On Sun, 23 May 2010 16:11:30 -0400 (EDT), William Pitcock wrote:
> "Stephen Powell" <zlinux...@wowway.com> wrote:
>> (blah blah blah blah)
>
> Nobody cares if you are opposed to it. Unless you are offering to become
> lilo upstream, it's going away.
>
&g
=="add", ATTR{address}=="00:11:25:86:61:87",
NAME="net0"
This rule will assign the Ethernet adapter with MAC address 00:11:25:86:61:87
the interface name net0. Reference the interface by this name in
/etc/network/interfaces.
I hope this helps.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@fastmail.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
d at least some of it useful.
I have received much benefit over the years as a user of open source
software. The docs are my attempt at giving something back.
Regards,
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@fastmail.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
epae.patch
For more information about building a custom kernel, see
http://www.stevesdebianstuff.org/Kernel.htm
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@fastmail.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
es, do we not have the best Congress money can buy?
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@fastmail.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
. I'd like to make the page
as
good as I can. Here's the link:
http://www.stevesdebianstuff.org/flash.htm
Let me know what you think.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@fastmail.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
I just tried building a custom kernel using "make deb-pkg" instead of
kernel-package
(make-kpkg), but results are the same. So this is not a bug in kernel-package.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@fastmail.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
21/build/ungrab-winmodem'
make modules -C /lib/modules/4.9.2-1custom01-686-pae/build
SUBDIRS=/var/lib/dkms/sl-modem/2.9.11~20110321/build/ungrab-winmodem
make[1]: Entering directory '/usr/src/linux-source-4.9'
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@fastmail.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
-source-4.9 instead of linux-source-3.16. Also,
linux-kbuild-4.9 is manually installed instead of linux-kbuild-3.16. Other
changes to the procedure are made based on package versions, of course.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@fastmail.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017, at 20:49, Stephen Powell wrote:
>
> ...
> The first two "image" entries define the standard "most recent" and
> "next-most recent" kernels and don't need to be messed with, provided
> that the standard symbolic link names are bein
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017, at 20:49, Stephen Powell wrote:
> ...
> One such program, memtest86+, provides a stand-alone memory testing
> program built to resemble a Linux kernel, so that Linuxboot loaders
> think it is a Linux kernel and will load it like one (the entire boot image
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017, at 11:38, Stephen Powell wrote:
>
> If there are special kernels that you want to be able to boot which are
> outside
> the normal "last two", then you must manually edit /etc/lilo.conf to provide
> the capability to boot this kernel, then run lil
b page where there are execs called
zy-symlinks which will provide equivalent function for custom kernels.
If there are special kernels that you want to be able to boot which are outside
the normal "last two", then you must manually edit /etc/lilo.conf to provide
the capability to boot this kernel, then run lilo.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@fastmail.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
not open it myself, I will leave closure to the OP or to the package
maintainer.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@fastmail.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
___
Pkg-xfce-devel mailing list
Pkg-xfce-devel@lists.alioth.debian.or
not open it myself, I will leave closure to the OP or to the package
maintainer.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@fastmail.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
orarily unavailable) on X server :0.
-
x-0.log shows no errors. Is there any other file you wish to see?
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@fastmail.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
orarily unavailable) on X server :0.
-
x-0.log shows no errors. Is there any other file you wish to see?
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@fastmail.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
___
Pkg-xfce-devel mailing list
Pkg-xfce-devel@lis
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016, at 16:32, Stephen Powell wrote:
>
> I did notice one thing peculiar. startx output is written to the terminal
> of vt1, of course, even though it's running as a background task. And I got
> the error message
>
> modprobe: FATAL: Module mach64 not found
here is no kernel module by that name.
I obviously don't like using this work-around, but I can at least limp
along until somebody somewhere fixes this problem.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@fastmail.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
On Mon, Sep 5, 2016, at 12:46, Stephen Powell wrote:
>
> To determine which module to blacklist, issue
>
>dmesg|less
>
> and see if you can figure out which module is loading. You can also issue
>
>lsmod|less
>
> to see which modules are loaded. Perhaps
ue as to the identity of the frame
buffer driver.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@fastmail.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
dpt_i2o is working just fine for me.
All's well that ends well!
Regards,
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@fastmail.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016, at 18:33, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 02/08/2016 à 02:28, Stephen Powell a écrit :
>> My original point remains. If one's computer has less than 4 GiB of
>> memory installed, and the processor does not support the XD/NX bit, then
>> running a 32-bit PA
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016, at 19:30, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 01/08/2016 à 04:02, Stephen Powell a écrit :
>>
>> To the best of my knowledge, there are no 32-bit-only processors which
>> support the NX bit. A 32-bit PAE-enabled kernel can only use NX if it
>> is running on
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016, at 19:07, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 01/08/2016 à 00:00, Stephen Powell a écrit :
>> one's processor supports PAE, but the motherboard only supports a maximum of
>> 2 GiB of RAM, what does a PAE kernel buy one? Nothing, as far as I can see.
>
> PAE al
ould be doing
things the way Ubuntu does. We're different for a reason. I'm not saying
there isn't room for improvement: I'm sure there is. But asking questions
is one thing. Telling us we should be like Ubuntu is another.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@fastmail.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
ands
and parameters, it is organized in a task-oriented fashion.
(Oh, you want to do *that*! Here, type this ...)
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@fastmail.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
d it, the AMD Geode processor is one instruction short
of the full Pentium Pro instruction set: NOPL. But it appears that
the GCC compiler has been modified to not generate NOPL instructions when
"-march i686" is used. Therefore, the AMD Geode should qualify.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@fastmail.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
686 and *-686-pae kernels. You don't
necessarily *need* to run a PAE kernel. Some prefer to run a non-PAE kernel
because it's easier on the memory requirements. But the processor must
support the Pentium Pro instruction set, which all Pentium Ms do.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@fastmail.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
g
in the testing release of the installer that was fixed before it became the
stable installer is not likely one that I would have encountered.
Sorry I can't be more helpful.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@fastmail.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
S. I apologize for the broken thread. My e-mail client does not appear to
provide a way to set the "In-reply-to" header, and I've already deleted your
original e-mail.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@fastmail.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
I systems may fail in the marketplace. There have been attempts
in the past to eliminate 16-bit support which failed. We'll just have to
wait and see.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@fastmail.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
On Sat, Jul 9, 2016, at 18:25, Brian wrote:
> On Sat 09 Jul 2016 at 16:41:24 -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
>>
>> Long live choice!
>
> For choice to exist it does not have to be presented as such in the
> installer.
>
Your point is well taken. The installer does not
t I don't want or need done
If you do the installation in expert mode, you can skip the step to install a
boot loader. But that's in interactive mode. I've never done an automated
installation, so I don't know what can and cannot be done in that environment.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@fastmail.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
nly
systems, there's elilo as a grub alternative.
Long live choice!
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@fastmail.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
On Sat, Jul 9, 2016, at 10:53, Felix Miata wrote:
> Stephen Powell composed on 2016-07-09 08:58 (UTC-0400):
>
>> As for features, LILO has all the features that I need.
>
> One feature it never acquired AFAIK, which Grub shares with Syslinux, is the
> ability to edit the k
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016, at 20:53, Felix Miata wrote:
> Stephen Powell composed on 2016-07-07 20:30 (UTC-0400):
>
> > If your system has a BIOS and a traditional DOS-style partition table,
> > there's no reason not to use LILO, unless you just don't want to.
>
> Or, if you
artition table,
there's no reason not to use LILO, unless you just don't want to.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@fastmail.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
which is essentially
a virtual machine running under PR/SM. And the physical machine behind
those (at least) two levels of virtualization doesn't really have the
same hardware architecture as a virtual machine, such as physical chpids
vs. logical chpids and logical channel subsystems, etc., define
which is essentially
a virtual machine running under PR/SM. And the physical machine behind
those (at least) two levels of virtualization doesn't really have the
same hardware architecture as a virtual machine, such as physical chpids
vs. logical chpids and logical channel subsystems, etc., define
which is essentially
a virtual machine running under PR/SM. And the physical machine behind
those (at least) two levels of virtualization doesn't really have the
same hardware architecture as a virtual machine, such as physical chpids
vs. logical chpids and logical channel subsystems, etc., define
which is essentially
a virtual machine running under PR/SM. And the physical machine behind
those (at least) two levels of virtualization doesn't really have the
same hardware architecture as a virtual machine, such as physical chpids
vs. logical chpids and logical channel subsystems, etc., define
which is essentially
a virtual machine running under PR/SM. And the physical machine behind
those (at least) two levels of virtualization doesn't really have the
same hardware architecture as a virtual machine, such as physical chpids
vs. logical chpids and logical channel subsystems, etc., define
which is essentially
a virtual machine running under PR/SM. And the physical machine behind
those (at least) two levels of virtualization doesn't really have the
same hardware architecture as a virtual machine, such as physical chpids
vs. logical chpids and logical channel subsystems, etc., define
which is essentially
a virtual machine running under PR/SM. And the physical machine behind
those (at least) two levels of virtualization doesn't really have the
same hardware architecture as a virtual machine, such as physical chpids
vs. logical chpids and logical channel subsystems, etc., define
which is essentially
a virtual machine running under PR/SM. And the physical machine behind
those (at least) two levels of virtualization doesn't really have the
same hardware architecture as a virtual machine, such as physical chpids
vs. logical chpids and logical channel subsystems, etc., define
which is essentially
a virtual machine running under PR/SM. And the physical machine behind
those (at least) two levels of virtualization doesn't really have the
same hardware architecture as a virtual machine, such as physical chpids
vs. logical chpids and logical channel subsystems, etc., define
which is essentially
a virtual machine running under PR/SM. And the physical machine behind
those (at least) two levels of virtualization doesn't really have the
same hardware architecture as a virtual machine, such as physical chpids
vs. logical chpids and logical channel subsystems, etc., define
which is essentially
a virtual machine running under PR/SM. And the physical machine behind
those (at least) two levels of virtualization doesn't really have the
same hardware architecture as a virtual machine, such as physical chpids
vs. logical chpids and logical channel subsystems, etc., define
which is essentially
a virtual machine running under PR/SM. And the physical machine behind
those (at least) two levels of virtualization doesn't really have the
same hardware architecture as a virtual machine, such as physical chpids
vs. logical chpids and logical channel subsystems, etc., define
which is essentially
a virtual machine running under PR/SM. And the physical machine behind
those (at least) two levels of virtualization doesn't really have the
same hardware architecture as a virtual machine, such as physical chpids
vs. logical chpids and logical channel subsystems, etc., define
off
older hardware. We still run z/VM 5.4.0 because it is the last
release of z/VM that still supports our z/890. Starting with
z/VM 6.1.0, a z10 or newer is required.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@fastmail.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
see it, it's not
running.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@fastmail.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
you really
want to do it, edit the file /etc/ssh/sshd_config. In the
# Authentication
section, look for
Permitrootlogin no
and change it to
Permitrootlogin yes
then bounce the ssh daemon with
/etc/init.d/ssh restart
As I said, it's not recommended;
but it's your gun, your bull
On Mon, May 23, 2016, at 22:16, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 21:06 -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
>>
>> The following message is received at boot time when booting the stock Debian
>> kernel
>> version 4.5.3-2 on the s390x architecture:
>>
>&g
On Mon, May 23, 2016, at 22:16, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 21:06 -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
>>
>> The following message is received at boot time when booting the stock Debian
>> kernel
>> version 4.5.3-2 on the s390x architecture:
>>
>&g
-
tainting kernel
The kernel does boot; but the kernel gets tainted, which disables lock
debugging.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@fastmail.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
-
tainting kernel
The kernel does boot; but the kernel gets tainted, which disables lock
debugging.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@fastmail.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
-
tainting kernel
The kernel does boot; but the kernel gets tainted, which disables lock
debugging.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@fastmail.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
le of years old that
uses it.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@fastmail.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016, at 17:31, Stephen Powell wrote:
> The "info" command in jessie has a tutorial which can be accessed by pressing
> the "H" key.
Oops!, I meant to say the "h" key, not the "H" key. Otherwise, the question
remains as writt
al?
What's the scoop on this?
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@fastmail.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
t; Ben.
>
Interesting. I wasn't aware of that. Thank you for calling my attention
to it. Under the circumstances, wishlist is fine.
Regards,
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@fastmail.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
t; Ben.
>
Interesting. I wasn't aware of that. Thank you for calling my attention
to it. Under the circumstances, wishlist is fine.
Regards,
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@fastmail.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
error checking corner cases.
Respectfully submitted,
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@fastmail.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--- a/functions 2016-01-21 18:33:59.0 -0500
+++ b/functions 2016-03-24 08:09:11.0 -0400
@@ -128,14 +128,28 @@
# lilo compati
error checking corner cases.
Respectfully submitted,
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@fastmail.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--- a/functions 2016-01-21 18:33:59.0 -0500
+++ b/functions 2016-03-24 08:09:11.0 -0400
@@ -128,14 +128,28 @@
# lilo compati
: recipe for target 'build-stamp' failed
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@fastmail.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016, at 21:59, Frank McCormick wrote:
>
> On 21/01/16 09:41 PM, Stephen Powell wrote:
>>
>> What does chrome give you that chromium does not?
>
> Nothing that I know of...but I thought that staying with the Google
> product is just simpler. I've h
hrome? What does chrome give you that chromium does not?
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@fastmail.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
On Fri, 25 Dec 2015 10:33:56 -0500 (EST), Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2015 10:57:41 -0500 (EST), Nicolas George wrote:
>> ...
>> I noticed that LILO seems to be actually capable
>> of finding the sectors for files on LVM.
>
> In the general case, the s
re are no rules for the use of unallocated sectors.
And grub-legacy and grub-pc (by default at least) now do a similar thing.
They store information in unallocated sectors. That's one of the
reasons (but not the only reason) that I switched back to LILO.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@wowway.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
o maybe it has already been
> addressed, but all this suggest that the OP should install GRUB instead of
> LILO and be done with that kind of trouble.
As subsequent posts have indicated, the trouble was with an incorrect UUID.
It had nothing to do with the OP's choice of boot loader
On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 10:36:48 -0500 (EST), David Baron wrote:
>
> On Monday 21 December 2015 10:25:15 Stephen Powell wrote:
>>
>> Obviously, the LILO map file is on the IDE drive. Is your /boot partition
>> on the IDE drive? If so, you cannot remove it.
On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 10:31:54 -0500 (EST), Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
> Could he not dd them onto another drive?
> ...
He can copy the /boot data to another drive, not necessarily
with dd. In fact, if he wants to be able to remove the
existing IDE drive, he must. But he cannot copy it to an
LVM2
e part of the same filesystem. I've been on the
wrong track
for several posts now. Please excuse the noise.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@wowway.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 04:50:00 -0500 (EST), David Baron wrote:
>
> Went through all the motions, both ways: On native and chroot. Results were
> the same. Get in that loop of lv not ready messages. Difference: Native
> attempt still needs the IDE plugged in or I get 99 99 99 ... , chroot does
On Sun, 20 Dec 2015 15:51:22 -0500 (EST), David Baron wrote:
>
> So ... do I need the chroot and the binds and all this at all?
That's the recommended way. Make sure that the edited copies of
/etc/lilo.conf, /etc/fstab, and /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/resume,
in the chrooted environment, all
On Sun, 20 Dec 2015 05:58:47 -0500 (EST), David Baron wrote:
>
> OK, mounted newrootpartition newroot
> Did a cp -x / newroot
> Successful so far, elementary
>
> Edited newroot/etc/fstab and newroot/etc/lilo.conf to point root to
> newrootpartition (by uuid)
>
> mount --bind /dev newroot/dev
On Tue, 08 Dec 2015 18:55:43 -0500 (EST), Gener Badenas wrote:
>
> How much is the hosting now and with whom?
$48 for hosting, $9.00 for domain registration, total $57.
Good for one year. I'll have to pay again next year.
I decided to go with debian-hosting.info. So far, I haven't
yet figured
Old site: h t t p : / / u s e r s . w o w w a y . c o m / ~ z l i n u x m a n /
New site: http://www.stevesdebianstuff.org/
If you have bookmarks set for the old site you should update your bookmarks.
Some pages from the old site are not on the new site because I judged them
to be obsolete.
On Tue, 08 Dec 2015 12:36:44 -0500 (EST), Martin Read wrote:
> On 08/12/15 16:58, Darac Marjal wrote:
>>
>> To which, the venerable W3C replied "Cool URIs don't change":
>> http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI.html
>
> Your criticism is invalid, given that the action that has clearly been
>
On Sat, 28 Nov 2015 10:15:08 -0500 (EST), mister s jones wrote:
> On Saturday, November 28, 2015 09:49:47 Stephen Powell wrote:
>> So, does anyone wish to share their experiences, good or bad? Is there
>> anyone you wish to recommend? Is there anyone you want to warn me to stay
&g
On Sat, 05 Dec 2015 18:43:13 -0500 (EST), Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
> I ma assuming (or subconsciously remembering) that you are in the USA. Is
> that correct?
Hi, Lisi. Yes, that's correct. I hope you won't hold that against me. :-)
Wow used to offer free web hosting to subscribers to their
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 20:31:29 -0500 (EST), Bob Bernstein wrote:
> ...
> With that as background, here is my question/request: is anyone
> aware of a spirited defence of our ideal method of "selective
> quoting," (for lack of a better label) one, say, that perhaps
> has achieved the status of a
I currently get my internet connectivity, e-mail service, and web-hosting
service from the same provider. I recently complained to my ISP about
backscatter SPAM I was getting from other people's infected machines
that were sending out SPAM to invalid e-mail addresses and spoofing me
as the
, this works for install but not for
safe-upgrade or full-upgrade.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@wowway.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 10:38:48 -0400 (EDT), "Reco" wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 10:29:48 -0400 (EDT), Stephen Powell wrote:
>> Does anyone know an easy way to identify obsolete packages without
>> using aptitide?
>
> deborphan --guess-all
According to
Thanks! (Although it does require the
installation of another package: apt-show-versions.)
I'm curious, though. Do you use the C shell? Or did you just customize
your prompt?
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@wowway.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
he same thing as an obsolete package. An obsolete package
may have been manually installed, but it's still obsolete, and I
need to be able to identify it as such.
Does anyone know an easy way to identify obsolete packages without
using aptitide?
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@wowway.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
LP-PHY).
Make sure that you have the contrib and the non-free sections of the
archive enabled in /etc/apt/sources.list, as this involves non-free stuff.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@wowway.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
ian; but perhaps it can be adapted for
Debian.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@wowway.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
is superfluous. It is no longer needed. It should be dropped from the package.
That's one less piece of code to maintain, and one less item that needs to be
included in the initial RAM file system image file.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@wowway.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
that my e-mail account has not been
hacked, just spoofed. I will report this to my ISP. Thanks to all
who participated in this thread.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@wowway.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
.
The script is attempting to set the DASD options *after* bringing the
device online. Thus, the DASD options are ignored. A patch which
fixes the problem is attached.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@wowway.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-diff -ura a/etc/sysconfig/scripts/hardware/hwup-cc
is superfluous. It is no longer needed. It should be dropped from the package.
That's one less piece of code to maintain, and one less item that needs to be
included in the initial RAM file system image file.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@wowway.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
stupid [or ignorant at best] to
> use public [or otherwise open] WiFi -- if you don't run it yourself or
> you totally trust the person whom is running it, then leave it alone.
That may have been the case for Stuart's friend, but it is not the case
with me. I use only wired ethernet.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@wowway.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
your own. That was a few years ago.
Maybe it's better now.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@wowway.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
at I have taken, it is still possible for
a password to be "discovered".
Having said that, it looks like someone else's credentials may have been
used, based on some other posts to this thread. But I am not an expert
in these matters. That's why I asked for help.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@wowway.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
. My wife and I are empty nesters. There is no-one else at home.
In short, I have not "handed it over".
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@wowway.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
installed.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@wowway.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
1 - 100 of 2047 matches
Mail list logo
