Re: RFR: 8282662: Use List/Set.of() factory methods to reduce memory consumption [v2]

On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 16:09:01 GMT, liach wrote: >> Сергей Цыпанов has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> 8282662: Revert dubious changes > > src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/invoke/Metho

Re: RFR: 8282662: Use List/Set.of() factory methods to reduce memory consumption [v2]

On Tue, 8 Mar 2022 14:27:23 GMT, liach wrote: >> Сергей Цыпанов has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> 8282662: Revert dubious changes > > src/java.base/share/classes/java/nio/file/FileTreeI

Re: RFR: 8282662: Use List/Set.of() factory methods to reduce memory consumption [v2]

On Tue, 8 Mar 2022 14:27:23 GMT, liach wrote: >> Сергей Цыпанов has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> 8282662: Revert dubious changes > > src/java.base/share/classes/java/nio/file/FileTreeI

Re: RFR: 8282662: Use List/Set.of() factory methods to reduce memory consumption [v2]

On Tue, 8 Mar 2022 14:28:00 GMT, liach wrote: >> Сергей Цыпанов has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> 8282662: Revert dubious changes > > src/java.base/share/classes/sun/reflect/annotation/Ann

Re: RFR: 8282662: Use List/Set.of() factory methods to reduce memory consumption [v2]

On Tue, 8 Mar 2022 14:28:00 GMT, liach wrote: >> Сергей Цыпанов has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> 8282662: Revert dubious changes > > src/java.base/share/classes/sun/reflect/annotation/Ann

Re: RFR: 8282662: Use List/Set.of() factory methods to reduce memory consumption [v2]

t; - parameter types are never null > - interfaces used for proxy construction and returned from > `Class.getInterfaces()` are never null > - exceptions types of method signature are never null Сергей Цыпанов has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since t

Re: RFR: 8282662: Use List/Set.of() factory methods to reduce memory consumption [v2]

t; - parameter types are never null > - interfaces used for proxy construction and returned from > `Class.getInterfaces()` are never null > - exceptions types of method signature are never null Сергей Цыпанов has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since t

Re: RFR: 8282662: Use List/Set.of() factory methods to reduce memory consumption

On Mon, 7 Mar 2022 16:06:44 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote: > Notice list.of will have the downside of copying the input array when the > size is not small while arrays aslist does not. Is the tradeoff worth it? Good point, I see risky changes in this PR: - `ProxyGenerator` - `Proxy` - `MethodType`

Re: RFR: 8282662: Use List/Set.of() factory methods to reduce memory consumption

On Mon, 7 Mar 2022 16:06:44 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote: > Notice list.of will have the downside of copying the input array when the > size is not small while arrays aslist does not. Is the tradeoff worth it? Good point, I see risky changes in this PR: - `ProxyGenerator` - `Proxy` - `MethodType`

RFR: 8282662: Use List/Set.of() factory methods to reduce memory consumption

`List.of()` along with `Set.of()` create unmodifiable `List/Set` but with smaller footprint comparing to `Arrays.asList()` / `new HashSet()` when called with vararg of size 0, 1, 2. In general replacement of `Arrays.asList()` with `List.of()` is dubious as the latter is null-hostile, however in

RFR: 8282662: Use List/Set.of() factory methods to reduce memory consumption

`List.of()` along with `Set.of()` create unmodifiable `List/Set` but with smaller footprint comparing to `Arrays.asList()` / `new HashSet()` when called with vararg of size 0, 1, 2. In general replacement of `Arrays.asList()` with `List.of()` is dubious as the latter is null-hostile, however in

RFR: 8282701: Use Class.getInterfaces(false) where possible to reduce allocation pressure

`Class.getInterfaces(false)` does not clone underlying array and can be used in cases when the returned array is only read from. - Commit messages: - 8282701: Use Class.getInterfaces(false) where possible to reduce allocation pressure Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull

Re: RFR: 8282632: Cleanup unnecessary calls to Throwable.initCause() in java.security.jgss

On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 19:33:21 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote: > Pass cause exception as constructor parameter is shorter and easier to read. LGTM - Marked as reviewed by stsypa...@github.com (no known OpenJDK username). PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7682

Re: [PVE-User] hi my network card is not working

Hi, Please give the output of command : lspci -nn | grep Network 02.03.2022 05:12, M. Lyakhovsky пишет: Sergey TS The best Regard __ pve-user mailing list pve-user@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user

Bug#1006414: reportbug: systemd-networkd does not read DHCPV4 config section

Yes, it does work with [DHCPv4]. Thanks! 25 февр. 2022 г. 12:27:29 Michael Biebl : > Am 25.02.22 um 05:43 schrieb Sergey Matsievskiy: >> Package: systemd >> Version: 250.3-2 >> Severity: normal >> X-Debbugs-Cc: seregaxvm.m...@gmail.com >> Dear Maintainer, >> systemd-networkd does not read setting

Bug#1006414: reportbug: systemd-networkd does not read DHCPV4 config section

Yes, it does work with [DHCPv4]. Thanks! 25 февр. 2022 г. 12:27:29 Michael Biebl : > Am 25.02.22 um 05:43 schrieb Sergey Matsievskiy: >> Package: systemd >> Version: 250.3-2 >> Severity: normal >> X-Debbugs-Cc: seregaxvm.m...@gmail.com >> Dear Maintainer, >> systemd-networkd does not read setting

Re: [PVE-User] New Disk on one node of Cluster.

Sergey, El 16/2/22 a las 10:54, Сергей Цаболов escribió: What IOPS are you getting in your 4K tests? You won't get near direct disk IOPS... I need to test the host disk or the VM disk ? If you're worried about VM performance, then test VM disks... :) Cheers Eneko Lacunza Zuzendar

Re: latest Pyhton

2.7.9 was the most current i was able to use with softimage i think it's a bit faster than built-in python, and you can easily use external libraries like numpy etc. (couldn't install numpy on internal python, but i think it's 'theoretically' possible) Anyway even with numpy python was 3 times

[Elisa] [Bug 450410] New: when you turn on the next track, the volume is reset to maximum sound.

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450410 Bug ID: 450410 Summary: when you turn on the next track, the volume is reset to maximum sound. Product: Elisa Version: 21.12.2 Platform: Archlinux Packages OS: Lin

Re: [PVE-User] New Disk on one node of Cluster.

ndows VM What IOPS are you getting in your 4K tests? You won't get near direct disk IOPS... I need to test the host disk or the VM disk ? Did you try with multiple parallel VMs? Aggregate 4K results should be much better :) I think about this way, maybe is work. Cheers El 16/2/22 a

Re: [PVE-User] New Disk on one node of Cluster.

device class of an existing OSD and how to create those rules: https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/rados/operations/crush-map/#device-classes Cheers, Aaron On 2/16/22 09:52, Сергей Цаболов wrote: Hi to all. I have 7 node's PVE Cluster + Ceph storage In 7 node I add new 2 disks and want to

Re: [PVE-User] New Disk on one node of Cluster.

Hi Eneko, 16.02.2022 11:58, Eneko Lacunza пишет: Hi Sergey, El 16/2/22 a las 9:52, Сергей Цаболов escribió: I have 7 node's PVE Cluster + Ceph storage In 7 node I add new 2 disks and want to make specific new osd pool on Ceph. Is possible with new  disk create specific pool ? Yo

[PVE-User] New Disk on one node of Cluster.

Hi to all. I have 7 node's PVE Cluster + Ceph storage In 7 node I add new 2 disks and want to make specific new osd pool on Ceph. Is possible with new  disk create specific pool ? Thanks Sergey TS The best Regard ___ pve-user mailing list pve-user@

ZooKeeper 3.7.1 release plan

Hello, There are a lot of improvements and issues in 3.7.1 (or 3.8.0, 3.6.4) fix version, including security CVE fixes (e.g. ZOOKEEPER-4337 ) and there are no any information about release dates. Moreover, latest releases 3.7.0 and 3.6.3 were

Bug#965379: FBreader: Sometimes draws hyphens after each word

Good day. This bug occurs because field *flags* of variable *myAnalysis* is not initialized. And therefore flag PANGO_ANALYSIS_FLAG_NEED_HYPHEN of this field randomly set or clear. Sincerelly yours, Siarhei Abmiotka. Description: Fix random bug: hyphenation after each word Author: Siarhei Ab

Bug#965379: FBreader: Sometimes draws hyphens after each word

Good day. This bug occurs because field *flags* of variable *myAnalysis* is not initialized. And therefore flag PANGO_ANALYSIS_FLAG_NEED_HYPHEN of this field randomly set or clear. Sincerelly yours, Siarhei Abmiotka. Description: Fix random bug: hyphenation after each word Author: Siarhei Ab

Re: [PVE-User] Update proxmox

Hi David, Before upgrade you need backup all  VM  or moved all to other host so as not to interrupt their work. After see this  documentation Upgrade from 5.x to 6.0 10.02.2022 13:18, David Martin пишет: Hi, I have 25 server's proxm

[ceph-users] Re: ceph osd tree

Janne, Thank you match, now is ok. 04.02.2022 17:46, Janne Johansson пишет: Den fre 4 feb. 2022 kl 15:31 skrev Сергей Цаболов : Hi everyone, One question below is my ceph osd tree, like you see some osd the REWEIGHT is less the default 1.0 * 2hdd7.27739 osd.2

[ceph-users] ceph osd tree

Hi everyone, One question below is my ceph osd tree, like you see some osd the  REWEIGHT is less the default 1.0 Advise me how I change the REWEIGHT on this osd? ID   CLASS  WEIGHT TYPE NAME    STATUS  REWEIGHT PRI-AFF  -1 106.43005  root default -13  14.55478

Re: Either intel nor glamor drivers do not work for Samsung NC215S

OMG, thank you so much Jonathan, it worked! I did not think about missing access to PCI. Do you maybe also know how to enable Chromium hardware acceleration on my hardware? пт, 4 февр. 2022 г. в 02:36, Jonathan Gray : > > On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 07:59:44PM +0300, Sergey Andrianov wrote: > > Hell

[PVE-User] ceph osd tree & destroy_cephfs

Hi to all. In my Proxmox Cluster  with 7 node I try to change some Pgs, Target Ratio and some Target size on some pool. MAX AVAIL on important pool not changed, I think if I destroy 2 pool on ceph is changed. I read the instructions https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/chapter-pveceph.html#_des

Re: Either intel nor glamor drivers do not work for Samsung NC215S

> The N455 and N570 should have the same 3150 GFX, see So this is why Debian's Xorg works, as I think. I'm trying to look into the driver's source, but I'm not a very experienced C programmer. Trying to compile the latest Xorg from the stable branch (in /usr/xenocara), it has xf86-video-intel v2.9

Fwd: Either intel nor glamor drivers do not work for Samsung NC215S

Hello, I've recently found some old Atom-based netbook in a "trash" box in my friend's house. HDD was dead, so I've replaced it with Kingston SSD and installed OpenBSD 7. I've installed Xorg, but I can't manage to start it. According to the specs of this netbook, the graphics card is Intel GMA 315

[ceph-users] TARGET RATIO

Hello to all, I read the documentation https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/rados/operations/placement-groups/ In this part the page placement-groups this part: *TARGET RATIO*, if present, is the ratio of storage that the administrator has specified that they expect this pool to consume relative

Re: [PVE-User] Ceph df

Hello, I read the documentation before. I know this page. In the part of page placement-groups this part: *TARGET RATIO*, if present, is the ratio of storage that the administrator has specified that they expect this pool to consume relative to other pools with target ratios set. If both targ

Re: [PVE-User] Ceph df

rget ration on vm.pool need not the *1* but more? * * 31.01.2022 15:05, Alwin Antreich пишет: Hello Sergey, January 31, 2022 9:58 AM, "Сергей Цаболов" wrote: My question is how I can decrease MAX AVAIL in default pool device_health_metrics + cephfs_metadata and set it to vm.pool and ce

[PVE-User] Ceph df

Hi to all. I have cluster with  7 pve nodes After ceph complete to  set the health: HEALTH_OK I for info  with command check the MAX AVAILABLE  storage : CLASS  SIZE AVAIL   USED    RAW USED  %RAW USED hdd    `106 TiB  96 TiB  10 TiB    10 TiB   9.51 TOTAL  106 TiB  96 TiB  10 TiB    1

Re: [PVE-User] openvswitch + bond0 + 2 Fiber interfaces.

net manual #    ovs_type OVSPort #    ovs_mtu 9000 #Fiber auto ens1f12np0 iface ens1f12np0 inet manual #    ovs_type OVSPort #    ovs_mtu  9000 #Fiber auto eno1 iface eno1 inet manual #    ovs_type OVSPort auto eno2 iface eno2 inet manual #    ovs_type OVSPort 21.01.2022 15:28, Сергей Цаболов пи

Re: [PVE-User] openvswitch + bond0 + 2 Fiber interfaces.

n Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 1:23 PM Сергей Цаболов wrote: Hello, I have PVE cluster and I thinking to install on the pve-7 openvswitch for can move and add VM from other networks and Proxmox Cluster With base Linux bridge all work well without problem with 2 interface 10GB ens1f0np0 ens1f12np0 I in

[PVE-User] openvswitch + bond0 + 2 Fiber interfaces.

Hello, I have PVE cluster and I thinking to install on  the pve-7 openvswitch for can move and add VM from other networks and Proxmox Cluster With base Linux bridge all work well without problem with 2 interface 10GB ens1f0np0 ens1f12np0 I  install openvswitch  with manual https://pve.prox

Re: [PVE-User] Unexpected reboot one of 6 node in Cluster

Hi  to all. Is good configure if I enable the /# select watchdog module (default is softdog) #WATCHDOG_MODULE=ipmi_watchdog/ /For now I have / /lsmod | grep dog softdog    16384  2 / / / 19.01.2022 14:22, Сергей Цаболов пишет: Hi, Like in this old thread https

Integrated: 8276166: Remove dead code from MimeTable and MimeEntry

On Fri, 29 Oct 2021 11:20:57 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов wrote: > There are unused methods/constructors in mentioned classes that can be safely > removed. This pull request has now been integrated. Changeset: cf977e88 Author:Sergey Tsypanov Committer: Julia Boes URL:

Re: RFR: 8276166: Remove dead code from MimeTable and MimeEntry

On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 16:55:44 GMT, Julia Boes wrote: >> Not now > > Happy to /sponsor once you /integrate, @stsypanov. @FrauBoes thanks! - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6169

[PVE-User] Unexpected reboot on of 6 node

Hi, Like in this old thread https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/unexpected-reboots-help-need.34310/ I have similar problem. In cluster I have 7 node. root@pve-1: pveversion -v proxmox-ve: 6.4-1 (running kernel: 5.4.143-1-pve) pve-manager: 6.4-13 (running version: 6.4-13/9f411e79) pve-kernel-h

Bug#1003707: nvidia-legacy-340xx-driver

On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 14:10:31 +0100 Andreas Beckmann wrote: > On 14/01/2022 02.03, Сергей Petrov wrote: > > Package: nvidia-legacy-340xx-driver > > Version: 340.108-12 > > There is not much infomation in this bug report. I'll try to guess, if > I'm wron

Bug#1003707: nvidia-legacy-340xx-driver

Package: nvidia-legacy-340xx-driver Version: 340.108-12 Jan 12 00:23:27 debian-home systemd[1]: Starting NVIDIA Persistence Daemon... Jan 12 00:23:27 debian-home nvidia-persistenced: Started (13397) Jan 12 00:23:27 debian-home nvidia-persistenced: Failed to open libnvidia-cfg.so.1: libnvidia-cfg.s

Re: [PVE-User] Remove 1-2 OSD from PVE Cluster

"Remove OSD" button in PVE WUI? :-) El 13/1/22 a las 9:13, Сергей Цаболов escribió: Hello to all. I have cluster with 7 node. Storage for VM disk and others pool data is on ceph version 15.2.15 (4b7a17f73998a0b4d9bd233cda1db482107e5908) octopus (stable) On pve-7 I have 10 OSD and for t

[ceph-users] Re: [PVE-User] Remove 1-2 OSD from PVE Cluster

me my steps command is correct ? Or I need change some steps? Step 6,7,8 looks a lot like "ceph osd purge", so unless you have a very old installation, replace them with one command. Apart from that it looks ok. -- - С уважением Сергей Цаболов, Системный адм

[ceph-users] [PVE-User] Remove 1-2 OSD from PVE Cluster

Hello to all. I have Proxmox cluster with 7 node. Storage for VM disk and others pool data is on ceph version 15.2.15 (4b7a17f73998a0b4d9bd233cda1db482107e5908) octopus (stable) On pve-7 I have 10 OSD and for test I want to remove 2 osd from this node. I write some steps command how I remove

[PVE-User] Remove 1-2 OSD from PVE Cluster

Hello to all. I have cluster with 7 node. Storage for VM disk and others pool data is on ceph version 15.2.15 (4b7a17f73998a0b4d9bd233cda1db482107e5908) octopus (stable) On pve-7 I have 10 OSD and for test I want to remove 2 osd from this node. I write some steps command how I remove this OS

Re: RFR: 8279833: Loop optimization issue in String.encodeUTF8_UTF16 [v4]

On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 13:53:58 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote: >> In `String.encodeUTF8_UTF16`, making the `char c` local to each loop helps >> the performance of the method by helping C2 optimize each individual loop >> better. >> >> Results on the updated micros: >> 19-b04: >> >> Benchmark

Bug#1003598: nvidia-legacy-340xx-driver bug

Package: nvidia-legacy-340xx-driver Version: 340.108-12 after upgrade: Jan 2 20:59:40 debian-home kernel: [ 12.651966] nvidia: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel. Jan 2 20:59:40 debian-home kernel: [ 12.651981] nvidia: module license 'NVIDIA' taints kernel. Jan 2 20:59:40 debian-home

Withdrawn: 8278518: String(byte[], int, int, Charset) constructor and String.translateEscapes() miss bounds check elimination

On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 09:39:55 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов wrote: > Originally this was spotted by by Amir Hadadi in > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70272651/missing-bounds-checking-elimination-in-string-constructor > > It looks like in the following code in `String(byte[], int,

Re: RFR: 8278518: String(byte[], int, int, Charset) constructor and String.translateEscapes() miss bounds check elimination

On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 09:39:55 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов wrote: > Originally this was spotted by by Amir Hadadi in > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70272651/missing-bounds-checking-elimination-in-string-constructor > > It looks like in the following code in `String(byte[], int,

Integrated: 8278461: Use Executable.getSharedParameterTypes() instead of Executable.getParameterTypes() in trusted code

On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 11:50:50 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов wrote: > `Executable.getParameterTypes()` creates a copy of underlying array which is > redundant in trusted code when we are sure the action is read-only. This pull request has now been integrated. Changeset: ece98d85 Author:Sergey Ts

Re: nginx есть десятки гигабат памяти и сервер уходит в swap

Здравствуйте, Maxim. Вы писали 11 января 2022 г., 16:09:07: > Hello! > On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 05:54:36AM +0300, Дугин Сергей wrote: >> Здравствуйте, Maxim. >> >> Вы писали 10 января 2022 г., 22:07:16: >> >> > А что при этом в конфиге? В частности,

Re: nginx есть десятки гигабат памяти и сервер уходит в swap

467200 ? Ss 05:39 0:30 nginx: master process /usr/sbin/nginx -c /etc/nginx/nginx.conf root 16005 0.1 2.6 4477008 3465784 ? S05:42 0:00 nginx: worker process В итоге 6 процессов кушают 3467940*6 около 20 гиг памяти при старте. Еще есть вот этот параметр client_max_body_size 128m; -- С уважением, Дугин Сергей mailto:d...@qwarta.ru QWARTA ___ nginx-ru mailing list nginx-ru@nginx.org http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-ru

Re: nginx есть десятки гигабат памяти и сервер уходит в swap

022, 8:43 PM Дугин Сергей wrote: >> Здравствуйте, Илья. >> >> Да reload делал не помогает и через killall-9 nginx делал, >> воркеров пробовал и так >> worker_processes auto; >> и так >> worker_processes 6; >> >> Памяти на сервере 128 гиг >>

Re: nginx есть десятки гигабат памяти и сервер уходит в swap

ете ? количество процессов-воркеров мониторите ? > пн, 10 янв. 2022 г. в 17:41, Дугин Сергей : >> Здравствуйте, Nginx-ru. >> >> Помогите nginx в течении часа после запуска начинает жрать порядка 60-70 >> гигобайт памяти и дальше растет >> не хвтает свапа и сервер перегружать

nginx есть десятки гигабат памяти и сервер уходит в swap

144 S 0.0 1.4 0:01.80 nginx -- С уважением, Дугин Сергей mailto:d...@qwarta.ru QWARTA ___ nginx-ru mailing list nginx-ru@nginx.org http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-ru

Re: RFR: 8278461: Use Executable.getSharedParameterTypes() instead of Executable.getParameterTypes() in trusted code [v3]

> `Executable.getParameterTypes()` creates a copy of underlying array which is > redundant in trusted code when we are sure the action is read-only. Сергей Цыпанов has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains two c

Re: RFR: 8278461: Use Executable.getSharedParameterTypes() instead of Executable.getParameterTypes() in trusted code [v2]

> `Executable.getParameterTypes()` creates a copy of underlying array which is > redundant in trusted code when we are sure the action is read-only. Сергей Цыпанов has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: 8278461: Revert Exec

Re: RFR: 8278461: Use Executable.getSharedParameterTypes() instead of Executable.getParameterTypes() in trusted code [v2]

On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 09:38:15 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов wrote: >> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/Executable.java line 313: >> >>> 311: // getParameterTypes(). >>> 312: if (!genericInfo) { >>> 313: return getSharedPara

Re: RFR: 8278461: Use Executable.getSharedParameterTypes() instead of Executable.getParameterTypes() in trusted code

On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 16:45:09 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote: >> `Executable.getParameterTypes()` creates a copy of underlying array which is >> redundant in trusted code when we are sure the action is read-only. > > src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/Executable.java line 317: > >> 315:

Re: RFR: 8278461: Use Executable.getSharedParameterTypes() instead of Executable.getParameterTypes() in trusted code

On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 16:38:05 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote: >> `Executable.getParameterTypes()` creates a copy of underlying array which is >> redundant in trusted code when we are sure the action is read-only. > > src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/Executable.java line 313: > >> 311:

Re: RFR: 8278461: Use Executable.getSharedParameterTypes() instead of Executable.getParameterTypes() in trusted code

On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 11:50:50 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов wrote: > `Executable.getParameterTypes()` creates a copy of underlying array which is > redundant in trusted code when we are sure the action is read-only. Let's wait - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6782

Re: RFR: 8279283 - BufferedInputStream should override transferTo [v5]

On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 13:43:12 GMT, Markus KARG wrote: >> Implementation of JDK-8279283 > > Markus KARG has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > fixed missing BufferedInputStream Maybe we need to include into this patch the benchmark

Re: [PVE-User] [ceph-users] Re: Ceph Usage web and terminal.

Ok,  I understand the case. 29.12.2021 16:13, Uwe Sauter пишет: Am 29.12.21 um 13:51 schrieb Сергей Цаболов: Hi, Uwe 29.12.2021 14:16, Uwe Sauter пишет: Just a feeling but I'd say that the imbalance in OSDs (one host having many more disks than the rest) is your problem. Yes, last no

Re: [PVE-User] [ceph-users] Re: Ceph Usage web and terminal.

and a little what to check  ? Can you explain me with example? Regards, Uwe Am 29.12.21 um 09:36 schrieb Сергей Цаболов: Hello to all. In my case I have the 7 node cluster Proxmox and working Ceph (ceph version 15.2.15  octopus (stable)": 7) Ceph HEALTH_OK ceph -s   cluster:    

Re: [PVE-User] [ceph-users] Re: Ceph Usage web and terminal.

Hello to all. In my case I have the 7 node cluster Proxmox and working Ceph (ceph version 15.2.15  octopus (stable)": 7) Ceph HEALTH_OK ceph -s   cluster:     id: 9662e3fa-4ce6-41df-8d74-5deaa41a8dde     health: HEALTH_OK   services:     mon: 7 daemons, quorum pve-3105,pve-3107,pve-3108

[ceph-users] Re: Ceph Usage web and terminal.

n some one to suggest me what I can to check in Ceph ? Thanks. 27.10.2021 12:34, Сергей Цаболов пишет: Hi, 27.10.2021 12:03, Eneko Lacunza пишет: Hi, El 27/10/21 a las 9:55, Сергей Цаболов escribió: My instalation of ceph is: 6 Node of Proxmox with 2 disk (8 TB) on the every node. I make

Re: RFR: 8274811: Remove superfluous use of boxing in java.base

On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 17:41:58 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote: >> Usages of primitive types should be preferred and makes code easier to read. >> Similar cleanups: >> 1. [JDK-8273168](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8273168) >> java.desktop >> 2. [JDK-8274234](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/br

Re: RFR: 8274811: Remove superfluous use of boxing in java.base

On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 17:41:58 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote: >> Usages of primitive types should be preferred and makes code easier to read. >> Similar cleanups: >> 1. [JDK-8273168](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8273168) >> java.desktop >> 2. [JDK-8274234](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/br

Re: RFR: 8274811: Remove superfluous use of boxing in java.base

On Sat, 11 Sep 2021 12:11:50 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote: > Usages of primitive types should be preferred and makes code easier to read. > Similar cleanups: > 1. [JDK-8273168](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8273168) > java.desktop > 2. [JDK-8274234](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/

Re: RFR: 8274811: Remove superfluous use of boxing in java.base

On Sat, 11 Sep 2021 12:11:50 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote: > Usages of primitive types should be preferred and makes code easier to read. > Similar cleanups: > 1. [JDK-8273168](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8273168) > java.desktop > 2. [JDK-8274234](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/

Re: RFR: 8276166: Remove dead code from MimeTable and MimeEntry

On Fri, 29 Oct 2021 11:20:57 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов wrote: > There are unused methods/constructors in mentioned classes that can be safely > removed. Not now - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6169

[Linphone-users] Linphone Desktop Linux Ports List

Hello dear users!  I ask for a list of all ports that must be open for Linphone Desktop to work, indicating the service and data transfer protocol.  For example, SIP-port 5060-udp.  Thank you. ___ Linphone-users mailing list Linphone-users@nongnu.org

Integrated: 8277868: Use Comparable.compare() instead of surrogate code

On Fri, 26 Nov 2021 12:46:59 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов wrote: > Instead of something like > > long x; > long y; > return (x < y) ? -1 : ((x == y) ? 0 : 1); > > we can use `return Long.compare(x, y);` > > All replacements are done with IDE. This pull request has n

Integrated: 8277868: Use Comparable.compare() instead of surrogate code

On Fri, 26 Nov 2021 12:46:59 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов wrote: > Instead of something like > > long x; > long y; > return (x < y) ? -1 : ((x == y) ? 0 : 1); > > we can use `return Long.compare(x, y);` > > All replacements are done with IDE. This pull request has n

Integrated: 8277868: Use Comparable.compare() instead of surrogate code

On Fri, 26 Nov 2021 12:46:59 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов wrote: > Instead of something like > > long x; > long y; > return (x < y) ? -1 : ((x == y) ? 0 : 1); > > we can use `return Long.compare(x, y);` > > All replacements are done with IDE. This pull request has n

Integrated: 8277868: Use Comparable.compare() instead of surrogate code

On Fri, 26 Nov 2021 12:46:59 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов wrote: > Instead of something like > > long x; > long y; > return (x < y) ? -1 : ((x == y) ? 0 : 1); > > we can use `return Long.compare(x, y);` > > All replacements are done with IDE. This pull request has n

Re: RFR: 8278518: String(byte[], int, int, Charset) constructor and String.translateEscapes() miss bounds check elimination

On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 13:20:46 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote: >>> Originally this was spotted by by Amir Hadadi in >>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70272651/missing-bounds-checking-elimination-in-string-constructor >> >> Before anyone looks at this, can you confirm that the patch does not includ

Re: RFR: 8278518: String(byte[], int, int, Charset) constructor and String.translateEscapes() miss bounds check elimination

On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 19:12:29 GMT, Mai Đặng Quân Anh wrote: > The problem, at first glance, seems to be that our compiled code is trying to > compute this mysterious number @merykitty how do you view it? 🤔 - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6812

Re: RFR: 8278518: String(byte[], int, int, Charset) constructor and String.translateEscapes() misses bounds check elimination

On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 09:55:36 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote: >> Originally this was spotted by by Amir Hadadi in >> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70272651/missing-bounds-checking-elimination-in-string-constructor >> >> It looks like in the following code in `String(byte[], int, int, Charset)` >>

RFR: 8278518: String(byte[], int, int, Charset) constructor and String.translateEscapes() misses bounds check elimination

Originally this was spotted by by Amir Hadadi in https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70272651/missing-bounds-checking-elimination-in-string-constructor It looks like in the following code in `String(byte[], int, int, Charset)` while (offset < sl) { int b1 = bytes[offset]; if (b1 >= 0) {

Bug#1001286: linux: Systems with more than 4 memory slots not supported yet, not instantiating SPD

Source: linux Version: 5.10.46-4 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: serfyo...@yandex.ru Dear Maintainer, /var/log/messages Dec 2 06:51:04 A1 kernel: [1.349519] i801_smbus :00:1f.3: SMBus using PCI interrupt

Re: RFR: 8277868: Use Comparable.compare() instead of surrogate code [v3]

On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 12:01:27 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote: >> Сергей Цыпанов has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> 8277868: Inline local var > > src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/Calendar.java line

Re: RFR: 8277868: Use Comparable.compare() instead of surrogate code [v4]

> Instead of something like > > long x; > long y; > return (x < y) ? -1 : ((x == y) ? 0 : 1); > > we can use `return Long.compare(x, y);` > > All replacements are done with IDE. Сергей Цыпанов has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional c

Re: RFR: 8277868: Use Comparable.compare() instead of surrogate code [v4]

> Instead of something like > > long x; > long y; > return (x < y) ? -1 : ((x == y) ? 0 : 1); > > we can use `return Long.compare(x, y);` > > All replacements are done with IDE. Сергей Цыпанов has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional c

Re: RFR: 8277868: Use Comparable.compare() instead of surrogate code [v3]

On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 12:01:27 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote: >> Сергей Цыпанов has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> 8277868: Inline local var > > src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/Calendar.java line

Re: RFR: 8277868: Use Comparable.compare() instead of surrogate code [v3]

On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 12:01:27 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote: >> Сергей Цыпанов has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> 8277868: Inline local var > > src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/Calendar.java line

Re: RFR: 8277868: Use Comparable.compare() instead of surrogate code [v4]

> Instead of something like > > long x; > long y; > return (x < y) ? -1 : ((x == y) ? 0 : 1); > > we can use `return Long.compare(x, y);` > > All replacements are done with IDE. Сергей Цыпанов has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional c

Re: RFR: 8277868: Use Comparable.compare() instead of surrogate code [v4]

> Instead of something like > > long x; > long y; > return (x < y) ? -1 : ((x == y) ? 0 : 1); > > we can use `return Long.compare(x, y);` > > All replacements are done with IDE. Сергей Цыпанов has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional c

Re: RFR: 8277868: Use Comparable.compare() instead of surrogate code [v3]

On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 12:01:27 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote: >> Сергей Цыпанов has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> 8277868: Inline local var > > src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/Calendar.java line

Re: RFR: 8277868: Use Comparable.compare() instead of surrogate code [v2]

On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 17:48:37 GMT, Phil Race wrote: >> Сергей Цыпанов has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> 8277868: Use Integer.signum() in BasicTableUI > > src/java.desktop/share/classes/

Re: RFR: 8277868: Use Comparable.compare() instead of surrogate code [v2]

On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 17:48:37 GMT, Phil Race wrote: >> Сергей Цыпанов has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> 8277868: Use Integer.signum() in BasicTableUI > > src/java.desktop/share/classes/

Re: RFR: 8277868: Use Comparable.compare() instead of surrogate code [v2]

On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 17:48:37 GMT, Phil Race wrote: >> Сергей Цыпанов has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> 8277868: Use Integer.signum() in BasicTableUI > > src/java.desktop/share/classes/

Re: RFR: 8277868: Use Comparable.compare() instead of surrogate code [v2]

On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 17:48:37 GMT, Phil Race wrote: >> Сергей Цыпанов has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> 8277868: Use Integer.signum() in BasicTableUI > > src/java.desktop/share/classes/

Re: RFR: 8277868: Use Comparable.compare() instead of surrogate code [v3]

> Instead of something like > > long x; > long y; > return (x < y) ? -1 : ((x == y) ? 0 : 1); > > we can use `return Long.compare(x, y);` > > All replacements are done with IDE. Сергей Цыпанов has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional

Re: RFR: 8277868: Use Comparable.compare() instead of surrogate code [v3]

> Instead of something like > > long x; > long y; > return (x < y) ? -1 : ((x == y) ? 0 : 1); > > we can use `return Long.compare(x, y);` > > All replacements are done with IDE. Сергей Цыпанов has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >