Re: DIS: PROTO: [Proposal] A Reward for Obedience

2017-10-16 Thread ATMunn .
Alright, thanks. I guess I should have more confidence in myself. As for the victory elections thing, I might actually go ahead and repeal that when I actually post the proposal. As for when I'll post it, I'll probably post it later today, if nobody else says anything. On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at

Re: DIS: PROTO: [Proposal] A Reward for Obedience

2017-10-15 Thread VJ Rada
No I think that's an actually good proposal that provides a path to victory that might be conceivable while also incentivising strict rules enforcement. I would likely vote FOR it in its current form. Although that said, perhaps if this comes in Victory Elections should go, for in my opinion

Re: DIS: PROTO: [Proposal] A Reward for Obedience

2017-10-15 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
I know that I for one read over it and liked the idea and wasn't sure whether it was would work as is, but didn't have thoughts on how to improve it, therefore I didn't comment. I'm sorry that I wasn't very helpful, but I don't have ideas on how I could be. On 10/15/2017 08:35 PM, ATMunn .

Re: DIS: PROTO: [Proposal] A Reward for Obedience

2017-10-14 Thread ATMunn .
Okay, the second draft is finished. I've changed a bunch of stuff, it's almost a completely different proposal now. I've taken into consideration almost everything Aris and Alexis mentioned, so I've given them co-authorship as well. I'm sure it's still got plenty of flaws. But it should be better.

Re: DIS: PROTO: [Proposal] A Reward for Obedience

2017-10-14 Thread ATMunn .
I don't really know what you mean by that, I don't think so? Anyone can win via a Victory Election; this is much harder to achieve as you have to not do anything wrong in order to be eligible. On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 9:33 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > Isn't that just 1/6 of a Victory

Re: DIS: PROTO: [Proposal] A Reward for Obedience

2017-10-14 Thread VJ Rada
Isn't that just 1/6 of a Victory Election? On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 12:18 PM, ATMunn . wrote: > Thanks, both of you, for your suggestions. I'm working on a revised version > at the moment. One idea I had, regarding what Alexis said about the idea of > players declaring

Re: DIS: PROTO: [Proposal] A Reward for Obedience

2017-10-14 Thread Aris Merchant
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 8:50 AM, ATMunn . wrote: > Title: A Reward for Obedience > Author: ATMunn > Co-Author(s): > AI: 1 > > Create a new power-1 rule titled "Badges of Honor" > { > Badges of Honor are an indestructible, player-owned asset. The Referee > is the

Re: DIS: PROTO: [Proposal] A Reward for Obedience

2017-10-14 Thread Alexis Hunt
On Sat, 14 Oct 2017 at 11:50 ATMunn . wrote: > Title: A Reward for Obedience > Author: ATMunn > Co-Author(s): > AI: 1 > > Create a new power-1 rule titled "Badges of Honor" > Nit: I prefer Honour :P > { > Badges of Honor are an indestructible, player-owned asset.