ak or gender neutral 'they' in the future.
uot; and R2350
"Proposals" are both also P3, so not less. They should be able to set
something to P>3, right? Am I missing something?
If it's False, it's False because of an interaction with the Power
system, or because I had not consented (which was the original
question's intent I think). Even if this is the right judgment it should
be reconsidered to include those lines of inquiry.
In a decluttering effort, I'm going to start using this address.
On 8/3/19 10:39 AM, Nich Evans wrote:
On 8/3/19 10:12 AM, D. Margaux wrote:
On Aug 2, 2019, at 11:27 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
The caller also provides this as an example:
"Repeal Rule 1698 (Ossification).
Enact a power 100 rule that procides, 'It is IMPOSSIBLE to change
ions of rule changes that are
IMPOSSIBLE. For example, it would be IMPOSSIBLE to enact the following pairs of "rule
The rule says "changes", not "sequence of changes". Any number of
proposals could be inserted before or between your examples to make them
work; the rule does not check for specific sets.
y Rule 2557, so the base value takes on its
default of 2.
I don't think there's a lot of basis for this one. Punctuation marks are
generally considered not important in the rules when they contradict
common sense readings.
On 8/10/19 2:47 PM, Nich Evans wrote:
On 8/9/19 9:58 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
[Please don't kill me for this one. I think this is a valid question.]
I CFJ: "The base value of the Crime of Endorsing Forgery is 2."
Excerpt from Rule 2202:
Such ratification or an
everyone for letting you down.
Take care of yourself first and worry about us later.
we make losing a battle increment/decrement you towards 0?
Bah, sent this without the sacrifice. Will have to correct tomorrow.
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019, 8:37 PM Nich Evans wrote:
> I submit myself to the Agoran Gods!
> I submit the following rule to the contest:
> I dedicate this rule to the LORD. As all gods are jealou
Mail list logo