Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On Fri, 2021-10-29 at 23:08 -0300, Eriberto Mota wrote:
> To: 992...@bugs.debian.org
Please CC submitters when you have questions/comments they should see,
I only saw your message by coincidence when looking at the bug.
> Unfortunately, your script ends with
>
Navtej Bhatti wrote:
> I have a project to get Linux (specifically Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora,
> and Arch) working on chromebooks.
This sounds like something that should be done within those
distributions themselves, rather than outside them in a separate
project. General distros want to be able to
On Fri, 2021-12-31 at 09:10 -0500, Devops PK Carlisle LLC wrote:
> Just a quick question as to whether Evolution Mail is still
> supported/updated?
You have already gotten an answer, but for future reference, this sort
of question should be asked on Debian support channels not debian-devel.
On Thu, 2021-12-30 at 11:04 -0500, Silas Cutler wrote:
> I'd also like to see information on both how to submit
> vulnerabilities as well as how to contribute to getting them fixed.
These are addressed in the FAQ:
https://www.debian.org/security/faq#discover
On Tue, 2021-12-28 at 19:46 +0100, max wrote:
> Debian's security updates are created by volunteers working in their
> spare time. Some packages may receive more attention than others. To
> view the current list of known unfixed vulnerabilities see
>
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.21.7
Followup-For: Bug #814449
This could also be useful for a diff seen in #1002683,
where an additional space was inserted in dependencies:
-Depends: libfilezilla-common (>= ${source:Version}), ${shlibs:Depends},
${misc:Depends}
+Depends: libfilezilla-common
On Tue, 2021-12-28 at 18:37 +0100, Matthias wrote:
> but it would be great, if RadioTray will get back into the official
> Debian repository.
Please note the extra steps required when reintroducing packages:
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#reintroducing-pkgs
>
On Mon, 2021-12-27 at 18:13 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> It's phrased as question, not as you say. And I can certainly change the
> wording but then it's no longer an "action item" and I find it hard to
> keep the entry in its current place. Thus I prefer to restrict the cases
> where we show
On Mon, 2021-12-27 at 18:13 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> It's phrased as question, not as you say. And I can certainly change the
> wording but then it's no longer an "action item" and I find it hard to
> keep the entry in its current place. Thus I prefer to restrict the cases
> where we show
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream
Control: forwarded -1
https://github.com/Nemo157/cargo-lichking/commit/fb3dce3cd01aec138bc3a485ea7aaf829eca53ae
On Wed, 2019-10-23 at 08:10 +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> rust-cargo-lichking build-depends on librust-cargo-0.32+default-dev,
> which doesn't exist in
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream
Control: forwarded -1
https://github.com/Nemo157/cargo-lichking/commit/fb3dce3cd01aec138bc3a485ea7aaf829eca53ae
On Wed, 2019-10-23 at 08:10 +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> rust-cargo-lichking build-depends on librust-cargo-0.32+default-dev,
> which doesn't exist in
On Sat, 2021-12-25 at 18:25 +, John Scott wrote:
> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/carl9170fw/carl9170fw_1.9.9-399-gcd480b9-1.dsc
Some things that prevent the upload of this package:
I don't think udebs are needed for firmware packages, none of the other
WiFi firmware packages
On Sat, 2021-12-25 at 18:25 +, John Scott wrote:
> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/carl9170fw/carl9170fw_1.9.9-399-gcd480b9-1.dsc
Some things that prevent the upload of this package:
I don't think udebs are needed for firmware packages, none of the other
WiFi firmware packages
On Sat, 2021-12-25 at 18:25 +, John Scott wrote:
> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/carl9170fw/carl9170fw_1.9.9-399-gcd480b9-1.dsc
Some things that prevent the upload of this package:
I don't think udebs are needed for firmware packages, none of the other
WiFi firmware packages
Package: seabios
Version: 1.15.0-1
Severity: normal
File: /usr/share/seabios/optionrom/extboot.bin
File: /usr/share/seabios/optionrom/kvmvapic.bin
File: /usr/share/seabios/optionrom/linuxboot.bin
File: /usr/share/seabios/optionrom/multiboot.bin
File: /usr/share/seabios/optionrom/vapic.bin
User:
Package: moreutils
Version: 0.66-1
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/share/man/man1/parallel.1.gz
For the moreutils implementation of parallel:
I noticed that the first form of command does not use the shell:
parallel [options] [command] -- [argument ...]
I noticed that the second form of
Package: diffoscope
Version: 197
Severity: wishlist
I recently sponsored memtest86+ and used diffoscope to compare the
Debian source packages before uploading. The debian/ directory had been
subject to wrap-and-sort, which also affects the Architecture field.
The architecture list hadn't been
Package: diffoscope
Version: 197
Severity: wishlist
I recently sponsored memtest86+ and used diffoscope to compare the
Debian source packages before uploading. The debian/ directory had been
subject to wrap-and-sort, which also affects the Architecture field.
The architecture list hadn't been
Control: reopen -1
Control: retitle -1 smart-open: FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage -nc/--no-pre-clean
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On Sun, 2021-12-19 at 13:20 +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> Looks like it is a local issue for you
I narrowed it down, it occurs when
On Sat, 2021-12-18 at 17:07 -0800, Kip Warner wrote:
> I would suggest Paul, but only Paul can decide that. He knows much more
> about Debianization than I do and, unlike me, is an actual Debian
> developer.
FTR: I don't really have the time for this, and using it from a git
checkout is
On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 13:03:38 +0800 Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 10:15:42 -0800 Noah Meyerhans wrote:
>
> > On sid we currently see the follow rdeps:
>
> There are a few more in Build-Depends
Also there are a few Recommends and Suggests:
$ reverse-depends -s py
On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 13:03:38 +0800 Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 10:15:42 -0800 Noah Meyerhans wrote:
>
> > On sid we currently see the follow rdeps:
>
> There are a few more in Build-Depends
Also there are a few Recommends and Suggests:
$ reverse-depends -s py
On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 13:03:38 +0800 Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 10:15:42 -0800 Noah Meyerhans wrote:
>
> > On sid we currently see the follow rdeps:
>
> There are a few more in Build-Depends
Also there are a few Recommends and Suggests:
$ reverse-depends -s py
On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 13:03:38 +0800 Paul Wise wrote:
> smart-open: python3-boto
This one build-deps on both python3-boto and python3-boto3.
It also has an unrelated failure to build as the test suite cannot
import the google.cloud Python module. Filed as #1001932.
--
bye,
pabs
ht
On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 13:03:38 +0800 Paul Wise wrote:
> smart-open: python3-boto
This one build-deps on both python3-boto and python3-boto3.
It also has an unrelated failure to build as the test suite cannot
import the google.cloud Python module. Filed as #1001932.
--
bye,
pabs
ht
On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 13:03:38 +0800 Paul Wise wrote:
> smart-open: python3-boto
This one build-deps on both python3-boto and python3-boto3.
It also has an unrelated failure to build as the test suite cannot
import the google.cloud Python module. Filed as #1001932.
--
bye,
pabs
ht
Source: smart-open
Version: 5.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
When trying to rebuild smart-open in pbuilder, I get a test failure:
$ pdebuild
...
= test session starts
==
platform linux -- Python 3.9.9, pytest-6.2.5,
Source: smart-open
Version: 5.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
When trying to rebuild smart-open in pbuilder, I get a test failure:
$ pdebuild
...
= test session starts
==
platform linux -- Python 3.9.9, pytest-6.2.5,
On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 10:15:42 -0800 Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On sid we currently see the follow rdeps:
There are a few more in Build-Depends, the totality of them are spread
across several different teams and individuals. I would suggest an MBF
(mini bug filing) if python-boto is going to be
On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 10:15:42 -0800 Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On sid we currently see the follow rdeps:
There are a few more in Build-Depends, the totality of them are spread
across several different teams and individuals. I would suggest an MBF
(mini bug filing) if python-boto is going to be
On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 10:15:42 -0800 Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On sid we currently see the follow rdeps:
There are a few more in Build-Depends, the totality of them are spread
across several different teams and individuals. I would suggest an MBF
(mini bug filing) if python-boto is going to be
On Sat, 2021-12-18 at 12:20 -0500, Sean Anderson wrote:
> The upstream package name conflicts with the existing package loki
> ("MCMC linkage analysis on general pedigrees"). However, that package is
> "dead upstream" (according to debian/watch), so perhaps this package can
> get the name
On Sat, 2021-12-18 at 12:20 -0500, Sean Anderson wrote:
> The upstream package name conflicts with the existing package loki
> ("MCMC linkage analysis on general pedigrees"). However, that package is
> "dead upstream" (according to debian/watch), so perhaps this package can
> get the name
On Sat, 2021-12-18 at 12:20 -0500, Sean Anderson wrote:
> The upstream package name conflicts with the existing package loki
> ("MCMC linkage analysis on general pedigrees"). However, that package is
> "dead upstream" (according to debian/watch), so perhaps this package can
> get the name
On Sat, 2021-12-18 at 12:20 -0500, Sean Anderson wrote:
> The upstream package name conflicts with the existing package loki
> ("MCMC linkage analysis on general pedigrees"). However, that package is
> "dead upstream" (according to debian/watch), so perhaps this package can
> get the name
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Wise
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: mpv-mpris
Version : 0.6
Upstream Author : Ho-Yon Mak
* URL : https://github.com/hoyon/mpv-mpris
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Wise
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: mpv-mpris
Version : 0.6
Upstream Author : Ho-Yon Mak
* URL : https://github.com/hoyon/mpv-mpris
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Wise
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: mpv-mpris
Version : 0.6
Upstream Author : Ho-Yon Mak
* URL : https://github.com/hoyon/mpv-mpris
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C
Description
On Fri, 2021-12-17 at 11:28 +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Could anyone who's using Chromium on Debian please create a page on
> wiki.debian.org which lists the alternative options to use a current
> Chromium (Flatpak, ungoogled Chromium from elsewhere, snap, whatever
> else there is)?
The
On Fri, 2021-12-17 at 11:28 +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Could anyone who's using Chromium on Debian please create a page on
> wiki.debian.org which lists the alternative options to use a current
> Chromium (Flatpak, ungoogled Chromium from elsewhere, snap, whatever
> else there is)?
The
On Mon, 2021-12-13 at 19:55 +0100, Patrice Duroux wrote:
> Packages may provide a NEWS (or any other name, compressed or not, etc.) file
Since that is an upstream file, it is not standard across all Debian
package upstreams, including the name, file type and contents.
Different subsets of
On Tue, 2021-12-07 at 09:44 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> When the List-Archive header exists and contains a URL, the link could
> be to that URL. This works for Debian lists and mailman lists and
> probably other types of lists too.
PS: I note that the mailman3 archiver uses
On Tue, 2021-12-07 at 09:44 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> When the List-Archive header exists and contains a URL, the link could
> be to that URL. This works for Debian lists and mailman lists and
> probably other types of lists too.
PS: I note that the mailman3 archiver uses
Package: rpmlint
Version: 2.2.0+ds1-0.1
Severity: normal
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: obsolete-conffile adequate
The recent upgrade did not deal with obsolete conffiles properly.
Please use the dpkg-maintscript-helper support provided by
dh_installdeb to remove these obsolete
Package: privoxy
Version: 3.0.33-1
Severity: normal
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: obsolete-conffile adequate
The recent upgrade did not deal with obsolete conffiles properly.
Please use the dpkg-maintscript-helper support provided by
dh_installdeb to remove these obsolete conffiles
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
The SPTAG upstream doesn't support anything other than amd64 so it is
unlikely that the build failure on i386 will be fixed, so please remove
the src:sptag binaries from i386.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description:
Source: ceres-solver
Version: 2.0.0+dfsg1-1~exp1
Severity: serious
ceres-solver 2.0.0+dfsg1-1~exp1 introduced an invalid Uploaders field,
that is missing a comma between Anton Gladky and Francois Mazen.
$ apt-cache showsrc ceres-solver | grep -E '^$|^Version|^Uploaders'
Version: 1.14.0-14
Source: ceres-solver
Version: 2.0.0+dfsg1-1~exp1
Severity: serious
ceres-solver 2.0.0+dfsg1-1~exp1 introduced an invalid Uploaders field,
that is missing a comma between Anton Gladky and Francois Mazen.
$ apt-cache showsrc ceres-solver | grep -E '^$|^Version|^Uploaders'
Version: 1.14.0-14
Source: ceres-solver
Version: 2.0.0+dfsg1-1~exp1
Severity: serious
ceres-solver 2.0.0+dfsg1-1~exp1 introduced an invalid Uploaders field,
that is missing a comma between Anton Gladky and Francois Mazen.
$ apt-cache showsrc ceres-solver | grep -E '^$|^Version|^Uploaders'
Version: 1.14.0-14
Package: ftp
Version: 20210827-3
Severity: normal
Usertags: warnings
When I upgraded the ftp binary package from 0.17-35 to 20210827-3,
the tnftp invocation of update-alternatives gave a warning about
the netkit-ftp alternative being missing.
First tnftp was unpacked, then the old ftp package
On Tue, 2021-12-07 at 09:23 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> The tracker doesn't receive emails via mailing lists, it gets sent a
> direct copy from the various services.
Ah. That is the case for Debian but maybe not for other instances,
so I think this could be useful for some distros
On Tue, 2021-12-07 at 09:23 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> The tracker doesn't receive emails via mailing lists, it gets sent a
> direct copy from the various services.
Ah. That is the case for Debian but maybe not for other instances,
so I think this could be useful for some distros
Jan Girke wrote: [automatic translations below] [automatische Übersetzungen
unten]
> Könnte es sein das auch Windowsbenutzer mit Jigdo was runterladen wollen?
> Wieso ist da nichts darüber wie man Jigdo auf Windows verwendet?
gregor herrmann wrote:
> But this forked PPI seems like a blocker, at least I have no good
> idea how to handle it right now. [1]
It seems like the best option would be to talk to upstream about
depending on its dependencies instead of embedding/forking them.
--
bye,
pabs
gregor herrmann wrote:
> But this forked PPI seems like a blocker, at least I have no good
> idea how to handle it right now. [1]
It seems like the best option would be to talk to upstream about
depending on its dependencies instead of embedding/forking them.
--
bye,
pabs
On Mon, 2021-12-06 at 21:56 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Why do you want a lists.debian.org link when you already have a
> tracker.debian.org link pointing to the same content?
I don't want a tracker.d.o link. Mainly I want a link with a Message-ID
in it, which are more likely to be long-term
On Mon, 2021-12-06 at 21:56 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Why do you want a lists.debian.org link when you already have a
> tracker.debian.org link pointing to the same content?
I don't want a tracker.d.o link. Mainly I want a link with a Message-ID
in it, which are more likely to be long-term
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Currently the only place that testing migration mails are publicly
archived is on the tracker.debian.org news section. There are probably
other mails in a similar situation. It would be nice to be able to go
from such a mail in local email archives
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Currently the only place that testing migration mails are publicly
archived is on the tracker.debian.org news section. There are probably
other mails in a similar situation. It would be nice to be able to go
from such a mail in local email archives
On Thu, 3 Dec 2015 15:09:59 +0100 niekt0 wrote:
> "stardict" program in default configuration have by default enabled
> plugin "Dict.cn 1.0". This plugin sends every searched word by a plain
> HTTP to a server dict.cn. Translated sentence is send even if local
> dictionary of local central
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 18:29:18 -0400 Vladimir Z wrote:
> here is what happens a lot to me: I have stardict always running,
> and often(after reboots or after I kill X, I am not sure), stardict
> reports: "empty config file". How come? It just loses the config! The file
> is indeed empty.
>
>
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 18:24:25 -0400 Vladimir Z wrote:
> there is this really annoying issue in stardict: if you highlight a word and
> press cntrl+e(my hotkey for stardict), close the stardict window
> and then press cntrl+e again, nothing happens. This happens to me
> when I am not sure if I
On Wed, 03 Jan 2007 22:28:10 +0100 Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> stardict-gtk: segfaults when enable_collation=1 in the .cfg
stardict was recently reintroduced to Debian sid.
Please try to reproduce the bug with the new version.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Package: security-tracker
Severity: wishlist
It would be nice to include some more information in page titles, so
that records of those page titles in search engine results, browser
tabs and browser history are more useful to visitors to the site.
Here are examples of the potential changes that
Package: security-tracker
Severity: wishlist
It would be nice to include some more information in page titles, so
that records of those page titles in search engine results, browser
tabs and browser history are more useful to visitors to the site.
Here are examples of the potential changes that
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
In the news emails, please show the Message-ID header and make the
value inside the angled brackets <> a link to the Debian lists
msgid-search. For example [1] should link to [2].
1.
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
In the news emails, please show the Message-ID header and make the
value inside the angled brackets <> a link to the Debian lists
msgid-search. For example [1] should link to [2].
1.
On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 16:29:08 +0200 Elrond wrote:
> It looks like pidgin-data offers an architecture
> independent (data/configuration level) interface to
> its users.
> Would you mind setting it to Multi-Arch: foreign?
> It's usually a matter of adding one line to debian/control.
I note that the
On Sat, 2021-12-04 at 02:43 +, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I think that there's a security consideration associated with all these
> proposals for externalizing finding upstream updates.
Good point.
> If one of these services were ever compromised it would provide a
> vector for offering
On Fri, 2021-12-03 at 14:15 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> The "default" download is appropriate for the majority of people using
> Intel/AMD processors but not for others, yes.
FTR, I discussed this with the original author of the download page on
IRC and they are working on an update to
On Fri, 2021-12-03 at 13:12 +0100, Stephan Lachnit wrote:
> I mean it looks rather easy to do, just a couple of mouse clicks.
> Compare that to writing a watch file at the moment (assuming one has
> to do more than copy and paste the github example).
Repology gets you mappings for all the source
Control: fixed -1 2.1.0-1
On Fri, 2021-12-03 at 11:03 +0100, Julien Puydt wrote:
> I just checked that the problem isn't present in the version in testing
> and unstable, and it doesn't make the package unusable in stable, so
> it's not worth trying anything there.
Confirmed that the warnings
Florian Weimer wrote:
> I'd like to provide an ld.so command as part of glibc.
Will this happen in glibc upstream or just in Debian?
> Today, ld.so can be used to activate preloading, for example.
> Compared to LD_PRELOAD, the difference is that it's specific to one
> process, and won't be
Florian Weimer wrote:
> I'd like to provide an ld.so command as part of glibc.
Will this happen in glibc upstream or just in Debian?
> Today, ld.so can be used to activate preloading, for example.
> Compared to LD_PRELOAD, the difference is that it's specific to one
> process, and won't be
On Thu, 2021-12-02 at 23:36 +0100, Stephan Lachnit wrote:
> If I understand correctly, release-monitoring already offers such a
> mapping [1].
It seems like the Ayanita distro mapping needs to be done manually once
per package, while using the Repology data would automatically get us
the mapping
On Thu, 2021-12-02 at 10:16 +0100, Yadd wrote:
> Yes but the redirector often responded with 500 codes
500 codes probably just mean bugs in the redirector, which should be
easy to fix for anyone with access to the redirector source code.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
On Thu, 2021-12-02 at 15:57 +0100, Stephan Lachnit wrote:
> I think this would be the best path forward - it would probably be not
> easy given that it changes entirely how the current system works, but
> it might be well worth the effort. Working together with another
> distribution would share
On Wed, 2021-12-01 at 16:41 +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> aptitude-robot does this in
> https://github.com/elmar/aptitude-robot/blob/master/reporting-helpers
Interesting. This detects instances of a few "warning" and "error"
types of strings. This is different to the approach I was going for
On Wed, 2021-12-01 at 09:11 +0100, Yadd wrote:
> after few discussions with some devscripts maintainers, we decided to
> build a new "version=5" format for debian/watch.
It might be a idea to look at how other distributions do checking for
new upstream releases and adopt some of their
On Wed, 2021-12-01 at 12:53 +0100, Yadd wrote:
> sf.net because it needs JS interpretation
The sf.net redirector uses the RSS feed of the files.
This is documented at the top of the redirector HTML:
$ curl -s https://qa.debian.org/watch/sf.php/NSIS/ | grep -i rss
On Wed, 2021-12-01 at 12:53 +0100, Yadd wrote:
> Personally I dislike redirectors.
A redirector service is superior to including the redirector code
within uscan itself or within a debian/watch file, since when the
upstream website breaks the existing code, a service can be updated in
one place
On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 23:05 +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Emails are sent by default only when apt fails.
>
> All output is logged to the cron-apt log file.
>
> Logs are sent to syslog on "upgrade".
> By default upgrade is not enabled.
Thanks for that info.
If this feature gets implemented in
On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 14:44 +, peter green wrote:
> parl-desktop-world depends on thunderbird-l10n-si which is no longer
> built from the thunderbird source package, it is still present in
> unstable as a cruft package but is completely gone from testing.
I suggest to depend on
On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 14:44 +, peter green wrote:
> parl-desktop-world depends on thunderbird-l10n-si which is no longer
> built from the thunderbird source package, it is still present in
> unstable as a cruft package but is completely gone from testing.
I suggest to depend on
On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 16:59 +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> -1 upload was rejected because one of its build depency was rejected
> and reuploaded so Built-Using was referring to non existing package.
> Only -1 changelog entry had closes command.
I see, you can use the -v option to
On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 16:59 +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> -1 upload was rejected because one of its build depency was rejected
> and reuploaded so Built-Using was referring to non existing package.
> Only -1 changelog entry had closes command.
I see, you can use the -v option to
Source: cutefish-core
Version: 0.4-1
Severity: minor
The Homepage field for cutefish-core should point here instead:
https://github.com/cutefishos/core
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 19:12:41 +0200 Michael Below wrote:
> I am syncing Evolution manually with a Nokia E71 via Bluetooth.
> This works well, but syncevolution keeps working for quite some
> time (5 minutes or more) after the mobile side shows that it is
> finished. According to the progress bar,
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 19:54:14 -0600 Ken Bloom wrote:
> SyncEvolution fails to sync with my Evolution calendar
This bug has likely been fixed in the last decade, please check
syncevolution version 2.0.0-3 from Debian testing/bookworm or later.
If you still have the same issue, please report it
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:06:20 +0200 Michael Below wrote:
> But there is a slight problem: when I create a recurring event in
> Evolution, and it is parallel to another event already known to
> the E71, the time of the new event is changed.
This bug has likely been fixed in the last decade, please
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 08:28:47 +0200 Thomas Maass wrote:
> If i want to sync with horde3, always only a slow-sync is possible.
> This causes double entries.
This bug has likely been fixed in the last decade, please check
syncevolution version 2.0.0-3 from Debian testing/bookworm or later.
If you
Package: ibverbs-providers
Version: 38.0-1
Severity: normal
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: obsolete-conffile adequate
The recent upgrade did not deal with obsolete conffiles properly.
Please use the dpkg-maintscript-helper support provided by
dh_installdeb to remove these obsolete
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/otakuto/crazydiskinfo/issues/17
On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 17:38:15 +0200 Adam Borowski wrote:
> Only some disks show up for me. I've got sda, sdb, nvme0..7 on this box,
> and only sda is visible in "crazy", while smartctl handles them fine.
This is discussed
Giulio Paci wrote:
> 3) what is the most appropriate solution.
As I understand it, floating point values should not be compared
without some kind of accuracy/precision factor. Zero idea about the
best reference for how to do it correctly, but here is a random one:
Package: logcheck
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: a...@packages.debian.org,
unattended-upgra...@packages.debian.org, cron-...@packages.debian.org,
aptitude-ro...@packages.debian.org
Currently logcheck focuses on /var/log/syslog and /var/log/auth.log but
it would be nice to have separate
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #994385 in uvloop reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
On Mon, 2021-11-22 at 08:47 +0200, Tommi Höynälänmaa wrote:
> Package theme-d-gnome was scheduled for autoremoval on 2021-11-21 but
> it looks like the package has not been removed yet.
It looks like the autoremoval was processed:
$ apt-cache madison theme-d-gnome
theme-d-gnome |0.9.6-3 |
Package: ddcci-dkms
Version: 0.4.1-1
Severity: serious
When I try to install ddcci-dkms with linux-headers-amd64 5.15.3-1
installed, the installation fails because the build of the ddcci module
fails because of an incompatible pointer type in the source code:
$ sudo apt install
Package: ddcci-dkms
Version: 0.4.1-1
Severity: serious
When I try to install ddcci-dkms with linux-headers-amd64 5.15.3-1
installed, the installation fails because the build of the ddcci module
fails because of an incompatible pointer type in the source code:
$ sudo apt install
On Sun, 2021-11-21 at 21:22 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> Is there a less ugly way?
Send upstream a patch to create a directory structure like this:
src/
examples/
c/
c++/
If you're only after workarounds, there are two options:
Run dh_installexamples twice. First install the C++
1301 - 1400 of 23278 matches
Mail list logo
