigned to V.J. Rada

2017-07-05 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
Except you should observe that an action does not cause the property to be transferred. A person must still cause it to be transferred. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Jul 5, 2017, at 1:42 PM, V.J Rada wrote: > > I move to reconsider (you can't, y

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: CFJ 3537 assigned to V.J. Rada

2017-07-05 Thread Cuddle Beam
Ah, OK. All good, thank you. Enviado desde mi iPhone > El 5 jul 2017, a las 22:35, V.J Rada escribió: > > I move to reconsider (you can't, you cndan intend to move > and wait for two support. > > I'm judging this FALSE. GASP! Surprise rocks the nation. > I'm not judging it FALSE because auctio

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: CFJ 3537 assigned to V.J. Rada

2017-07-05 Thread Cuddle Beam
Where did you post the reconsideration? I only find the original Judgement. > El 5 jul 2017, a las 22:19, V.J Rada escribió: > > Posting to business because each A-D post might > be a seperate breach. > > I already moved to reconsider and did so. You can > now intend to, with two support, enter

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: CFJ 3537 assigned to V.J. Rada

2017-07-05 Thread Cuddle Beam
I do that. Enviado desde mi iPhone > El 5 jul 2017, a las 19:42, V.J Rada escribió: > > I move to reconsider (you can't, you cndan intend to move > and wait for two support. > > I'm judging this FALSE. GASP! Surprise rocks the nation. > I'm not judging it FALSE because auctioning is a regulate

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: CFJ 3537 assigned to V.J. Rada

2017-07-05 Thread Cuddle Beam
I motion to reconsider. Whether the winning bid can actually make a transfer or not shouldn't affect if there is actually an *auction* or not in the first place, I believe. On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 11:14 AM, V.J Rada wrote: > I'm judging this FALSE. GASP! Surprise rocks the nation. > I'm not jud