Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [FRC] An Argument
I intended it to be an indirect quotation, but I'm not sure that will hold up. If it doesn't I will resubmit the argument with the correction. On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 1:55 PM Corona wrote: > > Possibly INVALID: not referring to Agora properly, though this is an > indirect speech quotation, so it may not count. > > > > error in the presentation of eir reasons for Agora's eksallance. In > >
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [FRC] An Argument
No, e should be "referred to as such", but I was addressing em. On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 1:44 PM Corona wrote: > > This isn't related to this rule in particular, but isn't addressing you > "Your Honor" illegal, given #6: "The Right Honourable > Judge G. SHALL be referred to as such"? > > ~Corona > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 5:57 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > > > > appears VALID (again, formal response later). > > > > On Wed, 11 Jul 2018, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > > > I present the following argument on the first docket to the court: > > > > > > Your Honor, My Fellow Counselor V.J. Rada seems to have made a fatal > > > error in the presentation of eir reasons for Agora's eksallance. In > > > eir argument, e stated that e would present six reasons. However, he > > > proceeded to present five reasons. Your Honor, I do not believe that > > > making such false statements before the court should be tolerated. > > > > > > Your Honor, while I concur with My Fellow Counselor Aris's objections > > > to many of My Fellow Counselor V.J. Rada's reasons, I intend to argue > > > that the arguments before the court are needless division. I believe > > > that My Fellow Counselors V.J. Rada and Aris are engaging in a petty > > > battle to divide the Great and Ancient Nomics when it would be most > > > beneficial to all, if the Great and Ancient Nomics were to come > > > together in cooperation to attempt to develop a better understanding > > > of the theory and practice of Nomic and develop a larger following to > > > address the problems that My Fellow Counselor Aris noted, regarding > > > the lack of dedication within the playerbase of the Great and Ancient > > > Nomic of Agora. To this end, I propose that a Joint Commissions on the > > > Shared Interests be formed to address those issues that affect the > > > Great and Ancient Nomics, with representatives from all interested > > > nomics. > > > > > > >
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [FRC] An Argument
This isn't related to this rule in particular, but isn't addressing you "Your Honor" illegal, given #6: "The Right Honourable Judge G. SHALL be referred to as such"? ~Corona On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 5:57 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > appears VALID (again, formal response later). > > On Wed, 11 Jul 2018, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > > I present the following argument on the first docket to the court: > > > > Your Honor, My Fellow Counselor V.J. Rada seems to have made a fatal > > error in the presentation of eir reasons for Agora's eksallance. In > > eir argument, e stated that e would present six reasons. However, he > > proceeded to present five reasons. Your Honor, I do not believe that > > making such false statements before the court should be tolerated. > > > > Your Honor, while I concur with My Fellow Counselor Aris's objections > > to many of My Fellow Counselor V.J. Rada's reasons, I intend to argue > > that the arguments before the court are needless division. I believe > > that My Fellow Counselors V.J. Rada and Aris are engaging in a petty > > battle to divide the Great and Ancient Nomics when it would be most > > beneficial to all, if the Great and Ancient Nomics were to come > > together in cooperation to attempt to develop a better understanding > > of the theory and practice of Nomic and develop a larger following to > > address the problems that My Fellow Counselor Aris noted, regarding > > the lack of dedication within the playerbase of the Great and Ancient > > Nomic of Agora. To this end, I propose that a Joint Commissions on the > > Shared Interests be formed to address those issues that affect the > > Great and Ancient Nomics, with representatives from all interested > > nomics. > > > >
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [FRC] An Argument
It's fine. On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 11:16 AM Rebecca wrote: > > sorry > > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 1:15 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > "eksallance" is not a quirky spelling? > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 11:13 AM Rebecca wrote: > > > > > > The above rule is invalid: no quirky spelling > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 1:06 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < > > > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > I present the following argument on the first docket to the court: > > > > > > > > Your Honor, My Fellow Counselor V.J. Rada seems to have made a fatal > > > > error in the presentation of eir reasons for Agora's eksallance. In > > > > eir argument, e stated that e would present six reasons. However, he > > > > proceeded to present five reasons. Your Honor, I do not believe that > > > > making such false statements before the court should be tolerated. > > > > > > > > Your Honor, while I concur with My Fellow Counselor Aris's objections > > > > to many of My Fellow Counselor V.J. Rada's reasons, I intend to argue > > > > that the arguments before the court are needless division. I believe > > > > that My Fellow Counselors V.J. Rada and Aris are engaging in a petty > > > > battle to divide the Great and Ancient Nomics when it would be most > > > > beneficial to all, if the Great and Ancient Nomics were to come > > > > together in cooperation to attempt to develop a better understanding > > > > of the theory and practice of Nomic and develop a larger following to > > > > address the problems that My Fellow Counselor Aris noted, regarding > > > > the lack of dedication within the playerbase of the Great and Ancient > > > > Nomic of Agora. To this end, I propose that a Joint Commissions on the > > > > Shared Interests be formed to address those issues that affect the > > > > Great and Ancient Nomics, with representatives from all interested > > > > nomics. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > From V.J. Rada > > > > > > -- > From V.J. Rada
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [FRC] An Argument
sorry On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 1:15 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > "eksallance" is not a quirky spelling? > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 11:13 AM Rebecca wrote: > > > > The above rule is invalid: no quirky spelling > > > > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 1:06 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < > > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I present the following argument on the first docket to the court: > > > > > > Your Honor, My Fellow Counselor V.J. Rada seems to have made a fatal > > > error in the presentation of eir reasons for Agora's eksallance. In > > > eir argument, e stated that e would present six reasons. However, he > > > proceeded to present five reasons. Your Honor, I do not believe that > > > making such false statements before the court should be tolerated. > > > > > > Your Honor, while I concur with My Fellow Counselor Aris's objections > > > to many of My Fellow Counselor V.J. Rada's reasons, I intend to argue > > > that the arguments before the court are needless division. I believe > > > that My Fellow Counselors V.J. Rada and Aris are engaging in a petty > > > battle to divide the Great and Ancient Nomics when it would be most > > > beneficial to all, if the Great and Ancient Nomics were to come > > > together in cooperation to attempt to develop a better understanding > > > of the theory and practice of Nomic and develop a larger following to > > > address the problems that My Fellow Counselor Aris noted, regarding > > > the lack of dedication within the playerbase of the Great and Ancient > > > Nomic of Agora. To this end, I propose that a Joint Commissions on the > > > Shared Interests be formed to address those issues that affect the > > > Great and Ancient Nomics, with representatives from all interested > > > nomics. > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > From V.J. Rada > -- >From V.J. Rada
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [FRC] An Argument
"eksallance" is not a quirky spelling? On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 11:13 AM Rebecca wrote: > > The above rule is invalid: no quirky spelling > > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 1:06 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I present the following argument on the first docket to the court: > > > > Your Honor, My Fellow Counselor V.J. Rada seems to have made a fatal > > error in the presentation of eir reasons for Agora's eksallance. In > > eir argument, e stated that e would present six reasons. However, he > > proceeded to present five reasons. Your Honor, I do not believe that > > making such false statements before the court should be tolerated. > > > > Your Honor, while I concur with My Fellow Counselor Aris's objections > > to many of My Fellow Counselor V.J. Rada's reasons, I intend to argue > > that the arguments before the court are needless division. I believe > > that My Fellow Counselors V.J. Rada and Aris are engaging in a petty > > battle to divide the Great and Ancient Nomics when it would be most > > beneficial to all, if the Great and Ancient Nomics were to come > > together in cooperation to attempt to develop a better understanding > > of the theory and practice of Nomic and develop a larger following to > > address the problems that My Fellow Counselor Aris noted, regarding > > the lack of dedication within the playerbase of the Great and Ancient > > Nomic of Agora. To this end, I propose that a Joint Commissions on the > > Shared Interests be formed to address those issues that affect the > > Great and Ancient Nomics, with representatives from all interested > > nomics. > > > > > > -- > From V.J. Rada
